River Springs Charter School in Temecula, CA
(KG-12 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in California) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 51
- Address
- 43466 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92590
- Telephone
- (951) 252-8800
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- Website
- http://www.riverspringscharter.org
- City-data.com school rating
- 51
- Students
- 5,833
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 218.1
- National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status - No
- Free lunch eligible students
- 1,859
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 991
- School district
- Riverside County Office of Education
- Charter school
- Yes
- Title I status
- Title I schoolwide school
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
No street view available for this location
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
River Springs Charter School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:California: | 46 |
Riverside County: | 40 |
Temecula: | 72 |
River Springs Charter School: | 51 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 5,833
Enrollment in 2015: 5,333
Enrollment in 2014: 5,229
Enrollment in 2013: 5,548
Enrollment in 2012: 5,423
Enrollment in 2011: 4,600
Enrollment in 2010: 3,807
Enrollment in 2009: 2,997
Enrollment in 2008: 2,425
Enrollment in 2007: 2,091
River Springs Charter School - Historical enrollment
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | KG | G01 | G02 | G03 | G04 | G05 | G06 | G07 | G08 | G09 | G10 | G11 | G12 | Total |
---|
All students | 666 | 504 | 604 | 576 | 572 | 515 | 540 | 484 | 448 | 256 | 232 | 228 | 208 | 5,833 |
Female students | 339 | 224 | 311 | 282 | 277 | 268 | 254 | 221 | 230 | 121 | 111 | 120 | 104 | 2,862 |
Male students | 327 | 280 | 293 | 294 | 295 | 247 | 286 | 263 | 218 | 135 | 121 | 108 | 104 | 2,971 |
American Indian/Alaska Native students | 4 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 2 | - | 49 |
Asian students | 18 | 15 | 20 | 15 | 12 | 15 | 14 | 21 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 163 |
Hispanic students | 235 | 201 | 226 | 202 | 206 | 188 | 190 | 189 | 181 | 107 | 108 | 80 | 84 | 2,197 |
Black students | 25 | 31 | 23 | 26 | 34 | 23 | 19 | 26 | 18 | 14 | 9 | 10 | 7 | 265 |
White students | 351 | 227 | 291 | 294 | 268 | 249 | 274 | 219 | 206 | 115 | 96 | 118 | 91 | 2,799 |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | 1 | - | - | 12 |
Two or More Races students | 33 | 28 | 39 | 33 | 40 | 32 | 36 | 28 | 27 | 14 | 8 | 10 | 20 | 348 |
Enrollment by grade:
Kindergarten enrollment: 666
1st grade enrollment: 504
2nd grade enrollment: 604
3rd grade enrollment: 576
4th grade enrollment: 572
5th grade enrollment: 515
6th grade enrollment: 540
7th grade enrollment: 484
8th grade enrollment: 448
9th grade enrollment: 256
10th grade enrollment: 232
11th grade enrollment: 228
12th grade enrollment: 208
River Springs Charter School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 2,862 (49.1%)Here: | 49.1% |
California: | 49.4% |
Male enrollment: 2,971 (50.9%)River Springs Charter School: | 50.9% |
State: | 49.6% |
River Springs Charter School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 49 (0.8%)
Asian enrollment: 163 (2.8%)
Hispanic enrollment: 2,197 (37.7%)River Springs Charter School: | 37.7% |
California: | 46.0% |
Black enrollment: 265 (4.5%)River Springs Charter School: | 4.5% |
California: | 6.1% |
White enrollment: 2,799 (48.0%)
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 12 (0.2%)
Two or More Races enrollment: 348 (6.0%)
River Springs Charter School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 2,850 (48.9%)River Springs Charter School: | 48.9% |
California: | 61.2% |
Free lunch eligible students: 1,859 (31.9%)
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 991 (17.0%)River Springs Charter School: | 17.0% |
State: | 8.6% |
River Springs Charter School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 218.1
Student/Teacher RatioRiver Springs Charter School: | 26.8 |
California: | 22.8 |
River Springs Charter School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
Statewide Student Assessments
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments:
(State average from 10,463 schools)
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments (SB) is one of the online summative assessments - part of California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System.
The summative assessments are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments of grade-level learning that measure progress toward college and career readiness. Each test in English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics is comprised of two parts: (1) a computer-adaptive test and (2) a performance task, administered within a selected testing window available at 66 percent of the instructional year for grades three through eight, and grade eleven.
The summative assessments are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA and mathematics. The tests capitalize on the strengths of computer adaptive testing efficient and precise measurement across the full range of achievement and timely turnaround of results.
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All47%
- Males42%
- Females52%
- Black19%
- American Indian45%
- Asian57%
- Filipino23%
- Hispanic34%
- White47%
- Multirace47%
ELA students tested: 3,251
ELA students with scores: 3,238
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 47% |
California: | 49% |
Standard Not Met:
27.9%Standard Nearly Met:
25.2%Standard Met:
28.5%Standard Exceeded:
18.4%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2409.4, Students tested: 527, Standard Not Met: 34.8%, Nearly Met: 22.8%, Met: 21.1%, Exceeded: 21.3%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2454.8, Students tested: 543, Standard Not Met: 33.5%, Nearly Met: 21.7%, Met: 21.7%, Exceeded: 23.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2483.6, Students tested: 536, Standard Not Met: 32.3%, Nearly Met: 22.8%, Met: 25.2%, Exceeded: 19.8%)6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2510.1, Students tested: 516, Standard Not Met: 28.7%, Nearly Met: 29.1%, Met: 32.4%, Exceeded: 9.9%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2543.8, Students tested: 493, Standard Not Met: 23.9%, Nearly Met: 27.6%, Met: 34.3%, Exceeded: 14.1%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2570.4, Students tested: 424, Standard Not Met: 17.4%, Nearly Met: 29.5%, Met: 36.3%, Exceeded: 16.8%)11th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2615.8, Students tested: 212, Standard Not Met: 13.7%, Nearly Met: 22.6%, Met: 34.0%, Exceeded: 29.7%)River Springs Charter School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All34%
- Males36%
- Females32%
- Black9%
- American Indian36%
- Asian57%
- Filipino31%
- Hispanic21%
- White33%
- Multirace34%
Math students tested: 3,252
Math students with scores: 3,250
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 34% |
State: | 38% |
Standard Not Met:
36.2%Standard Nearly Met:
30.1%Standard Met:
20.0%Standard Exceeded:
13.7%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2424.6, Students tested: 529, Standard Not Met: 28.4%, Nearly Met: 26.3%, Met: 27.3%, Exceeded: 18.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2461.3, Students tested: 541, Standard Not Met: 27.5%, Nearly Met: 32.0%, Met: 24.4%, Exceeded: 16.1%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2479.5, Students tested: 536, Standard Not Met: 38.4%, Nearly Met: 29.3%, Met: 18.1%, Exceeded: 14.2%)6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2496.9, Students tested: 517, Standard Not Met: 36.0%, Nearly Met: 33.9%, Met: 16.9%, Exceeded: 13.2%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2512.9, Students tested: 492, Standard Not Met: 36.8%, Nearly Met: 32.9%, Met: 18.1%, Exceeded: 12.2%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2522.6, Students tested: 424, Standard Not Met: 45.3%, Nearly Met: 27.4%, Met: 15.6%, Exceeded: 11.8%)11th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2539.3, Students tested: 213, Standard Not Met: 52.6%, Nearly Met: 26.8%, Met: 16.0%, Exceeded: 4.7%)River Springs Charter School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All46%
- Males42%
- Females50%
- Black26%
- Filipino46%
- Hispanic32%
- White45%
- Multirace50%
ELA students tested: 3,098
ELA students with scores: 3,093
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 46% |
State: | 48% |
Standard Not Met:
28.0%Standard Nearly Met:
26.0%Standard Met:
29.0%Standard Exceeded:
17.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2426.1, Students tested: 524, Standard Not Met: 28.0%, Nearly Met: 22.0%, Met: 23.0%, Exceeded: 27.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2447.3, Students tested: 521, Standard Not Met: 38.0%, Nearly Met: 21.0%, Met: 22.0%, Exceeded: 18.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2485.2, Students tested: 488, Standard Not Met: 35.0%, Nearly Met: 21.0%, Met: 27.0%, Exceeded: 17.0%)6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2509.0, Students tested: 500, Standard Not Met: 27.0%, Nearly Met: 33.0%, Met: 26.0%, Exceeded: 13.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2546.5, Students tested: 455, Standard Not Met: 23.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 36.0%, Exceeded: 13.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2557.2, Students tested: 402, Standard Not Met: 21.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 38.0%, Exceeded: 10.0%)11th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2611.0, Students tested: 208, Standard Not Met: 12.0%, Nearly Met: 25.0%, Met: 37.0%, Exceeded: 25.0%)River Springs Charter School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All31%
- Males33%
- Females28%
- Black14%
- Filipino38%
- Hispanic17%
- White28%
- Multirace38%
Math students tested: 3,094
Math students with scores: 3,091
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 31% |
California: | 37% |
Standard Not Met:
39.0%Standard Nearly Met:
30.0%Standard Met:
19.0%Standard Exceeded:
11.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2426.8, Students tested: 522, Standard Not Met: 27.0%, Nearly Met: 23.0%, Met: 31.0%, Exceeded: 18.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2447.4, Students tested: 522, Standard Not Met: 33.0%, Nearly Met: 34.0%, Met: 23.0%, Exceeded: 11.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2472.9, Students tested: 488, Standard Not Met: 44.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 15.0%, Exceeded: 13.0%)6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2486.4, Students tested: 500, Standard Not Met: 41.0%, Nearly Met: 32.0%, Met: 16.0%, Exceeded: 10.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2511.4, Students tested: 455, Standard Not Met: 34.0%, Nearly Met: 37.0%, Met: 20.0%, Exceeded: 9.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2508.2, Students tested: 400, Standard Not Met: 51.0%, Nearly Met: 30.0%, Met: 11.0%, Exceeded: 9.0%)11th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2528.7, Students tested: 207, Standard Not Met: 57.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 11.0%, Exceeded: 3.0%)River Springs Charter School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All42%
- Males36%
- Females47%
- Black22%
- American Indian42%
- Filipino47%
- Hispanic31%
- White35%
- Multirace48%
ELA students tested: 2,926
ELA students with scores: 2,918
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 42% |
California: | 44% |
Standard Not Met:
30.0%Standard Nearly Met:
28.0%Standard Met:
29.0%Standard Exceeded:
13.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2401.3, Students tested: 474, Standard Not Met: 35.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 22.0%, Exceeded: 15.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2439.4, Students tested: 474, Standard Not Met: 38.0%, Nearly Met: 25.0%, Met: 21.0%, Exceeded: 16.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2483.2, Students tested: 441, Standard Not Met: 34.0%, Nearly Met: 24.0%, Met: 30.0%, Exceeded: 12.0%)6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2509.5, Students tested: 440, Standard Not Met: 26.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 33.0%, Exceeded: 10.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2532.4, Students tested: 438, Standard Not Met: 29.0%, Nearly Met: 28.0%, Met: 35.0%, Exceeded: 8.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2553.2, Students tested: 438, Standard Not Met: 23.0%, Nearly Met: 34.0%, Met: 32.0%, Exceeded: 11.0%)11th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2587.7, Students tested: 221, Standard Not Met: 21.0%, Nearly Met: 28.0%, Met: 30.0%, Exceeded: 21.0%)River Springs Charter School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All28%
- Males29%
- Females27%
- Black8%
- American Indian8%
- Filipino29%
- Hispanic17%
- White25%
- Multirace32%
Math students tested: 2,921
Math students with scores: 2,911
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 28% |
California: | 34% |
Standard Not Met:
41.0%Standard Nearly Met:
31.0%Standard Met:
18.0%Standard Exceeded:
10.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2412.2, Students tested: 474, Standard Not Met: 32.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 27.0%, Exceeded: 12.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2444.2, Students tested: 473, Standard Not Met: 35.0%, Nearly Met: 36.0%, Met: 21.0%, Exceeded: 8.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2477.0, Students tested: 441, Standard Not Met: 41.0%, Nearly Met: 32.0%, Met: 16.0%, Exceeded: 11.0%)6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2488.3, Students tested: 437, Standard Not Met: 40.0%, Nearly Met: 33.0%, Met: 19.0%, Exceeded: 8.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2502.3, Students tested: 439, Standard Not Met: 45.0%, Nearly Met: 30.0%, Met: 16.0%, Exceeded: 9.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2511.6, Students tested: 438, Standard Not Met: 51.0%, Nearly Met: 26.0%, Met: 14.0%, Exceeded: 10.0%)11th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2538.6, Students tested: 219, Standard Not Met: 53.0%, Nearly Met: 26.0%, Met: 11.0%, Exceeded: 11.0%)River Springs Charter School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
California Alternate Assessments:
(State average from 1,579 schools)
The new California Alternate Assessments (CAAs) are based on alternate achievement standards-called the Core Content Connectors-and linked to the Common Core State Standards. The CAAs are online tests for students with an individualized education program (IEP) that designates the use of an alternate assessment to measure student progress on alternate achievement standards. This alternate assessment is part of the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System and replaces the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for English language arts and mathematics.
ELA Percentage Level 3
- All15%
- Males14%
- Females15%
ELA students tested: 27
ELA students with scores: 27
Percentage Level 3: | 15% |
State: | 15% |
Level 1:
40.7% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
44.4% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
14.8% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Math Percentage Level 3
- All7%
- Males7%
- Females8%
Math students tested: 27
Math students with scores: 27
Percentage Level 3: | 7% |
State: | 6% |
Level 1:
77.8% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
14.8% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
7.4% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
ELA students tested: 25
ELA students with scores: 25
Percentage Level 3: | 4% |
State: | 11% |
Level 1:
56.0% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
40.0% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
4.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Math students tested: 25
Math students with scores: 25
Percentage Level 3: | 0% |
State: | 5% |
Level 1:
80.0% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
20.0% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
0.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Paper-based CAASPP:
(State average from 9,784 schools)
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:
California Standards Tests (CSTs) - The CSTs for science in grades five, eight, and ten are administered only to students in California public schools. All questions are multiple-choice. These tests were developed specifically to assess students' knowledge of the California content standards in science.
California Modified Assessment (CMA) - The CMA for science was administered to eligible students in grades five, eight, and ten. The CMA is a standards-based test for students with an individualized education program who meet the eligibility criteria adopted by the State Board of Education. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act called for a range of assessments appropriate to students' abilities. The CMA provides an appropriate assessment for a small percentage of students allowing them to demonstrate their knowledge of skills in the California academic content standards for science.
CST Science students tested: 470
CST Science students with scores: 470
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 45% |
State: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
12.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
13.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
30.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
32.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
13.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 341.2, Students tested: 470, Far Below Basic: 12.0%, Below Basic: 13.0%, Basic: 30.0%, Proficient: 32.0%, Advanced: 13.0%)12.0%
13.0%
30.0%
32.0%
13.0%
CST Science students tested: 389
CST Science students with scores: 388
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 43% |
State: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
10.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
15.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
32.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
25.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
18.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 346.0, Students tested: 389, Far Below Basic: 10.0%, Below Basic: 15.0%, Basic: 32.0%, Proficient: 25.0%, Advanced: 18.0%)10.0%
15.0%
32.0%
25.0%
18.0%
CST Science students tested: 216
CST Science students with scores: 215
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 46% |
State: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
5.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
13.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
36.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
31.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
15.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.10th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 345.5, Students tested: 216, Far Below Basic: 5.0%, Below Basic: 13.0%, Basic: 36.0%, Proficient: 31.0%, Advanced: 15.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 18
CMA Science students with scores: 18
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 61% |
State: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
22.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
17.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
39.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
22.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 359.3, Students tested: 18, Far Below Basic: 0.0%, Below Basic: 22.0%, Basic: 17.0%, Proficient: 39.0%, Advanced: 22.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 13
CMA Science students with scores: 13
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 23% |
California: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
8.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
23.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
46.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
8.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
15.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 336.5, Students tested: 13, Far Below Basic: 8.0%, Below Basic: 23.0%, Basic: 46.0%, Proficient: 8.0%, Advanced: 15.0%) CST Science students tested: 425
CST Science students with scores: 424
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 47% |
State: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
9.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
10.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
34.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
35.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
13.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 347.4, Students tested: 425, Far Below Basic: 9.0%, Below Basic: 10.0%, Basic: 34.0%, Proficient: 35.0%, Advanced: 13.0%)
CST Science students tested: 423
CST Science students with scores: 423
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 47% |
State: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
10.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
16.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
27.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
28.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
18.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 347.2, Students tested: 423, Far Below Basic: 10.0%, Below Basic: 16.0%, Basic: 27.0%, Proficient: 28.0%, Advanced: 18.0%)10.0%
16.0%
27.0%
28.0%
18.0%
CST Science students tested: 236
CST Science students with scores: 236
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 46% |
California: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
5.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
15.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
34.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
27.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
19.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.10th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 347.8, Students tested: 236, Far Below Basic: 5.0%, Below Basic: 15.0%, Basic: 34.0%, Proficient: 27.0%, Advanced: 19.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 17
CMA Science students with scores: 17
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 47% |
State: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
6.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
6.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
41.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
24.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
24.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 351.6, Students tested: 17, Far Below Basic: 6.0%, Below Basic: 6.0%, Basic: 41.0%, Proficient: 24.0%, Advanced: 24.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 12
CMA Science students with scores: 11
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 45% |
State: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
10.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
27.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
18.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
36.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
9.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 340.1, Students tested: 12, Far Below Basic: 10.0%, Below Basic: 27.0%, Basic: 18.0%, Proficient: 36.0%, Advanced: 9.0%) CST Science students tested: 362
CST Science students with scores: 356
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 59% |
California: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
5.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
8.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
28.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
39.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
20.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 359.5, Students tested: 362, Far Below Basic: 5.0%, Below Basic: 8.0%, Basic: 28.0%, Proficient: 39.0%, Advanced: 20.0%)
CST Science students tested: 444
CST Science students with scores: 441
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 53% |
California: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
5.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
14.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
28.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
28.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
25.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 360.2, Students tested: 444, Far Below Basic: 5.0%, Below Basic: 14.0%, Basic: 28.0%, Proficient: 28.0%, Advanced: 25.0%)
CST Science students tested: 226
CST Science students with scores: 225
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 47% |
State: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
6.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
11.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
36.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
30.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
17.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.10th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 349.1, Students tested: 226, Far Below Basic: 6.0%, Below Basic: 11.0%, Basic: 36.0%, Proficient: 30.0%, Advanced: 17.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 15
CMA Science students with scores: 14
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 71% |
California: | 39% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
29.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
57.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
14.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 371.8, Students tested: 15, Far Below Basic: 0.0%, Below Basic: 0.0%, Basic: 29.0%, Proficient: 57.0%, Advanced: 14.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 17
CMA Science students with scores: 17
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 24% |
State: | 39% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
11.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
6.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
59.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
18.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
6.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 331.8, Students tested: 17, Far Below Basic: 11.0%, Below Basic: 6.0%, Basic: 59.0%, Proficient: 18.0%, Advanced: 6.0%) California High School Exit Exam:
(State average from 2,357 schools)
Beginning with the Class of 2006, students in California public schools were required to pass the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE) to demonstrate competency in grade-level skills in reading, writing, and mathematics to earn a high school diploma. The content of the CAHSEE was based on content standards in English-language arts and mathematics that were adopted by the State Board of Education (SBE) in 2003. In 2010, the SBE adopted the Common Core State Standards in English language arts and mathematics. The CAHSEE has been repealed. Assembly Bill 830 was chaptered into law by Governor Brown on October 10, 2017. This law eliminates the CAHSEE and removes it as a condition of receiving a diploma of graduation or a condition of graduation from high school.
River Springs Charter School - California High School Exit Exam results
2014-15 results for this school are based on 4 separate tests and combined using weighted average.Math Mean Scale Score
- All369
- Hispanic360
- Black381
- White376
Math Mean Scale Score: | 369 |
California: | 374 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 65% |
California: | 68% |
Math Number Tested: 386
Math Number Passed: 252
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 70% |
California: | 69% |
Number Sense: | 63% |
California: | 65% |
Algebra & Functions: | 66% |
State: | 68% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 62% |
California: | 64% |
Algebra 1: | 53% |
California: | 58% |
ELA Mean Scale Score
- All372
- Hispanic363
- Black399
- White381
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 372 |
California: | 370 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 71% |
California: | 68% |
ELA Number Tested: 346
ELA Number Passed: 247
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 79% |
State: | 76% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 71% |
California: | 71% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 77% |
State: | 75% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 64% |
State: | 64% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 71% |
State: | 69% |
2013-14 results for this school are based on 3 separate tests and combined using weighted average.Math Mean Scale Score
- All373
- Hispanic369
- White380
Math Mean Scale Score: | 373 |
California: | 375 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 69% |
California: | 68% |
Math Number Tested: 354
Math Number Passed: 243
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 72% |
State: | 70% |
Number Sense: | 67% |
State: | 68% |
Algebra & Functions: | 66% |
State: | 67% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 61% |
California: | 63% |
-
ELA Mean Scale Score
- All377
- Hispanic370
- White384
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 377 |
California: | 368 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 75% |
California: | 66% |
ELA Number Tested: 328
ELA Number Passed: 247
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 73% |
State: | 72% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 75% |
California: | 71% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 76% |
State: | 73% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 68% |
State: | 64% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 75% |
California: | 70% |
2012-13 results for this school are based on 5 separate tests and combined using weighted average.Math Mean Scale Score
- All369
- Hispanic369
- White372
Math Mean Scale Score: | 369 |
State: | 374 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 66% |
State: | 67% |
Math Number Tested: 426
Math Number Passed: 282
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 72% |
California: | 69% |
Number Sense: | 64% |
California: | 66% |
Algebra & Functions: | 65% |
State: | 68% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 61% |
State: | 62% |
-
ELA Mean Scale Score
- All377
- Hispanic360
- White381
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 377 |
California: | 369 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 76% |
State: | 65% |
ELA Number Tested: 380
ELA Number Passed: 290
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 80% |
California: | 74% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 75% |
California: | 71% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 76% |
California: | 72% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 68% |
State: | 64% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 72% |
California: | 68% |
2011-12 results for this school are based on 4 separate tests and combined using weighted average.Math Mean Scale Score
- All366
- Hispanic357
- White375
Math Mean Scale Score: | 366 |
California: | 373 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 66% |
State: | 67% |
Math Number Tested: 410
Math Number Passed: 270
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 71% |
State: | 69% |
Number Sense: | 62% |
California: | 65% |
Algebra & Functions: | 63% |
California: | 67% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 60% |
California: | 63% |
Algebra 1: | 50% |
California: | 57% |
ELA Mean Scale Score
- All369
- Hispanic365
- Black365
- White388
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 369 |
State: | 368 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 73% |
State: | 65% |
ELA Number Tested: 365
ELA Number Passed: 265
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 77% |
State: | 74% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 73% |
State: | 70% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 75% |
California: | 74% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 65% |
California: | 63% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 68% |
State: | 68% |
2010-11 results for this school are based on 5 separate tests and combined using weighted average.Math Mean Scale Score
- All362
- Hispanic355
- Black353
- White370
Math Mean Scale Score: | 362 |
California: | 370 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 60% |
State: | 64% |
Math Number Tested: 546
Math Number Passed: 330
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 65% |
California: | 68% |
Number Sense: | 59% |
California: | 66% |
Algebra & Functions: | 63% |
California: | 66% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 57% |
California: | 59% |
-
ELA Mean Scale Score
- All375
- Hispanic339
- Black359
- White384
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 375 |
State: | 369 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 72% |
California: | 65% |
ELA Number Tested: 450
ELA Number Passed: 325
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 77% |
California: | 72% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 74% |
State: | 70% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 75% |
State: | 72% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 70% |
State: | 66% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 71% |
California: | 67% |
2009-10 results for this school are based on 5 separate tests and combined using weighted average.Math Mean Scale Score
- All361
- Hispanic353
- White369
Math Mean Scale Score: | 361 |
State: | 370 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 58% |
State: | 63% |
Math Number Tested: 509
Math Number Passed: 296
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 66% |
California: | 68% |
Number Sense: | 63% |
California: | 65% |
Algebra & Functions: | 61% |
California: | 66% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 58% |
California: | 59% |
Algebra 1: | 46% |
California: | 52% |
ELA Mean Scale Score
- All364
- Hispanic349
- White382
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 364 |
California: | 366 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 69% |
State: | 63% |
ELA Number Tested: 441
ELA Number Passed: 306
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 77% |
State: | 70% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 69% |
State: | 70% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 75% |
California: | 71% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 63% |
State: | 60% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 68% |
State: | 68% |
2008-09 results for this school are based on 5 separate tests and combined using weighted average.Math Mean Scale Score
- All357
- Hispanic349
- Black355
- White365
Math Mean Scale Score: | 357 |
California: | 367 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 52% |
State: | 62% |
Math Number Tested: 457
Math Number Passed: 237
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 64% |
State: | 66% |
Number Sense: | 59% |
State: | 64% |
Algebra & Functions: | 59% |
California: | 64% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 55% |
State: | 59% |
-
ELA Mean Scale Score
- All357
- Hispanic344
- Black371
- White378
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 357 |
State: | 364 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 65% |
State: | 62% |
ELA Number Tested: 357
ELA Number Passed: 231
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 75% |
State: | 70% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 70% |
California: | 69% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 71% |
California: | 72% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 62% |
California: | 61% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 67% |
California: | 68% |
2007-08 results for this school are based on 5 separate tests and combined using weighted average.Math Mean Scale Score
- All353
- Hispanic340
- Black340
- White363
Math Mean Scale Score: | 353 |
California: | 366 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 47% |
State: | 60% |
Math Number Tested: 498
Math Number Passed: 232
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 61% |
State: | 65% |
Number Sense: | 56% |
California: | 63% |
Algebra & Functions: | 56% |
State: | 63% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 52% |
State: | 58% |
-
ELA Mean Scale Score
- All360
- Hispanic326
- Black230
- White377
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 360 |
California: | 363 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 62% |
California: | 61% |
ELA Number Tested: 413
ELA Number Passed: 257
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 71% |
California: | 73% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 70% |
State: | 69% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 73% |
California: | 71% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 58% |
State: | 58% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 69% |
State: | 69% |
2006-07 results for this school are based on 3 separate tests and combined using weighted average.Math Mean Scale Score
- All352
- Hispanic343
- Black354
- White363
Math Mean Scale Score: | 352 |
State: | 364 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 47% |
California: | 58% |
Math Number Tested: 405
Math Number Passed: 190
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 63% |
State: | 67% |
Number Sense: | 54% |
California: | 62% |
Algebra & Functions: | 56% |
State: | 62% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 52% |
California: | 58% |
-
ELA Mean Scale Score
- All362
- Hispanic349
- Black350
- White376
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 362 |
State: | 361 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 59% |
California: | 59% |
ELA Number Tested: 327
ELA Number Passed: 194
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 70% |
State: | 70% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 69% |
State: | 67% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 71% |
California: | 68% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 60% |
California: | 60% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 64% |
State: | 64% |
The Physical Fitness Test:
The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 467, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 56.5%, Needs Improvement: 32.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 11.2%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 430, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 35.3%, Needs Improvement: 28.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 36.3%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 196, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 17.9%, Needs Improvement: 22.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 59.7%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 467, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 69.4%, Needs Improvement: 18.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 12.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 430, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 68.8%, Needs Improvement: 17.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 14.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 196, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 71.4%, Needs Improvement: 17.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 11.3%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 467, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 74.7%, Needs Improvement: 25.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 430, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 74.0%, Needs Improvement: 26.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 196, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 61.2%, Needs Improvement: 38.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 467, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 90.6%, Needs Improvement: 9.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 430, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 93.5%, Needs Improvement: 6.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 196, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 85.2%, Needs Improvement: 14.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 467, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 70.7%, Needs Improvement: 29.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 430, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 71.9%, Needs Improvement: 28.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 196, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 55.1%, Needs Improvement: 44.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 467, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 77.1%, Needs Improvement: 22.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 430, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 80.0%, Needs Improvement: 20.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 196, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 78.6%, Needs Improvement: 21.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 440, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 49.3%, Needs Improvement: 37.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 13.2%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 414, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 38.9%, Needs Improvement: 28.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 32.4%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 196, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 23.0%, Needs Improvement: 27.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 50.0%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 440, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 66.8%, Needs Improvement: 19.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 13.4%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 414, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 62.1%, Needs Improvement: 20.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 17.4%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 196, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 54.6%, Needs Improvement: 28.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 17.3%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 440, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 77.7%, Needs Improvement: 22.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 414, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 70.3%, Needs Improvement: 29.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 196, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 71.4%, Needs Improvement: 28.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 440, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 85.2%, Needs Improvement: 14.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 414, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 89.1%, Needs Improvement: 10.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 196, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 91.8%, Needs Improvement: 8.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 440, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 65.9%, Needs Improvement: 34.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 414, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 60.9%, Needs Improvement: 39.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 196, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.0%, Needs Improvement: 48.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 440, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 74.8%, Needs Improvement: 25.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 414, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 77.1%, Needs Improvement: 22.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 196, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 81.6%, Needs Improvement: 18.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 394, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 43.1%, Needs Improvement: 38.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 18.6%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 366, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 51.4%, Needs Improvement: 23.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 24.8%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 209, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 17.2%, Needs Improvement: 19.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 63.7%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 394, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 70.8%, Needs Improvement: 16.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 13.2%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 366, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 68.6%, Needs Improvement: 18.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 13.4%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 209, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 57.9%, Needs Improvement: 19.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 22.5%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 394, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 78.9%, Needs Improvement: 21.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 366, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 83.1%, Needs Improvement: 16.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 209, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 76.6%, Needs Improvement: 23.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 394, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 87.6%, Needs Improvement: 12.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 366, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 88.3%, Needs Improvement: 11.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 209, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 84.7%, Needs Improvement: 15.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 394, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.4%, Needs Improvement: 24.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 366, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 66.9%, Needs Improvement: 33.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 209, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 66.5%, Needs Improvement: 33.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 394, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 76.9%, Needs Improvement: 23.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 366, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 80.9%, Needs Improvement: 19.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 209, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 78.0%, Needs Improvement: 22.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 340, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.9%, Needs Improvement: 38.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 8.3%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 405, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 40.5%, Needs Improvement: 28.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 30.9%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 198, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 15.7%, Needs Improvement: 18.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 66.1%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 340, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 69.7%, Needs Improvement: 17.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 12.4%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 405, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 72.1%, Needs Improvement: 12.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 15.1%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 198, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 62.6%, Needs Improvement: 12.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 25.3%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 340, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 78.8%, Needs Improvement: 21.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 405, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 79.3%, Needs Improvement: 20.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 198, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.8%, Needs Improvement: 24.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 340, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 84.7%, Needs Improvement: 15.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 405, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 84.2%, Needs Improvement: 15.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 198, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 89.9%, Needs Improvement: 10.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 340, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.6%, Needs Improvement: 24.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 405, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 70.4%, Needs Improvement: 29.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 198, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 65.7%, Needs Improvement: 34.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 340, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 77.1%, Needs Improvement: 22.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 405, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 81.0%, Needs Improvement: 19.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 198, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 77.8%, Needs Improvement: 22.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 383, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 77.8%, Needs Improvement: 15.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 6.3%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 496, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 71.0%, Needs Improvement: 16.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 12.9%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 241, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 54.8%, Needs Improvement: 23.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 22.0%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 383, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 63.4%, Needs Improvement: 13.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 23.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 496, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 60.7%, Needs Improvement: 12.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 26.4%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 241, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 56.8%, Needs Improvement: 12.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 31.2%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 383, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 86.9%, Needs Improvement: 13.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 496, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 85.5%, Needs Improvement: 14.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 241, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 77.2%, Needs Improvement: 22.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 383, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 91.6%, Needs Improvement: 8.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 496, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 94.4%, Needs Improvement: 5.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 241, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 90.0%, Needs Improvement: 10.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 383, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 78.6%, Needs Improvement: 21.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 496, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.6%, Needs Improvement: 24.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 241, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 72.2%, Needs Improvement: 27.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 383, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 77.5%, Needs Improvement: 22.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 496, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 78.4%, Needs Improvement: 21.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 241, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.5%, Needs Improvement: 24.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 384, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 80.2%, Needs Improvement: 12.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 7.6%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 502, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 66.7%, Needs Improvement: 21.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 11.4%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 284, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 54.9%, Needs Improvement: 25.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 19.7%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 384, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 64.3%, Needs Improvement: 10.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 25.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 502, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 64.5%, Needs Improvement: 9.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 25.7%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 284, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 54.9%, Needs Improvement: 13.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 32.1%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 384, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 89.1%, Needs Improvement: 10.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 502, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 81.7%, Needs Improvement: 18.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 284, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 86.6%, Needs Improvement: 13.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 384, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.6%, Needs Improvement: 3.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 502, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 94.2%, Needs Improvement: 5.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 284, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 94.4%, Needs Improvement: 5.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 384, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 87.5%, Needs Improvement: 12.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 502, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 80.9%, Needs Improvement: 19.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 284, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.0%, Needs Improvement: 25.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 384, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.3%, Needs Improvement: 24.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 502, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 79.3%, Needs Improvement: 20.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 284, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 77.5%, Needs Improvement: 22.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
California English Language Development Test:
(State average from 9,932 schools)
Students in kindergarten through grade twelve whose home language is not English are required by law to take an English skills test. In California, the test is called the California English Language Development Test (CELDT).
River Springs Charter School - students who met CELDT criterion (all grades)
All Grades:Student Count: 291
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 145
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 50.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 36
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 18
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 50.0% |
California: | 13.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 436.6 |
State: | 364.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 321.1 |
State: | 276.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 458.3 |
California: | 375.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 272.7 |
California: | 286.0 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 23
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 65.0% |
State: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 469.7 |
California: | 439.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 405.1 |
California: | 383.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 472.4 |
California: | 446.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 342.7 |
California: | 386.5 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 23
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 10
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 43.0% |
California: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 528.4 |
California: | 477.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 430.1 |
California: | 440.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 562.4 |
California: | 483.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 447.4 |
California: | 456.4 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 37
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 16
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 43.0% |
California: | 26.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 468.4 |
California: | 475.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 461.6 |
State: | 459.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 561.8 |
State: | 491.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 459.4 |
California: | 478.6 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 28
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 11
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 39.0% |
California: | 37.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 481.5 |
California: | 509.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 466.5 |
California: | 490.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 613.1 |
State: | 515.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 472.8 |
State: | 502.2 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 27
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 12
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 44.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 524.4 |
California: | 533.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 508.7 |
California: | 514.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 594.2 |
State: | 530.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 514.8 |
California: | 519.1 |
Grade 6:Student Count: 31
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 48.0% |
California: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 550.0 |
California: | 532.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 535.2 |
California: | 518.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 602.0 |
State: | 518.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 538.1 |
State: | 522.0 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 26
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 9
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 510.1 |
California: | 547.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 522.2 |
State: | 534.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 613.7 |
State: | 529.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 523.4 |
State: | 530.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 18
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 83.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 615.1 |
California: | 556.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 599.9 |
State: | 547.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 641.9 |
State: | 536.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 590.2 |
State: | 537.0 |
Grade 9:Student Count: 14
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 8
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 57.0% |
California: | 33.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 547.1 |
California: | 533.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 567.1 |
State: | 534.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 629.6 |
California: | 515.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 537.3 |
California: | 513.2 |
Grade 10:Student Count: 12
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 6
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 50.0% |
State: | 36.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 571.6 |
State: | 556.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 592.5 |
California: | 555.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 575.7 |
State: | 533.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 547.2 |
California: | 530.8 |
Grade 11:Student Count: 6
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 4
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 67.0% |
California: | 45.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 641.8 |
State: | 575.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 635.8 |
State: | 573.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 670.2 |
State: | 550.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 596.0 |
State: | 544.5 |
Grade 12:Student Count: 10
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 6
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 60.0% |
State: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 584.4 |
California: | 564.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 612.9 |
California: | 567.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 636.1 |
California: | 544.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 571.6 |
State: | 532.5 |
All Grades:Student Count: 305
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 191
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 63.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 40
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 21
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 53.0% |
California: | 13.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 443.7 |
State: | 365.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 347.2 |
State: | 279.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 492.1 |
State: | 374.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 297.0 |
California: | 285.8 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 31
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 29
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 94.0% |
State: | 42.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 504.4 |
California: | 437.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 472.2 |
State: | 382.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 581.0 |
California: | 443.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 358.9 |
State: | 383.8 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 33
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 45.0% |
California: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 533.3 |
State: | 478.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 452.7 |
California: | 441.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 583.0 |
State: | 482.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 436.9 |
State: | 458.7 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 30
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 11
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 37.0% |
California: | 26.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 491.8 |
California: | 475.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 455.5 |
California: | 461.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 630.7 |
State: | 493.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 474.9 |
State: | 479.8 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 29
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 11
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 38.0% |
California: | 37.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 506.9 |
California: | 511.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 471.2 |
California: | 494.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 621.2 |
State: | 515.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 491.6 |
State: | 504.8 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 26
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 17
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 65.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 558.7 |
State: | 533.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 524.5 |
California: | 515.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 685.3 |
California: | 527.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 524.7 |
State: | 519.3 |
Grade 6:Student Count: 27
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 18
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 67.0% |
California: | 41.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 576.3 |
State: | 536.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 557.1 |
State: | 523.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 665.1 |
California: | 520.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 541.8 |
State: | 524.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 22
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 19
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 86.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 592.4 |
State: | 550.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 581.2 |
California: | 536.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 665.2 |
California: | 530.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 558.6 |
State: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 20
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 17
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 85.0% |
California: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 615.6 |
California: | 562.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 600.6 |
State: | 552.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 699.1 |
California: | 539.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 575.6 |
California: | 541.2 |
Grade 9:Student Count: 17
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 12
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 71.0% |
California: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 596.1 |
State: | 543.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 579.0 |
State: | 541.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 712.8 |
State: | 524.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 579.6 |
State: | 521.2 |
Grade 10:Student Count: 12
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 9
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 75.0% |
California: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 679.3 |
State: | 565.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 629.6 |
California: | 563.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 740.0 |
California: | 541.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 594.3 |
California: | 537.7 |
Grade 11:Student Count: 10
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 7
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 70.0% |
California: | 45.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 627.0 |
State: | 577.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 609.1 |
State: | 577.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 676.1 |
California: | 552.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 562.7 |
California: | 546.3 |
Grade 12:Student Count: 8
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 63.0% |
California: | 43.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 651.6 |
State: | 566.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 615.9 |
California: | 570.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 642.3 |
State: | 548.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 572.3 |
California: | 536.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 276
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 182
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 66.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 31
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 21
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 68.0% |
California: | 12.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 452.4 |
California: | 362.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 306.6 |
State: | 277.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 524.1 |
California: | 373.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 280.6 |
California: | 289.5 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 33
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 29
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 88.0% |
State: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 510.5 |
California: | 434.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 434.0 |
California: | 380.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 545.1 |
California: | 443.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 392.7 |
California: | 386.6 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 27
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 56.0% |
State: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 537.1 |
State: | 477.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 484.3 |
State: | 442.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 584.1 |
California: | 483.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 484.5 |
California: | 459.9 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 26
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 9
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
California: | 28.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 486.7 |
State: | 478.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 443.5 |
California: | 464.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 586.1 |
California: | 494.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 482.9 |
State: | 486.2 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 25
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 52.0% |
California: | 36.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 515.5 |
State: | 509.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 489.3 |
State: | 494.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 649.5 |
State: | 515.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 502.7 |
California: | 505.6 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 20
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 75.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 537.5 |
California: | 535.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 534.7 |
California: | 519.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 656.9 |
California: | 532.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 538.2 |
State: | 523.7 |
Grade 6:Student Count: 20
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 14
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 70.0% |
California: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 589.7 |
State: | 535.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 556.0 |
California: | 521.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 680.6 |
State: | 519.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 548.6 |
California: | 522.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 21
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 16
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 76.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 577.6 |
California: | 551.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 569.0 |
California: | 538.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 698.0 |
State: | 532.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 562.8 |
California: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 16
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 81.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 619.6 |
State: | 562.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 598.1 |
State: | 552.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 688.2 |
California: | 543.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 592.2 |
California: | 541.5 |
Grade 9:Student Count: 15
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 87.0% |
California: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 616.5 |
California: | 551.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 611.9 |
California: | 549.3 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 680.7 |
California: | 530.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 578.1 |
State: | 536.5 |
Grade 10:Student Count: 17
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 8
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 47.0% |
State: | 41.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 613.3 |
State: | 571.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 603.0 |
State: | 568.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 681.4 |
California: | 547.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 567.8 |
California: | 549.3 |
Grade 11:Student Count: 15
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 11
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 73.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 610.8 |
California: | 585.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 634.7 |
State: | 581.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 682.5 |
State: | 559.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 605.1 |
State: | 558.0 |
Grade 12:Student Count: 10
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 50.0% |
State: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 614.7 |
State: | 584.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 584.9 |
California: | 579.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 643.2 |
State: | 559.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 549.6 |
California: | 552.4 |
All Grades:Student Count: 256
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 137
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 54.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 42
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 18
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 43.0% |
State: | 11.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 409.4 |
California: | 358.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 303.5 |
State: | 275.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 449.4 |
California: | 365.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 289.2 |
California: | 285.3 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 32
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 24
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 75.0% |
California: | 37.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 477.7 |
California: | 432.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 392.3 |
California: | 380.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 524.1 |
California: | 438.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 349.0 |
State: | 383.8 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 19
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 26.0% |
California: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 511.6 |
California: | 476.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 387.8 |
California: | 444.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 534.5 |
California: | 481.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 472.1 |
California: | 461.7 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 20
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 25.0% |
California: | 29.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 482.7 |
California: | 478.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 467.4 |
California: | 470.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 589.0 |
State: | 494.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 465.2 |
State: | 487.2 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 23
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 12
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 52.0% |
State: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 549.8 |
California: | 512.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 496.0 |
California: | 499.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 642.0 |
California: | 514.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 504.5 |
California: | 509.1 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 19
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 68.0% |
California: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 559.4 |
California: | 534.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 535.3 |
California: | 521.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 669.1 |
California: | 531.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 535.6 |
State: | 525.0 |
Grade 6:Student Count: 26
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 14
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 54.0% |
State: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 563.5 |
California: | 538.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 532.0 |
State: | 525.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 626.8 |
State: | 522.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 534.2 |
California: | 526.2 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 16
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 11
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 69.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 580.0 |
California: | 549.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 551.3 |
California: | 538.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 676.3 |
California: | 533.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 568.7 |
State: | 535.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 20
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 65.0% |
California: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 596.9 |
California: | 564.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 549.1 |
State: | 554.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 658.0 |
State: | 545.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 560.6 |
State: | 545.9 |
Grade 9:Student Count: 10
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 4
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 40.0% |
California: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 612.2 |
State: | 555.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 568.8 |
California: | 551.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 668.6 |
California: | 536.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 548.9 |
State: | 541.1 |
Grade 10:Student Count: 14
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 9
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 64.0% |
California: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 613.3 |
State: | 572.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 601.9 |
State: | 567.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 653.5 |
California: | 549.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 580.5 |
State: | 552.1 |
Grade 11:Student Count: 9
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 56.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 588.4 |
State: | 589.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 599.7 |
California: | 582.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 623.0 |
California: | 562.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 581.4 |
California: | 562.9 |
Grade 12:Student Count: 6
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 4
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 67.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 650.8 |
State: | 589.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 620.3 |
California: | 582.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 645.8 |
State: | 563.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 602.8 |
California: | 557.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 193
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 91
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 47.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 34
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 19
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 56.0% |
California: | 9.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 468.3 |
California: | 359.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 366.1 |
State: | 301.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 497.1 |
State: | 351.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 373.1 |
California: | 347.9 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 23
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 65.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 488.6 |
State: | 428.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 408.1 |
California: | 393.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 487.5 |
State: | 429.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 394.9 |
California: | 405.0 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 15
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 1
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 7.0% |
State: | 28.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 507.8 |
State: | 483.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 463.7 |
State: | 444.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 541.8 |
State: | 477.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 440.3 |
State: | 468.9 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 17
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 6
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
State: | 30.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 496.1 |
State: | 482.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 487.9 |
State: | 482.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 556.9 |
State: | 483.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 492.4 |
State: | 496.8 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 17
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 10
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 59.0% |
California: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 558.9 |
California: | 511.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 528.6 |
California: | 506.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 614.5 |
California: | 501.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 523.1 |
State: | 514.3 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 13
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 4
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 31.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 506.8 |
State: | 537.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 491.9 |
California: | 528.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 546.8 |
State: | 517.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 489.9 |
State: | 531.8 |
Grade 6:Student Count: 7
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 6
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 86.0% |
State: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 576.7 |
State: | 538.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 560.9 |
California: | 525.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 669.0 |
State: | 530.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 555.6 |
California: | 530.3 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 17
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 8
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 47.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 575.8 |
State: | 557.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 516.2 |
California: | 539.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 617.4 |
State: | 543.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 546.1 |
California: | 540.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 18
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 10
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 56.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 591.0 |
State: | 570.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 565.7 |
State: | 552.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 649.0 |
California: | 551.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 548.1 |
State: | 548.6 |
Grade 9:Student Count: 8
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 1
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 13.0% |
California: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 564.1 |
California: | 557.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 501.5 |
State: | 553.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 600.8 |
California: | 546.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 548.9 |
State: | 551.0 |
Grade 10:Student Count: 11
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 4
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
California: | 41.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 584.6 |
California: | 577.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 569.5 |
State: | 568.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 627.9 |
State: | 558.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 557.1 |
State: | 561.0 |
Grade 11:Student Count: 8
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 63.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 646.5 |
State: | 592.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 594.0 |
State: | 582.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 642.6 |
California: | 568.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 608.3 |
California: | 569.2 |
Grade 12:Student Count: 5
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 2
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 40.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 599.4 |
State: | 590.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 605.4 |
California: | 581.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 639.4 |
State: | 565.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 567.8 |
California: | 562.3 |
All Grades:Student Count: 178
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 64
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 32
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 10
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 31.0% |
California: | 9.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 427.0 |
State: | 358.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 323.6 |
State: | 299.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 444.3 |
California: | 357.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 360.9 |
State: | 350.9 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 21
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 9
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 43.0% |
California: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 453.0 |
State: | 428.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 358.0 |
State: | 391.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 449.0 |
State: | 434.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 388.2 |
California: | 405.5 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 22
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 23.0% |
California: | 25.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 499.3 |
California: | 478.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 443.3 |
State: | 442.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 531.0 |
California: | 478.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 446.0 |
California: | 465.8 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 18
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 28.0% |
State: | 32.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 490.4 |
State: | 493.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 479.7 |
California: | 482.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 529.9 |
State: | 486.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 498.8 |
California: | 494.3 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 13
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 2
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 15.0% |
California: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 494.4 |
State: | 522.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 494.0 |
California: | 510.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 537.6 |
California: | 505.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 494.8 |
State: | 512.8 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 6
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 3
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 50.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 534.8 |
California: | 544.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 542.5 |
California: | 531.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 580.0 |
State: | 519.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 535.5 |
State: | 527.0 |
Grade 6:Student Count: 12
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 4
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
California: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 545.1 |
State: | 551.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 528.2 |
California: | 532.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 569.9 |
California: | 532.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 524.3 |
California: | 534.7 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 16
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 8
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 50.0% |
State: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 589.3 |
State: | 566.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 531.1 |
California: | 544.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 635.6 |
California: | 543.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 536.9 |
State: | 545.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 11
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 45.0% |
State: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 565.7 |
State: | 579.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 565.4 |
California: | 558.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 591.5 |
California: | 553.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 559.3 |
California: | 555.6 |
Grade 9:Student Count: 11
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 45.0% |
California: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 578.9 |
State: | 557.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 575.0 |
State: | 554.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 643.5 |
State: | 554.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 565.1 |
California: | 549.3 |
Grade 10:Student Count: 9
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 56.0% |
State: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 583.8 |
State: | 575.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 574.7 |
State: | 568.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 638.0 |
State: | 564.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 596.4 |
State: | 557.8 |
Grade 12:Student Count: 4
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 3
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 75.0% |
State: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 635.0 |
State: | 590.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 639.0 |
California: | 582.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 648.8 |
California: | 577.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 600.0 |
California: | 559.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 131
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 67
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 51.0% |
California: | 31.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 23
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 57.0% |
California: | 8.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 456.9 |
State: | 348.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 339.8 |
California: | 294.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 472.0 |
State: | 345.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 357.8 |
State: | 337.4 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 17
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 88.0% |
California: | 32.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 485.2 |
State: | 423.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 385.6 |
State: | 389.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 541.6 |
State: | 431.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 399.2 |
California: | 402.3 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 7
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 2
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 29.0% |
State: | 24.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 485.9 |
California: | 466.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 467.4 |
California: | 440.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 574.6 |
California: | 484.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 467.3 |
State: | 452.2 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 6
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 4
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 67.0% |
California: | 25.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 534.3 |
California: | 468.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 487.8 |
California: | 471.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 590.5 |
State: | 486.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 492.2 |
State: | 484.8 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 6
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 2
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
California: | 33.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 527.8 |
State: | 504.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 515.8 |
State: | 503.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 602.8 |
State: | 505.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 518.5 |
California: | 506.6 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 10
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 3
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 30.0% |
California: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 509.7 |
State: | 528.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 510.3 |
State: | 526.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 558.1 |
State: | 517.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 486.9 |
California: | 524.0 |
Grade 6:Student Count: 13
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 6
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 46.0% |
California: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 525.7 |
California: | 546.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 518.6 |
State: | 529.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 601.5 |
State: | 533.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 498.7 |
California: | 525.3 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 9
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 3
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 595.7 |
State: | 559.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 562.1 |
California: | 542.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 673.1 |
California: | 548.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 535.6 |
California: | 534.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 11
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 1
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 9.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 530.0 |
California: | 570.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 556.5 |
California: | 557.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 597.2 |
California: | 562.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 533.3 |
State: | 544.1 |
Grade 9:Student Count: 14
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 6
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 43.0% |
State: | 33.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 575.4 |
California: | 546.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 572.5 |
California: | 551.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 657.5 |
State: | 550.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 563.6 |
State: | 544.5 |
Grade 10:Student Count: 5
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 3
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 60.0% |
California: | 32.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 629.2 |
State: | 560.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 588.2 |
California: | 565.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 740.0 |
California: | 559.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 590.8 |
California: | 550.5 |
Grade 11:Student Count: 5
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 4
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 80.0% |
California: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 645.4 |
State: | 575.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 648.0 |
California: | 579.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 629.2 |
State: | 570.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 626.4 |
California: | 557.7 |
Grade 12:Student Count: 5
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 100.0% |
State: | 43.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 688.2 |
California: | 576.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 635.6 |
California: | 581.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 705.6 |
State: | 573.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 556.4 |
California: | 554.0 |
Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
River Springs Charter School - Adequate Yearly Progress status
ELA Participation RateRiver Springs Charter School: | 96.0% |
California: | 96.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic96
- American Indian100
- Asian98
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black95
- White96
- Multirace98
- SED96
- LEP99
- With Disabilities97
- Hispanic: 96% (tested 1,143 out of 1,190 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 28 out of 28 enrolled)
- Asian: 98% (tested 43 out of 44 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 42 out of 42 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Black: 95% (tested 147 out of 154 enrolled)
- White: 96% (tested 1,485 out of 1,544 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 98% (tested 197 out of 202 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 96% (tested 1,410 out of 1,462 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 199 out of 202 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 97% (tested 465 out of 479 enrolled)
Math Participation RateSchool: | 96.0% |
California: | 96.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic96
- American Indian100
- Asian98
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black96
- White96
- Multirace97
- SED96
- LEP99
- With Disabilities97
- Hispanic: 96% (tested 1,141 out of 1,190 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 28 out of 28 enrolled)
- Asian: 98% (tested 43 out of 44 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 42 out of 42 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Black: 96% (tested 148 out of 154 enrolled)
- White: 96% (tested 1,485 out of 1,544 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 97% (tested 196 out of 202 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 96% (tested 1,407 out of 1,461 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 200 out of 202 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 97% (tested 464 out of 479 enrolled)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 18
Number of AYP criteria possible: 18
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
Graduation RateHere: | 79.3% |
California: | 85.0% |
Graduation Target Rate: 82.1
Met Schoolwide Graduation: Yes
Met Student Group Graduation Rates: Yes
Met Graduation Rate: Yes
(Note: To meet this criteria the graduation rate must be met at the schoolwide level and for all numerically significant student groups.)Attendance rate (calculated by using average daily attendance data) : 100
Met Attendance rate Target: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic97
- American Indian100
- Asian98
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black99
- White95
- Multirace96
- SED96
- LEP98
- With Disabilities94
- Hispanic: 97% (tested 1,105 out of 1,136 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 25 out of 25 enrolled)
- Asian: 98% (tested 36 out of 37 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 37 out of 37 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Black: 99% (tested 116 out of 117 enrolled)
- White: 95% (tested 1,379 out of 1,447 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 96% (tested 214 out of 222 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 96% (tested 1,372 out of 1,423 enrolled)
- English Learners: 98% (tested 172 out of 176 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 94% (tested 407 out of 433 enrolled)
- Hispanic: Yes
- Black: Yes
- White: Yes
- Two or More Races: Yes
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic36
- American Indian39
- Asian65
- Filipino54
- Black28
- White47
- Multirace56
- SED34
- LEP20
- With Disabilities16
- Hispanic: 36% (350 out of 987 valid scores)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 39% (9 out of 23 valid scores)
- Asian: 65% (22 out of 34 valid scores)
- Filipino: 54% (19 out of 35 valid scores)
- Black: 28% (28 out of 102 valid scores)
- White: 47% (598 out of 1,270 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 56% (107 out of 192 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 34% (420 out of 1,222 valid scores)
- English Learners: 20% (30 out of 147 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 16% (57 out of 352 valid scores)
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Math Participation RateRiver Springs Charter School: | 96.0% |
California: | 94.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic97
- American Indian96
- Asian98
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black99
- White95
- Multirace96
- SED96
- LEP98
- With Disabilities94
- Hispanic: 97% (tested 1,105 out of 1,137 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 96% (tested 24 out of 25 enrolled)
- Asian: 98% (tested 36 out of 37 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 37 out of 37 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Black: 99% (tested 116 out of 117 enrolled)
- White: 95% (tested 1,379 out of 1,448 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 96% (tested 213 out of 222 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 96% (tested 1,372 out of 1,424 enrolled)
- English Learners: 98% (tested 173 out of 177 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 94% (tested 406 out of 433 enrolled)
- Hispanic: Yes
- Black: Yes
- White: Yes
- Two or More Races: Yes
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic22
- American Indian22
- Asian62
- Filipino49
- Black14
- White33
- Multirace42
- SED22
- LEP13
- With Disabilities13
- Hispanic: 22% (216 out of 989 valid scores)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 22% (5 out of 23 valid scores)
- Asian: 62% (21 out of 34 valid scores)
- Filipino: 49% (17 out of 35 valid scores)
- Black: 14% (14 out of 102 valid scores)
- White: 33% (420 out of 1,270 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 42% (80 out of 191 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 22% (267 out of 1,222 valid scores)
- English Learners: 13% (19 out of 148 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 13% (44 out of 351 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 23
Number of AYP criteria possible: 32
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
Graduation RateRiver Springs Charter School: | 71.6% |
California: | 80.7% |
Graduation Target Rate: 78.2
Met Schoolwide Graduation: Yes
Met Student Group Graduation Rates: No
Met Graduation Rate: No
(Note: To meet this criteria the graduation rate must be met at the schoolwide level and for all numerically significant student groups.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 89.2%
ELA Participation RateRiver Springs Charter School: | 98.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian97
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White98
- Multirace99
- SED99
- LEP98
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,279 out of 1,294 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 97% (tested 27 out of 28 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 50 out of 50 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 48 out of 48 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 104 out of 104 enrolled)
- White: 98% (tested 1,975 out of 2,024 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 99% (tested 259 out of 262 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,534 out of 1,557 enrolled)
- English Learners: 98% (tested 170 out of 173 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 374 out of 383 enrolled)
- Hispanic: Yes
- Black: Yes
- White: Yes
- Two or More Races: Yes
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveRiver Springs Charter School: | 56.0% |
State: | 55.7% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic47
- American Indian52
- Asian79
- Filipino80
- Black41
- White61
- Multirace63
- SED44
- LEP16
- With Disabilities34
- Hispanic: 47% (535 out of 1,140 valid scores)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 52% (13 out of 25 valid scores)
- Asian: 79% (34 out of 43 valid scores)
- Filipino: 80% (36 out of 45 valid scores)
- Black: 41% (37 out of 91 valid scores)
- White: 61% (1,076 out of 1,770 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 63% (143 out of 228 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 44% (588 out of 1,328 valid scores)
- English Learners: 16% (25 out of 158 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 34% (115 out of 339 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 89.5%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian97
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White98
- Multirace98
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,286 out of 1,294 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 97% (tested 27 out of 28 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 50 out of 50 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 48 out of 48 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 104 out of 104 enrolled)
- White: 98% (tested 1,982 out of 2,025 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 98% (tested 258 out of 262 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,540 out of 1,557 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 171 out of 172 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 380 out of 384 enrolled)
- Hispanic: Yes
- Black: Yes
- White: Yes
- Two or More Races: Yes
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 53.1% |
California: | 59.6% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic47
- American Indian40
- Asian77
- Filipino78
- Black40
- White57
- Multirace59
- SED43
- LEP25
- With Disabilities34
- Hispanic: 47% (533 out of 1,146 valid scores)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 40% (10 out of 25 valid scores)
- Asian: 77% (33 out of 43 valid scores)
- Filipino: 78% (35 out of 45 valid scores)
- Black: 40% (36 out of 91 valid scores)
- White: 57% (1,003 out of 1,775 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 59% (133 out of 227 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 43% (570 out of 1,333 valid scores)
- English Learners: 25% (40 out of 159 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 34% (117 out of 343 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 27
Number of AYP criteria possible: 32
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
Graduation RateRiver Springs Charter School: | 79.2% |
State: | 79.4% |
Graduation Target Rate: 76.2
Met Graduation Rate: Yes
(Note: To meet this criteria the graduation rate must be met at the schoolwide level and for all numerically significant student groups.)
ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 78.4%
ELA Participation RateRiver Springs Charter School: | 99.0% |
State: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian78
- Black98
- White98
- Multirace97
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,235 out of 1,245 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 15 out of 15 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 41 out of 41 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 38 out of 38 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 78% (tested 7 out of 9 enrolled)
- Black: 98% (tested 109 out of 111 enrolled)
- White: 98% (tested 1,857 out of 1,889 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 97% (tested 234 out of 241 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,401 out of 1,421 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 122 out of 123 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 388 out of 397 enrolled)
- Hispanic: Yes
- Black: Yes
- White: Yes
- Two or More Races: Yes
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 56.3% |
California: | 57.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic46
- American Indian60
- Asian84
- Filipino60
- Black54
- White63
- Multirace59
- SED48
- LEP21
- With Disabilities36
- Hispanic: 46% (505 out of 1,107 valid scores)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 60% (9 out of 15 valid scores)
- Asian: 84% (31 out of 37 valid scores)
- Filipino: 60% (21 out of 35 valid scores)
- Black: 54% (45 out of 84 valid scores)
- White: 63% (1,041 out of 1,665 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 59% (116 out of 197 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 48% (584 out of 1,230 valid scores)
- English Learners: 21% (23 out of 108 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 36% (123 out of 338 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 79%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino98
- Native Hawaiian67
- Black95
- White98
- Multirace97
- SED98
- LEP98
- With Disabilities97
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,228 out of 1,243 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 15 out of 15 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 41 out of 41 enrolled)
- Filipino: 98% (tested 37 out of 38 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 67% (tested 6 out of 9 enrolled)
- Black: 95% (tested 105 out of 110 enrolled)
- White: 98% (tested 1,858 out of 1,888 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 97% (tested 233 out of 241 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 98% (tested 1,398 out of 1,420 enrolled)
- English Learners: 98% (tested 121 out of 123 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 97% (tested 387 out of 397 enrolled)
- Hispanic: Yes
- Black: Yes
- White: Yes
- Two or More Races: Yes
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic34
- American Indian27
- Asian84
- Filipino56
- Black33
- White46
- Multirace42
- SED33
- LEP18
- With Disabilities25
- Hispanic: 34% (378 out of 1,099 valid scores)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 27% (4 out of 15 valid scores)
- Asian: 84% (31 out of 37 valid scores)
- Filipino: 56% (19 out of 34 valid scores)
- Black: 33% (27 out of 82 valid scores)
- White: 46% (771 out of 1,663 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 42% (83 out of 196 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 33% (401 out of 1,228 valid scores)
- English Learners: 18% (19 out of 107 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 25% (85 out of 335 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 19
Number of AYP criteria possible: 28
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
Graduation RateHere: | 73.7% |
California: | 86.4% |
Graduation Target Rate: 77.1
Met Graduation Rate: No
(Note: To meet this criteria the graduation rate must be met at the schoolwide level and for all numerically significant student groups.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 67.6%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian98
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black98
- White98
- Multirace99
- SED99
- LEP97
- With Disabilities97
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,109 out of 1,122 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 17 out of 17 enrolled)
- Asian: 98% (tested 33 out of 34 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 29 out of 29 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Black: 98% (tested 102 out of 104 enrolled)
- White: 98% (tested 1,711 out of 1,740 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 99% (tested 206 out of 208 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,215 out of 1,233 enrolled)
- English Learners: 97% (tested 89 out of 92 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 97% (tested 301 out of 311 enrolled)
- Hispanic: Yes
- Black: Yes
- White: Yes
- Two or More Races: Yes
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveRiver Springs Charter School: | 51.6% |
California: | 55.9% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic39
- American Indian53
- Asian85
- Filipino75
- Black41
- White59
- Multirace54
- SED41
- LEP16
- With Disabilities27
- Hispanic: 39% (366 out of 934 valid scores)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 53% (8 out of 15 valid scores)
- Asian: 85% (23 out of 27 valid scores)
- Filipino: 75% (21 out of 28 valid scores)
- Black: 41% (37 out of 91 valid scores)
- White: 59% (880 out of 1,502 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 54% (99 out of 182 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 41% (415 out of 1,014 valid scores)
- English Learners: 16% (11 out of 69 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 27% (70 out of 264 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 68.5%
Math Participation RateRiver Springs Charter School: | 99.0% |
California: | 98.0% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino97
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White99
- Multirace99
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,108 out of 1,120 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 17 out of 17 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 34 out of 34 enrolled)
- Filipino: 97% (tested 28 out of 29 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 104 out of 104 enrolled)
- White: 99% (tested 1,715 out of 1,741 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 99% (tested 206 out of 208 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,217 out of 1,233 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 91 out of 92 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 305 out of 310 enrolled)
- Hispanic: Yes
- Black: Yes
- White: Yes
- Two or More Races: Yes
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveRiver Springs Charter School: | 37.1% |
State: | 59.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic28
- American Indian20
- Asian78
- Filipino74
- Black25
- White42
- Multirace43
- SED28
- LEP20
- With Disabilities20
- Hispanic: 28% (261 out of 933 valid scores)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 20% (3 out of 15 valid scores)
- Asian: 78% (21 out of 27 valid scores)
- Filipino: 74% (20 out of 27 valid scores)
- Black: 25% (23 out of 92 valid scores)
- White: 42% (627 out of 1,504 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 43% (77 out of 181 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 28% (283 out of 1,013 valid scores)
- English Learners: 20% (14 out of 70 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 20% (53 out of 266 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 16
Number of AYP criteria possible: 22
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
Graduation Target Rate: 79.8
Met Graduation Rate: No
(Note: To meet this criteria the graduation rate must be met at the schoolwide level and for all numerically significant student groups.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 56.8%
ELA Participation RateSchool: | 99.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic98
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black96
- White99
- Multirace100
- SED98
- LEP99
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 98% (tested 802 out of 820 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 19 out of 19 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 18 out of 18 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 96% (tested 45 out of 47 enrolled)
- White: 99% (tested 1,339 out of 1,356 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 244 out of 244 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 98% (tested 96 out of 98 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 57 out of 58 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 166 out of 168 enrolled)
- Hispanic: Yes
- White: Yes
- Two or More Races: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic39
- Asian93
- Filipino59
- Black24
- White57
- Multirace49
- SED13
- LEP11
- With Disabilities25
- Hispanic: 39% (279 out of 714 valid scores)
- Asian: 93% (14 out of 15 valid scores)
- Filipino: 59% (10 out of 17 valid scores)
- Black: 24% (9 out of 38 valid scores)
- White: 57% (670 out of 1,171 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 49% (101 out of 208 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 13% (9 out of 68 valid scores)
- English Learners: 11% (6 out of 55 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 25% (37 out of 150 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 58%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic98
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian67
- Black94
- White99
- Multirace100
- SED97
- LEP99
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 98% (tested 807 out of 820 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 19 out of 19 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 18 out of 18 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 67% (tested 2 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 94% (tested 44 out of 47 enrolled)
- White: 99% (tested 1,337 out of 1,355 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 243 out of 244 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 97% (tested 95 out of 98 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 57 out of 58 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 165 out of 168 enrolled)
- Hispanic: Yes
- White: Yes
- Two or More Races: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic26
- Asian93
- Filipino71
- Black16
- White42
- Multirace35
- SED18
- LEP7
- With Disabilities17
- Hispanic: 26% (189 out of 715 valid scores)
- Asian: 93% (14 out of 15 valid scores)
- Filipino: 71% (12 out of 17 valid scores)
- Black: 16% (6 out of 37 valid scores)
- White: 42% (496 out of 1,170 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 35% (73 out of 207 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 18% (12 out of 67 valid scores)
- English Learners: 7% (4 out of 55 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 17% (26 out of 149 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 16
Number of AYP criteria possible: 24
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
Met Graduation Rate: No
(Note: To meet this criteria the graduation rate must be met at the schoolwide level and for all numerically significant student groups.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 46%
ELA Participation RateHere: | 98.0% |
California: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic98
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black97
- White98
- SED97
- LEP97
- With Disabilities97
- Hispanic: 98% (tested 498 out of 510 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 18 out of 18 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 34 out of 34 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 16 out of 16 enrolled)
- Black: 97% (tested 105 out of 108 enrolled)
- White: 98% (tested 1,120 out of 1,148 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 97% (tested 599 out of 617 enrolled)
- English Learners: 97% (tested 73 out of 76 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 97% (tested 163 out of 168 enrolled)
- Hispanic: Yes
- Black: Yes
- White: Yes
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic32
- American Indian25
- Asian63
- Native Hawaiian29
- Black32
- White54
- SED34
- LEP9
- With Disabilities19
- Hispanic: 32% (132 out of 418 valid scores)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 25% (3 out of 12 valid scores)
- Asian: 63% (20 out of 32 valid scores)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 29% (4 out of 14 valid scores)
- Black: 32% (27 out of 84 valid scores)
- White: 54% (526 out of 968 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 34% (169 out of 505 valid scores)
- English Learners: 9% (6 out of 65 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 19% (26 out of 140 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 47.5%
Math Participation RateSchool: | 97.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic98
- American Indian100
- Asian95
- Filipino93
- Native Hawaiian95
- Black100
- White97
- SED96
- LEP97
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 98% (tested 500 out of 509 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 19 out of 19 enrolled)
- Asian: 95% (tested 32 out of 34 enrolled)
- Filipino: 93% (tested 13 out of 14 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 95% (tested 16 out of 17 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 108 out of 108 enrolled)
- White: 97% (tested 1,114 out of 1,150 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 96% (tested 591 out of 616 enrolled)
- English Learners: 97% (tested 73 out of 76 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 165 out of 168 enrolled)
- Hispanic: Yes
- Black: Yes
- White: Yes
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveRiver Springs Charter School: | 34.3% |
State: | 55.6% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic23
- American Indian33
- Asian53
- Native Hawaiian36
- Black16
- White39
- SED22
- LEP11
- With Disabilities12
- Hispanic: 23% (97 out of 422 valid scores)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 33% (4 out of 12 valid scores)
- Asian: 53% (16 out of 30 valid scores)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 36% (5 out of 14 valid scores)
- Black: 16% (14 out of 86 valid scores)
- White: 39% (379 out of 965 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 22% (112 out of 500 valid scores)
- English Learners: 11% (7 out of 65 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 12% (17 out of 142 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 14
Number of AYP criteria possible: 18
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
Met Graduation Rate: Yes
(Note: To meet this criteria the graduation rate must be met at the schoolwide level and for all numerically significant student groups.)
ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 35.2%
ELA Participation RateHere: | 98.0% |
California: | 98.1% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic97
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black98
- White97
- SED97
- LEP93
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 97% (tested 417 out of 428 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 11 out of 11 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 34 out of 34 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 11 out of 11 enrolled)
- Black: 98% (tested 91 out of 93 enrolled)
- White: 97% (tested 851 out of 874 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 97% (tested 477 out of 490 enrolled)
- English Learners: 93% (tested 84 out of 91 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 110 out of 111 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 41.7% |
California: | 48.6% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic26
- Asian55
- Black27
- White50
- SED27
- LEP11
- With Disabilities14
- Hispanic: 26% (95 out of 370 valid scores)
- Asian: 55% (18 out of 33 valid scores)
- Black: 27% (21 out of 79 valid scores)
- White: 50% (387 out of 770 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 27% (108 out of 403 valid scores)
- English Learners: 11% (8 out of 76 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 14% (14 out of 101 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 37%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic97
- American Indian91
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black95
- White97
- SED96
- LEP94
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 97% (tested 418 out of 430 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 91% (tested 10 out of 11 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 34 out of 34 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 11 out of 11 enrolled)
- Black: 95% (tested 89 out of 94 enrolled)
- White: 97% (tested 849 out of 874 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 96% (tested 473 out of 493 enrolled)
- English Learners: 94% (tested 85 out of 91 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 110 out of 111 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 28.7% |
California: | 52.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic19
- Asian52
- Black9
- White34
- SED17
- LEP8
- With Disabilities10
- Hispanic: 19% (69 out of 372 valid scores)
- Asian: 52% (17 out of 33 valid scores)
- Black: 9% (7 out of 76 valid scores)
- White: 34% (261 out of 767 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 17% (70 out of 402 valid scores)
- English Learners: 8% (6 out of 77 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 10% (10 out of 100 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 15
Number of AYP criteria possible: 20
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
Graduation RateRiver Springs Charter School: | 84.9% |
State: | 85.6% |
Met Graduation Rate: Yes
(Note: To meet this criteria the graduation rate must be met at the schoolwide level and for all numerically significant student groups.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateRiver Springs Charter School: | 97.0% |
California: | 97.8% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic96
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black98
- White97
- SED97
- LEP97
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 96% (tested 413 out of 428 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 13 out of 12 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 29 out of 29 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Black: 98% (tested 103 out of 105 enrolled)
- White: 97% (tested 792 out of 817 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 97% (tested 442 out of 456 enrolled)
- English Learners: 97% (tested 97 out of 100 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 76 out of 77 enrolled)
- Hispanic: Yes
- Black: Yes
- White: Yes
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveRiver Springs Charter School: | 34.5% |
State: | 46.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic18
- Asian65
- Black23
- White45
- SED20
- LEP3
- With Disabilities9
- Hispanic: 18% (58 out of 327 valid scores)
- Asian: 65% (11 out of 17 valid scores)
- Black: 23% (19 out of 84 valid scores)
- White: 45% (260 out of 578 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 20% (75 out of 382 valid scores)
- English Learners: 3% (2 out of 81 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 9% (6 out of 70 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateRiver Springs Charter School: | 97.0% |
State: | 97.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic96
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black96
- White97
- SED96
- LEP96
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 96% (tested 409 out of 427 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 13 out of 12 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 29 out of 29 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Black: 96% (tested 100 out of 104 enrolled)
- White: 97% (tested 795 out of 817 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 96% (tested 440 out of 456 enrolled)
- English Learners: 96% (tested 96 out of 100 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 76 out of 77 enrolled)
- Hispanic: Yes
- Black: Yes
- White: Yes
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic12
- Asian59
- Black7
- White30
- SED13
- LEP3
- With Disabilities9
- Hispanic: 12% (39 out of 328 valid scores)
- Asian: 59% (10 out of 17 valid scores)
- Black: 7% (6 out of 82 valid scores)
- White: 30% (172 out of 578 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 13% (49 out of 383 valid scores)
- English Learners: 3% (2 out of 81 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 9% (6 out of 70 valid scores)
SAT/ACT:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
The ACT Test (ACT) is a nationally recognized assessment used to indicate college readiness.
The SAT Reasoning Test (SAT) is a curriculum-based, college readiness test that assesses the academic skills and knowledge students acquire in high school and the ability to apply that knowledge.
River Springs Charter School - ACT/SAT scores
Percent of graduates taking the SAT: | 30.8% |
California: | 54.4% |
SAT scores greater or equal to 1500: | 46.9% |
California: | 36.3% |
Number of graduates: 208
Number of graduates taking the SAT: 64
Average Total SAT Score: | 1,477 |
California: | 1,374 |
Average SAT mathematics score: | 493 |
State: | 464 |
Average SAT critical reading score: | 507 |
State: | 459 |
Average SAT writing score: | 477 |
California: | 451 |
Percent of graduates taking the ACT: | 11.1% |
California: | 32.1% |
ACT Composite scores greater or equal to 21: | 54.5% |
State: | 51.2% |
Number of graduates: 198
Number of graduates taking the ACT: 22
Average ACT composite score: | 21.0 |
California: | 20.7 |
Average ACT English score: | 22.0 |
State: | 20.5 |
Average ACT mathematics score: | 21.0 |
California: | 21.6 |
Average ACT reading score: | 22.0 |
California: | 21.3 |
Average ACT science score: | 22.0 |
California: | 20.9 |
Percent of graduates taking the SAT: | 26.8% |
California: | 53.7% |
SAT scores greater or equal to 1500: | 37.7% |
State: | 38.7% |
Number of graduates: 198
Number of graduates taking the SAT: 53
Average Total SAT Score: | 1,425 |
California: | 1,426 |
Average SAT mathematics score: | 458 |
State: | 481 |
Average SAT critical reading score: | 489 |
California: | 476 |
Average SAT writing score: | 478 |
California: | 469 |
Percent of graduates taking the ACT: | 6.4% |
California: | 28.0% |
ACT Composite scores greater or equal to 21: | 75.0% |
State: | 50.8% |
Number of graduates: 187
Number of graduates taking the ACT: 12
Average ACT composite score: | 23.0 |
State: | 20.6 |
Average ACT English score: | 26.0 |
State: | 20.3 |
Average ACT mathematics score: | 23.0 |
State: | 21.7 |
Average ACT reading score: | 24.0 |
State: | 21.2 |
Average ACT science score: | 22.0 |
State: | 20.7 |
Percent of graduates taking the SAT: | 21.4% |
State: | 51.7% |
SAT scores greater or equal to 1500: | 60.0% |
State: | 40.6% |
Number of graduates: 187
Number of graduates taking the SAT: 40
Average Total SAT Score: | 1,506 |
California: | 1,444 |
Average SAT mathematics score: | 495 |
California: | 488 |
Average SAT critical reading score: | 520 |
California: | 480 |
Average SAT writing score: | 491 |
State: | 476 |
Percent of graduates taking the ACT: | 5.0% |
State: | 26.2% |
ACT Composite scores greater or equal to 21: | 38.0% |
California: | 51.7% |
Number of graduates: 233
Number of graduates taking the ACT: 13
Average ACT composite score: | 21.0 |
California: | 21.2 |
Percent of graduates taking the SAT: | 17.0% |
California: | 50.9% |
SAT scores greater or equal to 1500: | 56.0% |
California: | 39.3% |
Number of graduates: 233
Number of graduates taking the SAT: 41
Average Total SAT Score: | 1,509 |
California: | 1,434 |
Average SAT mathematics score: | 496 |
California: | 486 |
Average SAT critical reading score: | 522 |
California: | 476 |
Average SAT writing score: | 490 |
California: | 472 |
Percent of graduates taking the SAT: | 19.0% |
California: | 50.5% |
SAT scores greater or equal to 1500: | 54.0% |
California: | 39.5% |
Number of graduates: 232
Number of graduates taking the SAT: 46
Average Total SAT Score: | 1,491 |
California: | 1,436 |
Average SAT mathematics score: | 483 |
California: | 488 |
Average SAT critical reading score: | 518 |
California: | 475 |
Average SAT writing score: | 489 |
California: | 473 |
Percent of graduates taking the ACT: | 4.8% |
California: | 23.9% |
ACT Composite scores greater or equal to 21: | 63.0% |
California: | 53.1% |
Number of graduates: 228
Number of graduates taking the ACT: 11
Average ACT composite score: | 22.0 |
State: | 20.8 |
Percent of graduates taking the SAT: | 18.0% |
State: | 46.8% |
SAT scores greater or equal to 1500: | 60.0% |
State: | 41.1% |
Number of graduates: 228
Number of graduates taking the SAT: 41
Average Total SAT Score: | 1,546 |
State: | 1,449 |
Average SAT mathematics score: | 507 |
State: | 492 |
Average SAT critical reading score: | 524 |
State: | 480 |
Average SAT writing score: | 516 |
California: | 477 |
Percent of graduates taking the SAT: | 8.0% |
State: | 46.6% |
SAT scores greater or equal to 1500: | 47.0% |
State: | 43.2% |
Number of graduates: 254
Number of graduates taking the SAT: 21
Average Total SAT Score: | 1,476 |
State: | 1,462 |
Average SAT mathematics score: | 478 |
State: | 496 |
Average SAT critical reading score: | 510 |
State: | 484 |
Average SAT writing score: | 487 |
State: | 481 |
Percent of graduates taking the SAT: | 12.0% |
California: | 42.1% |
SAT scores greater or equal to 1500: | 55.0% |
California: | 41.8% |
Number of graduates: 213
Number of graduates taking the SAT: 27
Average Total SAT Score: | 1,521 |
State: | 1,448 |
Average SAT mathematics score: | 477 |
State: | 491 |
Average SAT critical reading score: | 542 |
State: | 481 |
Average SAT writing score: | 503 |
State: | 476 |
Advanced Placement:
(State average from 1,204 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
River Springs Charter School - AP exams with scores at or above criteria
Number of students in Grades 11 and 12: 208
Number of students taking at least one AP exam: 21
Percent of students taking at least one AP exam: | 10.0% |
California: | 89.5% |
Number of AP exams with scores at or above 3: 12
Percent of AP exams with scores at or above 3: | 38.7% |
State: | 47.4% |
Number of students in Grades 11 and 12: 198
Number of students taking at least one AP exam: 20
Percent of students taking at least one AP exam: | 10.0% |
California: | 90.8% |
Number of AP exams with scores at or above 3: 5
Percent of AP exams with scores at or above 3: | 17.2% |
California: | 47.6% |
Number of students in Grades 11 and 12: 537
Number of students taking at least one AP exam: 16
Percent of students taking at least one AP exam: | 2.0% |
California: | 35.7% |
Number of AP exams with scores at or above 3: 5
Percent of AP exams with scores at or above 3: | 27.8% |
California: | 49.0% |
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: