Little Havana Institute School in Miami, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 2.

300 SW 12 AVE
Miami, FL 33130

Little Havana Institute School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Miami:

44
Little Havana Institute School:

2

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 636-6147 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 7829
School type: Senior High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 7 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 636-6198
Principal: Samuel Johnson
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 1 in Need of Improvement
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 18
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 107
Senate District: 36
School Web Address: outreach.dadeschools.net

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

2%
State average from 25 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

20%
State average from 25 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
LITTLE HAVANA INSTITUTE:

53%
State average from 25 schools:

81%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

23%
State average from 25 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

50%
State average from 25 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

30%
State average from 25 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

50%
State average from 25 schools:

62%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

228
State average from 25 schools:

501
Percent Tested
Here:

90%
State average from 25 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: I

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 26 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 26 schools:

34%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (92%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (90%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (93%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Percent Tested
Here:

83%
State average from 26 schools:

98%
Grade in 2009: I

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 26 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
LITTLE HAVANA INSTITUTE:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

36%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (91%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LITTLE HAVANA INSTITUTE:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26 (79%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LITTLE HAVANA INSTITUTE:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1668
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LITTLE HAVANA INSTITUTE:

265
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

66%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

5%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

5%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
LITTLE HAVANA INSTITUTE:

8
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
LITTLE HAVANA INSTITUTE:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1489
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

219
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

4%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

96%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

4%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

8
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

224
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

91%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LITTLE HAVANA INSTITUTE:

1793
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

44%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LITTLE HAVANA INSTITUTE:

29%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1728
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

21%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
LITTLE HAVANA INSTITUTE:

64%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

4%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

4%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

1
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1584
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

250
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1620
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

243
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

220
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 94%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1716
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1755
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 50
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 42%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Miami, FL
  5. Little Havana Institute School in Miami, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.