A. Philip Randolph Academies School in Jacksonville, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 55.

1157 GOLFAIR BLVD
Jacksonville, FL 32209

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Global Leaf School (15.0 miles):	95
Drop Back In Academy Of Duval County School (7.5 miles):	71
Florida Virtual Academy School (8.4 miles):	62
Yulee High School (18.8 miles):	55
A. Philip Randolph Academies School:	55
Doctors Inlet Elementary School (19.8 miles):	45
Duncan U. Fletcher Middle School (17.0 miles):	35
Lackawanna Alternative Education Center School (3.7 miles):	27

A. Philip Randolph Academies School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Duval County:	44
Jacksonville:	43
A. Philip Randolph Academies:	55

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (904) 924-3011 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 16
School number: 2851
School type: Senior High
District Name: DUVAL
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (904) 924-3125
Magnet School.
Principal: Lorenda Tiscornia
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 3
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 15
Senate District: 1

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	90%
State average from 133 schools:	66%

Meeting High Standards in Math

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	92%
State average from 133 schools:	72%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	99%
State average from 133 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	78%
State average from 133 schools:	47%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 133 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	80%
State average from 132 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	69%
State average from 133 schools:	57%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	80%
State average from 133 schools:	66%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	658
State average from 133 schools:	522

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 132 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	18%
State average from 137 schools:	57%

Minority Rate

Here:	31%
State average from 137 schools:	53%

Region: 4

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1063 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1063 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 324
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1027
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 976

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1026
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 974
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 733 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 733 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 224
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 713
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 679

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 713
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 678
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 159 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 159 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 194 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 194 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 178
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 171

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 178
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 171
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	88%
State average from 141 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	89%
State average from 133 schools:	72%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	100%
State average from 139 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	75%
State average from 133 schools:	47%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	76%
State average from 133 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	80%
State average from 136 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	78%
State average from 133 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	78%
State average from 133 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	664
State average from 133 schools:	540

Percent Tested

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	100%
State average from 134 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	14%
State average from 132 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

Here:	32%
State average from 139 schools:	52%

Region: 4

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1082 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1082 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 401
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1049
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1007

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1048
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1008
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 740 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 740 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 276
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 727
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 697

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 726
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 697
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 168 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 168 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 154 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 154 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	84%
State average from 124 schools:	66%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	88%
State average from 124 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	100%
State average from 125 schools:	84%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	79%
State average from 122 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	64%
State average from 122 schools:	63%

Making Math Gains

Here:	79%
State average from 122 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	58%
State average from 122 schools:	61%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	71%
State average from 122 schools:	70%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	623
State average from 122 schools:	535

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 124 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	13%
State average from 126 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	29%
State average from 125 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1097 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1097 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 343
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1072
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1026

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1074
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1028
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 773 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 773 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 246
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 761
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 733

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 762
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 734
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 171 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 171 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 143 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 143 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	27%
State average from 63 schools:	49%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	59%
State average from 63 schools:	55%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	90%
State average from 63 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	33%
State average from 63 schools:	37%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	40%
State average from 63 schools:	53%

Making Math Gains

Here:	69%
State average from 63 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	47%
State average from 63 schools:	55%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	60%
State average from 63 schools:	63%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	425
State average from 63 schools:	461

Percent Tested

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	97%
State average from 63 schools:	97%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	41%
State average from 63 schools:	55%

Minority Rate

Here:	80%
State average from 63 schools:	55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 404 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 401 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 124
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 387
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 384
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 297 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 296 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	16%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 282
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 281
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 172 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 170 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	19%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	30%
State average from 62 schools:	49%

Meeting High Standards in Math

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	67%
State average from 62 schools:	55%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	91%
State average from 62 schools:	82%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	48%
State average from 62 schools:	57%

Making Math Gains

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	78%
State average from 62 schools:	66%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	52%
State average from 62 schools:	62%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	366
State average from 62 schools:	371

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 62 schools:	97%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	41%
State average from 63 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	77%
State average from 63 schools:	53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 336 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 333 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 126
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 333
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 329
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 40

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 83
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 82
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 229 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 228 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 77

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 226
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 224
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 45

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	14%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 139
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 136
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	9%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 47

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	13%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	24%
State average from 52 schools:	48%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	52%
State average from 52 schools:	56%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	86%
State average from 53 schools:	79%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	45%
State average from 53 schools:	54%

Making Math Gains

Here:	79%
State average from 53 schools:	67%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	59%
State average from 53 schools:	59%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	345
State average from 53 schools:	362

Percent Tested

Here:	98%
State average from 53 schools:	97%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	42%
State average from 53 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	75%
State average from 52 schools:	51%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1456
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	13%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	9%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	30%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	41%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	78%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1777
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	353
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	2%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	8%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	44%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	20%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	90%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	22
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1761
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	8%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	36%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	86%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	11
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1962
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	357
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	4%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	6%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	24%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	39%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	25%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	89%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1991
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	352
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	2%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	9%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	33%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	37%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	19%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	88%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2060
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	347
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	2%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	14%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	36%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	83%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	8
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1824
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	294
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	40%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	37%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	16%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	3%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	23%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	10
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1784
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	274
State average:	302

Percent Passing

Here:	33%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	58%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	26%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	11%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	2%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	17%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	13
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	348
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	4%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	27%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	40%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	23%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	69%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	11
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	10
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	357
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	4%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	46%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	23%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	75%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	11
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	11
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	293
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	37%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	39%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	22%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	1%
State average:	5%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	24%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	1544
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	353
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	9%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	38%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	21%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	88%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1731
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	363
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	1%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	42%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	21%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	93%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1850
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	372
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	8%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	18%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	40%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	28%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	86%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	9
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1902
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	363
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	8%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	26%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	34%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	26%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	86%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1998
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	358
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	2%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	8%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	28%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	32%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	29%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	90%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	2026
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	354
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	7%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	28%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	33%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	90%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	9
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	7
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1855
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	282
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	24%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	33%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	12%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	43%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1928
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	326

Percent Passing

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	66%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	24%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	27%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	19%
State average:	33%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	49%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1551
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1731
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 05%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1713
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1931
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1995
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	353
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2026
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1785
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	287
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	1786
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	274
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	354
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 11

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	295
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1582
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	361
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1765
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	371
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1798
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	360
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1883
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	359
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1983
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	354
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2016
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1871
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	286
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1904
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 109

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	5
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 97%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 407

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	5
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 28%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 27%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 274

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 64%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1494
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	332
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1640
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1737
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	326
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1909
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	347
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1911
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2010
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1795
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	288
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1795
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	276
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	357
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 10
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1586
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	362
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1661
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	347
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1784
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	357
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1877
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	357
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1953
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	347
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2013
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1845
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	279
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1918
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	112
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	646
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	72
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	83
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	663
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	78
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	9
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	148
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	679
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	81
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	332
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	701
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	86
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	10
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	17
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	419
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	706
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	84
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	351
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	714
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	84
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	12
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	291
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	681
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	49
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	199
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

Here:	702
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

Here:	60
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	10
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 79

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	340
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 82%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 349

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	378
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 30%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 90%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	5
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 26%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 31%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 99%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 217

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	277
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 34%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1791
State average from 612 schools:	1849

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	288
State average:	298

% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1804
State average:	1837

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1778
State average:	1779

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 26

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1890
State average from 573 schools:	1879

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	293
State average:	291

Percent Passing: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1898
State average:	1873

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1909
State average:	1876

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -10

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	295

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1873
State average from 613 schools:	1884

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	287
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	1876
State average:	1869

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1803
State average:	1821

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 74

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1974
State average from 581 schools:	1950

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	315

Percent Passing: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1978
State average:	1939

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1954
State average:	1901

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 24

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 265

Mean Scale Score

Here:	696
State average from 597 schools:	696

Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 111

Mean Scale Score

Here:	703
State average from 575 schools:	695

Median NPR: 61
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 265

Mean Scale Score

Here:	706
State average from 597 schools:	708

Median NPR: 68
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 111

Mean Scale Score

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	711
State average from 575 schools:	710

Median NPR: 63
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 127

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH ACADEMIES:	287
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 46%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 84%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 70%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AL	CA	CO	DC	DE	FL	GA
IA	ID	IL	IN	KS	KY	LA
MD	ME	MI	MN	NC	NE	NH
NJ	NV	NY	OH	OK	OR	PA
SC	TN	TX	UT	VA	WA	WI