Dr Michael M. Krop Senior High School in Miami, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 52.

1410 NE 215 ST
Miami, FL 33179

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Mast Academy School (16.2 miles):

94
West Broward High School (16.1 miles):

72
Dr Michael M. Krop Senior High School:

52
South Pines Academy School (5.1 miles):

48
Sunset Heights Charter (Inactive 10/02) School (18.2 miles):

33
Parkway Academy School (4.0 miles):

16
Cross Creek School (18.7 miles):

5
Life Skills Broward County School (13.3 miles):

2
Dr Michael M. Krop Senior High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Miami:

44
Dr Michael M. Krop Senior High:

52

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 652-6808 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 7141
School type: Senior High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 651-8043
Magnet Program.
Principal: Matthew J Welker
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 104
Senate District: 35
School Web Address: http://mkhs.dadeschools.net/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

55%
State average from 451 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

82%
State average from 451 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 452 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

41%
State average from 451 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 452 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

82%
State average from 449 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 452 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 452 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

537
State average from 452 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 450 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

45%
State average from 454 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 454 schools:

47%
Region: 5

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1457 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1443 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 739
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1399
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1319

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1390
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1305
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 355 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 354 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 217
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 344
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 321

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 345
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 321
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 562 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 554 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 250
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 548
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 520

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 541
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 509
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 515 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 510 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 261
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 482
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 457

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 479
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 454
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 654 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 646 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 310
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 630
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 600

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 623
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 590
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

51%
State average from 443 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 440 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 443 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

41%
State average from 443 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 441 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 442 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 442 schools:

56%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 441 schools:

66%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

520
State average from 441 schools:

522
Percent Tested
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

99%
State average from 448 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

32%
State average from 446 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
Here:

72%
State average from 451 schools:

45%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1972 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1948 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 980
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1872
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1748

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1840
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1716
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 564 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 557 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 265
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 537
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 484

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 525
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 470
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 603 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 594 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 329
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 572
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 541

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 562
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 532
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 737 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 729 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 353
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 700
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 662

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 690
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 653
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 626 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 617 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 303
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 589
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 568

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 577
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 555
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 197 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 192 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 109 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 100
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

48%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 425 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 425 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

47%
State average from 425 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

81%
State average from 425 schools:

74%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 425 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 425 schools:

71%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

542
State average from 425 schools:

526
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 425 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 425 schools:

42%
Minority Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 425 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2009 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1965 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 978
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1931
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1759

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1888
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1719
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 537 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 532 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 262
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 525
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 464

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 517
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 458
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 610 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 597 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 285
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 585
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 552

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 575
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 541
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 796 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 770 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 403
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 759
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 688

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 734
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 665
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 618 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 603 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 253
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 582
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 535

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 564
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 518
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 227 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 219 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 97
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 201
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 125 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 125 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

44%
State average from 370 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 370 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

87%
State average from 370 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

39%
State average from 370 schools:

41%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

50%
State average from 370 schools:

52%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 370 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

45%
State average from 370 schools:

49%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 370 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

487
State average from 370 schools:

482
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 370 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

26%
State average from 372 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

71%
State average from 372 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1928 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1915 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 930
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1847
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1827
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 511 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 508 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 245
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 486
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 479
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 560 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 557 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 275
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 544
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 536
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 783 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 776 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 367
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 747
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 741
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 555 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 554 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 263
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 528
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 526
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 258 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 256 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 107
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 240
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

45%
State average from 360 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 361 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 361 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 361 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

401
State average from 361 schools:

374
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 361 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

27%
State average from 362 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

72%
State average from 362 schools:

47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1969 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1963 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 871
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1880
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1874
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 537 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 536 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 259

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 515
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 515
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 566 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 564 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 230

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 543
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 540
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 798 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 795 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 360

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 755
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 752
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 604 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 599 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 238

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 573
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 567
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 311 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 307 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 127

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 275
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 272
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 41

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 105
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 105
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

41%
State average from 348 schools:

42%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 348 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 348 schools:

84%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

55%
State average from 348 schools:

51%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 348 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 348 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

402
State average from 348 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 348 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

24%
State average from 347 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

69%
State average from 348 schools:

45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2003
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

55%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2040
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

68%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

18%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

47%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

16
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

39%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1985
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

75%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2045
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

90%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

80%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1993
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2017
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1971
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2037
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 89%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1,023
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1962
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1994
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1968
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

315
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2027
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 89%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

705
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

72
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

950
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

716
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

73
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1,016
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

307
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 55%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1927
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1936
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1863
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 73

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1947
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1957
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1950
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1945
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1946
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1895
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 51

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2003
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

328
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2008
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1959
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 48

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 953
Mean Scale Score
Here:

703
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 70
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 923
Mean Scale Score
Here:

702
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 60
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 952
Mean Scale Score
Here:

715
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 74
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 9
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 920
Mean Scale Score
Here:

717
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 68
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 973
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

305
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 53%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
DR MICHAEL M. KROP SENIOR HIGH:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 83%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Miami, FL
  5. Dr Michael M. Krop Senior High School in Miami, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.