City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
64.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Suwannee Primary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:| Florida: | 45 |
| Suwannee County: | 24 |
| Live Oak: | 23 |
| Suwannee Primary School: | 64 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (386) 364-2650 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 61
School number: 11
School type: Elementary
District Name: SUWANNEE
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (386) 364-2667
Principal: Marilyn K Jones
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 2
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
Senate District: 3
School Web Address: www.suwannee.k12.fl.us/sps
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading: 94%
Meeting High Standards in Math: 90%
Meeting High Standards in Writing: 96%
Meeting High Standards in Science: 83%
Making Reading Gains : 80%
Making Math Gains: 79%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 89%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 82%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 693
Percent Tested: 100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 119999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 29%
Minority Rate: 49%
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 440 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 440 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 150
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 417
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 417
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 227 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 227 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 226
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 212
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 212
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading: 88%
Meeting High Standards in Math: 86%
Meeting High Standards in Writing: 99%
Meeting High Standards in Science: 72%
Making Reading Gains : 73%
Making Math Gains: 71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 628
Percent Tested: 100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 24%
Minority Rate: 52%
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 429 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 429 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 157
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 410
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 410
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 207 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 207 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 80
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 198
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 198
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 91 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 104 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading: 88%
Meeting High Standards in Math: 87%
Meeting High Standards in Writing: 98%
Meeting High Standards in Science: 69%
Making Reading Gains : 73%
Making Math Gains: 79%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 73%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 637
Percent Tested: 100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 25%
Minority Rate: 51%
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 438 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 438 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 145
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 429
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 428
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 212 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 212 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 208
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 207
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 350 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 349 (99%)
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 255 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 254 (99%)
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (97%)
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 215 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 214 (99%)
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (98%)
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 968 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 963 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 686 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 682 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 186 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 185 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 589 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 586 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 24% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1559 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 343 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 4% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 89% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 19 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1819 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 360 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 94% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 22 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1862 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 348 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 30% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 95% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1947 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 354 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 92% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1989 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 352 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 89% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2101 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 355 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 32% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 48% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 91% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2278 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 378 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 100% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2314 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 372 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing| Here: | 95% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 45% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 90% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 19 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 358 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 77% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 356 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 49% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 75% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 368 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 59% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 97% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1572 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 359 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 4% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 88% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1736 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 364 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 26% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 45% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 92% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1783 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 357 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 45% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 83% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1906 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 364 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 95% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1901 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 33% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 33% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 76% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2019 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 352 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 14% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 32% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 34% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 85% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2193 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 381 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 100% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2236 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 385 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 100% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 55% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 100% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1513 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1776 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 353 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 02%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 03%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1790 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1850 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1962 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 346 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2031 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2267 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 375 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 40%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2316 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 372 |
| State average: | 299 |
Percent Passing: 100%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 46%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 343 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 348 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 384 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 12
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 12
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1653 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 376 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 35%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1711 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 358 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1809 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 363 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1788 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1933 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 342 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1992 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 345 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2180 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 378 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 55%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 10
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2166 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 368 |
| State average: | 321 |
Percent Passing: 100%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 35%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 10
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 11
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 66
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 97%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 65
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 5 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 20%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 17%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 26
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 5 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 27%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1581 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 346 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1720 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 343 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1715 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1928 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 350 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1925 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 339 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2012 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2289 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 380 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 40%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2412 |
| State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 390 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 67%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 11
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 348 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 370 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 10
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 11
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1631 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 372 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 97%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1735 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 364 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1687 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1840 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 348 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1927 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2000 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 347 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2206 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 385 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 80%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 10
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2232 |
| State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 384 |
| State average: | 323 |
Percent Passing: 100%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 60%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 11
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 11
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 656 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 677 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 86 |
| State average: | 69 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 17 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 684 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 84 |
| State average: | 71 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 699 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 706 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 85 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 718 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Literary (max 18)| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 25 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 765 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 19 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 774 |
| State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Median NPR| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 97 |
| State average: | 65 |
Functional (max 18)| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 17 |
| State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 65
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 362 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 88%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined| SUWANNEE PRIMARY SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 17%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 66
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 371 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 91%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 30%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 15%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 398 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 53%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 93%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 13%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 27%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Live Oak, FL
- Suwannee Primary School in Live Oak, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: