Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Michigan forum
Enrollment in Bridgman Alternative Education School
2003 Student Enrollment: 9
Female Enrollment: 1 Male Enrollment: 8
Special Education Enrollment: 9
Special Education Female Enrollment: 1
Special Education Male Enrollment: 8
White Enrollment (%): 100.0%
Bridgman Alternative Education School:
100.0%
State average from 3497 schools:
73.5%
Genders in Bridgman Alternative Education School
2002 Student Enrollment: 7
Female Enrollment: 2 Male Enrollment: 5
Special Education Enrollment: 7
Special Education Female Enrollment: 2
Special Education Male Enrollment: 5
White Enrollment (%): 100.0%
This school:
100.0%
State average from 3348 schools:
74.2%
Genders in Bridgman Alternative Education School
School Safety Practices:
Warning codes used to alert faculty of a critical incident: Yes Tactical evacuation route for students or entry routes for emergency support teams: Yes Off-site staging area for assembly and communication at the onset of critical incident: Yes Emergency communication tree or plan: Yes Facility blueprints and site plan on file with emergency support team: Yes Control access to site during school hours (doors locked or monitored): Yes Control access to grounds during school hours (gates locked or monitored): Yes Students required to pass through metal detectors each day: No Visitors required to pass through metal detectors: No Campus closed for most students during lunch: Yes Integrated home-land security in school practices into school safety plans: Yes Random sweeps for weapons: No Require clear book bags or ban book bags: No Require students to wear badges or picture IDs: No Require staff to wear badges or picture IDs: No Provide staff training in risk assessment: No Security cameras used to monitor the school: Yes Telephones provided in most classrooms: Yes Emergency button provided in lavatories: No In compliance with the state law that requires that a student who brings a firearm to school be expelled for one year: Yes In compliance with Elem. and Sec. Edu. Act (ESEA), that requires referral to juvenile delinquency system of any student who brings a firearm to school: Yes School wide training in positive behavioral support and interventions: Yes
School Safety Plans:
Safety plan exists - Shootings: No Safety plan exists - Riots: No Safety plan exists - Bomb scares or comparable threats (excluding fire): No Safety plan exists - Disaster planning (tornadoes, floods, chemical spill, etc.): No Safety plan exists - Hostages: No Safety plan exists - Lock down: No
School Prevention Programs:
Implemented a violence prevention curriculum: No Practiced behavior modification/intervention with students: Yes Provided group counseling (social work) or therapeutic activity for students: Yes Provided peer mentoring or coaching program: Yes Provided peer mediation (student court) in resolving conduct problems: No Provided conflict resolution training to staff and students: Yes Provided programs that promote a sense of social integration among students: Yes Established a hot line for students to report problems: No Provided training and assistance in classroom management to teachers: Yes Revised or reviewed school wide discipline policy: Yes Made architectural or environmental modifications to reduce crime or violence: No Used a paid law enforcement or security service: No Implemented a drug prevention service: No Conducted community service projects on prevention: No Implemented teacher/staff training on violence/drug prevention: Yes Conducted public/parent awareness activities on violence/drug prevention: Yes Offered after-school or before-school programs: No Provided alternative education programs: No Underwent curriculum acquisition or development: No Provided services for out-of-school youth (school-age): No Administered special one-time events (not included in the above mentioned programs): No Involved organizations in administering drug and violence-prevention services via joint service delivery (including referrals): No Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via teacher/staff training: No Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via public awareness activities: No Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via fund raising: No Allowed students to participate in the design, delivery or critiquing of a drug or violence prevention program: No Balanced and restorative justice conferencing (aka transformative conferencing): No
2002 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Math Statistics:
MEAP Math Results - Bridgman Alternative Education School
MEAP Math Results - Michigan
Students Tested: 2
Students Scoring Proficient: 1 Students Scoring Partially Proficient: 1
Students Scoring Proficient (%): 50.0%
Here:
50.0%
State average from 805 schools:
42.9%
Students Scoring Partially Proficient (%): 50.0%
Here:
50.0%
State average from 805 schools:
15.4%
Met Or Exceeded Standards: 1 Did Not Meet Standard: 1
Met Or Exceeded Standards (%): 50.0%
Bridgman Alternative Education School:
50.0%
State average from 805 schools:
58.9%
Did Not Meet Standard (%): 50.0%
Here:
50.0%
State average from 805 schools:
41.1%
2002 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Reading Statistics:
MEAP Reading Results - Bridgman Alternative Education School
MEAP Reading Results - Michigan
Students Tested: 2
Students Scoring Proficient: 1 Students Scoring Partially Proficient: 1
Students Scoring Proficient (%): 50.0%
Here:
50.0%
State average from 804 schools:
48.9%
Students Scoring Partially Proficient (%): 50.0%
Here:
50.0%
State average from 804 schools:
12.5%
Met Or Exceeded Standards: 1 Did Not Meet Standard: 1
Met Or Exceeded Standards (%): 50.0%
This school:
50.0%
State average from 804 schools:
64.4%
Did Not Meet Standard (%): 50.0%
Here:
50.0%
State average from 804 schools:
35.6%
2002 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Writing Statistics:
Students Tested: 2
Students Scoring Partially Proficient: 2
Students Scoring Partially Proficient (%): 100.0%
This school:
100.0%
State average from 802 schools:
24.1%
Did Not Meet Standard: 2
Did Not Meet Standard (%): 100.0%
Here:
100.0%
State average from 802 schools:
41.7%
2002 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Science Statistics:
MEAP Science Results - Bridgman Alternative Education School
MEAP Science Results - Michigan
Students Tested: 2
Students Scoring Proficient: 1 Students Scoring Partially Proficient: 1
Students Scoring Proficient (%): 50.0%
Bridgman Alternative Education School:
50.0%
State average from 802 schools:
46.9%
Students Scoring Partially Proficient (%): 50.0%
Here:
50.0%
State average from 802 schools:
20.8%
Met Or Exceeded Standards: 1 Did Not Meet Standard: 1
Met Or Exceeded Standards (%): 50.0%
Here:
50.0%
State average from 802 schools:
52.4%
Did Not Meet Standard (%): 50.0%
Here:
50.0%
State average from 802 schools:
47.6%
2002 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Social Studies Statistics:
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: