Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Officer Leonard A Reed Elementary School in Cedar Park, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 28
Address
 1515 LITTLE ELM TRAIL
Cedar Park, TX 78613
Telephone
(512) 570-7700
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
28
Students
723
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
55.1
Free lunch eligible students
306
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
39
School district
LEANDER ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
RUTLEDGE EL (1.5 miles):

98
CHARLOTTE COX EL (1.0 miles):

95
CEDAR PARK MIDDLE (1.7 miles):

95
RONALD REAGAN EL (1.9 miles):

90
PAULINE NAUMANN EL (1.4 miles):

85
CYPRESS EL (2.2 miles):

80
CEDAR PARK H S (2.1 miles):

79
ADA MAE FAUBION EL (0.9 miles):

57
Officer Leonard A Reed Elementary School:

28
Officer Leonard A Reed Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Williamson County:

63
Cedar Park:

72
Officer Leonard A Reed Elementary:

28

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 723
Enrollment in 2015: 686

Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students5411912512388104110723
Female students21556859475556361
Male students33645764414954362
Asian students11193571248
Hispanic students35606359495453373
Black students68581291159
White students11334050202731212
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - - - - 11 - 2
Two or More Races students178316329

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 54
Kindergarten enrollment: 119
1st grade enrollment: 125
2nd grade enrollment: 123
3rd grade enrollment: 88
4th grade enrollment: 104
5th grade enrollment: 110

Officer Leonard A Reed Elementary School - Enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 361 (49.9%)
Officer Leonard A Reed Elementary School:

49.9%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 362 (50.1%)
Officer Leonard A Reed Elementary School:

50.1%
Texas:

50.1%

Officer Leonard A Reed Elementary School - Enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Asian enrollment: 48 (6.6%)
Here:

6.6%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 373 (51.6%)
School:

51.6%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 59 (8.2%)
Here:

8.2%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 212 (29.3%)
Here:

29.3%
Texas:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 2 (0.3%)
Officer Leonard A Reed Elementary School:

0.3%
State:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 29 (4.0%)
School:

4.0%
Texas:

2.1%

Officer Leonard A Reed Elementary School - Enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 345 (47.7%)
Officer Leonard A Reed Elementary School:

47.7%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 306 (42.3%)
Here:

42.3%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 39 (5.4%)
Officer Leonard A Reed Elementary School:

5.4%
State:

6.2%

Officer Leonard A Reed Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 55.1

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE school counselors: 1.5
Number of FTE nurses: 1
Number of FTE psychologists: 0.3

Student/Teacher Ratio
Officer Leonard A Reed Elementary School:

13.1
Texas:

15.6

School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,688,810
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 44 (Salary Expenditures: $2,193,961)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1.8 (Salary Expenditures: $40,302)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 6.5 (Salary Expenditures: $305,020)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $149,527)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,645,344
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $3,303,597
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,658,314
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 8.7 (Salary Expenditures: $190,736)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 6.5 (Salary Expenditures: $305,020)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $149,527)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $3,109,697

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic223
  • Asian7
  • Native Hawaiian2
  • Black2
  • White7
  • IDEA34
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 241 (male: 128, female: 113)
  • Hispanic: 223 (male: 122, female: 101)
  • Asian: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 34 (male: 23, female: 11)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.

    Students with disabilities served under IDEA

  • Hispanic56
  • Asian4
  • Black8
  • White17
  • LEP32
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 85 (male: 58, female: 27)
  • Hispanic: 56 (male: 40, female: 16)
  • Asian: 4 (all male)
  • Black: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • White: 17 (male: 10, female: 7)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 32 (male: 22, female: 10)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic22
  • Black4
  • White25
  • LEP10
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 51 (male: 33, female: 18)
  • Hispanic: 22 (male: 17, female: 5)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 25 (male: 14, female: 11)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 8, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 2,651 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained

    Total number of students retained in Kindergarten

  • Hispanic4
  • Multirace2
  • LEP4
  • IDEA4
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 6 (male: 2, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Here:

5.0%
State:

5.2%

Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
School:

1.6%
Texas:

4.8%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic37
  • Asian13
  • Native Hawaiian4
  • Black7
  • White37
  • Multirace4
  • LEP16
  • IDEA4
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 102 (male: 36, female: 66)
  • Hispanic: 37 (male: 11, female: 26)
  • Asian: 13 (male: 5, female: 8)
  • Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • White: 37 (male: 14, female: 23)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 16 (male: 5, female: 11)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

141.1
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,414
  • Males1,419
  • Females1,410
  • Hispanic1,377
  • Asian1,555
  • Black1,431
  • White1,445
  • Multirace1,420
Math Average Scale Score:

1,414
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 121
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 121

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.8 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.4 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

40%
26%
22%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,419, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 12%)
36%
35%
17%
12%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,410, Tested: 63, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
44%
18%
25%
13%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,377, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 10%)
53%
21%
16%
10%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,555, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 50%)
37%
13%
50%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,431, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 13%)
38%
38%
12%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,445, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 9%)
26%
30%
35%
9%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,420, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 11%)
44%
23%
22%
11%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,440
  • Males1,439
  • Females1,440
  • Hispanic1,444
  • Asian1,492
  • Black1,393
  • White1,445
  • Multirace1,405
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,440
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 94
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 95

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.8 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.7 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%

22%
34%
21%
23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,439, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 21%)
26%
32%
21%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,440, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 25%)
20%
35%
20%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,444, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 22%)
17%
33%
28%
22%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,492, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 29%)
43%
28%
29%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,393, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 25%)
50%
25%
25%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,445, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 24%)
24%
35%
17%
24%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,405, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 22%)
33%
34%
11%
22%

3rd Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 4
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 4


    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,351
  • Males1,330
  • Females1,373
  • Hispanic1,351
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,351
State:

956
Reading students tested: 30
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 30

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.5 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.1 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.1 (51%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 14%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

37%
36%
14%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,330, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 7%)
40%
40%
13%
7%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,373, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 20%)
33%
34%
13%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,351, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 13%)
37%
36%
14%
13%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,552
  • Males1,553
  • Females1,550
  • Hispanic1,520
  • Asian1,661
  • Black1,465
  • White1,560
Math Average Scale Score:

1,552
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 120
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 121

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.8 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

24%
36%
21%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,553, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 20%)
25%
33%
22%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,550, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 18%)
23%
39%
20%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,520, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 12%)
26%
42%
20%
12%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,661, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 33%)
11%
22%
34%
33%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,465, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
40%
60%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,560, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 22%)
24%
30%
24%
22%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,554
  • Males1,534
  • Females1,572
  • Hispanic1,527
  • Asian1,627
  • Black1,471
  • White1,551
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,554
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 84
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 85

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.6 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.3 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 30%

20%
25%
25%
30%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,534, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 26%)
26%
28%
20%
26%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,572, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 33%)
16%
22%
29%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,527, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 14%)
23%
32%
31%
14%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,627, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 44%)
33%
23%
44%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,471, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
40%
40%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,551, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 33%)
22%
20%
25%
33%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,835
  • Males3,655
  • Females3,992
  • Hispanic3,718
  • Asian4,368
  • Black3,301
  • White3,811
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,835
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 84
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 84

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (48%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.6 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.2 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 37%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

31%
19%
37%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,655, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 8%)
33%
31%
28%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,992, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 18%)
29%
9%
44%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,718, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 10%)
38%
24%
28%
10%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,368, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 67%, Masters: 22%)
11%
67%
22%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,301, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
67%
16%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,811, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 11%)
31%
18%
40%
11%

4th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 3
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 3


    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,480
  • Males1,464
  • Females1,500
  • Hispanic1,486
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,480
State:

815
Reading students tested: 39
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 39

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.8 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.5 (58%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 8%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%

31%
38%
8%
23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,464, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 5%, Masters: 18%)
32%
45%
5%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,500, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 29%)
29%
30%
12%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,486, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 24%)
29%
39%
8%
24%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All3,636
  • Males3,559
  • Females3,739
  • Hispanic3,645
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,636
State:

2,017
Writing students tested: 40
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 40

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.6 (45%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.6 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.3 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

40%
32%
15%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,559, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 9%)
48%
35%
8%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,739, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 18%)
29%
30%
23%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,645, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 13%)
38%
34%
15%
13%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,593
  • Males1,586
  • Females1,599
  • Hispanic1,568
  • Asian1,754
  • Black1,551
  • White1,621
Math Average Scale Score:

1,593
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 91
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 92

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.7 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.5 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.4 (59%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

21%
36%
25%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,586, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 14%)
18%
41%
27%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,599, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 21%)
23%
32%
24%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,568, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 16%)
33%
34%
17%
16%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,754, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 50%)
17%
33%
50%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,551, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 0%)
18%
46%
36%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,621, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 47%, Masters: 16%)
37%
47%
16%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,584
  • Males1,557
  • Females1,610
  • Hispanic1,589
  • Asian1,585
  • Black1,537
  • White1,588
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,584
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 75
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 76

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.8 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.4 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 27%

21%
28%
24%
27%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,557, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 19%)
22%
36%
23%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,610, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 33%)
21%
20%
26%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,589, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 30%)
27%
21%
22%
30%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,585, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 17%)
50%
33%
17%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,537, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 9%)
27%
46%
18%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,588, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 26%)
16%
26%
32%
26%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,766
  • Males3,798
  • Females3,737
  • Hispanic3,701
  • Asian4,084
  • Black3,552
  • White3,848
Science Average Scale Score:

3,766
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 71
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 71

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.9 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.9 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 42%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 7%

27%
42%
24%
7%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,798, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 6%)
26%
45%
23%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,737, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 8%)
27%
41%
24%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,701, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 3%)
34%
38%
25%
3%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,084, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 67%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 33%)
67%
33%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,552, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 0%)
45%
46%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,848, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 0%)
11%
47%
42%

5th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,502
  • Males1,455
  • Females1,544
  • Hispanic1,502
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,502
State:

683
Reading students tested: 17
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 17

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.5 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 42%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

29%
42%
29%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,455, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 0%)
50%
37%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,544, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 0%)
11%
45%
44%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,502, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 0%)
29%
42%
29%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade (Spanish))

  • All3,427
  • Males3,368
  • Females3,490
  • Hispanic3,427
Science Average Scale Score:

3,427
Texas:

857
Science students tested: 23
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 23

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.4 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.7 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.3 (43%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 6.6 (55%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 9%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

52%
39%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,368, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
67%
16%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,490, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 64%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
36%
64%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,427, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 0%)
52%
39%
9%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic19
  • Asian7
  • Black4
  • White7
  • Multirace2
  • LEP7
  • IDEA10
  • 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 39 (male: 19, female: 20)
  • Hispanic: 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
  • Asian: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Officer Leonard A Reed Elementary School:

53.9
State:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 4 (all female)
  • White: 4
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Here:

1.4
Texas:

102.7

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic10
  • Asian2
  • Black4
  • White7
  • Multirace2
  • LEP5
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 25 (male: 19, female: 6)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 5 (all male)

Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 2

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Here:

2.8
State:

27.5
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Section 504 only): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Section 504 only)
Officer Leonard A Reed Elementary School:

1.4
State:

12.0
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Cedar Park, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents