City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
17.
Other nearby schools ratings:
M. A. Milam K-8 Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:| Florida: | 45 |
| Miami-Dade County: | 45 |
| Hialeah: | 48 |
| M. A. Milam K-8 Center School: | 17 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (305) 822-0301 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 3421
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: DADE
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 556-1388
Principal: Robert G Valenzuela
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 21
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 102
Senate District: 40
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 48% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 43% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 65% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 444 |
| State average from 54 schools: | 539 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: D
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 60% |
Minority Rate| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 35% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 57% |
Region: 4
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1079 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1077 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 464
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 976
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 973
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 691 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 691 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 291
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 624
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 625
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 153 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 142
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 594 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 590 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 529
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 524
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 117
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 78% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 70% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 89% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 23% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 42% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 69% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 42% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 67% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 428 |
| State average from 52 schools: | 566 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: D
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 45% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 55% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 52% |
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1013 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1015 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 885
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 887
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 666 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 666 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 39% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 587
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 587
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 131 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 131 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 500 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 502 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 438
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 440
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 30% |
| State average from 51 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 51% |
| State average from 51 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 51 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 51% |
| State average from 51 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 51 schools: | 69% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 458 |
| State average from 51 schools: | 545 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 51 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 53% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1110 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1104 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 991
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 985
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 714 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 713 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 640
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 637
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 128 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 16% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 17% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 133
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 494 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 490 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 441
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 439
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 120 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 12% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 89% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 45% |
Making Reading Gains| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 65% |
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 57% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 64% |
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns| Here: | 486 |
| State average from 43 schools: | 531 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 98% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 57% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1015 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1015 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 985 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 985 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 763 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 763 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 392 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 392 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 44 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 44 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 44 schools: | 84% |
Making Reading Gains| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 44 schools: | 63% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 44 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 44 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns| Here: | 427 |
| State average from 44 schools: | 418 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 44 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 44 schools: | 51% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 44 schools: | 56% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1025 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1025 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 990 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 990 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 779 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 779 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 385 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 385 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 151 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 151 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 66% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 65% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 80% |
Making Reading Gains| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 62% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 407 |
| State average from 43 schools: | 400 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 52% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 43 schools: | 55% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1248 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 291 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 43% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 1% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 65% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1530 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 43% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 68% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 18 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1545 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 291 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 62% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1664 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 19% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 63% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1742 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 55% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1872 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 23% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 35% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 55% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 1906 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1926 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing| Here: | 51% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 290 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 25% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 30% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 3% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1360 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 26% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 68% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1485 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 31% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 35% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 17% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 55% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1601 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 319 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 32% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 48% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1628 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 41% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1807 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 43% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 63% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1885 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 14% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 5% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 64% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1924 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 61% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1986 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing| Here: | 79% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 23% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 65% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 1234 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 289 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1512 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 04%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1564 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 295 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1592 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 290 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1784 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1875 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1914 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1877 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 291 |
| State average: | 299 |
Percent Passing: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 281 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1379 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1513 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1623 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 323 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1634 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 301 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1806 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1895 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1945 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1963 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 318 |
| State average: | 321 |
Percent Passing: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 101
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 4
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 197
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 505
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 77%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1161 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 277 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1541 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1473 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 278 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1649 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1760 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1810 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 294 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1907 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1888 |
| State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 290 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 282 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1322 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1540 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1575 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1639 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1808 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1862 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 1934 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1958 |
| State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 323 |
Percent Passing: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 130 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 616 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 653 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Functional (max 18)| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 133 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 653 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 59 |
| State average: | 71 |
Functional (max 18)| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 172 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 664 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Informational (max 18)| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 191 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 677 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 63 |
| State average: | 66 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 125 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 672 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Literary (max 18)| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 11 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 529 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 695 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Functional (max 18)| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 12 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 504 |
| State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 702 |
| State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 129
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 291 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 53%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 71%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 126
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 289 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 52%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 552
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 290 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 46%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1215 |
| State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 286 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1447 |
| State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1477 |
| State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1338 |
| State average: | 1397 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 139
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1523 |
| State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 287 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1546 |
| State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1487 |
| State average: | 1532 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 60
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1602 |
| State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 98%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 1602 |
| State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1525 |
| State average: | 1592 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 77
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1708 |
| State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 298 |
| State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1770 |
| State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1636 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 134
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1832 |
| State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1849 |
| State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1732 |
| State average: | 1738 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 118
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 276 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 290 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1336 |
| State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 1445 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 298 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1463 |
| State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 1396 |
| State average: | 1414 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 67
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1549 |
| State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1572 |
| State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1499 |
| State average: | 1519 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 73
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1579 |
| State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 288 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1579 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 1571 |
| State average: | 1620 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1762 |
| State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1774 |
| State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 1637 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 137
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1849 |
| State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 1861 |
| State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 1783 |
| State average: | 1755 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 78
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 168
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 618 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR: 48
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 140
Mean Scale Score| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 632 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Median NPR: 52
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 155
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 656 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 189
Mean Scale Score| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 666 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR: 59
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 135
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 671 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Median NPR: 58
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 170
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 687 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 64
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 168
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 623 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Median NPR: 62
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 139
Mean Scale Score| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 642 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Median NPR: 69
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 155
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 645 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Median NPR: 58
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 189
Mean Scale Score| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 659 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Median NPR: 54
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 135
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 677 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 64
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 170
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 698 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Median NPR: 71
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 137
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 283 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 53%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined| M. A. MILAM K-8 CENTER: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 75%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 60%
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 166
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 305 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 52%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 95%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Hialeah, FL
- M. A. Milam K-8 Center School in Hialeah, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: