Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Blum Middle School in Blum, TX
(06-08 • Public • Regular School)

Address
 310 S AVE F
Blum, TX 76627
Telephone
(254) 874-5231
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Students
75
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
7.1
Free lunch eligible students
42
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
4
School district
BLUM ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide eligible school-No program
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 75

Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeG06G07G08Total
All students20292675
Female students10131437
Male students10161238
Hispanic students33511
White students16252162
Two or More Races students11 - 2

Enrollment by grade:
6th grade enrollment: 20
7th grade enrollment: 29
8th grade enrollment: 26

Blum Middle School - Enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 37 (49.3%)
Blum Middle School:

49.3%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 38 (50.7%)
Blum Middle School:

50.7%
Texas:

50.1%

Blum Middle School - Enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Hispanic enrollment: 11 (14.7%)
Blum Middle School:

14.7%
State:

46.9%
White enrollment: 62 (82.7%)
Here:

82.7%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 2 (2.7%)
Blum Middle School:

2.7%
State:

2.1%

Blum Middle School - Enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 46 (61.3%)
Blum Middle School:

61.3%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 42 (56.0%)
Blum Middle School:

56.0%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 4 (5.3%)
Blum Middle School:

5.3%
State:

6.2%

Blum Middle School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 7.1

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE school counselors: 0.3
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 1
Number of FTE nurses: 0.3

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

10.6
State:

15.6

School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $301,047
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 6.6 (Salary Expenditures: $180,894)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 5.4 (Salary Expenditures: $37,934)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1.7 (Salary Expenditures: $45,346)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $36,873)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $154,297
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $0
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $196,015
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $225,700

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 12 (male: 8, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 4 (all male)
  • White: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • White: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
School:

93.3
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 2,546 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,626
  • Males1,618
  • Females1,637
  • Hispanic1,643
  • White1,621
Math Average Scale Score:

1,626
Texas:

1,541
Math students tested: 31
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 31

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.8 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.6 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.3 (47%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 51%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%

10%
51%
33%
6%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,618, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 56%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 6%)
11%
56%
27%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,637, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 8%)
8%
46%
38%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,643, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 0%)
60%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,621, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 48%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 4%)
13%
48%
35%
4%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,548
  • Males1,548
  • Females1,547
  • Hispanic1,555
  • White1,549
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,548
Texas:

1,468
Reading students tested: 31
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 31

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.9 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.2 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.5 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 49%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 10%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%

35%
49%
10%
6%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,548, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 6%)
33%
50%
11%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,547, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 8%)
38%
47%
7%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,555, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
20%
60%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,549, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 48%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 9%)
35%
48%
8%
9%
7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,710
  • Males1,720
  • Females1,697
  • White1,700
Math Average Scale Score:

1,710
Texas:

1,559
Math students tested: 20
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 20

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.5 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.7 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.8 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.2 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 40%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

5%
35%
40%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,720, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 18%)
36%
46%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,697, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 22%)
11%
33%
34%
22%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,700, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 13%)
6%
38%
43%
13%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,619
  • Males1,591
  • Females1,653
  • White1,608
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,619
Texas:

1,532
Reading students tested: 20
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 20

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.9 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.7 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 45%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 10%

25%
45%
20%
10%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,591, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 0%)
36%
46%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,653, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 22%)
11%
45%
22%
22%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,608, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 13%)
31%
44%
12%
13%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All3,790
  • Males3,649
  • Females3,963
  • White3,779
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,790
State:

3,527
Writing students tested: 20
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 20

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7 (44%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.5 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

30%
35%
35%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,649, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 55%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 0%)
36%
55%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,963, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 67%, Masters: 0%)
22%
11%
67%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,779, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 0%)
25%
37%
38%
8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,704
  • Males1,654
  • Females1,774
  • Hispanic1,689
  • White1,714
Math Average Scale Score:

1,704
Texas:

1,520
Math students tested: 36
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 36

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.1 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.2 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.2 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

19%
31%
31%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,654, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 14%)
33%
34%
19%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,774, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 27%)
27%
46%
27%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,689, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 0%)
17%
33%
50%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,714, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 24%)
17%
31%
28%
24%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,653
  • Males1,603
  • Females1,723
  • Hispanic1,661
  • White1,660
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,653
State:

1,550
Reading students tested: 36
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 36

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.4 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.1 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

28%
28%
27%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,603, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 5%)
38%
38%
19%
5%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,723, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 33%)
13%
14%
40%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,661, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 17%)
17%
50%
16%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,660, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 17%)
28%
24%
31%
17%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,882
  • Males3,756
  • Females4,059
  • Hispanic3,636
  • White3,962
Science Average Scale Score:

3,882
Texas:

3,554
Science students tested: 36
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 36

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.9 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.3 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.9 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.4 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

28%
25%
30%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,756, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 14%)
38%
29%
19%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,059, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 47%, Masters: 20%)
13%
20%
47%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,636, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 0%)
33%
34%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,962, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 21%)
25%
25%
29%
21%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,535
  • Males3,404
  • Females3,720
  • Hispanic3,363
  • White3,586
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,535
State:

3,412
Social Studies students tested: 36
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 36

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.5 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.4 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.9 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.7 (53%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 58%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 14%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

58%
20%
14%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,404, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 0%)
67%
23%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,720, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
47%
13%
20%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,363, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 83%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
83%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,586, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 54%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 11%)
54%
17%
18%
11%

Health & Safety


Corporal Punishment:
Show data for
This school uses corporal punishment to discipline students
Corporal punishment refers to paddling, spanking, or other forms of physical punishment imposed on a child.
Instances of corporal punishment (Students without disabilities): 1
Students without disabilities who received corporal punishment: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Blum, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Blum main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Blum Middle School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents