City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
35.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Oceanway School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Duval County: | 44 |
Jacksonville: | 43 |
Oceanway School: | 35 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (904) 714-4680 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 16
School number: 621
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DUVAL
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (904) 714-4685
Principal: John Cochran
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 4
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
Senate District: 8
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 79% |
State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 82% |
State average from 612 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 81% |
State average from 613 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 46% |
State average from 612 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 72% |
State average from 613 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 58% |
State average from 612 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 69% |
State average from 613 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 63% |
State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 550 |
State average from 613 schools: | 545 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 119999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 77% |
State average from 614 schools: | 56% |
Minority RateHere: | 66% |
State average from 614 schools: | 49% |
Region: 2
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 279 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 279 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 69% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 254
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 260
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 255
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 91 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 59% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 217 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 217 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 198
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 195
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 199
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 196
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 31% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 44% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 79% |
State average from 613 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 85% |
State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 89% |
State average from 613 schools: | 92% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 67% |
State average from 613 schools: | 49% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 71% |
State average from 613 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 75% |
State average from 613 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 67% |
State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 76% |
State average from 613 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 609 |
State average from 613 schools: | 553 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 79% |
State average from 613 schools: | 52% |
Minority RateHere: | 62% |
State average from 613 schools: | 48% |
Region: 3
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 245 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 245 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 68% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 223
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 223
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 77% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 188 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 188 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 172
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 172
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 30% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 78% |
State average from 603 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 81% |
State average from 603 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 73% |
State average from 603 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 37% |
State average from 602 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 65% |
State average from 602 schools: | 65% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 65% |
State average from 602 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 69% |
State average from 602 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 56% |
State average from 602 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 524 |
State average from 602 schools: | 543 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 604 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 75% |
State average from 605 schools: | 49% |
Minority RateHere: | 64% |
State average from 605 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 229 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 229 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 77% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 69% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 209
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 204
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 209
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 204
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 140
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 140
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 33% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 50% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 65% |
State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 61% |
State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 88% |
State average from 539 schools: | 91% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 52% |
State average from 538 schools: | 44% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 59% |
State average from 539 schools: | 61% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 71% |
State average from 539 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 65% |
State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 71% |
State average from 539 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere: | 532 |
State average from 539 schools: | 523 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 539 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 32% |
State average from 541 schools: | 49% |
Minority RateHere: | 27% |
State average from 542 schools: | 53% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1139 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1142 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 409
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1073
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1076
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 822 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 825 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 276
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 791
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 791
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 229 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 229 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 105
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 48% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 204
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 207
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 368 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 368 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 135
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 44% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 341
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 39% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 343
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 178 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 178 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 22% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 18% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 59% |
State average from 526 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 52% |
State average from 526 schools: | 63% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 85% |
State average from 526 schools: | 89% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 62% |
State average from 526 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 66% |
State average from 526 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 69% |
State average from 526 schools: | 72% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 393 |
State average from 526 schools: | 425 |
Percent TestedOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 98% |
State average from 526 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 36% |
State average from 525 schools: | 50% |
Minority RateHere: | 27% |
State average from 526 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1127 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1127 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 328
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1047
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1044
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 822 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 823 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 240
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 775
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 775
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 236 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 237 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 98% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 64
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 211
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 28% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 211
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 395 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 397 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 103
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 360
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 32% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 360
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 179 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 181 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 47
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 19% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 169
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 14% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 170
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 53% |
State average from 505 schools: | 59% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 46% |
State average from 505 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 87% |
State average from 506 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 58% |
State average from 505 schools: | 61% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 56% |
State average from 505 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 71% |
State average from 505 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 371 |
State average from 506 schools: | 397 |
Percent TestedHere: | 97% |
State average from 506 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 40% |
State average from 506 schools: | 51% |
Minority RateHere: | 27% |
State average from 506 schools: | 50% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1335 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 306 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 14% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 16% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 44% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 23% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 70% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1554 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 315 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 20% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 14% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 26% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 30% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 10% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 67% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1613 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 303 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 17% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 17% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 39% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 21% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 66% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1906 |
State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 346 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 38% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 86% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2001 |
State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 354 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 12% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 28% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 37% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 20% |
State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 84% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2050 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 345 |
State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 15% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 37% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 31% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 80% |
State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1984 |
State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 323 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 17% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 24% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 19% |
State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 58% |
State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2016 |
State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 317 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent PassingHere: | 64% |
State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 27% |
State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 28% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 20% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 15% |
State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 45% |
State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 21% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 37% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 27% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 10% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 43% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 355 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 22% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 41% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 71% |
State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 323 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 17% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 35% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 37% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 48% |
State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1450 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 332 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 12% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 46% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 30% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 85% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1489 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 308 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 24% |
State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 49% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 19% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 69% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1681 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 336 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 12% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 26% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 27% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 62% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 1826 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 345 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 12% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 10% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 30% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 30% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 78% |
State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1913 |
State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 337 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 12% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 36% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 29% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 80% |
State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2010 |
State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 349 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 7% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 31% |
State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 31% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 28% |
State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 89% |
State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1966 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 314 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 10% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 20% |
State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 35% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 24% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 70% |
State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2021 |
State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 332 |
State average: | 326 |
Percent PassingHere: | 86% |
State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 15% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 36% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 77% |
State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1293 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 299 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1554 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 315 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 06%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 1659 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 312 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 1865 |
State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 339 |
State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1991 |
State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 352 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2048 |
State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 344 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1962 |
State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2043 |
State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 322 |
State average: | 299 |
Percent Passing: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 327 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 355 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 11
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 301 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1432 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 329 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1563 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 325 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1716 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 343 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1843 |
State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 349 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1952 |
State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 346 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2031 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 355 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 1959 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 312 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2033 |
State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 335 |
State average: | 321 |
Percent Passing: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 77
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 61%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 341
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 5 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 13%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 15%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 97%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 424
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1353 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 309 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1548 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 314 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1548 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 292 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 1880 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 342 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2026 |
State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 359 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2028 |
State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 340 |
State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2001 |
State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 326 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1958 |
State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 306 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 290 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 352 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 295 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1503 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 344 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1547 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 321 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1621 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 323 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1886 |
State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 359 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 2002 |
State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 359 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2013 |
State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 350 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1987 |
State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 321 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1985 |
State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 323 |
State average: | 323 |
Percent Passing: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 630 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Informational (max 18)OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 13 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of StudentsOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 89 |
State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale ScoreOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 647 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 658 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 9 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 353 |
State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 695 |
State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 17 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 348 |
State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 717 |
State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 16 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 346 |
State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 716 |
State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Functional (max 18)OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 15 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 450 |
State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 705 |
State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Informational (max 18)OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 12 |
State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 15 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of StudentsOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 384 |
State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 709 |
State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Functional (max 18)OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 13 |
State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)OCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 8 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 88
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 276 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 45%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 68%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 349
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 363 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 85%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 20%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 19%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 98%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 436
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 300 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 52%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1697 |
State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 309 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1710 |
State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1608 |
State average: | 1592 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 102
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1742 |
State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 304 |
State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1769 |
State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1700 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 69
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1839 |
State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 300 |
State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1847 |
State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1777 |
State average: | 1738 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 70
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 309 |
State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1633 |
State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 301 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1642 |
State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1600 |
State average: | 1620 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 42
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1773 |
State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 302 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1789 |
State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1671 |
State average: | 1645 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 117
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1854 |
State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 310 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1858 |
State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1734 |
State average: | 1755 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 124
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 377
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 677 |
State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR: 69
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 349
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 678 |
State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Median NPR: 64
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 441
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 692 |
State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 69
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 377
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 665 |
State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Median NPR: 61
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 350
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 682 |
State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 68
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 439
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 696 |
State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Median NPR: 68
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 430
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedOCEANWAY SCHOOL: | 279 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 37%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 81%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 67%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Jacksonville, FL
- Oceanway School in Jacksonville, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: