Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


School Of Science And Technology - Alamo in San Antonio, TX
(KG-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 84
Address
 12200 CROWNPOINT DR STE 100
San Antonio, TX 78233
Telephone
(210) 657-6400
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.sstalamo.org
City-data.com school rating
84
Students
413
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
22.0
Free lunch eligible students
185
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
66
School district
SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Charter school
Yes
Charter authorizer name
STATE BOARD OF (#000001)
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
School Of Science And Technology - Alamo:

84
CRESTVIEW EL (2.0 miles):

77
MILLER POINT EL (1.9 miles):

66
ROYAL RIDGE EL (1.2 miles):

63
WOODSTONE EL (1.1 miles):

49
ED FRANZ EL (1.9 miles):

47
NORTHERN HILLS EL (2.1 miles):

47
EL DORADO EL (1.7 miles):

43
WOOD MIDDLE (1.7 miles):

37
School Of Science And Technology - Alamo rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Bexar County:

48
San Antonio:

48
This School:

84

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 413
Enrollment in 2015: 419
Enrollment in 2014: 428
Enrollment in 2013: 425
Enrollment in 2012: 416
Enrollment in 2011: 335
Enrollment in 2010: 259

School Of Science And Technology - Alamo - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradeKGG01G02G03G04G05G06G07G08Total
All students474952514342495030413
Female students251225272122202315190
Male students223727242220292715223
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - - - - - 1 - - 1
Asian students - 1121314215
Hispanic students282427302320262712217
Black students56855487351
White students10141211121211910101
Two or More Races students44432323328

Enrollment by grade:
Kindergarten enrollment: 47
1st grade enrollment: 49
2nd grade enrollment: 52
3rd grade enrollment: 51
4th grade enrollment: 43
5th grade enrollment: 42
6th grade enrollment: 49
7th grade enrollment: 50
8th grade enrollment: 30

School Of Science And Technology - Alamo - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 190 (46.0%)
Here:

46.0%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 223 (54.0%)
School:

54.0%
State:

50.1%

School Of Science And Technology - Alamo - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.2%)
Here:

0.2%
Texas:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 15 (3.6%)
School Of Science And Technology - Alamo:

3.6%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 217 (52.5%)
Here:

52.5%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 51 (12.3%)
School:

12.3%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 101 (24.5%)
Here:

24.5%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 28 (6.8%)
Here:

6.8%
Texas:

2.1%

School Of Science And Technology - Alamo - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 251 (60.8%)
School Of Science And Technology - Alamo:

60.8%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 185 (44.8%)
School Of Science And Technology - Alamo:

44.8%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 66 (16.0%)
School Of Science And Technology - Alamo:

16.0%
Texas:

6.2%

School Of Science And Technology - Alamo - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 22

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 2
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 6

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

18.8
State:

15.6

School Of Science And Technology - Alamo - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,637,118
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 22 (Salary Expenditures: $1,307,961)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $51,126)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $74,865)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $201,275)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $574,522
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $1,307,961
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,307,962
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $51,126)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $74,865)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $201,275)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $98,849

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic28
  • Asian4
  • White10
  • IDEA4
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 42 (male: 24, female: 18)
  • Hispanic: 28 (male: 17, female: 11)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 27 (male: 17, female: 10)
  • Hispanic: 23 (male: 13, female: 10)
  • White: 4 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 8 (male: 4, female: 4)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic10
  • Black2
  • White7
  • LEP2
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 19 (male: 9, female: 10)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained

    Total number of students retained in 2nd grade

  • Hispanic2
  • White2
  • LEP2
  • 5042
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
School Of Science And Technology - Alamo:

7.7%
Texas:

4.8%

Total number of students retained in 6th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 6th grade students retained
School:

4.1%
State:

6.3%

Total number of students retained in 7th grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of 7th grade students retained
School:

4.0%
Texas:

6.0%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic16
  • American Indian2
  • Black4
  • White7
  • Multirace7
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 36 (male: 19, female: 17)
  • Hispanic: 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
School Of Science And Technology - Alamo:

87.2
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
End-of-course (EOC)

    Algebra I Average Scale Score

  • All4,923
  • Males4,960
  • Females4,866
  • Hispanic4,878
  • Black4,760
  • White5,151
Algebra I Average Scale Score:

4,923
State:

4,001
Algebra I students tested: 25
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 25

Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 9.8 (89%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.8 (90%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.8 (92%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 10.1 (92%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 5.1 (85%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 4%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 96%

4%
96%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,960, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,866, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 90%)
10%
90%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,878, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 92%)
8%
92%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,760, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%
White: (Average Scale Score: 5,151, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%

3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,523
  • Males1,517
  • Females1,538
  • Hispanic1,506
  • Black1,398
  • White1,605
Math Average Scale Score:

1,523
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 48
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 49

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.1 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.7 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 38%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 33%

10%
19%
38%
33%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,517, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 32%)
12%
20%
36%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,538, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 36%)
7%
14%
43%
36%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,506, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 57%, Masters: 14%)
5%
24%
57%
14%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,398, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 20%)
40%
40%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,605, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 65%)
12%
23%
65%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,454
  • Males1,439
  • Females1,488
  • Hispanic1,449
  • Black1,382
  • White1,493
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,454
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 48
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 49

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.1 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.6 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 44%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

13%
44%
27%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,439, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 12%)
15%
47%
26%
12%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,488, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 29%)
7%
36%
28%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,449, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 62%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 14%)
62%
24%
14%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,382, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
40%
60%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,493, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 47%, Masters: 24%)
12%
17%
47%
24%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,547
  • Males1,542
  • Females1,551
  • Hispanic1,549
  • Black1,401
  • White1,539
  • Multirace1,658
Math Average Scale Score:

1,547
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 55
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 56

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.8 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.3 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 25%

29%
26%
20%
25%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,542, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 30%)
26%
33%
11%
30%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,551, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 21%)
32%
18%
29%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,549, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 24%)
28%
20%
28%
24%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,401, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 71%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 14%)
71%
15%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,539, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 13%)
20%
47%
20%
13%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,658, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 50%)
17%
16%
17%
50%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,502
  • Males1,489
  • Females1,515
  • Hispanic1,492
  • Black1,418
  • White1,466
  • Multirace1,622
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,502
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 55
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 56

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.5 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.1 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.3 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

36%
24%
20%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,489, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 22%)
44%
19%
15%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,515, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 18%)
29%
28%
25%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,492, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 16%)
32%
24%
28%
16%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,418, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 71%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 14%)
71%
15%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,466, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
40%
40%
20%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,622, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 67%)
17%
16%
67%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,654
  • Males3,557
  • Females3,745
  • Hispanic3,659
  • Black3,192
  • White3,543
  • Multirace4,114
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,654
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 56
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 56

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.6 (44%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.2 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.3 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 7%

43%
25%
25%
7%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,557, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 4%)
48%
19%
29%
4%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,745, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 10%)
38%
31%
21%
10%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,659, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 0%)
38%
27%
35%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,192, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 71%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
71%
29%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,543, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 7%)
47%
26%
20%
7%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 4,114, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 33%)
33%
17%
17%
33%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,769
  • Males1,736
  • Females1,801
  • Hispanic1,776
  • White1,721
Math Average Scale Score:

1,769
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 53
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 53

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 14.1 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.8 (87%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.2 (80%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 15%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 72%

2%
15%
11%
72%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,736, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 65%)
4%
23%
8%
65%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,801, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 78%)
7%
15%
78%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,776, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 72%)
16%
12%
72%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,721, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 68%)
5%
16%
11%
68%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,595
  • Males1,558
  • Females1,631
  • Hispanic1,601
  • White1,547
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,595
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 53
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 53

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.6 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.8 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 9%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 41%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 25%

25%
9%
41%
25%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,558, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 4%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 15%)
38%
4%
43%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,631, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 33%)
11%
15%
41%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,601, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 28%)
24%
8%
40%
28%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,547, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 21%)
37%
16%
26%
21%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All4,070
  • Males4,075
  • Females4,065
  • Hispanic4,021
  • White4,002
Science Average Scale Score:

4,070
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 53
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 53

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.5 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.5 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.4 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 43%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

9%
27%
43%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,075, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 27%)
12%
19%
42%
27%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,065, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 15%)
7%
34%
44%
15%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,021, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 20%)
8%
28%
44%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,002, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 16%)
16%
26%
42%
16%

6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,734
  • Males1,726
  • Females1,747
  • Hispanic1,753
  • Black1,644
  • White1,687
Math Average Scale Score:

1,734
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 42
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 42

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.3 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.3 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.3 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.4 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 40%

12%
19%
29%
40%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,726, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 40%)
16%
20%
24%
40%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,747, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 41%)
6%
18%
35%
41%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,753, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 39%)
9%
13%
39%
39%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,644, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 33%)
33%
17%
17%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,687, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 30%)
10%
40%
20%
30%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,593
  • Males1,607
  • Females1,572
  • Hispanic1,615
  • Black1,567
  • White1,529
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,593
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 42
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 42

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.5 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.7 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.1 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

29%
23%
29%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,607, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 20%)
28%
20%
32%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,572, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 18%)
29%
30%
23%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,615, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 26%)
26%
26%
22%
26%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,567, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 0%)
33%
34%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,529, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 0%)
40%
20%
40%

