Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Jacob's Well Elementary School in Wimberley, TX
(02-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 71
Address
 3470 RANCH RD 2325
Wimberley, TX 78676
Telephone
(512) 847-5558
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.wimberleyisd.net
City-data.com school rating
71
Students
636
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
41.7
Free lunch eligible students
163
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
17
School district
WIMBERLEY ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I targeted assistance school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
MT VALLEY EL (10.1 miles):

86
DANFORTH J H (0.6 miles):

84
WIMBERLEY H S (0.8 miles):

79
MT VALLEY MIDDLE (11.3 miles):

79
Jacob's Well Elementary School:

71
KATHERINE ANNE PORTER SCHOOL (0.3 miles):

69
CANYON LAKE H S (7.8 miles):

61
TRINITY CHARTER SCHOOL (10.6 miles):

18
PATHFINDER CAMP (10.6 miles):

4
Jacob's Well Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Hays County:

53
Wimberley:

76
Jacob's Well Elementary School:

71

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 636
Enrollment in 2015: 629
Enrollment in 2014: 588
Enrollment in 2013: 572
Enrollment in 2012: 546
Enrollment in 2011: 523
Enrollment in 2010: 522
Enrollment in 2009: 414
Enrollment in 2008: 405
Enrollment in 2007: 426
Enrollment in 2006: 409
Enrollment in 2005: 407
Enrollment in 2004: 396
Enrollment in 2003: 363
Enrollment in 2002: 339
Enrollment in 2001: 341
Enrollment in 2000: 342
Enrollment in 1999: 355

Jacob's Well Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradeG02G03G04G05Total
All students146152169169636
Female students75837784319
Male students71699285317
American Indian/Alaska Native students23 - 27
Asian students1 - 2 - 3
Hispanic students32363534137
Black students - 1214
White students109106128128471
Two or More Races students262414

Enrollment by grade:
2nd grade enrollment: 146
3rd grade enrollment: 152
4th grade enrollment: 169
5th grade enrollment: 169

Jacob's Well Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 319 (50.2%)
School:

50.2%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 317 (49.8%)
Jacob's Well Elementary School:

49.8%
State:

50.1%

Jacob's Well Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 7 (1.1%)
School:

1.1%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 3 (0.5%)
Jacob's Well Elementary School:

0.5%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 137 (21.5%)
Here:

21.5%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 4 (0.6%)
Here:

0.6%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 471 (74.1%)
Jacob's Well Elementary School:

74.1%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 14 (2.2%)
Here:

2.2%
State:

2.1%

Jacob's Well Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 180 (28.3%)
Here:

28.3%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 163 (25.6%)
School:

25.6%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 17 (2.7%)
School:

2.7%
Texas:

6.2%

Jacob's Well Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 41.7

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 4
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 6
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Jacob's Well Elementary School:

15.2
Texas:

15.6

Jacob's Well Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,287,116
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 40 (Salary Expenditures: $1,897,721)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 11 (Salary Expenditures: $190,208)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $51,683)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $147,504)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $283,112
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $2,453,468
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,047,587
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 12 (Salary Expenditures: $206,694)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $51,683)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $147,504)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $680,569

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic58
  • American Indian2
  • White2
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA7
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 64 (male: 35, female: 29)
  • Hispanic: 58 (male: 29, female: 29)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 46 (male: 32, female: 14)
  • Hispanic: 17 (male: 13, female: 4)
  • White: 29 (male: 19, female: 10)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (all male)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic10
  • American Indian2
  • White40
  • LEP4
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 52 (male: 34, female: 18)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all female)
  • White: 40 (male: 26, female: 14)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 2,844 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
School:

1.4%
State:

4.8%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic4
  • White34
  • LEP2
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 38 (male: 19, female: 19)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 34 (male: 17, female: 17)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

59.7
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,492
  • Males1,495
  • Females1,490
  • Hispanic1,432
  • White1,516
Math Average Scale Score:

1,492
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 169
# Absent - Not Tested: 3
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 173

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.4 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.4 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

13%
33%
33%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,495, Tested: 88, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 22%)
11%
32%
35%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,490, Tested: 81, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 21%)
15%
34%
30%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,432, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 6%)
21%
43%
30%
6%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,516, Tested: 121, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 27%)
10%
30%
33%
27%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,485
  • Males1,482
  • Females1,488
  • Hispanic1,418
  • White1,510
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,485
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 170
# Absent - Not Tested: 3
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 173

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.7 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 33%

13%
34%
20%
33%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,482, Tested: 88, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 28%)
13%
35%
25%
28%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,488, Tested: 82, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 38%)
13%
35%
14%
38%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,418, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 11%)
26%
38%
25%
11%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,510, Tested: 122, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 42%)
8%
32%
18%
42%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,572
  • Males1,568
  • Females1,576
  • Hispanic1,520
  • White1,590
Math Average Scale Score:

1,572
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 173
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 174

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

17%
39%
23%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,568, Tested: 83, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 20%)
17%
38%
25%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,576, Tested: 90, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 21%)
18%
39%
22%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,520, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 51%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 7%)
26%
51%
16%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,590, Tested: 126, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 25%)
14%
36%
25%
25%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,556
  • Males1,543
  • Females1,569
  • Hispanic1,484
  • White1,580
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,556
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 173
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 174

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.9 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.1 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 32%

20%
29%
19%
32%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,543, Tested: 83, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 28%)
22%
30%
20%
28%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,569, Tested: 90, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 37%)
18%
28%
17%
37%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,484, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 12%)
37%
33%
18%
12%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,580, Tested: 126, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 39%)
14%
28%
19%
39%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,836
  • Males3,674
  • Females3,981
  • Hispanic3,447
  • White3,962
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,836
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 173
# Absent - Not Tested: 2
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 175

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.5 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.7 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

33%
25%
27%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,674, Tested: 82, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 9%)
45%
22%
24%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,981, Tested: 91, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 21%)
22%
27%
30%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,447, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 55%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 7%)
55%
21%
17%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,962, Tested: 127, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 18%)
26%
26%
30%
18%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,622
  • Males1,628
  • Females1,618
  • Hispanic1,600
  • White1,629
  • Multirace1,635
Math Average Scale Score:

1,622
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 167
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 169

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.7 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.1 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 41%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

7%
41%
31%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,628, Tested: 74, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 20%)
5%
40%
35%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,618, Tested: 93, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 22%)
9%
42%
27%
22%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,600, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 48%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 17%)
8%
48%
27%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,629, Tested: 120, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 21%)
7%
39%
33%
21%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,635, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 43%)
14%
29%
14%
43%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,633
  • Males1,626
  • Females1,639
  • Hispanic1,574
  • White1,650
  • Multirace1,695
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,633
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 168
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 169

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.9 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.4 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 17%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 39%

9%
17%
35%
39%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,626, Tested: 74, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 41%)
12%
12%
35%
41%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,639, Tested: 94, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 37%)
6%
21%
36%
37%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,574, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 25%)
22%
28%
25%
25%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,650, Tested: 121, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 45%)
5%
14%
36%
45%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,695, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 57%, Masters: 29%)
14%
57%
29%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,819
  • Males3,894
  • Females3,758
  • Hispanic3,641
  • White3,875
  • Multirace3,810
Science Average Scale Score:

3,819
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 170
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 171

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.7 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.6 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.2 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 44%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

25%
44%
20%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,894, Tested: 76, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 16%)
22%
40%
22%
16%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,758, Tested: 94, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 49%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 7%)
27%
49%
17%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,641, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 3%)
42%
42%
13%
3%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,875, Tested: 121, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 13%)
21%
43%
23%
13%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 3,810, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 57%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 29%)
14%
57%
29%

5th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


Reading students tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


Science students tested: 1
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,090 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic7
  • American Indian2
  • White28
  • IDEA4
  • 5047
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 37 (male: 19, female: 18)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all female)
  • White: 28 (male: 14, female: 14)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
School:

58.2
State:

159.6

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)

Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
School:

3.1
Texas:

7.2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Wimberley, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents