Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Rummel Creek Elementary School in Houston, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 97
Address
 625 BRITTMOORE
Houston, TX 77079
Telephone
(713) 251-6700
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://rce.springbranchisd.com
City-data.com school rating
97
Students
706
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
39.4
Free lunch eligible students
19
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
6
School district
SPRING BRANCH ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Not a Title I school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
WILCHESTER EL (0.8 miles):

99
Rummel Creek Elementary School:

97
MEMORIAL MIDDLE (1.1 miles):

95
WESTCHESTER ACADEMY FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (0.9 miles):

70
MEADOW WOOD EL (1.5 miles):

62
SPRING FOREST MIDDLE (1.6 miles):

55
ASKEW EL (1.6 miles):

50
SHERWOOD EL (1.7 miles):

36
SHADOW OAKS EL (1.5 miles):

10
Rummel Creek Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Harris County:

51
Houston:

47
Rummel Creek Elementary School:

97

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 706
Enrollment in 2015: 694
Enrollment in 2014: 679
Enrollment in 2013: 694
Enrollment in 2012: 679
Enrollment in 2011: 729
Enrollment in 2010: 712
Enrollment in 2009: 754
Enrollment in 2008: 727
Enrollment in 2007: 696
Enrollment in 2006: 657
Enrollment in 2005: 641
Enrollment in 2004: 605
Enrollment in 2003: 591
Enrollment in 2002: 579
Enrollment in 2001: 588
Enrollment in 2000: 627
Enrollment in 1999: 640

Rummel Creek Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students4010412210211788133706
Female students23415741604263327
Male students17636561574670379
Asian students213111513141684
Hispanic students58101298557
Black students - 22 - 1117
White students327891748864107534
Two or More Races students138161424

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 40
Kindergarten enrollment: 104
1st grade enrollment: 122
2nd grade enrollment: 102
3rd grade enrollment: 117
4th grade enrollment: 88
5th grade enrollment: 133

Rummel Creek Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 327 (46.3%)
Rummel Creek Elementary School:

46.3%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 379 (53.7%)
Rummel Creek Elementary School:

53.7%
Texas:

50.1%

Rummel Creek Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Asian enrollment: 84 (11.9%)
Rummel Creek Elementary School:

11.9%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 57 (8.1%)
Here:

8.1%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 7 (1.0%)
Here:

1.0%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 534 (75.6%)
Rummel Creek Elementary School:

75.6%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 24 (3.4%)
Rummel Creek Elementary School:

3.4%
Texas:

2.1%

Rummel Creek Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 25 (3.5%)
School:

3.5%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 19 (2.7%)
Rummel Creek Elementary School:

2.7%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 6 (0.8%)
School:

0.8%
Texas:

6.2%

Rummel Creek Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 39.4

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1.9
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 5
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

17.9
State:

15.6

Rummel Creek Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,406,011
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 39.4 (Salary Expenditures: $1,935,500)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $84,208)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $199,343)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $173,969)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,800
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $3,107,450
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,305,000
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 11 (Salary Expenditures: $245,706)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 9 (Salary Expenditures: $369,784)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $173,969)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $2,800

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic13
  • Asian31
  • White19
  • IDEA7
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 63 (male: 30, female: 33)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 2, female: 11)
  • Asian: 31 (male: 20, female: 11)
  • White: 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.

    Students with disabilities served under IDEA

  • Hispanic4
  • Asian4
  • White26
  • LEP7
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 34 (male: 30, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 4 (all male)
  • Asian: 4 (all male)
  • White: 26 (male: 22, female: 4)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (all male)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 2,651 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Rummel Creek Elementary School:

2.0%
Texas:

4.8%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic2
  • Asian16
  • Black2
  • White37
  • Multirace4
  • LEP2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 61 (male: 37, female: 24)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Asian: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 37 (male: 20, female: 17)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Rummel Creek Elementary School:

86.4
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,578
  • Males1,590
  • Females1,564
  • Hispanic1,541
  • Asian1,602
  • White1,576
  • Multirace1,649
Math Average Scale Score:

1,578
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 125
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 125

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.8 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.9 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.3 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.3 (84%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 15%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 36%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 46%

3%
15%
36%
46%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,590, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 47%)
14%
39%
47%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,564, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 44%)
7%
15%
34%
44%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,541, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 38%)
10%
28%
24%
38%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,602, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 58%)
8%
34%
58%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,576, Tested: 83, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 40%)
2%
14%
44%
40%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,649, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,512
  • Males1,503
  • Females1,522
  • Hispanic1,467
  • Asian1,486
  • White1,525
  • Multirace1,554
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,512
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 125
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 125

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (91%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.3 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.7 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 44%

7%
23%
26%
44%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,503, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 44%)
6%
24%
26%
44%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,522, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 44%)
8%
21%
27%
44%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,467, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 38%)
14%
38%
10%
38%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,486, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 50%)
17%
8%
25%
50%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,525, Tested: 83, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 43%)
5%
20%
32%
43%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,554, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 67%)
17%
16%
67%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,769
  • Males1,785
  • Females1,749
  • Hispanic1,702
  • Asian1,780
  • White1,786
Math Average Scale Score:

1,769
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 96
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 102

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.3 (92%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.8 (89%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.1 (91%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.6 (89%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 5%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 80%

5%
15%
80%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,785, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 4%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 85%)
4%
11%
85%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,749, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 74%)
7%
19%
74%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,702, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 56%)
11%
33%
56%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,780, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 82%)
18%
82%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,786, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 5%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 86%)
5%
9%
86%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,669
  • Males1,677
  • Females1,657
  • Hispanic1,610
  • Asian1,643
  • White1,685
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,669
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 102
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 102

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.9 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.5 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.5 (88%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 1%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 13%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 62%

1%
13%
24%
62%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,677, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 66%)
2%
10%
22%
66%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,657, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 56%)
16%
28%
56%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,610, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 45%, Masters: 33%)
22%
45%
33%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,643, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 50%)
7%
7%
36%
50%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,685, Tested: 68, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 71%)
12%
17%
71%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All4,491
  • Males4,456
  • Females4,539
  • Hispanic4,201
  • Asian4,593
  • White4,540
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,491
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 102
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 102

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.2 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.2 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 14.2 (88%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 6%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 49%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 41%

4%
6%
49%
41%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,456, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 51%, Masters: 39%)
3%
7%
51%
39%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,539, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 4%, Meets: 47%, Masters: 44%)
5%
4%
47%
44%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,201, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 61%, Masters: 17%)
11%
11%
61%
17%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,593, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 43%)
7%
50%
43%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,540, Tested: 68, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 4%, Meets: 47%, Masters: 46%)
3%
4%
47%
46%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,776
  • Males1,788
  • Females1,765
  • Hispanic1,740
  • Asian1,861
  • White1,764
  • Multirace1,808
Math Average Scale Score:

1,776
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 119
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 126

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 14.6 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.7 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.6 (89%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 1%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 6%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 71%

1%
6%
22%
71%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,788, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 4%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 79%)
4%
17%
79%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,765, Tested: 63, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 63%)
2%
8%
27%
63%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,740, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 62%)
8%
30%
62%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,861, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 93%)
7%
93%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,764, Tested: 86, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 1%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 67%)
1%
6%
26%
67%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,808, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 80%)
20%
80%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,708
  • Males1,694
  • Females1,721
  • Hispanic1,672
  • Asian1,745
  • White1,707
  • Multirace1,727
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,708
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 120
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 126

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.3 (91%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.8 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.5 (82%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 4%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 63%

3%
4%
30%
63%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,694, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 3%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 61%)
4%
3%
32%
61%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,721, Tested: 63, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 5%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 63%)
3%
5%
29%
63%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,672, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 62%)
8%
30%
62%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,745, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 64%)
7%
29%
64%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,707, Tested: 86, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 3%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 62%)
5%
3%
30%
62%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,727, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 83%)
17%
83%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,984
  • Males4,035
  • Females3,939
  • Hispanic3,791
  • Asian4,152
  • White3,973
  • Multirace4,169
Science Average Scale Score:

3,984
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 120
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 120

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.9 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.3 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.9 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.9 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

13%
35%
35%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,035, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 18%)
11%
31%
40%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,939, Tested: 63, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 17%)
14%
37%
32%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,791, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 8%)
23%
46%
23%
8%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,152, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 36%)
7%
29%
28%
36%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,973, Tested: 86, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 15%)
13%
35%
37%
15%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 4,169, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 33%)
17%
50%
33%
6th Grade
Math Average Scale Score:

1,958
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 6
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 6

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 9 (90%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 14.3 (96%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.7 (94%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 6.5 (93%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 0%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 100%

100%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,973, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 6

7th Grade
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

Health & Safety


Harassment & Bullying:
Show data for

(State average from 919 schools)
An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.

Harassment or bullying on the basis of sex includes sexual harassment or bullying and gender-based harassment or bullying. Sexual harassment or bullying is unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature, such as unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, nonverbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature. Gender-based harassment or bullying is nonsexual intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on the student's actual or perceived sex, including harassment based on gender identity, gender expression, and nonconformity with gender stereotypes. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Both male and female students can be victims of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex, and the harasser or bully and the victim can be of the same sex. Bullying on the basis of sex constitutes sexual harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex: 48
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex per 1,000 students
Here:

68.0
Texas:

4.1
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of sex: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic4
  • White16
  • LEP2
  • IDEA7
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 20 (male: 10, female: 10)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
School:

28.3
State:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 12 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 4
  • White: 8
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 8
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 3

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Rummel Creek Elementary School:

4.2
Texas:

102.7

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic2
  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • White2
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 10 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Asian: 2
  • Black: 2
  • White: 2
  • Two or More Races: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 8

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Rummel Creek Elementary School:

11.3
State:

27.5
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Houston, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Houston main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Rummel Creek Elementary School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents