Phone: (305) 485-2323 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 6052
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 485-2324
Principal: Melba Brito
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 25
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 112
Senate District: 38
School Web Address: http://zgm.dadeschools.net
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingZELDA GLAZER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 81% |
State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 76% |
State average from 612 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingZELDA GLAZER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 89% |
State average from 613 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceZELDA GLAZER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 39% |
State average from 612 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 72% |
State average from 613 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 68% |
State average from 612 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 66% |
State average from 613 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 68% |
State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 559 |
State average from 613 schools: | 545 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 66% |
State average from 614 schools: | 56% |
Minority RateZELDA GLAZER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 96% |
State average from 614 schools: | 49% |
Region: 5
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 868 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 868 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 77% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 828
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 812
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 828
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 812
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 820 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 820 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 77% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 781
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 769
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 781
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 769
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 566 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 566 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 532
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 527
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 532
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 527
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (99%)
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 81% |
State average from 613 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 78% |
State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingZELDA GLAZER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 94% |
State average from 613 schools: | 92% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 39% |
State average from 613 schools: | 49% |
Making Reading Gains ZELDA GLAZER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 74% |
State average from 613 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 66% |
State average from 613 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 76% |
State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 58% |
State average from 613 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 566 |
State average from 613 schools: | 553 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 54% |
State average from 613 schools: | 52% |
Minority RateHere: | 96% |
State average from 613 schools: | 48% |
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 377 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 377 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 352
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 337
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 352
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 337
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 355 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 355 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 330
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 315
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 330
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 315
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 203 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 203 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 77% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 182
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 182
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1770 |
State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500ZELDA GLAZER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 322 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 13% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2ZELDA GLAZER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 14% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 36% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 28% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 73% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1888 |
State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 332 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 11% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 11% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 38% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 27% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 78% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1750 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 328 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 16% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 19% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 35% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 20% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 65% |
State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12ZELDA GLAZER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1881 |
State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 329 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 10% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 12% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 38% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 31% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 77% |
State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1766 |
State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 321 |
State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1780 |
State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 335 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Miami, FL
- Zelda Glazer Middle School in Miami, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: