One last post on this thread, I'm done after this.
Going back to the spanish point of the thread, obviously they are a root stock of NM, but the reactionary elements that boil out of "cultural preservation" and "going back" usually end up being ugly, just like the pro Onate idiot that shot a protester at the statue site:
https://www.abqjournal.com/news/man-...793df8a.html#1.
That's the kinda crap that NM needs to move on from. Lots of ugliness can hide with the good in "preservation".
The 1900s paradigm of railroads, interstates, and corporatism / big business left people unoptimally glumped into major metros and left vast swaths of the US pretty devoid of people. It's an unhealthy and rather unnatural arrangement (literally with Denver's brown cloud) that will change. What happened in the past won't be the way that things develop in the future - it'll be more like it was in the past, a network of small cities rather than big urban and rural. That's bearing out in the post covid population trends, expect more.
The climate and water situation in Taos is BETTER than Colorado Springs, it's most definitely not too cold or arid, this isn't Wyoming. Why do you think there were so many native settlements on the Rio Grande and not at the base of Pikes Peak or in Greeley?? More stuff grows here like fruit trees, less wack snow, less hail, better summers and similar winters... New Mexico is VERY underpopulated relative to what a comfortable carrying capacity is, using somewhere like Pennsylvania as a comparison. If a drought now of similar proportions to the one that created all sorts of upheaval in the 1100s didn't shake the SW, we're definitely not overdeveloped. Literally nothing broke except some farms stopped.
New Mexico is not going to stay frozen in population or culture, no matter how much people (generally over 60) want it to stay that way. It's going to evolve into something new with new generations based off the the roots it came from. We should be involved on it being a good change, but no change is not an option.