Community Learning Center West School in Orange City, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 13.

1000 WEST RHODE ISLAND AVE
Orange City, FL 32763

Community Learning Center West School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Volusia County:

42
Orange City:

29
Community Learning Center West:

13

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (386) 575-4076 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 64
School number: 7861
School type: Senior High
District Name: VOLUSIA
Grade range: GRADES 7 TO 10
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (386) 668-3512
Principal: Lloyd Haynes
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 7
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 26
Senate District: 20
School Web Address: www.Volusia.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 29%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 33%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 81%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 21%

Making Reading Gains : 53%

Making Math Gains: 59%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 60%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 58%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 394

Percent Tested: 93%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: F

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 73%

Minority Rate: 55%

Region: 2

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 31%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 30%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 86%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 53%

Making Reading Gains : 42%

Making Math Gains: 57%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 43%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 60%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 402

Percent Tested: 98%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 71%

Minority Rate: 52%

Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 26%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 27%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 80%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 47%

Making Reading Gains: 58%

Making Math Gains: 64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 63%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 63%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns: 428

Percent Tested: 100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 57%

Minority Rate: 39%


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 17%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 22%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 88%

Making Reading Gains: 51%

Making Math Gains: 56%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 61%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 295

Percent Tested: 93%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 45%

Minority Rate: 25%


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (94%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 31
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 67
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 65
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (93%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 42
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

1710
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

53%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

33%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1793
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

48%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

4%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

27%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

1876
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

41%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

36%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

45%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

2%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

20%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1603
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

47%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

47%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

7%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

7%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1814
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

43%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

32%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1835
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

29%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

14%
State average:

21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1787
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1774
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1806
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1847
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1721
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1785
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1832
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1920
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

308
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 32
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 72%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 12
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1699
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1774
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1802
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1899
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

253
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1639
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1771
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1841
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

1918
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

13
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

663
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

50
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

30
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

665
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

43
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

39
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

678
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

46
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

12
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

682
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

40
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 31
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

264
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 23%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 77%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

285
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 38%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 38%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1749
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1750
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1623
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 128

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1697
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1695
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1561
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 134

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

1879
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1889
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1736
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 154

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1852
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 11
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

1825
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1761
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 64

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

254
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1664
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1655
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1532
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 123

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1721
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1709
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1621
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 88

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1840
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1854
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

1784
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 71

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1897
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1888
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1802
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 86

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 20
Mean Scale Score
Here:

663
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 50
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 33
Mean Scale Score
Here:

652
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 31
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 21
Mean Scale Score
Here:

689
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 57
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 22
Mean Scale Score
Here:

684
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 41
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 20
Mean Scale Score
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

658
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 46
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 33
Mean Scale Score
Here:

672
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 45
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 21
Mean Scale Score
Here:

706
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 69
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 22
Mean Scale Score
Here:

694
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 43
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 34
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER WEST:

234
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 9%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 65%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 41%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 23
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

293
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 35%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 96%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Orange City, FL
  5. Community Learning Center West School in Orange City, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.