Alpha Middle School in Hialeah, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 0.

1851 PALM AVE
Hialeah, FL 33010

Show street view No street view available for this location

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 636-6167 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 7824
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 636-6198
Principal: Samuel Johnson
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 1 in Need of Improvement
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 21
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 111
Senate District: 40
School Web Address: outreach.dadeschools.net

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (90%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (89%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (87%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (87%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
ALPHA MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
ALPHA MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1360
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

208
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
ALPHA MIDDLE SCHOOL:

97%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

3%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

5
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
ALPHA MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1523
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

225
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

6%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

84%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

3%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
ALPHA MIDDLE SCHOOL:

215
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

96%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

4%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

3
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1694
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
ALPHA MIDDLE SCHOOL:

234
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

67%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

22%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
ALPHA MIDDLE SCHOOL:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1840
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

54%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

74%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

6%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
ALPHA MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
ALPHA MIDDLE SCHOOL:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1536
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1479
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

217
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

205
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 95%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1740
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1852
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 54
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
ALPHA MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 17%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Hialeah, FL
  5. Alpha Middle School in Hialeah, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.