City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
15.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Bond Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Leon County: | 45 |
Tallahassee: | 45 |
Bond Elementary School: | 15 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (850) 488-1176 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 37
School number: 1181
School type: Elementary
District Name: LEON
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 922-5206
Principal: Pam Hightower
School Web Address: www.bond.leon.k12.fl.us
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 34% |
State average from 963 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 71% |
State average from 963 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 85% |
State average from 963 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 25% |
State average from 962 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 40% |
State average from 963 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 72% |
State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 29% |
State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 59% |
State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 415 |
State average from 963 schools: | 543 |
Percent TestedHere: | 98% |
State average from 963 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: D
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 63% |
State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateHere: | 54% |
State average from 963 schools: | 47% |
Region: 4
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 901 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 895 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 406
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 30% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 827
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 789
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 820
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 782
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 433 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 430 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 195
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 39% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 403
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 382
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 399
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 379
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 235 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 234 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 14% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 205
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 48% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 210
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 203
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 189 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 189 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 25% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 173
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 167
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 173
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 586 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 581 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 257
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 25% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 533
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 511
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 527
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 504
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 11% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 23% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 125
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 29% |
State average from 959 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 63% |
State average from 959 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 78% |
State average from 959 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 21% |
State average from 959 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 44% |
State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 68% |
State average from 959 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 51% |
State average from 959 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 61% |
State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 415 |
State average from 959 schools: | 560 |
Percent TestedHere: | 96% |
State average from 959 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: D
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 61% |
State average from 959 schools: | 54% |
Minority RateHere: | 52% |
State average from 959 schools: | 46% |
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 947 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 942 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 431
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 26% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 855
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 802
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 854
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 805
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 451 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 450 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 199
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 32% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 424
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 397
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 424
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 400
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 268 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 265 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 128
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 12% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 235
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 223
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 223
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 189 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 188 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 88
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 27% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 596 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 595 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 268
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 23% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 530
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 499
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 531
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 501
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 151 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (93%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 12% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 24% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 29% |
State average from 954 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 64% |
State average from 954 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 81% |
State average from 954 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 27% |
State average from 954 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 46% |
State average from 954 schools: | 65% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 76% |
State average from 954 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 48% |
State average from 954 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 75% |
State average from 954 schools: | 68% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 446 |
State average from 954 schools: | 544 |
Percent TestedHere: | 97% |
State average from 954 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 59% |
State average from 954 schools: | 51% |
Minority RateHere: | 52% |
State average from 954 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 894 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 892 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 399
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 26% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 816
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 773
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 817
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 771
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 433 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 431 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 201
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 34% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 402
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 389
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 403
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 388
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 260 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 260 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 105
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 12% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 217
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 44% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 217
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 164 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 21% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 137
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 50% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 149
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 135
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 559 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 554 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 239
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 21% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 509
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 480
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 506
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 475
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 136 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 133 (93%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 15% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 26% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 56% |
State average from 862 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 59% |
State average from 862 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 76% |
State average from 862 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 21% |
State average from 862 schools: | 43% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 61% |
State average from 862 schools: | 70% |
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere: | 43% |
State average from 862 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 63% |
State average from 862 schools: | 66% |
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 39% |
State average from 862 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere: | 418 |
State average from 862 schools: | 539 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 862 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: NO
Grade in 2007: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 91% |
State average from 865 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateHere: | 98% |
State average from 865 schools: | 56% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 264 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 264 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 48% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 229
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 229
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 252 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 252 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 67
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 220
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 219
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 238 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 238 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 208
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 50% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 208
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 19% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 21% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1529 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 338 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 42% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 14% |
State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 85% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1796 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 356 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 29% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 26% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 88% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 10 |
State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1838 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 344 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 27% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 45% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 90% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 4 |
State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1859 |
State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 300 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 32% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 33% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 22% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 35% |
State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1811 |
State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 279 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent PassingHere: | 41% |
State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 49% |
State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 30% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 15% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 22% |
State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 347 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 19% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 50% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 17% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 73% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 290 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 40% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 38% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 18% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 22% |
State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1538 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 351 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 33% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 30% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 24% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 86% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1711 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 358 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 40% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 29% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 24% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 93% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1784 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 357 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 3% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 20% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 16% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 50% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 77% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1913 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 299 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 20% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 21% |
State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 20% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 59% |
State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1946 |
State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 314 |
State average: | 326 |
Percent PassingHere: | 72% |
State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 18% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 23% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 24% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 59% |
State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1593 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 348 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1809 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 359 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 02%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1840 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 344 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1837 |
State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 296 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1836 |
State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 283 |
State average: | 299 |
Percent Passing: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 335 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 276 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1573 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 359 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1726 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 362 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1778 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 356 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1886 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 291 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1935 |
State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 311 |
State average: | 321 |
Percent Passing: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 103
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 466
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1643 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 356 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1730 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 345 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1785 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 334 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1819 |
State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 293 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1828 |
State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 282 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 341 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 286 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1615 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 368 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1637 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 342 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1772 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 355 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1893 |
State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 293 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1939 |
State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 312 |
State average: | 323 |
Percent Passing: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 104 |
State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 657 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Literary (max 18)BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 15 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 668 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 115 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 689 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 11 |
State average: | 9 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 436 |
State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale ScoreBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 680 |
State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of StudentsBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 407 |
State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale ScoreBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 696 |
State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 10 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 133
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 294 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 54%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 62%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 437
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 278 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 39%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - CombinedBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 4 |
State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1164 |
State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 278 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1336 |
State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 278 |
State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1328 |
State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1256 |
State average: | 1397 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 72
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1514 |
State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 286 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1522 |
State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1454 |
State average: | 1532 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 68
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 277 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1325 |
State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 305 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000BOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1392 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 285 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1387 |
State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1342 |
State average: | 1414 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 44
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1535 |
State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 305 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1538 |
State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1459 |
State average: | 1519 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 79
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 106
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 607 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR: 38
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 79
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 620 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Median NPR: 41
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 660 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR: 66
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 105
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 618 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Median NPR: 58
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 78
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 629 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Median NPR: 58
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 73
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 655 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 79
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 269 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - CombinedBOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 3 |
State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 66%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 52%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Tallahassee, FL
- Bond Elementary School in Tallahassee, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: