Joseph Le Conte Middle School in Los Angeles, CA
(06-08 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in California) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 22
- Address
- 1316 N. Bronson Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 90028
- Telephone
- (323) 308-1700
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- City-data.com school rating
- 22
- Students
- 909
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 43.3
- National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status - Yes, under Provision 2
- Free lunch eligible students
- 738
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 91
- School district
- Los Angeles Unified
- Charter school
- No
- Title I status
- Title I schoolwide school
- Magnet School Indicator
- Yes
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
No street view available for this location
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Joseph Le Conte Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:California: | 46 |
Los Angeles County: | 44 |
Los Angeles: | 36 |
Joseph Le Conte Middle School: | 22 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 909
Enrollment in 2015: 900
Enrollment in 2014: 889
Enrollment in 2013: 934
Enrollment in 2012: 917
Enrollment in 2011: 1,105
Enrollment in 2010: 1,413
Enrollment in 2009: 1,703
Enrollment in 2008: 1,829
Enrollment in 2007: 2,018
Enrollment in 2006: 2,239
Enrollment in 2005: 2,374
Enrollment in 2004: 2,367
Enrollment in 2003: 2,412
Enrollment in 2002: 2,314
Enrollment in 2001: 2,263
Enrollment in 2000: 2,145
Enrollment in 1999: 2,163
Joseph Le Conte Middle School - Historical enrollment
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | G06 | G07 | G08 | Total |
---|
All students | 211 | 384 | 314 | 909 |
Female students | 99 | 173 | 143 | 415 |
Male students | 112 | 211 | 171 | 494 |
American Indian/Alaska Native students | 1 | - | - | 1 |
Asian students | 12 | 19 | 25 | 56 |
Hispanic students | 168 | 308 | 234 | 710 |
Black students | 18 | 18 | 21 | 57 |
White students | 10 | 37 | 29 | 76 |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students | - | - | 4 | 4 |
Two or More Races students | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
Enrollment by grade:
6th grade enrollment: 211
7th grade enrollment: 384
8th grade enrollment: 314
Joseph Le Conte Middle School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 415 (45.7%)
Male enrollment: 494 (54.3%)Joseph Le Conte Middle School: | 54.3% |
State: | 49.6% |
Joseph Le Conte Middle School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.1%)
Asian enrollment: 56 (6.2%)
Hispanic enrollment: 710 (78.1%)Joseph Le Conte Middle School: | 78.1% |
State: | 46.0% |
Black enrollment: 57 (6.3%)School: | 6.3% |
California: | 6.1% |
White enrollment: 76 (8.4%)
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 4 (0.4%)Joseph Le Conte Middle School: | 0.4% |
State: | 0.6% |
Two or More Races enrollment: 5 (0.6%)
Joseph Le Conte Middle School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 829 (91.2%)
Free lunch eligible students: 738 (81.2%)Joseph Le Conte Middle School: | 81.2% |
State: | 52.8% |
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 91 (10.0%)
Joseph Le Conte Middle School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 43.3
Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 3
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 4
Number of FTE school counselors: 4
Number of FTE nurses: 2
Number of FTE psychologists: 2
Student/Teacher RatioSchool: | 21.0 |
California: | 22.8 |
Joseph Le Conte Middle School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$3,813,176- Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 37.5 (Salary Expenditures: $2,734,569)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $7,623)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 6.5 (Salary Expenditures: $667,353)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 5.5 (Salary Expenditures: $403,631)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$111,644Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,:
$5,271,699- Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $3,447,560
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 8.2 (Salary Expenditures: $301,625)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 11.7 (Salary Expenditures: $1,118,883)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 5.5 (Salary Expenditures: $403,631)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds:
$204,480 Limited English Proficiency:
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic160
- Asian10
- Native Hawaiian2
- White22
- IDEA73
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 194 (male: 108, female: 86)
- Hispanic: 160 (male: 92, female: 68)
- Asian: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all female)
- White: 22 (male: 11, female: 11)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 73 (male: 47, female: 26)
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic196
- American Indian2
- Asian16
- White13
- IDEA64
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 227 (male: 141, female: 86)
- Hispanic: 196 (male: 122, female: 74)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all female)
- Asian: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
- White: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 64 (male: 47, female: 17)
Students with disabilities:
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA
- Hispanic107
- Asian7
- Black14
- White4
- LEP77
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 132 (male: 94, female: 38)
- Hispanic: 107 (male: 73, female: 34)
- Asian: 7 (all male)
- Black: 14 (male: 10, female: 4)
- White: 4 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 77 (male: 52, female: 25)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students with disabilities served under IDEA
- Hispanic92
- Black4
- White4
- LEP65
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 100 (male: 75, female: 25)
- Hispanic: 92 (male: 67, female: 25)
- Black: 4 (all male)
- White: 4 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 65 (male: 46, female: 19)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504
- Hispanic7
- Black2
- White2
- LEP2
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 11 (male: 9, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Retention:
(State average from 171 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 7th grade: 2 (all female)
Percent of 7th grade students retainedSchool: | 0.5% |
California: | 2.7% |
Gifted and Talented:
(State average from 5,551 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment
- Hispanic94
- Asian7
- Black10
- White10
- Multirace2
- IDEA4
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 123 (male: 61, female: 62)
- Hispanic: 94 (male: 47, female: 47)
- Asian: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
- Black: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 studentsJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 135.3 |
State: | 84.3 |
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment
- Hispanic97
- American Indian2
- Asian4
- Black4
- White10
- LEP2
- IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 117 (male: 70, female: 47)
- Hispanic: 97 (male: 59, female: 38)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
- Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Statewide Student Assessments
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments:
(State average from 10,463 schools)
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments (SB) is one of the online summative assessments - part of California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System.
The summative assessments are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments of grade-level learning that measure progress toward college and career readiness. Each test in English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics is comprised of two parts: (1) a computer-adaptive test and (2) a performance task, administered within a selected testing window available at 66 percent of the instructional year for grades three through eight, and grade eleven.
The summative assessments are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA and mathematics. The tests capitalize on the strengths of computer adaptive testing efficient and precise measurement across the full range of achievement and timely turnaround of results.
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All32%
- Males25%
- Females39%
- Black14%
- Asian53%
- Filipino50%
- Hispanic30%
- White40%
ELA students tested: 920
ELA students with scores: 920
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 32% |
State: | 49% |
Standard Not Met:
40.9%Standard Nearly Met:
27.4%Standard Met:
25.0%Standard Exceeded:
6.7%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2481.7, Students tested: 162, Standard Not Met: 35.2%, Nearly Met: 37.0%, Met: 19.8%, Exceeded: 8.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2514.9, Students tested: 361, Standard Not Met: 34.4%, Nearly Met: 28.0%, Met: 28.3%, Exceeded: 9.4%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2498.6, Students tested: 397, Standard Not Met: 49.1%, Nearly Met: 22.9%, Met: 24.2%, Exceeded: 3.8%)Joseph Le Conte Middle School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All21%
- Males21%
- Females21%
- Black12%
- Asian35%
- Filipino42%
- Hispanic18%
- White35%
Math students tested: 940
Math students with scores: 940
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 21% |
California: | 38% |
Standard Not Met:
53.1%Standard Nearly Met:
26.1%Standard Met:
14.4%Standard Exceeded:
6.5%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2458.2, Students tested: 163, Standard Not Met: 54.6%, Nearly Met: 26.4%, Met: 15.3%, Exceeded: 3.7%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2486.2, Students tested: 369, Standard Not Met: 45.3%, Nearly Met: 33.6%, Met: 13.8%, Exceeded: 7.3%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2481.9, Students tested: 408, Standard Not Met: 59.6%, Nearly Met: 19.1%, Met: 14.5%, Exceeded: 6.9%)Joseph Le Conte Middle School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All33%
- Males30%
- Females38%
- Black26%
- Asian28%
- Filipino52%
- Hispanic32%
- White40%
ELA students tested: 881
ELA students with scores: 879
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 33% |
California: | 48% |
Standard Not Met:
38.0%Standard Nearly Met:
29.0%Standard Met:
28.0%Standard Exceeded:
5.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2493.5, Students tested: 206, Standard Not Met: 33.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 29.0%, Exceeded: 7.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2506.2, Students tested: 377, Standard Not Met: 41.0%, Nearly Met: 24.0%, Met: 28.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2515.2, Students tested: 298, Standard Not Met: 37.0%, Nearly Met: 33.0%, Met: 27.0%, Exceeded: 3.0%)Joseph Le Conte Middle School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All22%
- Males23%
- Females20%
- Black13%
- Asian26%
- Filipino43%
- Hispanic21%
- White31%
Math students tested: 896
Math students with scores: 896
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 22% |
California: | 37% |
Standard Not Met:
49.0%Standard Nearly Met:
29.0%Standard Met:
16.0%Standard Exceeded:
6.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2463.6, Students tested: 211, Standard Not Met: 53.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 11.0%, Exceeded: 7.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2477.4, Students tested: 386, Standard Not Met: 50.0%, Nearly Met: 28.0%, Met: 17.0%, Exceeded: 4.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2514.8, Students tested: 299, Standard Not Met: 44.0%, Nearly Met: 30.0%, Met: 17.0%, Exceeded: 9.0%)Joseph Le Conte Middle School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All26%
- Males22%
- Females31%
- Black24%
- Asian46%
- Filipino38%
- Hispanic25%
- White28%
ELA students tested: 901
ELA students with scores: 897
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 26% |
California: | 44% |
Standard Not Met:
44.0%Standard Nearly Met:
30.0%Standard Met:
24.0%Standard Exceeded:
2.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2474.1, Students tested: 222, Standard Not Met: 43.0%, Nearly Met: 30.0%, Met: 23.0%, Exceeded: 4.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2484.0, Students tested: 313, Standard Not Met: 49.0%, Nearly Met: 28.0%, Met: 21.0%, Exceeded: 1.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2516.1, Students tested: 366, Standard Not Met: 39.0%, Nearly Met: 32.0%, Met: 26.0%, Exceeded: 3.0%)Joseph Le Conte Middle School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All18%
- Males18%
- Females18%
- Black11%
- Asian23%
- Filipino25%
- Hispanic17%
- White27%
Math students tested: 912
Math students with scores: 912
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 18% |
State: | 34% |
Standard Not Met:
50.0%Standard Nearly Met:
32.0%Standard Met:
13.0%Standard Exceeded:
5.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2457.9, Students tested: 230, Standard Not Met: 55.0%, Nearly Met: 30.0%, Met: 11.0%, Exceeded: 4.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2479.4, Students tested: 313, Standard Not Met: 50.0%, Nearly Met: 33.0%, Met: 15.0%, Exceeded: 3.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2508.0, Students tested: 369, Standard Not Met: 47.0%, Nearly Met: 33.0%, Met: 13.0%, Exceeded: 7.0%)Joseph Le Conte Middle School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
California Alternate Assessments:
(State average from 1,489 schools)
The new California Alternate Assessments (CAAs) are based on alternate achievement standards-called the Core Content Connectors-and linked to the Common Core State Standards. The CAAs are online tests for students with an individualized education program (IEP) that designates the use of an alternate assessment to measure student progress on alternate achievement standards. This alternate assessment is part of the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System and replaces the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for English language arts and mathematics.
ELA students tested: 12
ELA students with scores: 12
Percentage Level 3: | 0% |
California: | 11% |
Level 1:
50.0% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
50.0% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
0.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Math students tested: 14
Math students with scores: 14
Percentage Level 3: | 0% |
State: | 5% |
Level 1:
71.0% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
29.0% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
0.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Paper-based CAASPP:
(State average from 9,784 schools)
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:
California Standards Tests (CSTs) - The CSTs for science in grades five, eight, and ten are administered only to students in California public schools. All questions are multiple-choice. These tests were developed specifically to assess students' knowledge of the California content standards in science.
CST Science students tested: 297
CST Science students with scores: 292
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 53% |
State: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
13.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
14.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
20.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
22.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
31.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 359.4, Students tested: 297, Far Below Basic: 13.0%, Below Basic: 14.0%, Basic: 20.0%, Proficient: 22.0%, Advanced: 31.0%)13.0%
14.0%
20.0%
22.0%
31.0%
CST Science students tested: 362
CST Science students with scores: 360
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 51% |
California: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
11.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
11.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
27.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
29.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
22.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 352.0, Students tested: 362, Far Below Basic: 11.0%, Below Basic: 11.0%, Basic: 27.0%, Proficient: 29.0%, Advanced: 22.0%)11.0%
11.0%
27.0%
29.0%
22.0%
CST Science students tested: 385
CST Science students with scores: 385
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 59% |
State: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
11.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
11.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
19.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
21.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
38.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 372.4, Students tested: 385, Far Below Basic: 11.0%, Below Basic: 11.0%, Basic: 19.0%, Proficient: 21.0%, Advanced: 38.0%)11.0%
11.0%
19.0%
21.0%
38.0%
The Physical Fitness Test:
The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 367, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 54.0%, Needs Improvement: 22.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 23.4%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 367, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.6%, Needs Improvement: 19.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 27.8%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 367, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 57.8%, Needs Improvement: 42.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 367, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 86.9%, Needs Improvement: 13.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 367, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 54.0%, Needs Improvement: 46.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 367, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 68.4%, Needs Improvement: 31.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 383, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.7%, Needs Improvement: 26.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 20.7%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 383, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 49.1%, Needs Improvement: 22.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 28.4%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 383, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 59.8%, Needs Improvement: 40.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 383, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 90.6%, Needs Improvement: 9.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 383, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 43.9%, Needs Improvement: 56.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 383, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.7%, Needs Improvement: 24.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 322, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 37.0%, Needs Improvement: 54.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 8.3%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 322, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 49.1%, Needs Improvement: 24.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 26.7%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 322, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 66.8%, Needs Improvement: 33.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 322, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 88.8%, Needs Improvement: 11.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 322, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 48.8%, Needs Improvement: 51.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 322, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.8%, Needs Improvement: 24.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 347, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 38.9%, Needs Improvement: 49.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 11.2%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 347, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 50.7%, Needs Improvement: 22.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 26.5%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 347, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 67.7%, Needs Improvement: 32.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 347, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 92.2%, Needs Improvement: 7.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 347, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 41.8%, Needs Improvement: 58.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 347, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 78.4%, Needs Improvement: 21.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 385, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 42.3%, Needs Improvement: 44.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 12.8%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 385, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 41.0%, Needs Improvement: 14.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 44.5%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 385, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 81.0%, Needs Improvement: 19.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 385, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 95.6%, Needs Improvement: 4.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 385, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 48.6%, Needs Improvement: 51.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 385, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 76.1%, Needs Improvement: 23.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 348, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 46.6%, Needs Improvement: 32.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 20.9%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 348, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 37.9%, Needs Improvement: 17.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 45.1%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 348, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 86.2%, Needs Improvement: 13.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 348, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 94.8%, Needs Improvement: 5.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 348, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 57.5%, Needs Improvement: 42.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 348, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 85.6%, Needs Improvement: 14.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
California English Language Development Test:
(State average from 9,932 schools)
Students in kindergarten through grade twelve whose home language is not English are required by law to take an English skills test. In California, the test is called the California English Language Development Test (CELDT).
Joseph Le Conte Middle School - students who met CELDT criterion (all grades)
All Grades:Student Count: 234
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 83
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 38
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 14
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 37.0% |
State: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 502.9 |
California: | 532.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 507.4 |
State: | 518.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 533.3 |
State: | 518.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 473.8 |
State: | 522.0 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 93
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 33
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 489.6 |
California: | 547.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 500.4 |
State: | 534.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 518.5 |
California: | 529.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 495.5 |
California: | 530.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 103
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 36
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 504.4 |
State: | 556.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 507.2 |
State: | 547.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 524.9 |
California: | 536.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 502.5 |
State: | 537.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 248
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 93
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 38.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 70
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 28
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 40.0% |
California: | 41.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 540.0 |
State: | 536.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 517.2 |
State: | 523.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 521.3 |
State: | 520.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 514.7 |
California: | 524.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 104
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 40
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 38.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 507.8 |
State: | 550.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 518.0 |
State: | 536.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 527.3 |
State: | 530.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 511.5 |
California: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 74
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 25
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 34.0% |
California: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 513.4 |
State: | 562.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 528.7 |
State: | 552.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 511.9 |
California: | 539.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 503.0 |
California: | 541.2 |
All Grades:Student Count: 224
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 74
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 50
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 11
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 22.0% |
California: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 506.4 |
State: | 535.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 484.0 |
State: | 521.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 495.2 |
California: | 519.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 499.5 |
State: | 522.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 84
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 35
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 42.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 522.0 |
State: | 551.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 507.3 |
California: | 538.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 507.5 |
State: | 532.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 488.1 |
State: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 90
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 28
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 31.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 502.4 |
State: | 562.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 516.5 |
State: | 552.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 508.7 |
State: | 543.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 496.2 |
California: | 541.5 |
All Grades:Student Count: 254
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 86
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 34.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 52
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 25.0% |
California: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 479.4 |
State: | 538.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 487.6 |
State: | 525.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 473.7 |
California: | 522.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 477.8 |
State: | 526.2 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 109
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 35
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 32.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 500.7 |
California: | 549.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 510.0 |
California: | 538.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 468.7 |
California: | 533.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 493.9 |
State: | 535.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 93
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 38
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 41.0% |
State: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 520.9 |
State: | 564.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 523.4 |
State: | 554.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 482.8 |
State: | 545.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 503.1 |
California: | 545.9 |
All Grades:Student Count: 233
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 81
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 49
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 27.0% |
State: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 477.0 |
State: | 538.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 477.0 |
State: | 525.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 465.6 |
California: | 530.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 473.0 |
State: | 530.3 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 110
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 46
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 42.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 533.1 |
California: | 557.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 531.9 |
State: | 539.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 519.8 |
State: | 543.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 530.8 |
California: | 540.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 74
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 22
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 30.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 530.3 |
State: | 570.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 523.3 |
California: | 552.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 508.4 |
State: | 551.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 526.4 |
California: | 548.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 279
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 96
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 34.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 53
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 19
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
State: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 547.2 |
California: | 551.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 512.9 |
State: | 532.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 545.5 |
California: | 532.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 515.9 |
State: | 534.7 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 103
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 34
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
State: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 558.7 |
California: | 566.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 524.9 |
State: | 544.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 518.1 |
California: | 543.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 519.8 |
California: | 545.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 123
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 43
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
State: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 545.0 |
State: | 579.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 519.7 |
California: | 558.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 527.7 |
State: | 553.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 518.3 |
California: | 555.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 343
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 115
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 34.0% |
California: | 31.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 51
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 16
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 31.0% |
California: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 523.5 |
State: | 546.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 498.2 |
California: | 529.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 569.1 |
State: | 533.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 507.4 |
California: | 525.3 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 141
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 53
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 38.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 523.1 |
California: | 559.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 516.5 |
California: | 542.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 580.8 |
California: | 548.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 511.6 |
California: | 534.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 151
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 46
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 30.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 522.3 |
California: | 570.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 511.0 |
State: | 557.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 573.1 |
California: | 562.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 499.8 |
State: | 544.1 |
Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
Joseph Le Conte Middle School - Adequate Yearly Progress status
ELA Participation RateJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 98.0% |
California: | 96.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian96
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black97
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED99
- LEP98
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 690 out of 694 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 96% (tested 22 out of 23 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 33 out of 33 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 97% (tested 54 out of 56 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 73 out of 73 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 813 out of 819 enrolled)
- English Learners: 98% (tested 477 out of 489 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 128 out of 129 enrolled)
Math Participation RateJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 99.0% |
State: | 96.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian96
- Filipino97
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black97
- White99
- Multirace100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 697 out of 700 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 96% (tested 24 out of 25 enrolled)
- Filipino: 97% (tested 32 out of 33 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 97% (tested 53 out of 55 enrolled)
- White: 99% (tested 73 out of 74 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 816 out of 823 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 493 out of 497 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 128 out of 129 enrolled)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 11
Number of AYP criteria possible: 11
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)Attendance rate (calculated by using number of days attended and enrolled) : 98
Met Attendance rate Target: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black91
- White99
- Multirace100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 728 out of 731 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 28 out of 28 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 29 out of 29 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Black: 91% (tested 37 out of 41 enrolled)
- White: 99% (tested 79 out of 80 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 854 out of 859 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 421 out of 423 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 114 out of 116 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 27.4% |
California: | 42.6% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic26
- Asian48
- Filipino41
- Black26
- White33
- SED27
- LEP9
- With Disabilities3
- Hispanic: 26% (174 out of 682 valid scores)
- Asian: 48% (13 out of 27 valid scores)
- Filipino: 41% (11 out of 27 valid scores)
- Black: 26% (9 out of 35 valid scores)
- White: 33% (23 out of 70 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 27% (218 out of 810 valid scores)
- English Learners: 9% (34 out of 382 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 3% (3 out of 99 valid scores)
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Math Participation RateSchool: | 99.0% |
California: | 94.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black93
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 733 out of 736 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 30 out of 30 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 30 out of 30 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Black: 93% (tested 38 out of 41 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 83 out of 83 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 861 out of 865 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 434 out of 436 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 114 out of 116 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 18.8% |
California: | 33.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic18
- Asian26
- Filipino30
- Black11
- White24
- SED19
- LEP6
- With Disabilities4
- Hispanic: 18% (120 out of 682 valid scores)
- Asian: 26% (7 out of 27 valid scores)
- Filipino: 30% (8 out of 27 valid scores)
- Black: 11% (4 out of 35 valid scores)
- White: 24% (17 out of 70 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 19% (155 out of 810 valid scores)
- English Learners: 6% (23 out of 382 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 4% (4 out of 99 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 13
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 89.2%
ELA Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 768 out of 768 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 17 out of 17 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 26 out of 26 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 32 out of 32 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 97 out of 97 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 949 out of 949 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 294 out of 294 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 114 out of 114 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 46.6% |
State: | 55.7% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic42
- Asian71
- Filipino73
- Black52
- White69
- SED47
- LEP13
- With Disabilities24
- Hispanic: 42% (304 out of 725 valid scores)
- Asian: 71% (10 out of 14 valid scores)
- Filipino: 73% (19 out of 26 valid scores)
- Black: 52% (15 out of 29 valid scores)
- White: 69% (59 out of 86 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 47% (414 out of 888 valid scores)
- English Learners: 13% (37 out of 278 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 24% (26 out of 108 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 89.5%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 768 out of 768 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 17 out of 17 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 26 out of 26 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 32 out of 32 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 97 out of 97 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 949 out of 949 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 294 out of 294 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 114 out of 114 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 35.8% |
California: | 59.6% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic33
- Asian57
- Filipino69
- Black38
- White48
- SED36
- LEP19
- With Disabilities23
- Hispanic: 33% (236 out of 725 valid scores)
- Asian: 57% (8 out of 14 valid scores)
- Filipino: 69% (18 out of 26 valid scores)
- Black: 38% (11 out of 29 valid scores)
- White: 48% (41 out of 86 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 36% (318 out of 888 valid scores)
- English Learners: 19% (53 out of 278 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 23% (25 out of 108 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 12
Number of AYP criteria possible: 23
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 78.4%
ELA Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 731 out of 733 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 16 out of 16 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 34 out of 34 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 28 out of 28 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 107 out of 107 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 870 out of 872 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 499 out of 500 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 121 out of 121 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 46.4% |
California: | 57.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic42
- Asian64
- Filipino73
- Black75
- White60
- SED45
- LEP26
- With Disabilities17
- Hispanic: 42% (284 out of 682 valid scores)
- Asian: 64% (9 out of 14 valid scores)
- Filipino: 73% (24 out of 33 valid scores)
- Black: 75% (21 out of 28 valid scores)
- White: 60% (59 out of 98 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 45% (370 out of 815 valid scores)
- English Learners: 26% (125 out of 474 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 17% (20 out of 117 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 79%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 729 out of 733 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 16 out of 16 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 34 out of 34 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 28 out of 28 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 107 out of 107 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 868 out of 872 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 498 out of 500 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 119 out of 121 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 35.2% |
State: | 59.9% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic31
- Asian57
- Filipino64
- Black64
- White45
- SED34
- LEP22
- With Disabilities9
- Hispanic: 31% (210 out of 682 valid scores)
- Asian: 57% (8 out of 14 valid scores)
- Filipino: 64% (21 out of 33 valid scores)
- Black: 64% (18 out of 28 valid scores)
- White: 45% (44 out of 98 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 34% (276 out of 815 valid scores)
- English Learners: 22% (104 out of 474 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 9% (11 out of 117 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 16
Number of AYP criteria possible: 25
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 67.6%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP99
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 849 out of 854 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 35 out of 35 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 42 out of 42 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 31 out of 31 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 130 out of 130 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 923 out of 926 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 700 out of 704 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 131 out of 131 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 42.4% |
California: | 55.9% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic40
- Asian53
- Filipino71
- Black48
- White48
- SED41
- LEP28
- With Disabilities12
- Hispanic: 40% (319 out of 805 valid scores)
- Asian: 53% (17 out of 32 valid scores)
- Filipino: 71% (29 out of 41 valid scores)
- Black: 48% (14 out of 29 valid scores)
- White: 48% (59 out of 123 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 41% (361 out of 877 valid scores)
- English Learners: 28% (189 out of 677 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 12% (15 out of 126 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 68.5%
Math Participation RateJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.0% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP99
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 849 out of 854 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 35 out of 35 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 42 out of 42 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 31 out of 31 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 130 out of 130 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 922 out of 926 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 700 out of 704 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 131 out of 131 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 32.2% |
California: | 59.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic28
- Asian50
- Filipino63
- Black35
- White45
- SED32
- LEP21
- With Disabilities12
- Hispanic: 28% (225 out of 807 valid scores)
- Asian: 50% (16 out of 32 valid scores)
- Filipino: 63% (26 out of 41 valid scores)
- Black: 35% (10 out of 29 valid scores)
- White: 45% (55 out of 123 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 32% (282 out of 878 valid scores)
- English Learners: 21% (140 out of 679 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 12% (15 out of 126 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 13
Number of AYP criteria possible: 25
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 56.8%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White99
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,130 out of 1,131 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 46 out of 46 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 54 out of 54 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 35 out of 35 enrolled)
- White: 99% (tested 161 out of 162 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,202 out of 1,204 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,032 out of 1,032 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 171 out of 172 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 36.9% |
California: | 53.7% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic33
- Asian53
- Filipino70
- Black39
- White48
- SED36
- LEP27
- With Disabilities9
- Hispanic: 33% (351 out of 1,062 valid scores)
- Asian: 53% (24 out of 45 valid scores)
- Filipino: 70% (35 out of 50 valid scores)
- Black: 39% (10 out of 26 valid scores)
- White: 48% (75 out of 155 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 36% (410 out of 1,134 valid scores)
- English Learners: 27% (270 out of 998 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 9% (15 out of 166 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 58%
Math Participation RateJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black98
- White99
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,130 out of 1,132 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 46 out of 46 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 54 out of 54 enrolled)
- Black: 98% (tested 34 out of 35 enrolled)
- White: 99% (tested 161 out of 162 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,201 out of 1,205 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,032 out of 1,033 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 172 out of 173 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic29
- Asian58
- Filipino60
- Black44
- White46
- SED34
- LEP28
- With Disabilities11
- Hispanic: 29% (309 out of 1,061 valid scores)
- Asian: 58% (26 out of 45 valid scores)
- Filipino: 60% (30 out of 50 valid scores)
- Black: 44% (11 out of 25 valid scores)
- White: 46% (71 out of 155 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 34% (387 out of 1,132 valid scores)
- English Learners: 28% (278 out of 997 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 11% (18 out of 166 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 14
Number of AYP criteria possible: 25
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 46%
ELA Participation RateJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black98
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,316 out of 1,321 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 54 out of 54 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 61 out of 61 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 98% (tested 36 out of 37 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 212 out of 212 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,435 out of 1,440 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,257 out of 1,259 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 195 out of 197 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 35.6% |
California: | 52.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic32
- Asian59
- Filipino54
- Black29
- White48
- SED35
- LEP26
- With Disabilities7
- Hispanic: 32% (405 out of 1,266 valid scores)
- Asian: 59% (27 out of 46 valid scores)
- Filipino: 54% (32 out of 59 valid scores)
- Black: 29% (8 out of 28 valid scores)
- White: 48% (93 out of 194 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 35% (483 out of 1,371 valid scores)
- English Learners: 26% (316 out of 1,226 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 7% (12 out of 186 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 47.5%
Math Participation RateJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 96.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic96
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black92
- White100
- SED96
- LEP96
- With Disabilities70
- Hispanic: 96% (tested 1,262 out of 1,321 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 54 out of 54 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 61 out of 61 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 92% (tested 34 out of 37 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 211 out of 212 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 96% (tested 1,386 out of 1,440 enrolled)
- English Learners: 96% (tested 1,206 out of 1,259 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 70% (tested 138 out of 197 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: No
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic29
- Asian54
- Filipino66
- Black32
- White45
- SED33
- LEP27
- With Disabilities10
- Hispanic: 29% (348 out of 1,215 valid scores)
- Asian: 54% (25 out of 46 valid scores)
- Filipino: 66% (39 out of 59 valid scores)
- Black: 32% (9 out of 28 valid scores)
- White: 45% (86 out of 193 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 33% (438 out of 1,326 valid scores)
- English Learners: 27% (322 out of 1,178 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 10% (13 out of 134 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 19
Number of AYP criteria possible: 25
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 35.2%
ELA Participation RateJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.1% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian98
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,418 out of 1,425 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Asian: 98% (tested 44 out of 45 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 74 out of 74 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 43 out of 43 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 225 out of 226 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,590 out of 1,598 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 1,361 out of 1,370 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 200 out of 204 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic28
- Asian47
- Filipino64
- Black41
- White39
- SED31
- LEP23
- With Disabilities4
- Hispanic: 28% (380 out of 1,338 valid scores)
- Asian: 47% (17 out of 36 valid scores)
- Filipino: 64% (44 out of 69 valid scores)
- Black: 41% (16 out of 39 valid scores)
- White: 39% (82 out of 211 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 31% (462 out of 1,504 valid scores)
- English Learners: 23% (309 out of 1,321 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 4% (7 out of 188 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 37%
Math Participation RateJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 99.0% |
State: | 98.0% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian98
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,417 out of 1,425 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Asian: 98% (tested 44 out of 45 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 74 out of 74 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 43 out of 43 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 225 out of 226 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,589 out of 1,598 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 1,360 out of 1,370 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 199 out of 204 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 30.9% |
California: | 52.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic28
- Asian56
- Filipino64
- Black23
- White36
- SED30
- LEP25
- With Disabilities6
- Hispanic: 28% (374 out of 1,337 valid scores)
- Asian: 56% (20 out of 36 valid scores)
- Filipino: 64% (44 out of 69 valid scores)
- Black: 23% (9 out of 39 valid scores)
- White: 36% (75 out of 211 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 30% (451 out of 1,503 valid scores)
- English Learners: 25% (334 out of 1,320 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 6% (11 out of 187 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 17
Number of AYP criteria possible: 25
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 99.0% |
State: | 97.8% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino99
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black98
- White100
- SED100
- LEP99
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,557 out of 1,564 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 52 out of 52 enrolled)
- Filipino: 99% (tested 90 out of 91 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 98% (tested 45 out of 46 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 237 out of 238 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,801 out of 1,810 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 1,501 out of 1,509 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 234 out of 236 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 26.4% |
California: | 46.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic23
- Asian34
- Filipino55
- Black31
- White32
- SED26
- LEP18
- With Disabilities4
- Hispanic: 23% (344 out of 1,473 valid scores)
- Asian: 34% (16 out of 47 valid scores)
- Filipino: 55% (48 out of 88 valid scores)
- Black: 31% (12 out of 39 valid scores)
- White: 32% (69 out of 216 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 26% (437 out of 1,699 valid scores)
- English Learners: 18% (264 out of 1,461 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 4% (8 out of 223 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino99
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White99
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,553 out of 1,564 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 52 out of 52 enrolled)
- Filipino: 99% (tested 90 out of 91 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 46 out of 46 enrolled)
- White: 99% (tested 235 out of 238 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,795 out of 1,810 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 1,497 out of 1,509 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 232 out of 236 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic19
- Asian47
- Filipino47
- Black13
- White29
- SED22
- LEP18
- With Disabilities5
- Hispanic: 19% (282 out of 1,471 valid scores)
- Asian: 47% (22 out of 47 valid scores)
- Filipino: 47% (41 out of 88 valid scores)
- Black: 13% (5 out of 39 valid scores)
- White: 29% (63 out of 215 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 22% (378 out of 1,696 valid scores)
- English Learners: 18% (262 out of 1,459 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 5% (12 out of 222 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 18
Number of AYP criteria possible: 29
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateHere: | 99.0% |
California: | 97.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,627 out of 1,641 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 63 out of 63 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 113 out of 113 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 55 out of 55 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 276 out of 276 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,997 out of 2,010 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 1,621 out of 1,632 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 242 out of 244 enrolled)
- Hispanic: Yes
- Filipino: Yes
- White: Yes
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic19
- Asian25
- Filipino49
- Black28
- White25
- SED22
- LEP14
- With Disabilities5
- Hispanic: 19% (291 out of 1,503 valid scores)
- Asian: 25% (12 out of 48 valid scores)
- Filipino: 49% (52 out of 106 valid scores)
- Black: 28% (14 out of 51 valid scores)
- White: 25% (62 out of 249 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 22% (395 out of 1,839 valid scores)
- English Learners: 14% (215 out of 1,536 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 5% (12 out of 224 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateHere: | 99.0% |
California: | 97.5% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino99
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,622 out of 1,641 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 63 out of 63 enrolled)
- Filipino: 99% (tested 112 out of 113 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 55 out of 55 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 275 out of 276 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,991 out of 2,010 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 1,616 out of 1,632 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 241 out of 244 enrolled)
- Hispanic: Yes
- Filipino: Yes
- White: Yes
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Asian40
- Filipino45
- Black10
- White25
- SED21
- LEP17
- With Disabilities7
- Asian: 40% (19 out of 48 valid scores)
- Filipino: 45% (47 out of 105 valid scores)
- Black: 10% (5 out of 51 valid scores)
- White: 25% (62 out of 249 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 21% (390 out of 1,834 valid scores)
- English Learners: 17% (252 out of 1,531 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 7% (15 out of 223 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 16
Number of AYP criteria possible: 27
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 99.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,721 out of 1,727 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 66 out of 66 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 101 out of 101 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 55 out of 55 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 312 out of 313 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 2,143 out of 2,148 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,774 out of 1,779 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 268 out of 269 enrolled)
- Hispanic: Yes
- Filipino: Yes
- White: Yes
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic17
- Asian34
- Filipino47
- Black7
- White26
- SED19
- LEP14
- With Disabilities3
- Hispanic: 17% (266 out of 1,594 valid scores)
- Asian: 34% (16 out of 47 valid scores)
- Filipino: 47% (43 out of 92 valid scores)
- Black: 7% (3 out of 44 valid scores)
- White: 26% (73 out of 285 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 19% (370 out of 1,966 valid scores)
- English Learners: 14% (241 out of 1,698 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 3% (7 out of 249 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateHere: | 99.0% |
California: | 99.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian50
- Asian100
- Filipino99
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black99
- White100
- SED100
- LEP99
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,718 out of 1,727 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 50% (tested 1 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 66 out of 66 enrolled)
- Filipino: 99% (tested 100 out of 101 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 99% (tested 54 out of 55 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 312 out of 313 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 2,139 out of 2,148 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 1,770 out of 1,779 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 265 out of 269 enrolled)
- Hispanic: Yes
- Filipino: Yes
- White: Yes
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic14
- Asian43
- Filipino40
- Black5
- White21
- SED16
- LEP12
- With Disabilities3
- Hispanic: 14% (219 out of 1,592 valid scores)
- Asian: 43% (20 out of 47 valid scores)
- Filipino: 40% (36 out of 91 valid scores)
- Black: 5% (2 out of 43 valid scores)
- White: 21% (61 out of 285 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 16% (312 out of 1,962 valid scores)
- English Learners: 12% (209 out of 1,695 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 3% (8 out of 246 valid scores)
Health & Safety
Referrals and Arrests:
(State average from 2,295 schools)
Referral to law enforcement is an action by which a student is reported to any law enforcement agency or official, including a school police unit, for an incident that occurs on school grounds, during school-related events, or while taking school transportation, regardless of whether official action is taken. Citations, tickets, court referrals, and school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
School-related arrest refers to an arrest of a student for any activity conducted on school grounds, during off-campus school activities (including while taking school transportation), or due to a referral by any school official. All school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 17 (male: 7, female: 10)
- Hispanic: 13 (male: 5, female: 8)
- Black: 2 (all female)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 studentsJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 18.7 |
California: | 21.3 |
Students with disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 8 (all male)
- Black: 2 (all female)
Students with disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Students without disabilities who received a school-related arrest: 2 (all female)
Students without disabilities who received a school-related arrest per 1,000 students
Students with disabilities who received a school-related arrest: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities who received a school-related arrest per 1,000 students
Harassment & Bullying:
(State average from 2,337 schools)
An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.
Harassment or bullying on the basis of sex includes sexual harassment or bullying and gender-based harassment or bullying. Sexual harassment or bullying is unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature, such as unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, nonverbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature. Gender-based harassment or bullying is nonsexual intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on the student's actual or perceived sex, including harassment based on gender identity, gender expression, and nonconformity with gender stereotypes. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Both male and female students can be victims of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex, and the harasser or bully and the victim can be of the same sex. Bullying on the basis of sex constitutes sexual harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex: 6
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex per 1,000 studentsJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 6.6 |
State: | 6.8 |
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of sex
- Hispanic4
- Black4
- LEP4
- IDEA4
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of sex: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students disciplined for bullying or harassment on the basis of sex: 2 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
(State average from 8,737 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic52
- American Indian2
- Asian2
- Black10
- White4
- LEP16
- IDEA19
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 70 (male: 37, female: 33)
- Hispanic: 52 (male: 26, female: 26)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
- Asian: 2 (all male)
- Black: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 77.0 |
State: | 172.7 |
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic55
- Asian2
- Native Hawaiian2
- Black5
- White13
- LEP22
- IDEA13
- 5042
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 77 (male: 34, female: 43)
- Hispanic: 55 (male: 26, female: 29)
- Asian: 2 (all female)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all female)
- Black: 5 (all female)
- White: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 22 (male: 14, female: 8)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
- Section 504: 2 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsSchool: | 84.7 |
California: | 178.2 |
Suspensions:
(State average from 1,406 schools)
Out-of-school suspension - For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
- For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 15 (male: 11, female: 4)
- Hispanic: 9 (male: 5, female: 4)
- Black: 6 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (all male)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 8
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Black: 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 2
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
Expulsions:
(State average from 1,805 schools)
Expulsion with educational services refers to an action taken by the local educational agency of removing a child from his/her regular school for disciplinary purposes, and providing educational services to the child (e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring; transfer to an alternative school) for the remainder of the school year (or longer) in accordance with local educational agency policy. Expulsion with educational services also includes removals resulting from violations of the Gun Free Schools Act that are modified to less than 365 days.
Students without Disabilities who received an expulsion with educational services: 2 (all male)
Students without Disabilities who received an expulsion with educational services per 1,000 students
Classes & Courses
Algebra I:
(State average from 1,382 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
Number of Algebra I classes: 15
7-8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I
- Hispanic343
- American Indian4
- Asian19
- Black13
- White43
- Multirace4
- LEP82
- IDEA37
7-8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 426 (male: 213, female: 213)
- Hispanic: 343 (male: 170, female: 173)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Asian: 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
- Black: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
- White: 43 (male: 23, female: 20)
- Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 82 (male: 47, female: 35)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 37 (male: 29, female: 8)
7-8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I
- Hispanic239
- American Indian4
- Asian14
- Black4
- White23
- LEP65
- IDEA29
7-8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 284 (male: 149, female: 135)
- Hispanic: 239 (male: 121, female: 118)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 4 (all male)
- Asian: 14 (male: 7, female: 7)
- Black: 4 (all male)
- White: 23 (male: 13, female: 10)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 65 (male: 37, female: 28)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 29 (male: 22, female: 7)
Percent of 7-8th grade students who passedJoseph Le Conte Middle School: | 66.7% |
California: | 83.6% |
Number of Algebra I classes: 15
Geometry:
Geometry is a (college-preparatory) course that typically includes topics such as properties of plane and solid figures; deductive methods of reasoning and use of logic; geometry as an axiomatic system including the study of postulates, theorems, and formal proofs; concepts of congruence, similarity, parallelism, perpendicularity, and proportion; and rules of angle measurement in triangles.Geometry is considered a prerequisite for Algebra II.
Number of Geometry classes: 3
Student Enrollment in Geometry
- Hispanic67
- American Indian2
- Asian4
- Black7
- White19
- LEP10
- IDEA7
Student Enrollment in Geometry: 99 (male: 46, female: 53)
- Hispanic: 67 (male: 26, female: 41)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
- Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Black: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- White: 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: