Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-03-2012, 09:19 AM
 
5,546 posts, read 6,868,827 times
Reputation: 3826

Advertisements

To the OP, I think your initial post is dead-on. And, I think the answer is "no". People who drive can be familiar with the concerns and logistics of transit on a superficial level, but I do not think they truly understand the nuances (per your initial post) until they live a life around transit.

Conversely, I wouldn't expect to understand a life of driving until I've lived it. I would know about accidents, expenses, etc. before I lived that life, but I wouldn't know about the nuances such as complexity of route (e.g. major merging), timeframe complexities, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-03-2012, 10:48 AM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,827 posts, read 25,102,289 times
Reputation: 19060
How much is there really to get? I never much used the bus until college. Even then I never used it daily then or when I lived in San Francisco or Seattle. It was just easier to get around via bicycle or simply walking. In both places I lived around a mile from work. When you got done with the walking to and form the bus stop and waiting, it was often just as fast to walk. Biking you run into the parking issues, but I could get around my immediate area, which was about four miles in any direction, just as fast or generally faster. The only places I really relied on transit were Prague and Seoul. Seoul was very easy with Google maps transit integration. Prague was more difficult. No Google transit directions (and not smartphone). Transit was generally frequent enough, except at nights, to not worry about schedules. Just like driving it was only difficult in going somewhere you didn't know. Once I'd been there a week I pretty much new my immediate area's transit and only encountered difficult when venturing outside my comfort bubble. That's not that much different than driving. Slightly more complicated as you have to worry about connections but the same concept. Read map plus use timetables if infrequent will do the same thing as Google's transit directions, it just is less convenient.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,945 posts, read 75,144,160 times
Reputation: 66884
I understand that I cannot easily take public transit from my home to my office.

Pretty much all I need to know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 05:38 PM
 
5,816 posts, read 15,908,183 times
Reputation: 4741
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJNEOA View Post
To the OP, I think your initial post is dead-on. And, I think the answer is "no". People who drive can be familiar with the concerns and logistics of transit on a superficial level, but I do not think they truly understand the nuances (per your initial post) until they live a life around transit.

Conversely, I wouldn't expect to understand a life of driving until I've lived it. I would know about accidents, expenses, etc. before I lived that life, but I wouldn't know about the nuances such as complexity of route (e.g. major merging), timeframe complexities, etc.
Good points here. People who rely exclusively on either mode of travel are unlikely to know all the nuances of the other. However, they can learn easily enough if need be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 05:54 PM
 
5,816 posts, read 15,908,183 times
Reputation: 4741
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
I'd be really surprised if anyone is uncomfortable walking at night where I live.
At one time years ago, I worked in law enforcement for a few years. Judging by what I saw during those years, I can say that you might be surprised at the dangerous incidents that sometimes happen even in "safe" towns. I wouldn't expect that there would be much danger on a busy street at any hour, even in the largest cities, though this might depend on the neighborhood. When it comes to walking around in more isolated areas, though, I wouldn't consider a woman paranoid if she felt nervous about that, even in towns where "those kinds of things don't happen."

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJNEOA View Post
Do you think that's the case in Boston, Chicago, etc? It depends on the area of the city and the city itself (e.g. is there mixed-use development with adequate residential?). In a lot of less dense cities in the CBD this may be the case, but certainly not an across-the-board rule. That's also only a view of commuting on transit to/from work. Another huge chunk of scenarios for transit users exists for leisure, running errands, etc. Within actual neighborhoods, I wouldn't expect people to feel unsafe at 9pm where there's adequate foot traffic, even women.
From what I've observed, some cities that are more sprawling can be pretty deserted downtown after 7:00PM or so. I'm talking about cities where the CBD is mostly office buildings, and the nightlife is widely scattered.

This can still be true in old-style, densely built cities, in some areas. I've seen Boston's financial and retail districts very quiet in the early evening. Those are two areas with little in the way of businesses that are open at night.

The difference between a city like Boston and a more sprawling city is that in Boston's financial district most streets are only a few blocks from areas with more activity, while in the downtown of a Sun Belt city, the CBD might be a mile or more from any really busy nighttime hustle and bustle. Still, there are parts of downtown Boston that are far enough from any activity at night so that it would be understandable if a woman felt nervous about walking alone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 06:45 PM
 
13,005 posts, read 18,896,239 times
Reputation: 9251
Buses aren't attractive to most people. Even in the best cases they are slower than rush hour traffic. And sometimes the transit agency discourage riding, with small seats, bumpy rides and erratic scheduling. The main advantage is they are cheaper to ride. Trains are another story. Express trains mean that downtown locations can be a draw even for workers living 50 miles (80 km) away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 07:14 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,465,757 times
Reputation: 10343
The only thing I need to know is I hate taking the bus.

[i'll drive]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 07:14 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,447,987 times
Reputation: 15179
Quote:
Originally Posted by ogre View Post
At one time years ago, I worked in law enforcement for a few years. Judging by what I saw during those years, I can say that you might be surprised at the dangerous incidents that sometimes happen even in "safe" towns. I wouldn't expect that there would be much danger on a busy street at any hour, even in the largest cities, though this might depend on the neighborhood. When it comes to walking around in more isolated areas, though, I wouldn't consider a woman paranoid if she felt nervous about that, even in towns where "those kinds of things don't happen."
True, no area is perfectly safe. But in safe areas, the risk of street crime is very low, so I'd consider unreasonable to worry about scary but very unlikely occurrences. In most places, the majority of crime is not random. As mentioned in another thread, there's also the risk of getting hit by a car walking around. Or driving. All everyday activities carry a certain amount of risk.

I'm wondering if a certain amount of the worries is generational. I know among New Yorkers of my parent's generation tend to mention and worry about crime far more than those of my generation. New York has seen one of the more drastic crime declines in the last couple decades, but many other cities have seen large declines as well.

Quote:
The difference between a city like Boston and a more sprawling city is that in Boston's financial district most streets are only a few blocks from areas with more activity, while in the downtown of a Sun Belt city, the CBD might be a mile or more from any really busy nighttime hustle and bustle. Still, there are parts of downtown Boston that are far enough from any activity at night so that it would be understandable if a woman felt nervous about walking alone.
The Financial District empties out rather quickly, but it seemed like most commercial streets had large volumes of pedestrians at least till 9 or 10 pm. Side residential streets are usually quieter but aren't usually desolate until later. From what I remember of Cambridge/ Somerville, there were some people out at 11 pm but it started to get desolate. I did a long walk at 12:30-1 am or so once and it was very empty, the single digits temperatures didn't help. Jamaica Plain is quieter but still some people out in the evening.

Going back to the OP: Do those who drive think less about street crime? I don't really think so, and my guess is those who walk for transportation in eventually get used to it and forget about any safety dangers (as long as no obvious safety incidents occur). Stuff people do everyday people take for granted as normal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 08:03 PM
 
5,816 posts, read 15,908,183 times
Reputation: 4741
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
True, no area is perfectly safe. But in safe areas, the risk of street crime is very low, so I'd consider unreasonable to worry about scary but very unlikely occurrences. In most places, the majority of crime is not random. As mentioned in another thread, there's also the risk of getting hit by a car walking around. Or driving. All everyday activities carry a certain amount of risk.
Very true. The chances of a serious incident are low in many areas. My point is simply that you never know when the exception will occur. Because of that, I would never scoff at a woman who preferred to avoid walking alone through isolated spots, even in generally safe areas.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
I'm wondering if a certain amount of the worries is generational. I know among New Yorkers of my parent's generation tend to mention and worry about crime far more than those of my generation. New York has seen one of the more drastic crime declines in the last couple decades, but many other cities have seen large declines as well.
Interesting thought. It's like the way I've heard it said that people who lived through the Depression tend to be especially frugal, as they never quite feel totally secure financially. Maybe in the same way, people who lived in NYC in the '70's have never completely shaken the feeling that they need to be careful on the streets.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
The Financial District empties out rather quickly, but it seemed like most commercial streets had large volumes of pedestrians at least till 9 or 10 pm.
Yeah, my point was that even on the quiet streets in the Financial District you're not far from some of those busy commercial streets. The same is not always true of downtown business districts in Sun Belt cities, where the nightlife may be scattered all over town, not concentrated in a relatively compact central area in and around downtown.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 08:05 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,384,526 times
Reputation: 55562
street safety is like surfing. the same spot u surfed yesterday may be very dangerous today due to changing surf conditions. that is why people remain in these crab shells called cars. they are safe 24/7 no matter what the weather.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top