7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,901
  • Males1,941
  • Females1,874
  • Hispanic1,972
  • White1,821
Math Average Scale Score:

1,901
Texas:

1,571
Math students tested: 37
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 37

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.4 (91%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.8 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.3 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 5.9 (84%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 3%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 76%

3%
21%
76%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,941, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 80%)
20%
80%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,874, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 5%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 73%)
5%
22%
73%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,972, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 82%)
18%
82%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,821, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 64%)
7%
29%
64%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,721
  • Males1,737
  • Females1,710
  • Hispanic1,748
  • White1,663
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,721
State:

1,550
Reading students tested: 37
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 37

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.2 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.7 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.1 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 18%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 43%

14%
18%
25%
43%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,737, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 47%)
13%
14%
26%
47%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,710, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 41%)
14%
22%
23%
41%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,748, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 53%)
35%
12%
53%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,663, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 29%)
36%
7%
28%
29%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All4,057
  • Males4,137
  • Females4,003
  • Hispanic4,119
  • White3,926
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,057
Texas:

3,515
Writing students tested: 37
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 37

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.1 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.2 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 14 (82%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 48%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

11%
30%
48%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,137, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 13%)
13%
14%
60%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,003, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 9%)
9%
41%
41%
9%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,119, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 18%)
41%
41%
18%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,926, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 57%, Masters: 0%)
21%
22%
57%

8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,722
  • Males1,747
  • Females1,685
  • Hispanic1,713
Math Average Scale Score:

1,722
Texas:

1,539
Math students tested: 22
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 47

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.5 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.3 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.8 (55%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 50%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

9%
32%
50%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,747, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 69%, Masters: 8%)
23%
69%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,685, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 11%)
22%
45%
22%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,713, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 7%)
7%
43%
43%
7%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,745
  • Males1,748
  • Females1,740
  • Hispanic1,725
  • Black1,796
  • White1,754
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,745
Texas:

1,561
Reading students tested: 47
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 47

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 15.4 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 13.1 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 40%

6%
28%
26%
40%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,748, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 39%)
4%
32%
25%
39%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,740, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 42%)
11%
21%
26%
42%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,725, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 41%)
11%
30%
18%
41%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,796, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 50%)
12%
38%
50%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,754, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 33%)
33%
34%
33%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All4,011
  • Males4,129
  • Females3,836
  • Hispanic3,962
  • Black4,088
  • White4,119
Science Average Scale Score:

4,011
Texas:

3,634
Science students tested: 47
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 47

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.5 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.2 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.5 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 26%

15%
32%
27%
26%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,129, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 32%)
7%
32%
29%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,836, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 16%)
26%
32%
26%
16%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,962, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 22%)
22%
30%
26%
22%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,088, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 25%)
25%
50%
25%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,119, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 44%)
11%
33%
12%
44%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,963
  • Males4,078
  • Females3,794
  • Hispanic3,869
  • Black4,025
  • White4,182
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,963
Texas:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 47
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 47

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 11.8 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.4 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.5 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.8 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 26%

17%
40%
17%
26%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,078, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 32%)
14%
36%
18%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,794, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 16%)
21%
47%
16%
16%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,869, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 22%)
19%
40%
19%
22%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,025, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 38%)
13%
50%
38%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,182, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 33%)
22%
34%
11%
33%

Health & Safety


Harassment & Bullying:
Show data for

(State average from 919 schools)

An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.

Harassment or bullying on the basis of religion refers to intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on actual or perceived religion. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Bullying on the basis of religion constitutes religious harassment.

Harassment or bullying on the basis of sexual orientation refers to intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on actual or perceived sexual orientation. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Bullying on the basis of sexual orientation constitutes sexual orientation harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sexual orientation: 1
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sexual orientation per 1,000 students
Here:

2.4
Texas:

0.8

Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of religion: 1
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of religion per 1,000 students
School Of Science And Technology - Alamo:

2.4
Texas:

0.3


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic16
  • White4
  • LEP4
  • IDEA2
  • 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 20 (male: 13, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

48.4
State:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic19
  • Asian2
  • Black5
  • White4
  • LEP5
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 30 (male: 23, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 19 (male: 14, female: 5)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 5 (all male)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 5 (all male)

Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)

Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all male)

    Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic7
  • Black2
  • White2
  • LEP2
  • 5044
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 11 (male: 6, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all male)

Classes & Courses


Algebra I:
Show data for

(State average from 1,291 schools)

Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.

    8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I

  • Hispanic7
  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • White13
  • Multirace2
8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 26 (male: 13, female: 13)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 13 (male: 5, female: 8)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 12 (male: 4, female: 8)
  • Hispanic: 4 (all female)
  • White: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
Percent of 8th grade students who passed
Here:

46.2%
State:

87.0%

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss San Antonio, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents