Community Education Partners-Se School in Orlando, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 10.

2274 S SEMORAN BLVD
Orlando, FL 32822

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Lake Eola Charter School (4.4 miles):	98
Lake Howell High School (8.7 miles):	68
Olympia High School (12.1 miles):	59
Professional & Technical High School (15.6 miles):	49
Apopka High School (17.6 miles):	37
Ae Fmec School (8.2 miles):	23
Community Education Partners-Se School:	10
Ae Beta School (11.1 miles):	9

Community Education Partners-Se School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Orange County:	44
Orlando:	42
Community Education Partners-Se:	10

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (321) 281-2400 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 85
School type: Senior High
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (321) 281-2511
Principal: Denise Mccarty
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 8
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 40
Senate District: 9

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	44%
State average from 133 schools:	66%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	69%
State average from 133 schools:	72%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	87%
State average from 133 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	45%
State average from 133 schools:	47%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	46%
State average from 133 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	66%
State average from 132 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	42%
State average from 133 schools:	57%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	52%
State average from 133 schools:	66%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	461
State average from 133 schools:	522

Percent Tested

Here:	98%
State average from 132 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	60%
State average from 137 schools:	57%

Minority Rate

Here:	57%
State average from 137 schools:	53%

Region: 4

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 502 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 496 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 250
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 468
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 438

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 464
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 434
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 216 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 217 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 105
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 199
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 179

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 70
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	19%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 316 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 311 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 153
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 295
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 283

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 291
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 278
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	47%
State average from 141 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	74%
State average from 133 schools:	72%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	81%
State average from 139 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	34%
State average from 133 schools:	47%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	46%
State average from 133 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	73%
State average from 136 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	38%
State average from 133 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	64%
State average from 133 schools:	67%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	457
State average from 133 schools:	540

Percent Tested

Here:	98%
State average from 134 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	54%
State average from 132 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

Here:	58%
State average from 139 schools:	52%

Region: 4

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 564 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 560 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 284
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 514
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 487

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 511
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 486
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 236 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 234 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 128
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 227
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 211

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 227
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 213
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 144

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 149
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 142
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 128 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 327 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 326 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 153
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 290
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 278

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 288
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 277
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	44%
State average from 124 schools:	66%

Meeting High Standards in Math

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	67%
State average from 124 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	70%
State average from 125 schools:	84%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	38%
State average from 122 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	53%
State average from 122 schools:	63%

Making Math Gains

Here:	75%
State average from 122 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	47%
State average from 122 schools:	61%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	71%
State average from 122 schools:	70%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	465
State average from 122 schools:	535

Percent Tested

Here:	96%
State average from 124 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	44%
State average from 126 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	56%
State average from 125 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 707 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 701 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 343
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 667
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 625

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 661
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 621
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 288 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 286 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 148
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 277
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 257

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 273
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 255
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 215 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 213 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 98
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 201
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 192

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 198
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 190
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 165 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 162 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 144

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 359 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 355 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 158
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 333
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 314

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 328
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 309
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 128 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	13%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 118
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	23%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	21%
State average from 63 schools:	49%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	28%
State average from 63 schools:	55%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	73%
State average from 63 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	9%
State average from 63 schools:	37%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	46%
State average from 63 schools:	53%

Making Math Gains

Here:	72%
State average from 63 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	57%
State average from 63 schools:	55%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	76%
State average from 63 schools:	63%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	382
State average from 63 schools:	461

Percent Tested

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	98%
State average from 63 schools:	97%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	77%
State average from 63 schools:	55%

Minority Rate

Here:	78%
State average from 63 schools:	55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 517 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 512 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 175
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 317
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 320
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	22%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 153 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 154 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	100%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	15%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 239 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 235 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 413 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 409 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 145
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	19%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 263
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 264
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	9%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	14%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	13%
State average from 62 schools:	49%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	26%
State average from 62 schools:	55%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	52%
State average from 62 schools:	82%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	47%
State average from 62 schools:	57%

Making Math Gains

Here:	72%
State average from 62 schools:	66%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	62%
State average from 62 schools:	62%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	272
State average from 62 schools:	371

Percent Tested

Here:	93%
State average from 62 schools:	97%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	73%
State average from 63 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	77%
State average from 63 schools:	53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 496 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 486 (93%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 167
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	13%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 330
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 321
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (93%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 37

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 76
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 73
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 159 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 156 (92%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 59

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	6%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 112
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 109
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 204 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 197 (92%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 63

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	12%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 133
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 127
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 371 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 365 (93%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 127

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	12%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 254
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	22%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 249
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	6%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	14%
State average from 52 schools:	48%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	25%
State average from 52 schools:	56%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	49%
State average from 53 schools:	79%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	42%
State average from 53 schools:	54%

Making Math Gains

Here:	71%
State average from 53 schools:	67%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	70%
State average from 53 schools:	59%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	271
State average from 53 schools:	362

Percent Tested

Here:	77%
State average from 53 schools:	97%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	68%
State average from 53 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	77%
State average from 52 schools:	51%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1457
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	7%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	37%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	10%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	80%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1641
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	33%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	78%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	20
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1772
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	332
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	8%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	43%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	14%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	85%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	11
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1919
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	311
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	24%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	33%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	24%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	12%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	43%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	11
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	1984
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	311
State average:	302

Percent Passing

Here:	62%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	28%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	35%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	16%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	11%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	37%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	30%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	48%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	12%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	63%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	10
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	10
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	31%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	31%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	6%
State average:	5%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	1%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	38%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1464
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	336
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	8%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	34%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	80%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1609
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	1%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	12%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	54%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	27%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	87%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	1701
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	340
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	24%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	34%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	69%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1927
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	16%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	24%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	20%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	9%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	59%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1989
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	324
State average:	326

Percent Passing

Here:	83%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	14%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	28%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	67%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1484
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1695
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 09%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1759
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1942
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1898
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	295
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	289
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1515
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	346
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1634
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1704
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1949
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1964
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	318
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 97

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 54%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 308

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 71%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	1473
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1662
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	333
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1675
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1421
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	259
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1604
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	278
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	1761
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	284
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1889
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	306
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1893
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	294
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	257
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	295
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1436
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1562
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1677
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1472
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	263
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1676
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	278
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1804
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1907
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	297
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1966
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	319
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	106
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	641
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	68
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	106
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	656
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	73
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	100
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	673
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	77
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	45
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	636
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	30
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	9
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	6
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	11
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	102
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	653
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	40
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	12
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	11
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	133
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	668
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	45
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	9
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	337
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	696
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	63
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	12
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	5
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	291
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

Here:	712
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

Here:	70
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 104

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	299
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 58%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 70%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 125

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	254
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 16%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 356

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	276
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 38%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 63%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1484
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	270
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 78%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1505
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1387
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 117

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1619
State average from 808 schools:	1746

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	281
State average:	305

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1603
State average:	1743

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1555
State average:	1668

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 47

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1722
State average from 819 schools:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	276
State average:	294

% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1714
State average:	1807

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1642
State average:	1738

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 72

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1788
State average from 612 schools:	1849

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	287
State average:	298

% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 74%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1803
State average:	1837

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1736
State average:	1779

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 67

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1731
State average from 573 schools:	1879

Mean Scale Score 100-500

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	264
State average:	291

Percent Passing: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 10
Percent Matched to 2006: 79%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1726
State average:	1873

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1761
State average:	1876

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -35

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	255
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	268
State average:	295

% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1420
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	251
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 78%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1428
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1445
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -16

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1667
State average from 804 schools:	1777

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	276
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1664
State average:	1774

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1464
State average:	1645

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 200

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1773
State average from 815 schools:	1851

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	289
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1768
State average:	1845

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1645
State average:	1755

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 123

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1841
State average from 613 schools:	1884

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1855
State average:	1869

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1786
State average:	1821

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 69

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1853
State average from 581 schools:	1950

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	315

Percent Passing: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	1853
State average:	1939

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	1833
State average:	1901

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 20

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 30

Mean Scale Score

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	656
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 50
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 121

Mean Scale Score

Here:	654
State average from 796 schools:	675

Median NPR: 42
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 151

Mean Scale Score

Here:	667
State average from 810 schools:	685

Median NPR: 44
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 134

Mean Scale Score

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	688
State average from 597 schools:	696

Median NPR: 56
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 98

Mean Scale Score

Here:	683
State average from 575 schools:	695

Median NPR: 41
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 33

Mean Scale Score

Here:	641
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 37
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 114

Mean Scale Score

Here:	659
State average from 796 schools:	685

Median NPR: 47
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 149

Mean Scale Score

Here:	680
State average from 810 schools:	698

Median NPR: 54
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 135

Mean Scale Score

Here:	700
State average from 597 schools:	708

Median NPR: 63
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 96

Mean Scale Score

Here:	697
State average from 575 schools:	710

Median NPR: 46
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 144

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

COMMUNITY EDUCATION PARTNERS-SE:	239
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 9%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 75%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 50%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 98

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	256
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 9%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 69%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 46%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AB	BC	MB	NB	NL	NS	NT
NU	ON	PE	QC	SK	YT