Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Like ANY demoncrat cares about the evidence. Their party won that's ALL they care about PERIOD.
It’s clear you are letting your disappointment in the results affect your reaction to events. Some times things go your way (your guys won the House), sometimes, they don’t. The world will go on my friend.
I'm not watching anything at all. I am saying count ALL the votes THEN declare a winner
No. I am saying count ALL the votes especially when only 5k votes separate the 2.
Media outlets themselves don't finalize any elections by calling it, but are able to make projections based on what is out, where it is out, etc. Laxalt himself hinted that he knew he was going to lose based off what was out in Clark.
It’s clear you are letting your disappointment in the results affect your reaction to events. Some times things go your way (your guys won the House), sometimes, they don’t. The world will go on my friend.
I imagine we are going to see an awful lot of angry sore Trumpies in the next few weeks. MAGA didn't do so well in this election.
I just looked at the map, the majority of counties still have votes outstanding.
Elko County still have 5% to county and Laxalt is leading by A TON there.
Washoe has 9% still to county and the demoncrat has a narrow lead there
Douglas has 5%
Carson City has 5%
Lyon has 5%
Churchill has 6%
Nye has 3%
Clark has 2%
The 2 counties where the demoncrat is leading its a NARROW lead so there is a LOT of vote left out to count.
Sounds a lot like the punchline of an old joke Ronald Reagan used to tell "There's got to be a pony in there somewhere..."
It’s clear you are letting your disappointment in the results affect your reaction to events. Some times things go your way (your guys won the House), sometimes, they don’t. The world will go on my friend.
Exactly. We have all had our candidate or candidates lose from time to time. It's disappointing, but it's part of life.
It's a matter of months until a new election, regroup, rethink your candidates or Policies and move on,
maybe better luck the next time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasLawyer2000
Who cares about the "Trumpies"? We need to focus on fixing our conservative party and weed out "Trumpies" and other RINOs.
Figures. I knew that he would lose as this stretched out and the dems always win when the count is stretched out. Never has a Republican won when it takes days to count a small amount of votes.. More time to cheat. We know any means to an end to win. Democrats will destroy this country with corruption. It worked in 2020 so why not again.
Figures. I knew that he would lose as this stretched out and the dems always win when the count is stretched out. Never has a Republican won when it takes days to count a small amount of votes.. More time to cheat. We know any means to an end to win. Democrats will destroy this country with corruption. It worked in 220 so why not again.
Nevada has specific deadline and rules, and all of them have been followed, with time to spare.
__________________ ____________________________________________
My posts as a Mod will always be in red.
Be sure to review Terms of Service: TOS
And check this out: FAQ
Moderator: Relationships Forum / Hawaii Forum / Dogs / Pets / Current Events
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
