Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Exercise and Fitness
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-11-2023, 11:02 AM
 
Location: Juneau, AK + Puna, HI
10,545 posts, read 7,735,179 times
Reputation: 16038

Advertisements

Some studies suggest that VO2 max is the single best predictor of mortality.

The only way to improve this number is exercise, and the best way to maintain healthy levels is also exercise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-11-2023, 11:09 AM
 
Location: A coal patch in Pennsyltucky
10,385 posts, read 10,650,173 times
Reputation: 12699
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaikikiWaves View Post
Thanks, I had a look. And you're right, they found a short term benefit for increasing exercise only in the short term. In the long term there was no clear benefit, but they noted that they had no way to measure if the physical activity reported 33 years ago was consistently followed through the end points of their study. Which maybe why there is a short term association, but no long term association. The last questionnaire went out in 1990, they just followed up on mortality.

This study is a great example of why trying to do this study is hard. Even if we are to assume that self-reported assessments are accurate, they would need to realistically send out this questionnaire every day to get a full picture of volume of exercise being done. Instead, what they're capturing is activity levels at the time of the questionnaire, and not really anything before or after.
Good points about any research concerning exercise. It is impossible to control all the variables in any study on exercise since it is impossible to treat humans like mice in cages where all variables can be controlled. It is also impossible to start a research study with all subjects who are similar. Some subjects may have never exercised before while others exercise extensively. You can't expect them to have similar results after a certain length of time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2023, 12:40 PM
 
Location: north bama
3,505 posts, read 761,791 times
Reputation: 6447
it took me 68 years to become 68 years old ,, i dont think exorcise had anything to do with it ..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2023, 04:15 PM
 
Location: Wonderland
67,650 posts, read 60,853,687 times
Reputation: 101073
You know what I do? I walk. My daughter, who is 21 years younger than me, runs. She has all sorts of structural health issues, and I have zero health issues. Hmmmmm...

Oh and I am fluffy while she is very slim. I stick to a basically gluten free diet and she eats all sorts of stuff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2023, 04:18 PM
 
Location: Wonderland
67,650 posts, read 60,853,687 times
Reputation: 101073
Quote:
Originally Posted by ExNooYawk2 View Post
There are people who exercise and take care of themselves but still get sick with a terminal illness. Then there are people who do nothing and live forever. My mother's only exercise was to get up and change the tv channel until her kids were old enough to do it for her. She just turned 95 y/o.

If exercising makes you feel/look good then do it and enjoy the boost. There are no guarantees of anything in life, though, and exercising to hedge your bets might not work either. Meantime, have fun.
Bingo!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2023, 05:39 PM
 
2,020 posts, read 976,503 times
Reputation: 5638
Quote:
Originally Posted by KathrynAragon View Post
Bingo!
But there's a difference between simple age and quality of life.

Lots of my mom's side of the family lived into their 90s but their QOL was awful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2023, 07:47 PM
 
631 posts, read 884,151 times
Reputation: 1266
Trump was right again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2023, 08:19 PM
 
3,566 posts, read 1,492,058 times
Reputation: 2438
Quote:
Originally Posted by aggie972 View Post
Trump was right again.
Meet Fauja Singh, marathon runner, over 100 years old

https://olympics.com/en/news/who-is-...arathon-runner
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2023, 08:48 PM
 
Location: Near Falls Lake
4,251 posts, read 3,170,586 times
Reputation: 4700
My father's theory is you only have so many exercise hours in your body....don't use them up unnecessarily. He is 94 and has never exercised a day in his life. His father lived to just under 100 years of age and exercised with hard physical work until his mid 90's.....walked 5 miles a day. In my opinion, genetics seems to play the larger part. That said, I choose to stay very physically active....most of the things I enjoy require being in good physical condition. I believe exercise will give you a better quality of life but may not add significant time to your lifespan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2023, 10:32 PM
 
3,566 posts, read 1,492,058 times
Reputation: 2438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arktikos View Post
Some studies suggest that VO2 max is the single best predictor of mortality.

The only way to improve this number is exercise, and the best way to maintain healthy levels is also exercise.
This is the famous study:

Quote:
Results:
A total of 5,107 men with a mean age of 48.8 ± 5.4 years were included in the study. During the 46 years of follow-up, 4,700 (92%) men died; 2,149 (42.1%) of the men died of CVD. Compared with below the lower limit of normal CRF, low normal CRF was associated with 2.1 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7 to 3.4; p = 0.002), high normal with 2.9 years (95% CI: 1.5 to 4.2; p < 0.001), and above upper limit of normal with 4.9 years (95% CI: 3.1 to 6.7; p < 0.001) longer mean life expectancy. Each unit increase in Vo2max was associated with a 45-day (95% CI: 30 to 61; p < 0.001) increase in longevity. Estimates for cardiovascular mortality were similar to all-cause mortality. Results were essentially unchanged when excluding individuals who died within the first 10 years of follow-up, suggesting a minimal role of reverse causation.
Conclusions:
CRF was significantly related to longevity over the course of 4 decades in middle-aged, employed men free of CVD. The benefits of higher midlife CRF extend well into the later part of life.
https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.045

During strenuous bouts of cardiovascular activity, your body is forced to find alternate ways of getting oxygen to the heart. As a result, you increase the number of blood vessels. This is one of the many reasons cardiovascular exercise leads to lower BP. But also, during a heart attack, increases your odds of survival, as now you have more routes for blood to flow in case one gets blocked.

The many benefits of exercise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Exercise and Fitness

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top