Miramar Elementary School in Miami, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 40.


Miami, FL 33136

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Hallandale Elementary School (13.4 miles):

96
South Pointe Elementary School (4.2 miles):

78
William H. Lehman Elementary School (13.7 miles):

67
Charter Of Excellence At Davie School (17.3 miles):

54
Rockway Elementary School (9.4 miles):

45
Miramar Elementary School:

40
Dania Elementary School (18.4 miles):

36
Benjamin Franklin Elementary School (7.6 miles):

24
Miramar Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Miami:

44
Miramar Elementary School:

40

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 547-1013 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 3461
School type: Elementary
District Name: DADE
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN AND GRADES 3 TO 5
Principal: Sandra Powell

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 3 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 3 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 3 schools:

89%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

46%
State average from 3 schools:

64%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 3 schools:

73%
Making Math Gains
Here:

55%
State average from 3 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 3 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

50%
State average from 3 schools:

59%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

516
State average from 3 schools:

577
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 3 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

69%
State average from 3 schools:

43%
Minority Rate
Here:

53%
State average from 3 schools:

33%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 341 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 341 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 116
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 324
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 320

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 324
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 320
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 167 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 167 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 219 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 219 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 76
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 203
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 201

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 203
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 201
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 3 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Math
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

74%
State average from 3 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 3 schools:

90%
Meeting High Standards in Science
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

50%
State average from 3 schools:

62%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 3 schools:

72%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 3 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 3 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 3 schools:

74%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

570
State average from 3 schools:

604
Percent Tested
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 3 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

64%
State average from 3 schools:

41%
Minority Rate
Here:

50%
State average from 3 schools:

29%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 349 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 349 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 102
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 326
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 320

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 326
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 319
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 191 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 191 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 181
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 179

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 181
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 179
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 214 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 214 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 195
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 191

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 195
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 190
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

70%
State average from 3 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 3 schools:

81%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

92%
State average from 3 schools:

80%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

37%
State average from 3 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 3 schools:

70%
Making Math Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 3 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 3 schools:

63%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 3 schools:

64%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

514
State average from 3 schools:

557
Percent Tested
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 3 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

59%
State average from 3 schools:

36%
Minority Rate
Here:

47%
State average from 3 schools:

27%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 297 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 296 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 96
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 286
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 280

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 285
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 278
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 170 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 169 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 168 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1304
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

43%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

70%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1533
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1614
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

40%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

40%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1358
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1535
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

47%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

18%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1612
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

29%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

29%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1332
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1529
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 05%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1604
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1391
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1554
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1671
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 113
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1250
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1558
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1597
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1392
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1540
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1616
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

322
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

95
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

614
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

44
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

104
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

651
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

68
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

103
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

664
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
MIRAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

70
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 101
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

318
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 67%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Miami, FL
  5. Miramar Elementary School in Miami, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.