Magnolia School in Orlando, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 6.

1900 MATTERHORNE RD
Orlando, FL 32818

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Eola Charter School (6.9 miles):

98
West Creek Elementary School (14.7 miles):

69
Wicklow Elementary School (18.7 miles):

60
Gotha Middle School (3.0 miles):

54
Robinswood Middle School (1.3 miles):

45
Wheatley Elementary School (6.3 miles):

35
Meadowbrook Middle School (2.3 miles):

20
Magnolia School:

6
Magnolia School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Orlando:

42
Magnolia School:

6

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 296-6499 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 1561
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 521-3301
Principal: W Thomas Oldroyd
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 3
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 39
Senate District: 19

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MAGNOLIA:

64%
State average from 59 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 59 schools:

78%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 59 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

60%
State average from 59 schools:

54%
Making Reading Gains
MAGNOLIA:

81%
State average from 59 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 59 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

88%
State average from 59 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 59 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

591
State average from 59 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 59 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 59 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
MAGNOLIA:

99%
State average from 59 schools:

46%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MAGNOLIA:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MAGNOLIA:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MAGNOLIA:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MAGNOLIA:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 58 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Math
MAGNOLIA:

52%
State average from 58 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
MAGNOLIA:

75%
State average from 58 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

26%
State average from 58 schools:

50%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 58 schools:

69%
Making Math Gains
Here:

52%
State average from 58 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

48%
State average from 58 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

55%
State average from 58 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

422
State average from 58 schools:

564
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 59 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 59 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 59 schools:

46%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 59 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

54%
State average from 59 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 59 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

15%
State average from 59 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
MAGNOLIA:

58%
State average from 59 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 59 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 59 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

55%
State average from 59 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

427
State average from 59 schools:

541
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 59 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

97%
State average from 59 schools:

47%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 59 schools:

46%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MAGNOLIA:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1188
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

28%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1443
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

45%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1528
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

50%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MAGNOLIA:

65%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
MAGNOLIA:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MAGNOLIA:

313
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

53%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
MAGNOLIA:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1322
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
MAGNOLIA:

9%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
MAGNOLIA:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1493
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

49%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
MAGNOLIA:

1%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

62%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
MAGNOLIA:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1671
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

47%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

29%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1084
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MAGNOLIA:

265
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MAGNOLIA:

1392
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MAGNOLIA:

287
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1377
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1221
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1433
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MAGNOLIA:

1525
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1419
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

200
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 84
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1072
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MAGNOLIA:

1370
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MAGNOLIA:

1373
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1296
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

219
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

249
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1298
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MAGNOLIA:

300
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1412
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1433
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
MAGNOLIA:

93
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

602
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
MAGNOLIA:

34
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
MAGNOLIA:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
MAGNOLIA:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
MAGNOLIA:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
MAGNOLIA:

58
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
MAGNOLIA:

631
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

51
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MAGNOLIA:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
MAGNOLIA:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
MAGNOLIA:

7
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

73
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
MAGNOLIA:

637
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

44
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
MAGNOLIA:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

10
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

622
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

16
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

2
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

2
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

2
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 63
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

264
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 38%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 71%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Orlando, FL
  5. Magnolia School in Orlando, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.