Jerry Thomas Elementary School in Jupiter, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 53.

800 MAPLEWOOD DR
Jupiter, FL 33458

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Beacon Cove Intermediate School (3.0 miles):

94
Sea Wind Elementary School (13.0 miles):

79
Jupiter Elementary School (1.5 miles):

68
Renaissance Learning Center School (11.3 miles):

57
Jerry Thomas Elementary School:

53
Roosevelt Elementary School (14.1 miles):

48
Northmore Elementary School (12.6 miles):

41
The Imagine School (10.0 miles):

32
Jerry Thomas Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Palm Beach County:

45
Jupiter:

70
Jerry Thomas Elementary School:

53

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (561) 741-9100 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 1651
School type: Elementary
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 741-9150
Principal: Ann Wark
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 22
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 82
Senate District: 28
School Web Address: www.edline.net/pages/Jerry_Thomas_Elementary_School

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

92%
State average from 734 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

93%
State average from 734 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 734 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

81%
State average from 733 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

80%
State average from 734 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 733 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

81%
State average from 734 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 734 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

651
State average from 734 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 733 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

30%
State average from 734 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

28%
State average from 735 schools:

46%
Region: 5

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 465 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 465 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 170
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 450
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 437

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 450
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 437
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 347 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 347 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 131
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 339
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 331

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 339
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 331
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

96%
State average from 735 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

93%
State average from 734 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 734 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

78%
State average from 734 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 735 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

81%
State average from 735 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

652
State average from 734 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 734 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

25%
State average from 734 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

30%
State average from 734 schools:

45%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 458 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 458 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 148
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 450
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 441

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 450
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 441
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 336 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 336 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 333
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 326
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 333
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 326
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

92%
State average from 711 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

92%
State average from 711 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 711 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

78%
State average from 711 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 711 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 711 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 711 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

83%
State average from 711 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

646
State average from 711 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 711 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

24%
State average from 711 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

30%
State average from 711 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 424 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 423 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 127
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 409
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 397

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 408
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 396
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 298 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 297 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 289
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 280

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 288
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 279
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 104 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

12%
State average from 652 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

44%
State average from 652 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 652 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

15%
State average from 650 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

32%
State average from 652 schools:

72%
Making Math Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 652 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

41%
State average from 652 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

55%
State average from 652 schools:

69%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

342
State average from 652 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 652 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: F

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

53%
State average from 655 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 655 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 769 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 754 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 271
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 722
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 708
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 757 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 742 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 268
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 714
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 700
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 435 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 431 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 138
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 407
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 400
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 128 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 126 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

14%
State average from 643 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

45%
State average from 643 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

85%
State average from 643 schools:

81%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

38%
State average from 643 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 643 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

39%
State average from 643 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

287
State average from 643 schools:

420
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 643 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: F

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

52%
State average from 644 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 644 schools:

54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 787 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 781 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 219
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 727
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 719
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 777 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 772 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 216

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 718
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 710
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 470 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 467 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 114

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 434
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 428
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (93%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 98

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 97
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

10%
State average from 631 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

41%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 631 schools:

80%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

43%
State average from 631 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

55%
State average from 631 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

311
State average from 631 schools:

417
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 631 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: F

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

53%
State average from 631 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 631 schools:

52%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1535
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

41%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

86%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1806
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

358
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

26%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

26%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

90%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

22
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1856
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

42%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

20%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

91%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

12
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1929
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

31%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

45%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1972
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

308
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

56%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

34%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

16%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

38%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

41%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

10
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

307
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

36%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1644
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

374
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

4%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

36%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

33%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

95%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1711
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

358
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

22%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

92%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1809
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

363
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

35%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

24%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

86%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1946
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

12%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

66%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2014
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

83%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1577
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1783
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

354
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 03%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 03%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1834
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1947
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1956
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

305
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1654
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

377
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1771
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

372
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1800
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

361
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1963
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1987
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 149
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 800
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1570
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1759
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1796
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1907
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1971
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1654
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

376
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1740
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

365
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1809
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

363
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1932
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2000
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

154
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

655
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

79
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

130
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

668
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

81
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

11
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

145
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

686
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

85
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

884
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

701
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

68
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

730
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

721
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

77
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 134
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

334
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 76%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 788
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

298
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 45%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1732
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1731
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1664
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 67

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1757
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

269
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 11
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1759
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1797
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -38

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1806
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1810
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1742
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 68

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1921
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1926
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1888
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 39

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 467
Mean Scale Score
Here:

683
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 50
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 277
Mean Scale Score
Here:

692
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 49
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 466
Mean Scale Score
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

694
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 57
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 277
Mean Scale Score
Here:

704
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 56
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 284
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
JERRY THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

268
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 25%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 79%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 59%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Jupiter, FL
  5. Jerry Thomas Elementary School in Jupiter, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.