Locklin Technical Center School in Milton, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 85.

5330 BERRYHILL RD
Milton, FL 32570

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
T. R. Jackson Prek Center School (4.0 miles):

96
Locklin Technical Center School:

85
Capstone Academy School (18.5 miles):

76
L. D. Mcarthur Elementary School (12.2 miles):

61
Allie Yniestra Elementary School (18.0 miles):

49
Oakcrest Elementary School (17.6 miles):

46
Bagdad Elementary School (5.3 miles):

31
Lincoln Park Elementary School (14.4 miles):

17
Locklin Technical Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Santa Rosa County:

54
Milton:

48
Locklin Technical Center School:

85

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (850) 983-5700 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 57
School number: 321
School type: Adult
District Name: SANTA ROSA
Grade range: ADULT
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 983-5345
Principal: Charles Etheredge
The function/setting of the school: Area Vocational-Technical Center
The main educational program offered at the school: Vocational/Technical
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 1
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 1
Senate District: 2
School Web Address: http://www.locklintech.com/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

85%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

89%
State average from 133 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 133 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

73%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 133 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 133 schools:

59%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

625
State average from 133 schools:

541
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 119999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

6%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

4%
State average from 133 schools:

43%
Region: 2

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 975 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 975 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 327
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 956
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 905

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 957
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 905
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 843 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 843 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 286
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LOCKLIN TECHNICAL CENTER:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 831
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 786

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 832
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 786
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LOCKLIN TECHNICAL CENTER:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

85%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

86%
State average from 133 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 133 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
LOCKLIN TECHNICAL CENTER:

71%
State average from 133 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 133 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

617
State average from 133 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

4%
State average from 132 schools:

48%
Minority Rate
LOCKLIN TECHNICAL CENTER:

15%
State average from 133 schools:

42%
Region: 2


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

85%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

86%
State average from 131 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 131 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

69%
State average from 131 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
LOCKLIN TECHNICAL CENTER:

63%
State average from 131 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 131 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 131 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
LOCKLIN TECHNICAL CENTER:

603
State average from 131 schools:

540
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 131 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

4%
State average from 131 schools:

47%
Minority Rate
Here:

14%
State average from 131 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (78%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (82%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (78%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

5
State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
LOCKLIN TECHNICAL CENTER:

4
State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
LOCKLIN TECHNICAL CENTER:

7
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

2
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

7
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Milton, FL
  5. Locklin Technical Center School in Milton, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.