Ridge Teen Parent Program School in Winter Haven, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 2.

7700 STATE RD 544
Winter Haven, FL 33881

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
International Baccalaureate School (18.0 miles):

100
Lakeland Highlands Middle School (19.7 miles):

63
Clarence Boswell Elementary School (11.6 miles):

51
Jewett Of The Arts School (4.7 miles):

44
Four Corners Charter School (15.0 miles):

35
Dundee Elementary School (4.3 miles):

27
Auburndale Central Elementary School (8.4 miles):

17
Ridge Teen Parent Program School:

2
Ridge Teen Parent Program School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Polk County:

41
Winter Haven:

38
Ridge Teen Parent Program School:

2

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (863) 299-2512 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 9205
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: POLK
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN AND GRADES 6 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 419-3060
Principal: John Small
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 65
Senate District: 17

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18 (83%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
RIDGE TEEN PARENT PROGRAM:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (82%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (79%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
RIDGE TEEN PARENT PROGRAM:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (81%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (82%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27 (71%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
RIDGE TEEN PARENT PROGRAM:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22 (71%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20 (65%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27 (74%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1762
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1813
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RIDGE TEEN PARENT PROGRAM:

269
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 12
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 58%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1812
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

6
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

7
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

2
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

13
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

670
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

29
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
RIDGE TEEN PARENT PROGRAM:

11
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
RIDGE TEEN PARENT PROGRAM:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
RIDGE TEEN PARENT PROGRAM:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

216
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 87%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 13%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 2
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 5
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 53%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 20%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
RIDGE TEEN PARENT PROGRAM:

1705
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RIDGE TEEN PARENT PROGRAM:

259
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 10
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1683
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1682
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale Score
Here:

681
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 39
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale Score
Here:

693
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 40
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

217
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 9%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

2
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 55%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 9%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Winter Haven, FL
  5. Ridge Teen Parent Program School in Winter Haven, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.