Polk Correctional Institution School in Polk City, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 5.

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Bartow Elementary Academy School (19.9 miles):

93
Frank E. Brigham Academy School (12.9 miles):

67
Wendell Watson Elementary School (6.9 miles):

57
Rosabelle W. Blake Academy School (13.0 miles):

46
Loughman Oaks Elementary School (14.3 miles):

42
Polk City Elementary School (0.3 miles):

33
James E. Stephens Elementary School (18.6 miles):

25
Polk Correctional Institution School:

5
Lake Alfred B.E.S.T Program School (8.5 miles):

1
Polk Correctional Institution School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Polk County:

41
Polk City:

24
Polk Correctional Institution:

5

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (941) 984-2273 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 76
School number: 5801
School type: Adult
District Name: CESA
Grade range: ADULT
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (941) 984-3072
Principal: William Slaughter
The function/setting of the school: Adult Education
The main educational program offered at the school: Adult

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

36%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

79%
State average from 131 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

80%
State average from 131 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

30%
State average from 131 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

41%
State average from 131 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

37%
State average from 131 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

56%
State average from 131 schools:

69%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

437
State average from 131 schools:

540
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 131 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

64%
State average from 131 schools:

47%
Minority Rate
Here:

88%
State average from 131 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Results


2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
POLK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

322
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2002
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2019
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
POLK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

332
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

90
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

727
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

82
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
POLK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

15
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

12
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

9
State average:

8

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Writing Results



2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 90
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

303
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 49%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.