Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Bess Campbell Elementary School in Sugar Land, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 100
Address
 1000 SHADOW BEND DR
Sugar Land, TX 77479
Telephone
(832) 223-1300
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.lcisd.org
City-data.com school rating
100
Students
625
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
38.6
Free lunch eligible students
15
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
3
School district
LAMAR CISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Not a Title I school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
FORT SETTLEMENT MIDDLE (1.9 miles):

100
CORNERSTONE EL (2.5 miles):

100
Bess Campbell Elementary School:

100
SUSANNA DICKINSON EL (1.5 miles):

99
COLONY MEADOWS EL (2.9 miles):

99
SARTARTIA MIDDLE (2.6 miles):

97
CLEMENTS H S (2.4 miles):

96
READING J H (2.9 miles):

95
WILLIAM VELASQUEZ (1.5 miles):

69
Bess Campbell Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Fort Bend County:

70
Sugar Land:

86
Bess Campbell Elementary School:

100

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 625
Enrollment in 2015: 701
Enrollment in 2014: 731
Enrollment in 2013: 758
Enrollment in 2012: 764
Enrollment in 2011: 755
Enrollment in 2010: 752
Enrollment in 2009: 1,068
Enrollment in 2008: 998
Enrollment in 2007: 964
Enrollment in 2006: 902
Enrollment in 2005: 1,131
Enrollment in 2004: 946
Enrollment in 2003: 805
Enrollment in 2002: 590
Enrollment in 2001: 403

Bess Campbell Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students86611295115109120625
Female students4385643615564321
Male students4285652545456304
American Indian/Alaska Native students - 1 - - 11 - 3
Asian students - 7710991153
Hispanic students1121916161524103
Black students21441081241
White students5427764777570410
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - 1 - - - - - 1
Two or More Races students - 25121314

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 8
Kindergarten enrollment: 66
1st grade enrollment: 112
2nd grade enrollment: 95
3rd grade enrollment: 115
4th grade enrollment: 109
5th grade enrollment: 120

Bess Campbell Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 321 (51.4%)
Here:

51.4%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 304 (48.6%)
Bess Campbell Elementary School:

48.6%
Texas:

50.1%

Bess Campbell Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 3 (0.5%)
School:

0.5%
Texas:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 53 (8.5%)
School:

8.5%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 103 (16.5%)
Bess Campbell Elementary School:

16.5%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 41 (6.6%)
Here:

6.6%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 410 (65.6%)
School:

65.6%
State:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 1 (0.2%)
Bess Campbell Elementary School:

0.2%
State:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 14 (2.2%)
Bess Campbell Elementary School:

2.2%
Texas:

2.1%

Bess Campbell Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 18 (2.9%)
Bess Campbell Elementary School:

2.9%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 15 (2.4%)
Bess Campbell Elementary School:

2.4%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 3 (0.5%)
Bess Campbell Elementary School:

0.5%
Texas:

6.2%

Bess Campbell Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 38.6


Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

16.2
State:

15.6

Bess Campbell Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $3,043,040
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 40 (Salary Expenditures: $2,369,342)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $70,657
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $0
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,891,258
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $0

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic7
  • American Indian2
  • Asian7
  • Black2
  • White4
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 22 (male: 13, female: 9)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • Asian: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 34 (male: 23, female: 11)
  • Hispanic: 4 (all male)
  • Black: 4 (all female)
  • White: 26 (male: 19, female: 7)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 16 (male: 9, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 2,613 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
School:

3.0%
Texas:

5.3%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic22
  • Asian19
  • Black4
  • White115
  • Multirace4
  • LEP2
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 164 (male: 82, female: 82)
  • Hispanic: 22 (male: 8, female: 14)
  • Asian: 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 115 (male: 62, female: 53)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Bess Campbell Elementary School:

262.4
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,574
  • Males1,577
  • Females1,570
  • Hispanic1,566
  • Asian1,639
  • White1,569
Math Average Scale Score:

1,574
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 104
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 105

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.9 (87%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.4 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.6 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.3 (82%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 14%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 36%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 47%

3%
14%
36%
47%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,577, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 50%)
4%
8%
38%
50%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,570, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 44%)
2%
21%
33%
44%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,566, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 41%)
6%
12%
41%
41%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,639, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 67%)
33%
67%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,569, Tested: 76, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 47%)
3%
15%
35%
47%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,549
  • Males1,523
  • Females1,579
  • Hispanic1,530
  • Asian1,604
  • White1,555
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,549
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 104
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 105

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (91%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.1 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 15%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 53%

6%
15%
26%
53%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,523, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 41%)
5%
25%
29%
41%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,579, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 4%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 67%)
6%
4%
23%
67%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,530, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 41%)
12%
23%
24%
41%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,604, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 67%)
33%
67%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,555, Tested: 76, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 55%)
4%
14%
27%
55%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,792
  • Males1,796
  • Females1,786
  • Hispanic1,761
  • Asian1,845
  • Black1,651
  • White1,811
Math Average Scale Score:

1,792
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 104
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 105

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.1 (90%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.8 (89%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.2 (92%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.8 (94%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 5%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 4%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 88%

3%
5%
4%
88%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,796, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 5%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 87%)
2%
5%
6%
87%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,786, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 4%, Meets: 4%, Masters: 88%)
4%
4%
4%
88%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,761, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 88%)
12%
88%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,845, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 92%)
8%
92%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,651, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 60%)
30%
10%
60%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,811, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 5%, Meets: 4%, Masters: 91%)
5%
4%
91%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,660
  • Males1,668
  • Females1,651
  • Hispanic1,655
  • Asian1,665
  • Black1,622
  • White1,666
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,660
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 104
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 105

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7 (88%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.5 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.3 (87%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 7%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 64%

5%
7%
24%
64%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,668, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 63%)
2%
9%
26%
63%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,651, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 4%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 66%)
8%
4%
22%
66%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,655, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 59%)
6%
6%
29%
59%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,665, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 67%)
33%
67%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,622, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 50%)
30%
20%
50%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,666, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 68%)
2%
9%
21%
68%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All4,401
  • Males4,356
  • Females4,448
  • Hispanic4,576
  • Asian4,422
  • Black3,788
  • White4,444
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,401
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 105
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 105

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.8 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.2 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 13.7 (85%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 16%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 43%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 36%

5%
16%
43%
36%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,356, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 35%)
2%
22%
41%
35%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,448, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 45%, Masters: 37%)
8%
10%
45%
37%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,576, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 47%)
18%
35%
47%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,422, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 50%)
17%
33%
50%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,788, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 0%)
30%
30%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,444, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 47%, Masters: 36%)
3%
14%
47%
36%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,766
  • Males1,746
  • Females1,786
  • Hispanic1,750
  • Asian1,769
  • Black1,730
  • White1,773
Math Average Scale Score:

1,766
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 120
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 120

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 14.4 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.8 (87%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.6 (89%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 4%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 69%

4%
27%
69%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,746, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 65%)
7%
28%
65%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,786, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 2%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 73%)
2%
25%
73%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,750, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 72%)
11%
17%
72%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,769, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 86%)
14%
86%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,730, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 67%)
33%
67%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,773, Tested: 84, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 4%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 67%)
4%
29%
67%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,700
  • Males1,659
  • Females1,742
  • Hispanic1,723
  • Asian1,743
  • Black1,637
  • White1,700
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,700
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 120
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 120

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7 (87%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 14 (88%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.5 (82%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 1%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 10%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 58%

1%
10%
31%
58%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,659, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 43%)
2%
18%
37%
43%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,742, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 2%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 72%)
2%
26%
72%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,723, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 61%)
6%
33%
61%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,743, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 71%)
29%
71%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,637, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 56%, Masters: 33%)
11%
56%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,700, Tested: 84, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 58%)
12%
30%
58%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All4,369
  • Males4,332
  • Females4,407
  • Hispanic4,404
  • Asian4,893
  • Black4,151
  • White4,333
Science Average Scale Score:

4,369
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 120
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 120

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.6 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.7 (87%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 10.3 (86%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 16%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 48%

3%
16%
33%
48%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,332, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 47%)
5%
17%
31%
47%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,407, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 48%)
2%
15%
35%
48%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,404, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 5%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 61%)
6%
5%
28%
61%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,893, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 71%)
14%
15%
71%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,151, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 44%)
11%
22%
23%
44%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,333, Tested: 84, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 43%)
2%
17%
38%
43%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic2
  • White7
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA4
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 11 (male: 5, female: 6)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

17.6
State:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)
Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
Here:

3.2
Texas:

6.8

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Sugar Land, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Sugar Land main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Bess Campbell Elementary School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents