Summit Charter Central School in Orlando, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 6.

720 W PRINCETON ST
Orlando, FL 32804

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Eola Charter School (2.0 miles):

98
Ventura Elementary School (7.4 miles):

69
Lakeview Middle School (13.0 miles):

59
South Creek Middle School (12.6 miles):

53
South Seminole Middle School (7.6 miles):

44
Shingle Creek Elementary School (6.8 miles):

33
Hopper Center School (17.9 miles):

18
Summit Charter Central School:

6
New Beginnings Education Complex School (19.2 miles):

0
Summit Charter Central School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Orlando:

42
Summit Charter Central School:

6

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 244-5920 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 73
School type: Elementary
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: GRADES 1 TO 6
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 244-5923
Principal: Steve Palmer
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 8
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 38
Senate District: 22

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 58%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 81%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 92%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 49%

Making Reading Gains : 56%

Making Math Gains: 75%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 49%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 59%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 529

Percent Tested: 99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 29%

Minority Rate: 16%

Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 866 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 858 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 407
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 848
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 805

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 841
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 797
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 729 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 721 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 350
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 717
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 679

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 710
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 672
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 275 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 273 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 122
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 265
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 254

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 263
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 251
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 120 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 48%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 77%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 79%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 41%

Making Reading Gains : 51%

Making Math Gains: 77%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 47%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 64%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 494

Percent Tested: 98%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 33%

Minority Rate: 18%

Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1237 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1233 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 583
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1189
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1130

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1184
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1122
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1019 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1015 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 476
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 988
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 939

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 983
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 931
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 452 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 450 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 211
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 423
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 401

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 420
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 395
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 149
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 140

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 140
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 49%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 78%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 82%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 50%

Making Reading Gains : 58%

Making Math Gains: 77%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 50%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 68%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 522

Percent Tested: 98%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 28%

Minority Rate: 16%


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1342 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1333 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 633
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1298
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1231

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1283
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1216
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1123 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1113 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 535
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1085
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1036

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1070
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1021
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 406 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 404 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 157
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 381
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 358

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 375
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 352
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 176 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 178 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (90%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 70
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 69
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (89%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (91%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (89%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 40
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (91%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 63
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 61
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1146
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

36%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

45%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1364
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

36%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

21%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

43%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

16
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1491
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

28%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1605
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

50%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

17%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

25%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1719
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

40%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

27%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2007
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

35%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

60%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2056
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

70%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

13%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

42%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

17%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

21%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

53%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

13%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

13%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

5%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

45%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1388
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

71%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1453
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

18%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

56%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1572
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

313
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

45%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

1673
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

46%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

15%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

15%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1793
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

40%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

20%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

33%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1964
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

22%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

70%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2051
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

92%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

44%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

84%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1043
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

258
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1425
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 02%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1397
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1744
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

280
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1974
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

322
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1974
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

256
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

1256
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1425
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1495
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1798
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1973
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

317
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2014
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 87%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 165
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 64%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 605
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

725
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

205
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1338
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1269
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

232
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1553
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

1949
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

225
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

179
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

743
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

180
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 1
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 1

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1170
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

193
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 89%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 1
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1600
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

246
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1949
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

10
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

573
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

14
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

5
State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

10
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

627
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

35
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

19
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

618
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

17
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

5
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

12
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

636
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

18
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

9
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

621
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

699
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

66
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

6
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 12
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

243
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 8%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 6
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

953
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

243
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1311
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

250
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 76%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1273
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1052
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 221

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1155
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

211
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1155
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1105
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 50

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1294
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

219
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1294
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1193
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 101

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1373
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

202
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1397
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1416
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -19

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

198
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

210
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

913
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

216
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 91%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1165
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

226
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1125
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1011
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 113

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1390
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

207
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1390
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1088
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 302

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1511
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

223
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1544
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1376
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 169

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 11
Mean Scale Score
Here:

588
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 23
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 12): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 11
Mean Scale Score
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

600
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 25
Literary (max 18): 8
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
Here:

620
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 29
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale Score
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

614
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 15
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 7
Initial Understanding (max 12): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 8
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 13
Mean Scale Score
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

626
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 19
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 7
Initial Understanding (max 12): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 12): 4
Strategies (max 10): 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
Here:

641
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 22
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 11
Mean Scale Score
Here:

548
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 7
Number Sense (max 14): 5
Operations (max 11): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 2
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 11
Mean Scale Score
Here:

591
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 26
Number Sense (max 12): 6
Operations (max 12): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 13
Mean Scale Score
Here:

609
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 23
Number Sense (max 12): 6
Operations (max 12): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 2
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale Score
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

619
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 17
Number Sense (max 10): 3
Operations (max 12): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 2
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 13
Mean Scale Score
Here:

629
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 18
Number Sense (max 9): 2
Operations (max 9): 2
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 2
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
Here:

647
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 20
Number Sense (max 9): 2
Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

216
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 9%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 36%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 27%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
SUMMIT CHARTER CENTRAL:

168
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

2
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 23%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 8%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Orlando, FL
  5. Summit Charter Central School in Orlando, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.