Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 81.

5901 PINE ISLAND RD
Parkland, FL 33076

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
The Quest Center School (18.6 miles):

87
Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School:

81
Park Vista Community High School (19.1 miles):

75
Boca Raton High School (10.1 miles):

58
Atlantic Technical Center School (6.3 miles):

40
Drop Back In School (11.0 miles):

22
Broward Detention Center School (13.9 miles):

12
Lauderhill High School (11.6 miles):

4
Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Broward County:

47
Parkland:

78
Marjory Stoneman Douglas High:

81

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (754) 322-2150 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 6
School number: 3011
School type: Senior High
District Name: BROWARD
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (754) 322-2280
Principal: Ann Kowalski
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 22
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 97
Senate District: 32

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 451 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

90%
State average from 451 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 452 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

55%
State average from 451 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

62%
State average from 452 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

83%
State average from 449 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

47%
State average from 452 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 452 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

584
State average from 452 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 450 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

14%
State average from 454 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

39%
State average from 454 schools:

47%
Region: 5

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1662 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1658 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 796
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1606
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1512

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1603
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1506
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1026 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1025 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 493
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1004
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 943

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1002
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 937
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 117
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 348 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 347 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 167
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 330
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 313

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 329
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 312
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 238 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 237 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 103
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 220
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 210

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 219
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 206
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 144 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 144 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 443 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

88%
State average from 440 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 443 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

59%
State average from 443 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 441 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 442 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

48%
State average from 442 schools:

56%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 441 schools:

66%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

570
State average from 441 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 448 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

10%
State average from 446 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
Here:

30%
State average from 451 schools:

45%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1625 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1616 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 755
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1584
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1476

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1569
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1460
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1120 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1116 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 517
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1106
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1027

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1096
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1015
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 151 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 226 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 226 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 214
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 204

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 214
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 204
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 156 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 152 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 70
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 142

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 99

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 97
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

87%
State average from 425 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 425 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

61%
State average from 425 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

67%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 425 schools:

74%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

55%
State average from 425 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 425 schools:

71%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

592
State average from 425 schools:

526
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 425 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

9%
State average from 425 schools:

42%
Minority Rate
Here:

31%
State average from 425 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

62%
State average from 370 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

88%
State average from 370 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 370 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

65%
State average from 370 schools:

41%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 370 schools:

52%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 370 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

43%
State average from 370 schools:

49%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 370 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

547
State average from 370 schools:

482
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 370 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

8%
State average from 372 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

29%
State average from 372 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1580 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1581 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 753
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1524
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1526
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1097 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1098 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 540
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1071
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1071
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 226 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 226 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 103
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 209
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 210
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 132 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (93%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

61%
State average from 360 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

87%
State average from 361 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 361 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 361 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

434
State average from 361 schools:

374
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 361 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

7%
State average from 362 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 362 schools:

47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1540 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1540 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 726
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1504
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1504
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1105 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1105 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 524

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1092
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1090
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 131 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 131 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 60
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 121
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 122
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 207 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 207 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 99

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 197
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 198
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 36
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 72
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 58
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 114
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 113
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 49

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 47
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 102
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 102
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 348 schools:

42%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

86%
State average from 348 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 348 schools:

84%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 348 schools:

51%
Making Math Gains
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

79%
State average from 348 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 348 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

430
State average from 348 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 348 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

7%
State average from 347 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 348 schools:

45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2067
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

8%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

23%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

21%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2135
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

77%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

27%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

60%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

11%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2066
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

27%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

87%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2091
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

93%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

46%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

21%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

86%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2061
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

337
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2106
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

333
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2043
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

2072
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 771
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2060
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2136
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

339
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

334
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2025
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2088
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

785
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

720
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

83
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

793
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

738
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

88
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

12
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

9
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 796
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

344
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 80%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2038
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2046
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1982
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 64

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL:

2091
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 13
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2105
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

2062
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 43

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 9

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2038
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2047
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

2011
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 36

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2078
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 94%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2084
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

2062
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 22

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 824
Mean Scale Score
Here:

728
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 87
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 16
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 14): 12
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 761
Mean Scale Score
Here:

721
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 824
Mean Scale Score
Here:

741
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 88
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 11
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 8
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 10

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 760
Mean Scale Score
Here:

738
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 84
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 10
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 8
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 767
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

326
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 69%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 88%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Parkland, FL
  5. Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.