Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"Despite a large body of evidence from extraordinary efforts by investigators around the world, our committee found that in many cases, if not most, evidence was insufficient to accept or reject causality for a particular potential harm from a specific COVID-19 vaccine," said committee vice chair Anne Bass, MD, of Weill Cornell Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York City.
"In other cases, we did find sufficient evidence to favor rejection, favor acceptance, or establish causality. It is important to note, however, that identifying a harm does not mean that it occurs frequently," she cautioned. "Harms associated with vaccines are rare."
I know that more studies are ongoing and there will be more in the future.
"mRNA vaccine boosters may impair immune system response in immune compromised individuals. Multiple doses of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines may result in much higher levels of IgG 4 antibodies, or also impaired activation of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells.Jan 27, 2024"
It just seems to me watching that it causes immune suppression, which makes the most sense to me as I watch.
"mRNA vaccine boosters may impair immune system response in immune compromised individuals. Multiple doses of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines may result in much higher levels of IgG 4 antibodies, or also impaired activation of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells.Jan 27, 2024"
It just seems to me watching that it causes immune suppression, which makes the most sense to me as I watch.
No, the vaccines do not cause immune suppression.
Your first link is from 2018, before the covid vaccines even existed. The senior author is Nobel Prizewinner Drew Weissman, one of the inventors of the Moderna mRNA vaccine. The covid vaccine was designed to avoid potential problems previously identified with mRNA.
One of the authors of the article in the second link is Stephanie Seneff, a well known antivax crank with no background in vaccines or virology. Another is Peter McCullough, who should stick to cardiology. That article has been retracted.
If we don't know of any, the provisional answer is none.
There may be some, but I'm not aware of any. I am aware that most cancers occur many years or decades after exposure. But certain predictable posters will trumpet this one, probably flawed study as if it were the truth they've been waiting for.
A) The studies noted above are in vitro (test tube) studies that showed certain changes in immunochemistry in cell cultures.It's always Ill advised to extrapolate those results to the real world...but it does give suggestions for further studies.
2) It"s always difficult to evaluate "causes' of cancer because of the low numbers. Eg- if a certain lymphoma ocurrs naturally in 3 of every 10,000 people, but occurs in 4 of 10,000 exposed to chemical X, and you come down with lymphoma and were exposed, are you the "1" extra or one of the "3" who were bound to get it anyways?
How many carcinogens cause detectable cancer in less than 2 years? Zero?
High dose of radiation.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
