Special Needs High -Fsdb School in St Augustine, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 13.

207 N SAN MARCO AVE
St Augustine, FL 32084

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Ponte Vedra High School (12.9 miles):

85
Deaf High (Fsdb) School (0.0 miles):

66
St Johns County Transition Program School (1.8 miles):

59
Hastings Juvenile Correctional School (16.7 miles):

45
The Webster School (2.1 miles):

39
Palm Beach County Jail School (4.2 miles):

15
Special Needs High -Fsdb School:

13
St. Johns Technical High School (1.6 miles):

5
Special Needs High -Fsdb School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
St Augustine:

40
Special Needs High -Fsdb School:

13

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (904) 827-2700 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 68
School number: 19
School type: Senior High
District Name: DEAF/BLIND
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (904) 827-2714
Principal: Mary Lou Hofmann-Sitten
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 7
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 18
Senate District: 8

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
SPECIAL NEEDS HIGH SCHOOL-FSDB:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 34
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 32
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 34
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. St Augustine, FL
  5. Special Needs High -Fsdb School in St Augustine, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.