City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
75.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Park Vista Community High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:| Florida: | 45 |
| Palm Beach County: | 45 |
| Lake Worth: | 48 |
| Park Vista Community High School: | 75 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (561) 491-8400 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 2001
School type: Senior High
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 493-6854
Principal: Nora Rosensweig
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 19
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 86
Senate District: 27
School Web Address: www.parkvistacommunityhighschool.com
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 62% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 89% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 67% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 58% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 449 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 62% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 52% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 75% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 602 |
| State average from 452 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 450 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 47% |
Region: 4
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1278 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1277 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 475
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1197
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1196
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1016 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1015 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 390
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 955
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 954
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 133 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 133 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 334 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 334 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 112
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 307
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 307
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 109 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 89% |
| State average from 440 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 66% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 68% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 59% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 64% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 56% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 75% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 613 |
| State average from 441 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 448 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 446 schools: | 46% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 45% |
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1295 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1295 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 440
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1219
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1219
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1062 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1062 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 360
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1008
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1008
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 269 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 269 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 255
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 255
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 117 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 86% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 45% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 66% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 74% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 74% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 57% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 55% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 71% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 589 |
| State average from 425 schools: | 526 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 42% |
Minority Rate| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 16% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1204 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1203 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 421
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1098
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1097
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1015 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1014 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 932
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 931
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 218 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 218 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 204
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 204
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 94% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 41% |
Making Reading Gains| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 52% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 49% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 67% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns| Here: | 563 |
| State average from 370 schools: | 482 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 97% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 12% |
| State average from 372 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 372 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1666 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1664 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1070 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1070 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 190 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 190 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 290 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 288 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 214 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 214 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 160 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 360 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 81% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 68% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 93% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading Gains| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns| Here: | 412 |
| State average from 361 schools: | 374 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 98% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 12% |
| State average from 362 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 362 schools: | 47% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1793 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1789 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1170 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1168 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 201 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 200 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 296 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 295 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 226 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 224 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 15% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 173 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 42% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 84% |
Making Reading Gains| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 51% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 73% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 408 |
| State average from 348 schools: | 371 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 98% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 347 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 45% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 1588 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 347 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 6% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 43% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 18% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 88% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1738 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 346 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 89% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1801 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 85% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1858 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 338 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 87% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1948 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 344 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 10% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 86% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1984 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 331 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2081 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 23% |
| State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 66% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2126 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing| Here: | 81% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 34% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 54% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 8% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 46% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 13% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 64% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 48% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 64% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 29% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 50% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 11% |
| State average: | 5% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 64% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1586 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 362 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 93% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1681 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 352 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 90% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1770 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 355 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 79% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1831 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 346 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 6% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 16% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 80% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1894 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 43% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 78% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1969 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 339 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 15% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 46% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 84% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2067 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 344 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 43% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 97% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2093 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 350 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing| Here: | 99% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 58% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 96% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1588 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 347 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1722 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 344 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 05%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1797 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1851 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1943 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 343 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2004 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 335 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 2084 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 342 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2148 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 299 |
Percent Passing: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 331 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1636 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 373 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 97%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1666 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 348 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1770 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 355 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1837 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 348 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1912 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1966 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2076 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 347 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 97%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2084 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 348 |
| State average: | 321 |
Percent Passing: 99%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 141
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 163
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 145
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1572 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 345 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1707 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1692 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1830 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 333 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1948 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 344 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2007 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 2117 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 348 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2065 |
| State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 326 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 342 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 339 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1557 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 356 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1643 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 343 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1710 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 342 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1802 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1930 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1996 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 346 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2064 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 343 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2055 |
| State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 323 |
Percent Passing: 94%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 131 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 649 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 665 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 79 |
| State average: | 69 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 149 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 672 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Literary (max 18)| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 174 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 684 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Literary (max 18)| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 645 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 9 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 649 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Functional (max 18)| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 149 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 721 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Informational (max 18)| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 111 |
| State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 730 |
| State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 153
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 317 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 67%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 79%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 164
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 329 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 66%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 114
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 328 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 69%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 2035 |
| State average from 612 schools: | 1849 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 333 |
| State average: | 298 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 2045 |
| State average: | 1837 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1935 |
| State average: | 1779 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 110
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 2021 |
| State average from 573 schools: | 1879 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 291 |
Percent Passing: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 13
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 2032 |
| State average: | 1873 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1986 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 46
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 295 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 8
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 2012 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 1884 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 328 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 2018 |
| State average: | 1869 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1964 |
| State average: | 1821 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 54
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 2039 |
| State average from 581 schools: | 1950 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 315 |
Percent Passing: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 2042 |
| State average: | 1939 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 2002 |
| State average: | 1901 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 40
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 769
Mean Scale Score| PARK VISTA COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: | 723 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 696 |
Median NPR: 84
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 16
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 851
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 710 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 695 |
Median NPR: 68
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 767
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 733 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 708 |
Median NPR: 85
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 10
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 8
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 10
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 851
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 726 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 710 |
Median NPR: 77
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 9
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 864
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 323 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 67%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 91%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Lake Worth, FL
- Park Vista Community High School in Lake Worth, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: