All Cities
Nevada Forum
Nevada
Las Vegas, NV
Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School in Las Vegas, Nevada (NV)
Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School in Las Vegas, Nevada (NV)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Nevada) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
81 .
Address:
Principal: Celese R. Rayford
Phone Number (Verify before using): (702) 799-4740
Fax Number (Verify before using): (702) 799-4884
Website: www.wix.com
Title I School: No
AYP School Designation: Adequate
Special Programs: Homework Help Centers: No
Other nearby schools ratings:
Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings: Nevada:
43Clark County:
41Las Vegas:
39This School:
81
Adequate Yearly Progress English Language Arts School English Language Arts AYP Designation: Adequate
Participation All Students:
100.0%Asian:
100.0%Hispanic:
100.0%Black:
100.0%White:
100.0%Two or more Races:
100.0%Limited English Proficiency Students:
100.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
100.0%
Percent Proficient White:
88.6%All Students:
80.4%Hispanic:
72.7%Black:
72.1%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
72.0%Limited English Proficiency Students:
64.7%
Math School Math AYP Designation: Adequate
Participation All Students:
100.0%Asian:
100.0%Hispanic:
100.0%Black:
100.0%White:
100.0%Two or more Races:
100.0%Limited English Proficiency Students:
100.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
100.0%
Percent Proficient White:
75.0%All Students:
74.2%Black:
72.1%Hispanic:
67.2%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
66.5%Limited English Proficiency Students:
57.4%
Average Daily Attendance School Average Daily Attendance AYP Designation: Adequate
Asian:
98.3%Limited English Proficiency Students:
97.5%Hispanic:
97.2%Pacific Islander:
97.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
96.9%All Students:
96.9%Black:
96.8%Two or more Races:
96.3%Individual Education Plan Students:
96.3%White:
96.1%
Discuss this school with others on our active
Nevada Forum
Nevada Writing Examination Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 81 25.8% 1.9% 4.9% 13.8% 29.6% 44.7% 51.9% 34.4% 13.6% 7.1%
Male 49 25.7% -5.7% 4.1% 18.1% 30.6% 48.0% 49.0% 29.5% 16.3% 4.4%
Female 32 26.0% 9.7% 6.3% 9.4% 28.1% 41.3% 56.3% 39.5% 9.4% 9.7%
Asian 11 33.1% 15.6% 9.1% 7.2% 18.2% 37.6% 63.6% 44.2% 9.1% 11.0%
Hispanic 18 16.0% -10.6% 11.1% 20.9% 33.3% 50.1% 44.4% 25.8% 11.1% 3.2%
Black 26 18.1% -7.3% 0.0% 18.2% 42.3% 49.5% 46.2% 28.1% 11.5% 4.2%
White 24 35.4% 11.0% 4.2% 8.6% 20.8% 40.8% 54.2% 40.7% 20.8% 10.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 11 33.1% -14.1% 9.1% 23.5% 18.2% 51.0% 72.7% 23.0% 0.0% 2.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 22 19.5% -10.0% 9.1% 20.0% 31.8% 50.3% 50.0% 26.3% 9.1% 3.3%
Select school year: 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 74 33.3% 12.1% 8.1% 16.2% 31.1% 44.1% 56.8% 32.9% 4.1% 6.7%
Male 38 27.8% 4.2% 13.2% 21.3% 31.6% 47.1% 50.0% 27.4% 5.3% 4.3%
Female 36 39.2% 20.6% 2.8% 10.9% 30.6% 41.0% 63.9% 38.8% 2.8% 9.3%
Hispanic 19 40.9% 0.3% 5.3% 23.9% 26.3% 48.3% 68.4% 24.8% 0.0% 3.0%
Black 20 17.5% 3.3% 10.0% 21.6% 45.0% 47.6% 45.0% 26.8% 0.0% 4.0%
White 28 33.2% 20.5% 10.7% 10.5% 28.6% 41.4% 57.1% 38.8% 3.6% 9.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 14 51.1% -3.6% 0.0% 27.4% 21.4% 48.7% 78.6% 21.5% 0.0% 2.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 18.7% 0.4% 11.5% 23.1% 42.3% 49.0% 46.2% 24.9% 0.0% 3.1%
Select school year: 2004/2005 2003/2004
Nevada Writing Examination Grade 5 Students Tested: 81
This School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.9%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Approaches Standard This School:
44.4%Nevada:
47.5%
Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
Here : -8.2%Nevada : -18.6%
Male
This School : -9.6%State : -26.3%
Female
This School : -6.2%State : -10.3%
Hispanic
This School : -12.0%Nevada : -27.2%
Black
This School : 1.2%Nevada : -27.0%
White
Here : -20.1%Nevada : -10.3%
Two or more Races
Here : -13.8%State : -11.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students
Here : -20.9%Nevada : -31.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Here : -9.5%Nevada : -28.2%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 81 -8.2% -18.6% 0.0% 7.3% 44.4% 47.5% 49.4% 40.7% 6.2% 4.5%
Male 48 -9.6% -26.3% 0.0% 10.2% 45.8% 52.3% 50.0% 34.5% 4.2% 3.0%
Female 33 -6.2% -10.3% 0.0% 4.2% 42.4% 42.3% 48.5% 47.3% 9.1% 6.2%
Hispanic 27 -12.0% -27.2% 0.0% 9.3% 48.2% 54.0% 48.2% 34.3% 3.7% 2.3%
Black 20 1.2% -27.0% 0.0% 10.2% 35.0% 53.0% 55.0% 34.4% 10.0% 2.4%
White 16 -20.1% -10.3% 0.0% 5.2% 56.3% 41.3% 37.5% 47.0% 6.3% 6.5%
Two or more Races 14 -13.8% -11.7% 0.0% 6.1% 50.0% 41.8% 42.9% 46.2% 7.1% 5.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students 21 -20.9% -31.2% 0.0% 10.9% 57.1% 56.6% 42.9% 30.6% 0.0% 2.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 35 -9.5% -28.2% 0.0% 10.2% 45.7% 54.2% 51.4% 33.4% 2.9% 2.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 82 -7.7% -17.2% 4.9% 7.7% 39.0% 45.7% 53.7% 41.9% 2.4% 4.7%
Male 44 -20.6% -25.2% 9.1% 10.6% 47.7% 50.8% 40.9% 35.6% 2.3% 2.9%
Female 38 7.3% -8.8% 0.0% 4.7% 28.9% 40.3% 68.4% 48.5% 2.6% 6.5%
Asian 14 21.9% -1.8% 0.0% 3.8% 14.3% 34.2% 85.7% 52.7% 0.0% 9.3%
Hispanic 30 -23.8% -26.4% 10.0% 9.7% 50.0% 52.9% 40.0% 35.0% 0.0% 2.4%
Black 28 -13.8% -27.0% 3.6% 10.6% 46.4% 52.6% 46.4% 34.1% 3.6% 2.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students 11 -45.6% -44.1% 18.2% 17.6% 63.6% 62.8% 18.2% 19.3% 0.0% 0.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 33 -24.4% -27.2% 9.1% 10.8% 51.5% 52.6% 39.4% 34.3% 0.0% 2.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 81 -2.3% -4.9% 2.5% 8.9% 48.1% 44.3% 40.7% 40.4% 8.6% 6.4%
Male 45 -11.7% -13.2% 2.2% 12.5% 57.8% 49.0% 35.6% 34.4% 4.4% 4.1%
Female 36 9.4% 3.8% 2.8% 5.2% 36.1% 39.3% 47.2% 46.7% 13.9% 8.8%
Hispanic 21 -13.6% -13.8% 4.8% 11.3% 57.1% 50.8% 33.3% 34.9% 4.8% 3.1%
Black 25 4.3% -14.2% 0.0% 12.8% 44.0% 49.6% 40.0% 33.2% 16.0% 4.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 33 -21.4% -15.5% 6.1% 12.6% 63.6% 51.2% 27.3% 33.2% 3.0% 3.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 81 -2.3% -7.5% 2.5% 9.8% 48.1% 46.0% 45.7% 38.8% 3.7% 5.3%
Male 48 -5.9% -15.5% 4.2% 13.3% 50.0% 50.5% 41.7% 32.8% 4.2% 3.3%
Female 33 2.8% 0.9% 0.0% 6.2% 45.5% 41.3% 51.5% 45.1% 3.0% 7.4%
Asian 10 28.3% 6.4% 10.0% 5.2% 10.0% 36.7% 60.0% 48.0% 20.0% 10.1%
Hispanic 27 -7.3% -18.0% 3.7% 13.8% 51.9% 52.5% 44.4% 31.2% 0.0% 2.5%
Black 28 -12.4% -15.8% 0.0% 13.3% 60.7% 50.8% 35.7% 32.6% 3.6% 3.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 31 6.4% -19.0% 3.2% 14.3% 38.7% 53.0% 54.8% 30.5% 3.2% 2.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 81 17.2% 8.1% 2.5% 10.3% 40.7% 42.0% 40.7% 40.1% 16.0% 7.6%
Male 43 6.9% -0.1% 2.3% 13.9% 51.2% 46.6% 34.9% 34.5% 11.6% 5.0%
Female 38 28.8% 16.8% 2.6% 6.5% 28.9% 37.1% 47.4% 46.1% 21.1% 10.4%
Asian 16 29.2% 22.0% 0.0% 5.2% 31.3% 33.2% 37.5% 48.1% 31.3% 13.5%
Hispanic 19 -2.8% -3.3% 0.0% 14.5% 63.2% 49.2% 36.8% 32.8% 0.0% 3.5%
Black 20 10.4% 0.5% 10.0% 13.6% 40.0% 46.3% 45.0% 35.1% 5.0% 5.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 23 16.9% -3.5% 4.3% 15.0% 39.1% 48.9% 56.5% 32.8% 0.0% 3.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 80 16.1% 5.3% 1.3% 11.1% 43.0% 44.0% 50.6% 38.4% 5.1% 6.5%
Male 45 5.9% -2.4% 2.3% 14.8% 52.3% 48.0% 43.2% 33.1% 2.3% 4.1%
Female 35 29.0% 13.2% 0.0% 7.3% 31.4% 40.0% 60.0% 43.9% 8.6% 8.9%
Asian 11 24.0% 18.1% 0.0% 5.2% 36.4% 37.1% 54.5% 46.2% 9.1% 11.5%
Hispanic 20 10.4% -6.4% 0.0% 16.0% 50.0% 50.8% 45.0% 30.2% 5.0% 3.0%
Black 26 8.4% -4.0% 4.0% 15.4% 48.0% 49.0% 44.0% 32.3% 4.0% 3.3%
White 21 27.1% 14.8% 0.0% 7.1% 33.3% 38.5% 61.9% 45.3% 4.8% 9.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 21 3.3% -7.2% 4.8% 16.4% 52.4% 51.2% 38.1% 29.8% 4.8% 2.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 3 Students Tested: 58
Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.8%
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Approaches Standard This School:
17.2%Nevada:
20.3%
Meets Standard This School:
32.8%Nevada:
31.9%
Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 58 11.7% 3.5% 5.2% 10.3% 17.2% 20.3% 32.8% 31.9% 44.8% 37.5%
Male 33 12.9% 3.8% 3.0% 11.1% 18.2% 19.2% 30.3% 30.7% 48.5% 39.0%
Female 25 10.1% 3.2% 8.0% 9.5% 16.0% 21.5% 36.0% 33.1% 40.0% 36.0%
Hispanic 26 -4.4% -2.7% 7.7% 12.5% 30.8% 24.3% 30.8% 33.0% 30.8% 30.2%
Black 10 14.1% -16.7% 0.0% 21.7% 20.0% 29.1% 40.0% 30.6% 40.0% 18.6%
White 15 27.4% 13.5% 6.7% 6.0% 0.0% 14.6% 33.3% 31.5% 60.0% 47.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 20 -10.9% -5.4% 10.0% 13.8% 35.0% 25.8% 35.0% 32.0% 20.0% 28.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 -1.2% -4.6% 5.9% 13.9% 29.4% 24.8% 29.4% 32.6% 35.3% 28.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 59 8.7% 0.4% 6.8% 11.5% 18.6% 22.2% 27.1% 34.9% 47.5% 31.4%
Male 21 15.1% 0.7% 4.8% 11.6% 14.3% 21.7% 23.8% 33.9% 57.1% 32.8%
Female 38 5.2% 0.1% 7.9% 11.3% 21.1% 22.7% 28.9% 35.9% 42.1% 30.0%
Asian 12 25.8% 13.3% 0.0% 5.7% 8.3% 15.1% 8.3% 32.5% 83.3% 46.6%
Hispanic 29 -0.4% -6.3% 3.4% 14.1% 31.0% 26.4% 34.5% 35.7% 31.0% 23.9%
Black 12 9.1% -17.1% 16.7% 22.8% 8.3% 28.4% 41.7% 30.3% 33.3% 18.4%
Limited English Proficiency Students 21 -18.3% -10.5% 4.8% 15.8% 47.6% 28.7% 33.3% 35.5% 14.3% 19.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 38 -0.1% -8.4% 10.5% 15.5% 23.7% 26.9% 31.6% 34.5% 34.2% 23.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 58 14.4% 4.2% 1.7% 6.5% 27.6% 33.0% 34.5% 31.3% 36.2% 29.2%
Male 35 29.4% 6.0% 2.9% 6.6% 11.4% 31.0% 40.0% 31.3% 45.7% 31.1%
Female 23 -8.5% 2.2% 0.0% 6.4% 52.2% 35.1% 26.1% 31.3% 21.7% 27.2%
Hispanic 16 -0.1% -4.0% 0.0% 8.1% 43.8% 39.6% 43.8% 30.3% 12.5% 22.0%
Black 20 3.7% -13.0% 0.0% 12.6% 40.0% 44.1% 30.0% 26.5% 30.0% 16.7%
White 13 36.0% 14.7% 0.0% 3.7% 7.7% 25.3% 46.2% 33.2% 46.2% 37.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 11 -19.9% -8.6% 0.0% 9.2% 63.6% 43.1% 27.3% 29.8% 9.1% 17.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 19 -14.2% -5.3% 0.0% 9.2% 57.9% 39.8% 21.1% 29.9% 21.1% 21.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 56 13.3% 3.6% 3.6% 8.3% 26.8% 31.7% 32.1% 35.6% 37.5% 24.4%
Male 28 18.7% 4.0% 3.6% 8.6% 21.4% 31.1% 42.9% 34.8% 32.1% 25.4%
Female 28 8.0% 3.3% 3.6% 8.0% 32.1% 32.4% 21.4% 36.3% 42.9% 23.2%
Hispanic 24 10.4% -5.3% 0.0% 10.4% 33.3% 38.6% 33.3% 34.5% 33.3% 16.5%
Black 19 6.9% -11.7% 10.5% 16.3% 26.3% 39.1% 47.4% 31.4% 15.8% 13.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 13 5.2% -9.2% 0.0% 12.0% 38.5% 41.0% 53.8% 33.6% 7.7% 13.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 24 -6.3% -6.7% 4.2% 12.0% 45.8% 38.4% 29.2% 33.6% 20.8% 16.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 56 22.8% 12.4% 10.7% 8.8% 23.2% 35.5% 37.5% 33.7% 28.6% 22.1%
Male 30 10.0% 13.0% 20.0% 9.6% 26.7% 34.2% 30.0% 32.6% 23.3% 23.7%
Female 26 37.5% 11.9% 0.0% 8.0% 19.2% 36.9% 46.2% 34.8% 34.6% 20.3%
Hispanic 14 28.1% 3.1% 0.0% 11.3% 28.6% 42.3% 57.1% 31.6% 14.3% 14.8%
Black 25 16.7% -4.2% 12.0% 17.8% 28.0% 43.1% 44.0% 28.3% 16.0% 10.8%
White 11 29.4% 23.4% 18.2% 5.0% 9.1% 28.3% 9.1% 36.8% 63.6% 30.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 10 6.7% -3.5% 10.0% 13.7% 40.0% 46.6% 40.0% 28.4% 10.0% 11.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 19 14.6% 2.2% 10.5% 12.3% 31.6% 42.2% 47.4% 31.2% 10.5% 14.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 57 10.7% 5.1% 8.8% 10.8% 35.1% 38.7% 40.4% 32.2% 15.8% 18.3%
Male 34 22.2% 5.6% 2.9% 11.5% 29.4% 37.6% 50.0% 32.0% 17.6% 18.9%
Female 23 -6.3% 4.7% 17.4% 10.1% 43.5% 39.8% 26.1% 32.4% 13.0% 17.7%
Hispanic 18 -1.0% -6.7% 16.7% 14.5% 38.9% 46.8% 38.9% 27.8% 5.6% 10.9%
Black 19 -8.6% -11.5% 5.3% 20.6% 57.9% 45.5% 15.8% 24.9% 21.1% 9.0%
White 16 42.1% 17.4% 6.3% 6.0% 6.3% 31.2% 62.5% 37.2% 25.0% 25.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 10 -25.4% -15.4% 30.0% 18.1% 50.0% 51.9% 20.0% 23.1% 0.0% 6.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 20 -0.4% -7.6% 25.0% 15.7% 30.0% 46.5% 35.0% 27.2% 10.0% 10.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 60 16.3% 5.6% 10.0% 11.8% 28.3% 37.3% 21.7% 28.4% 40.0% 22.6%
Male 34 10.5% 7.5% 11.8% 11.9% 32.4% 35.2% 11.8% 28.2% 44.1% 24.6%
Female 26 23.8% 3.9% 7.7% 11.4% 23.1% 39.3% 34.6% 28.6% 34.6% 20.7%
Asian 11 36.4% 20.6% 0.0% 5.6% 18.2% 28.4% 9.1% 33.3% 72.7% 32.7%
Hispanic 18 10.2% -7.0% 16.7% 16.1% 27.8% 45.5% 33.3% 25.6% 22.2% 12.9%
Black 14 -9.7% -12.4% 14.3% 22.3% 50.0% 44.7% 14.3% 20.9% 21.4% 12.1%
White 17 31.1% 17.6% 5.9% 6.9% 17.6% 30.1% 23.5% 31.6% 52.9% 31.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 9.8% -7.2% 10.3% 16.9% 34.5% 45.0% 24.1% 25.1% 31.0% 13.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 70 26.9% 10.4% 4.3% 12.3% 34.3% 42.7% 30.0% 24.5% 31.4% 20.4%
Male 40 25.5% 11.8% 2.5% 13.1% 37.5% 40.6% 30.0% 24.7% 30.0% 21.6%
Female 30 28.8% 9.1% 6.7% 11.5% 30.0% 44.9% 30.0% 24.3% 33.3% 19.3%
Hispanic 15 32.2% -2.9% 13.3% 17.8% 20.0% 50.6% 46.7% 19.9% 20.0% 11.6%
Black 18 9.9% -7.9% 5.6% 23.6% 50.0% 49.8% 33.3% 17.9% 11.1% 8.7%
White 27 32.2% 22.2% 0.0% 7.0% 33.3% 36.3% 18.5% 28.8% 48.1% 28.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 17 12.6% -2.6% 17.6% 17.7% 35.3% 50.4% 35.3% 20.2% 11.8% 11.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 4
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Approaches Standard This School:
15.7%Nevada:
23.3%
Exceeds Standard This School:
24.1%Nevada:
14.1%
Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Male This School:
25.0%State:
3.2%
Female This School:
12.1%State:
4.0%
Asian This School:
27.4%Nevada:
19.4%
Black
Here : 18.7%Nevada : -14.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students
This School : -0.5%Nevada : -5.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Detailed Students Results Percent of Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 83 17.2% 3.6% 1.2% 7.2% 15.7% 23.3% 59.0% 55.4% 24.1% 14.1%
Male 33 25.0% 3.2% 0.0% 7.7% 9.1% 23.3% 63.6% 55.0% 27.3% 14.1%
Female 50 12.1% 4.0% 2.0% 6.6% 20.0% 23.4% 56.0% 55.9% 22.0% 14.1%
Asian 15 27.4% 19.4% 0.0% 2.5% 6.7% 12.3% 33.3% 56.8% 60.0% 28.5%
Hispanic 34 10.6% -3.0% 2.9% 8.8% 20.6% 28.2% 67.7% 53.9% 8.8% 9.0%
Black 13 18.7% -14.3% 0.0% 15.6% 15.4% 32.8% 76.9% 46.4% 7.7% 5.2%
White 12 25.8% 12.5% 0.0% 4.2% 8.3% 17.5% 50.0% 58.9% 41.7% 19.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 26 -0.5% -5.3% 3.9% 9.8% 30.8% 29.6% 50.0% 52.1% 15.4% 8.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 47 10.7% -4.5% 2.1% 9.9% 21.3% 28.7% 59.6% 52.8% 17.0% 8.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 82 12.1% 0.5% 1.2% 8.0% 20.7% 25.6% 68.3% 57.5% 9.8% 8.9%
Male 48 21.6% -0.3% 0.0% 8.5% 12.5% 25.9% 72.9% 56.2% 14.6% 9.5%
Female 34 -1.2% 1.3% 2.9% 7.5% 32.4% 25.2% 61.8% 58.9% 2.9% 8.4%
Hispanic 25 10.1% -6.8% 4.0% 9.6% 20.0% 31.3% 68.0% 53.9% 8.0% 5.2%
Black 25 2.1% -15.8% 0.0% 16.0% 32.0% 33.9% 60.0% 47.1% 8.0% 3.0%
White 23 21.1% 9.8% 0.0% 5.0% 13.0% 19.3% 73.9% 62.9% 13.0% 12.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 13 -12.1% -17.1% 7.7% 13.1% 38.5% 38.2% 53.8% 46.5% 0.0% 2.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 1.7% -9.1% 2.9% 11.4% 29.4% 31.9% 67.6% 51.8% 0.0% 5.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 80 18.7% 8.0% 2.5% 8.1% 22.5% 27.6% 32.5% 32.4% 42.5% 31.9%
Male 42 19.9% 7.6% 2.4% 8.4% 21.4% 27.7% 33.3% 32.1% 42.9% 31.8%
Female 38 17.4% 8.3% 2.6% 7.8% 23.7% 27.6% 31.6% 32.7% 42.1% 32.0%
Asian 10 43.7% 23.2% 0.0% 3.4% 0.0% 17.1% 40.0% 32.2% 60.0% 47.3%
Hispanic 29 12.7% 0.0% 0.0% 10.3% 31.0% 33.4% 31.0% 32.4% 37.9% 23.9%
Black 29 9.2% -7.3% 6.9% 15.1% 27.6% 35.9% 31.0% 30.6% 34.5% 18.4%
White 12 35.4% 17.0% 0.0% 4.9% 8.3% 21.8% 33.3% 32.9% 58.3% 40.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 13 -10.1% -9.5% 0.0% 13.9% 53.8% 39.3% 38.5% 30.4% 7.7% 16.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 -0.4% -1.7% 2.9% 11.4% 41.2% 34.0% 29.4% 31.7% 26.5% 22.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 79 17.1% 9.9% 6.3% 9.3% 20.3% 24.5% 35.4% 38.7% 38.0% 27.4%
Male 44 5.1% 9.5% 9.1% 10.2% 29.5% 24.0% 29.5% 38.1% 31.8% 27.7%
Female 35 32.3% 10.3% 2.9% 8.4% 8.6% 25.1% 42.9% 39.4% 45.7% 27.2%
Hispanic 20 13.7% 2.1% 5.0% 11.8% 25.0% 29.8% 45.0% 38.8% 25.0% 19.6%
Black 27 14.1% -5.9% 11.1% 17.7% 18.5% 31.9% 33.3% 35.2% 37.0% 15.2%
White 20 23.7% 19.0% 0.0% 5.7% 20.0% 19.0% 35.0% 39.8% 45.0% 35.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 10 -16.3% -7.4% 20.0% 15.4% 40.0% 35.7% 40.0% 36.2% 0.0% 12.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 35 6.6% -0.1% 11.4% 13.3% 25.7% 30.5% 37.1% 37.5% 25.7% 18.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 81 32.0% 21.0% 4.9% 9.9% 19.8% 25.8% 35.8% 35.6% 39.5% 28.7%
Male 52 33.6% 20.3% 7.7% 10.8% 15.4% 25.6% 34.6% 34.6% 42.3% 29.0%
Female 29 29.1% 21.8% 0.0% 8.9% 27.6% 26.0% 37.9% 36.7% 34.5% 28.4%
Asian 10 56.7% 34.9% 0.0% 4.7% 0.0% 17.1% 40.0% 34.8% 60.0% 43.4%
Hispanic 25 24.7% 11.5% 4.0% 13.4% 28.0% 31.8% 40.0% 35.0% 28.0% 19.7%
Black 26 14.4% 4.6% 11.5% 18.6% 30.8% 33.5% 30.8% 31.8% 26.9% 16.1%
White 18 51.1% 31.5% 0.0% 5.3% 5.6% 19.8% 27.8% 37.3% 66.7% 37.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 28 21.0% 10.4% 7.1% 14.5% 28.6% 31.8% 32.1% 34.8% 32.1% 18.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 5 Students Tested: 83
Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.9%
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Meets Standard This School:
73.5%State:
64.0%
Exceeds Standard This School:
6.0%Nevada:
5.2%
Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective All Students This School:
13.6%Nevada:
3.3%
Black
Here : -5.9%Nevada : -15.6%
White This School:
16.5%State:
11.0%
Two or more Races This School:
34.1%State:
8.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
This School : 7.1%Nevada : -4.5%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 83 13.6% 3.3% 8.4% 16.4% 12.1% 14.5% 73.5% 64.0% 6.0% 5.2%
Male 50 20.1% 1.9% 4.0% 17.3% 10.0% 14.9% 76.0% 62.4% 10.0% 5.4%
Female 33 3.8% 4.8% 15.2% 15.3% 15.2% 14.0% 69.7% 65.8% 0.0% 4.8%
Hispanic 28 12.7% -2.0% 7.1% 19.5% 14.3% 16.5% 78.6% 60.5% 0.0% 3.5%
Black 20 -5.9% -15.6% 20.0% 31.1% 20.0% 18.7% 60.0% 48.9% 0.0% 1.4%
White 17 16.5% 11.0% 5.9% 10.7% 11.8% 12.3% 64.7% 70.0% 17.7% 6.9%
Two or more Races 14 34.1% 8.9% 0.0% 13.4% 0.0% 11.8% 85.7% 68.9% 14.3% 5.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students 22 6.8% -4.4% 9.1% 21.7% 18.2% 16.8% 72.7% 58.1% 0.0% 3.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 37 7.1% -4.5% 13.5% 21.7% 13.5% 16.9% 73.0% 58.3% 0.0% 3.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 82 6.6% 0.6% 10.0% 16.2% 17.5% 17.3% 66.3% 60.4% 6.3% 6.1%
Male 44 1.5% -0.6% 9.3% 17.3% 23.3% 17.4% 58.1% 59.0% 9.3% 6.3%
Female 38 12.5% 1.8% 10.8% 15.0% 10.8% 17.2% 75.7% 61.8% 2.7% 5.9%
Asian 14 27.0% 14.4% 0.0% 8.0% 7.1% 11.7% 78.6% 67.9% 14.3% 12.4%
Hispanic 30 -2.6% -6.2% 3.3% 19.9% 33.3% 20.5% 63.3% 56.3% 0.0% 3.4%
Black 28 -2.9% -15.8% 25.9% 27.9% 11.1% 22.1% 59.3% 47.5% 3.7% 2.6%
White 10 34.1% 9.3% 0.0% 10.8% 0.0% 14.0% 77.8% 66.7% 22.2% 8.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 11 -38.6% -22.7% 9.1% 31.1% 63.6% 25.7% 27.3% 42.1% 0.0% 1.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 33 -12.8% -8.5% 18.8% 21.7% 28.1% 20.9% 53.1% 54.0% 0.0% 3.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 79 5.7% 5.9% 5.1% 4.0% 32.9% 33.8% 44.3% 45.7% 17.7% 16.5%
Male 44 -4.0% 4.7% 6.8% 4.8% 40.9% 34.2% 34.1% 44.8% 18.2% 16.3%
Female 35 18.0% 7.1% 2.9% 3.3% 22.9% 33.3% 57.1% 46.6% 17.1% 16.8%
Hispanic 21 -13.4% -2.7% 4.8% 5.3% 52.4% 41.1% 33.3% 42.4% 9.5% 11.2%
Black 25 7.7% -10.7% 8.0% 8.5% 28.0% 45.9% 48.0% 38.0% 16.0% 7.6%
White 22 21.0% 16.0% 0.0% 2.1% 22.7% 25.5% 50.0% 50.4% 27.3% 21.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 33 -10.8% -4.5% 9.1% 5.8% 45.5% 42.5% 36.4% 41.2% 9.1% 10.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 81 32.6% 5.3% 0.0% 5.9% 11.1% 32.5% 69.1% 48.4% 19.8% 13.2%
Male 48 37.4% 4.4% 0.0% 6.6% 6.3% 32.6% 75.0% 47.6% 18.8% 13.1%
Female 33 25.5% 6.2% 0.0% 5.1% 18.2% 32.5% 60.6% 49.3% 21.2% 13.2%
Asian 10 43.7% 19.0% 0.0% 2.6% 0.0% 22.2% 70.0% 51.8% 30.0% 23.4%
Hispanic 28 33.0% -3.9% 0.0% 7.7% 10.7% 39.9% 82.1% 44.3% 7.1% 8.2%
Black 27 21.5% -12.0% 0.0% 11.2% 22.2% 44.5% 63.0% 38.5% 14.8% 5.8%
White 15 43.7% 15.5% 0.0% 3.5% 0.0% 24.7% 53.3% 54.1% 46.7% 17.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 30 27.0% -5.1% 0.0% 8.5% 16.7% 40.3% 70.0% 43.5% 13.3% 7.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 80 46.7% 15.1% 0.0% 6.7% 10.0% 34.8% 53.8% 46.9% 36.3% 11.6%
Male 42 44.8% 14.1% 0.0% 7.9% 11.9% 34.8% 50.0% 45.9% 38.1% 11.5%
Female 38 48.8% 16.3% 0.0% 5.5% 7.9% 34.9% 57.9% 47.9% 34.2% 11.7%
Asian 16 50.5% 29.6% 0.0% 3.4% 6.3% 23.7% 43.8% 53.0% 50.0% 19.9%
Hispanic 19 40.9% 4.8% 0.0% 9.0% 15.8% 42.9% 63.2% 41.4% 21.1% 6.7%
Black 20 36.7% -3.2% 0.0% 13.3% 20.0% 46.6% 50.0% 35.2% 30.0% 4.8%
White 24 56.7% 26.5% 0.0% 3.7% 0.0% 26.6% 58.3% 53.6% 41.7% 16.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 23 43.7% 3.3% 0.0% 9.8% 13.0% 43.6% 65.2% 40.4% 21.7% 6.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 80 27.1% 9.3% 3.8% 8.2% 23.8% 37.2% 46.3% 41.5% 26.3% 13.2%
Male 45 19.0% 7.9% 4.4% 9.2% 31.1% 37.6% 42.2% 40.9% 22.2% 12.4%
Female 35 37.5% 10.7% 2.9% 7.2% 14.3% 36.7% 51.4% 42.0% 31.4% 14.1%
Asian 11 45.5% 24.4% 0.0% 3.5% 9.1% 26.7% 36.4% 47.2% 54.5% 22.6%
Hispanic 20 9.6% -2.0% 0.0% 10.6% 45.0% 46.0% 45.0% 36.1% 10.0% 7.3%
Black 26 20.0% -9.6% 11.5% 16.4% 23.1% 47.7% 50.0% 30.5% 15.4% 5.3%
White 21 49.8% 20.8% 0.0% 5.0% 4.8% 28.9% 52.4% 47.7% 42.9% 18.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 21 2.2% -4.3% 14.3% 12.2% 38.1% 46.7% 28.6% 34.5% 19.0% 6.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 77 15.6% 5.1% 10.4% 9.2% 28.6% 40.3% 42.9% 38.1% 18.2% 12.4%
Male 40 17.1% 3.8% 15.0% 10.8% 22.5% 40.0% 45.0% 37.1% 17.5% 12.1%
Female 37 14.1% 6.7% 5.4% 7.5% 35.1% 40.4% 40.5% 39.3% 18.9% 12.7%
Hispanic 23 2.4% -8.3% 17.4% 12.6% 34.8% 50.4% 43.5% 31.2% 4.3% 5.9%
Black 16 -26.6% -13.2% 25.0% 17.4% 56.3% 50.5% 18.8% 27.6% 0.0% 4.6%
White 31 38.5% 17.5% 0.0% 5.5% 16.1% 31.7% 48.4% 44.7% 35.5% 18.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 0.8% -8.8% 15.4% 13.6% 38.5% 49.8% 42.3% 30.6% 3.8% 6.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 75 29.0% 15.2% 2.7% 8.4% 33.8% 41.9% 47.3% 39.7% 16.2% 10.0%
Male 34 27.3% 13.3% 2.9% 9.7% 35.3% 42.4% 41.2% 37.6% 20.6% 10.2%
Female 41 30.5% 17.3% 2.5% 6.8% 32.5% 41.4% 52.5% 41.9% 12.5% 9.9%
Asian 10 -234.5% 29.7% -100.0% 4.3% -100.0% 31.6% -100.0% 47.2% -100.0% 17.0%
Hispanic 16 9.3% 2.5% 12.5% 11.2% 43.8% 51.8% 37.5% 32.5% 6.3% 4.5%
Black 30 25.5% -3.6% 0.0% 16.1% 40.0% 52.9% 56.7% 27.5% 3.3% 3.4%
White 19 39.2% 26.1% 0.0% 5.2% 26.3% 34.2% 57.9% 46.3% 15.8% 14.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 10 -14.5% -18.0% 10.0% 31.4% 70.0% 52.1% 10.0% 14.1% 10.0% 2.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 13.8% 2.2% 6.9% 12.4% 44.8% 50.9% 44.8% 32.2% 3.4% 4.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 3
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Meets Standard This School:
34.5%State:
32.6%
Exceeds Standard This School:
36.2%State:
25.7%
Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
This School : 6.9%Nevada : -5.5%
Male
This School : 11.9%Nevada : -8.6%
Black
This School : 16.2%State : -22.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students
This School : -13.8%Nevada : -22.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Detailed Students Results Percent of Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 58 6.9% -5.5% 8.6% 21.5% 20.7% 20.2% 34.5% 32.6% 36.2% 25.7%
Male 33 11.9% -8.6% 6.1% 24.2% 18.2% 20.6% 36.4% 31.8% 39.4% 23.4%
Female 25 0.2% -2.3% 12.0% 18.7% 24.0% 19.8% 32.0% 33.5% 32.0% 28.0%
Hispanic 26 -6.1% -16.6% 15.4% 28.9% 26.9% 23.9% 42.3% 30.8% 15.4% 16.4%
Black 10 16.2% -22.0% 10.0% 33.7% 10.0% 24.4% 40.0% 28.5% 40.0% 13.4%
White 15 9.5% 7.9% 0.0% 12.6% 26.7% 15.7% 20.0% 35.2% 53.3% 36.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 20 -13.8% -22.3% 20.0% 33.5% 30.0% 25.0% 40.0% 29.0% 10.0% 12.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 0.9% -16.9% 14.7% 29.2% 20.6% 23.8% 44.1% 30.8% 20.6% 16.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 59 12.5% -3.0% 3.4% 3.4% 20.3% 35.8% 32.2% 34.7% 44.1% 26.1%
Male 21 2.9% -6.5% 4.8% 4.0% 28.6% 38.7% 19.0% 33.3% 47.6% 24.0%
Female 38 17.8% 0.7% 2.6% 2.8% 15.8% 32.7% 39.5% 36.1% 42.1% 28.4%
Asian 12 27.9% 11.4% 0.0% 1.3% 8.3% 23.5% 8.3% 37.2% 83.3% 37.9%
Hispanic 29 12.1% -13.9% 3.4% 4.6% 20.7% 45.5% 55.2% 33.8% 20.7% 16.1%
Black 12 -5.5% -16.9% 8.3% 5.7% 33.3% 47.4% 8.3% 30.6% 50.0% 16.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students 21 -1.9% -22.2% 4.8% 5.5% 33.3% 52.8% 57.1% 31.5% 4.8% 10.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 38 4.6% -14.1% 5.3% 4.9% 26.3% 45.4% 39.5% 33.1% 28.9% 16.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 58 27.6% 8.3% 3.4% 4.4% 17.2% 35.5% 39.7% 37.2% 39.7% 22.9%
Male 35 31.2% 4.7% 5.7% 5.6% 11.4% 38.0% 31.4% 35.5% 51.4% 20.9%
Female 23 22.2% 12.2% 0.0% 3.2% 26.1% 32.8% 52.2% 38.9% 21.7% 25.0%
Hispanic 16 17.0% -3.3% 0.0% 6.3% 31.3% 45.3% 50.0% 34.7% 18.8% 13.7%
Black 20 23.3% -5.6% 10.0% 6.7% 15.0% 47.1% 50.0% 32.9% 25.0% 13.2%
White 13 40.6% 21.6% 0.0% 2.4% 7.7% 24.3% 23.1% 40.2% 69.2% 33.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 11 11.9% -11.9% 0.0% 7.8% 36.4% 52.5% 54.5% 32.3% 9.1% 7.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 19 16.7% -3.8% 5.3% 6.5% 26.3% 45.6% 52.6% 34.6% 15.8% 13.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 56 21.5% 6.9% 0.0% 6.1% 26.8% 35.3% 30.4% 33.5% 42.9% 25.1%
Male 28 16.2% 3.2% 0.0% 7.1% 32.1% 38.0% 35.7% 32.4% 32.1% 22.5%
Female 28 26.9% 10.8% 0.0% 5.1% 21.4% 32.5% 25.0% 34.7% 53.6% 27.7%
Hispanic 24 6.6% -5.6% 0.0% 8.9% 41.7% 45.0% 33.3% 31.2% 25.0% 15.0%
Black 19 27.2% -5.4% 0.0% 8.3% 21.1% 45.4% 36.8% 30.9% 42.1% 15.4%
Limited English Proficiency Students 13 -20.9% -14.3% 0.0% 11.2% 69.2% 51.4% 30.8% 28.6% 0.0% 8.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 24 6.6% -5.8% 0.0% 9.0% 41.7% 45.2% 41.7% 31.0% 16.7% 14.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 56 35.4% 19.7% 1.8% 7.0% 23.2% 33.7% 57.1% 43.1% 17.9% 16.2%
Male 30 20.4% 15.5% 3.3% 8.6% 36.7% 36.3% 46.7% 40.6% 13.3% 14.5%
Female 26 52.7% 24.1% 0.0% 5.4% 7.7% 30.9% 69.2% 45.7% 23.1% 18.0%
Hispanic 14 31.8% 7.4% 0.0% 10.2% 28.6% 42.9% 71.4% 38.6% 0.0% 8.4%
Black 25 32.4% 6.8% 0.0% 10.5% 28.0% 43.1% 48.0% 36.3% 24.0% 10.2%
White 11 42.2% 32.6% 0.0% 3.9% 18.2% 24.0% 45.5% 47.9% 36.4% 24.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students 10 10.4% -3.6% 0.0% 13.4% 50.0% 50.6% 50.0% 31.9% 0.0% 4.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 19 23.6% 6.5% 5.3% 10.5% 31.6% 43.4% 42.1% 37.6% 21.1% 8.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 57 23.6% 11.3% 5.3% 10.7% 31.6% 38.4% 33.3% 29.5% 29.8% 21.4%
Male 34 25.1% 7.5% 2.9% 12.6% 32.4% 40.3% 35.3% 27.4% 29.4% 19.7%
Female 23 21.3% 15.2% 8.7% 8.8% 30.4% 36.4% 30.4% 31.7% 30.4% 23.1%
Hispanic 18 4.8% -3.3% 16.7% 16.4% 38.9% 47.2% 27.8% 25.1% 16.7% 11.3%
Black 19 18.3% -2.3% 0.0% 15.1% 42.1% 47.6% 36.8% 25.0% 21.1% 12.3%
White 16 41.7% 25.1% 0.0% 5.7% 18.8% 29.6% 25.0% 33.5% 56.3% 31.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 10 -19.6% -15.3% 30.0% 21.4% 50.0% 54.2% 0.0% 19.1% 20.0% 5.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 20 0.4% -3.2% 15.0% 16.2% 45.0% 47.4% 15.0% 25.1% 25.0% 11.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 60 25.4% 4.8% 3.3% 12.3% 31.7% 43.2% 26.7% 29.9% 38.3% 14.6%
Male 34 22.2% 1.8% 5.9% 14.2% 32.4% 44.4% 14.7% 28.2% 47.1% 13.3%
Female 26 29.6% 8.2% 0.0% 10.3% 30.8% 41.9% 42.3% 31.8% 26.9% 16.1%
Asian 11 51.3% 17.7% 0.0% 5.5% 9.1% 37.1% 27.3% 36.3% 63.6% 21.1%
Hispanic 18 10.4% -12.2% 5.6% 19.5% 44.4% 53.1% 22.2% 21.7% 27.8% 5.7%
Black 14 3.3% -7.6% 7.1% 18.4% 50.0% 49.6% 21.4% 24.5% 21.4% 7.4%
White 17 42.8% 19.4% 0.0% 6.3% 17.6% 34.7% 35.3% 36.7% 47.1% 22.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 8.7% -10.0% 6.9% 18.7% 44.8% 51.8% 17.2% 23.1% 31.0% 6.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 70 45.4% 17.2% 5.7% 10.7% 21.4% 44.6% 27.1% 28.0% 45.7% 16.8%
Male 40 47.5% 13.6% 7.5% 12.6% 17.5% 46.2% 32.5% 26.5% 42.5% 14.7%
Female 30 42.5% 20.9% 3.3% 8.6% 26.7% 43.0% 20.0% 29.5% 50.0% 18.9%
Hispanic 15 25.8% -1.2% 13.3% 18.0% 33.3% 55.7% 40.0% 19.9% 13.3% 6.4%
Black 18 33.6% 3.1% 11.1% 15.4% 27.8% 54.0% 27.8% 23.4% 33.3% 7.3%
White 27 61.4% 31.7% 0.0% 5.4% 11.1% 35.4% 22.2% 33.7% 66.7% 25.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 17 13.7% 1.3% 17.6% 16.1% 41.2% 55.1% 23.5% 21.2% 17.6% 7.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 4 Students Tested: 83
Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.9%
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Approaches Standard This School:
12.1%Nevada:
19.3%
Exceeds Standard This School:
36.1%State:
18.5%
Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 83 16.0% -1.1% 6.0% 15.9% 12.1% 19.3% 45.8% 46.3% 36.1% 18.5%
Male 33 18.9% -5.4% 6.1% 19.0% 9.1% 20.5% 39.4% 44.7% 45.5% 15.9%
Female 50 14.1% 3.4% 6.0% 12.7% 14.0% 18.0% 50.0% 48.0% 30.0% 21.3%
Asian 15 27.4% 13.5% 6.7% 7.4% 0.0% 13.2% 26.7% 52.0% 66.7% 27.4%
Hispanic 34 7.6% -10.8% 5.9% 21.5% 20.6% 23.4% 47.1% 43.4% 26.5% 11.7%
Black 13 11.0% -18.2% 7.7% 26.0% 15.4% 26.3% 53.9% 38.5% 23.1% 9.2%
White 12 25.8% 10.9% 0.0% 9.1% 8.3% 14.1% 50.0% 50.0% 41.7% 26.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 26 -4.4% -16.6% 11.5% 25.4% 26.9% 25.3% 38.5% 40.0% 23.1% 9.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 47 4.3% -11.4% 10.6% 21.7% 19.2% 23.8% 40.4% 43.1% 29.8% 11.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 82 18.2% -0.8% 1.2% 7.4% 14.6% 27.5% 39.0% 41.6% 45.1% 23.5%
Male 48 25.8% -4.2% 2.1% 9.3% 6.3% 29.1% 47.9% 41.0% 43.8% 20.6%
Female 34 7.6% 2.8% 0.0% 5.4% 26.5% 25.8% 26.5% 42.1% 47.1% 26.6%
Hispanic 25 18.1% -11.7% 0.0% 10.1% 16.0% 35.6% 56.0% 39.4% 28.0% 14.9%
Black 25 14.1% -14.0% 4.0% 12.6% 16.0% 35.5% 40.0% 38.5% 40.0% 13.4%
White 23 21.1% 11.4% 0.0% 4.2% 13.0% 18.5% 26.1% 43.9% 60.9% 33.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students 13 -4.4% -27.9% 0.0% 14.5% 38.5% 47.4% 46.2% 33.1% 15.4% 5.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 13.5% -11.7% 2.9% 10.7% 17.6% 35.1% 47.1% 39.6% 32.4% 14.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 80 19.9% 5.8% 2.5% 9.1% 21.3% 28.9% 51.3% 46.2% 25.0% 15.8%
Male 42 12.7% 1.8% 4.8% 11.1% 26.2% 30.7% 42.9% 44.6% 26.2% 13.6%
Female 38 27.9% 9.9% 0.0% 6.9% 15.8% 26.9% 60.5% 48.0% 23.7% 18.2%
Asian 10 33.7% 16.1% 0.0% 4.2% 10.0% 23.4% 50.0% 48.1% 40.0% 24.3%
Hispanic 29 9.2% -6.3% 3.4% 12.6% 31.0% 37.3% 44.8% 41.4% 20.7% 8.7%
Black 29 16.1% -7.0% 3.4% 13.6% 24.1% 37.1% 58.6% 41.1% 13.8% 8.2%
White 12 43.7% 18.8% 0.0% 5.4% 0.0% 19.4% 50.0% 52.0% 50.0% 23.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 13 -17.8% -22.7% 7.7% 18.2% 53.8% 48.2% 30.8% 31.2% 7.7% 2.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 8.4% -6.1% 5.9% 13.0% 29.4% 36.8% 47.1% 41.3% 17.6% 8.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 79 10.8% 0.8% 10.1% 11.7% 22.8% 31.2% 44.3% 41.7% 22.8% 15.4%
Male 44 -4.0% -3.8% 15.9% 14.4% 31.8% 33.1% 31.8% 39.0% 20.5% 13.5%
Female 35 29.4% 5.7% 2.9% 8.8% 11.4% 29.2% 60.0% 44.6% 25.7% 17.4%
Hispanic 20 8.7% -10.9% 10.0% 15.7% 25.0% 38.9% 65.0% 37.4% 0.0% 8.0%
Black 27 3.0% -12.3% 14.8% 18.3% 25.9% 37.6% 33.3% 35.2% 25.9% 8.9%
White 20 13.7% 13.0% 0.0% 7.1% 30.0% 23.5% 35.0% 46.6% 35.0% 22.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 10 -16.3% -26.3% 30.0% 22.6% 30.0% 47.5% 40.0% 27.2% 0.0% 2.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 35 0.8% -11.8% 14.3% 17.1% 28.6% 38.4% 45.7% 36.7% 11.4% 7.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 81 25.8% 14.5% 8.6% 13.0% 22.2% 29.2% 51.9% 41.5% 17.3% 16.3%
Male 52 25.9% 9.4% 9.6% 16.1% 21.2% 31.1% 51.9% 38.3% 17.3% 14.5%
Female 29 25.7% 19.9% 6.9% 9.7% 24.1% 27.1% 51.7% 44.9% 17.2% 18.2%
Asian 10 46.7% 26.5% 0.0% 6.7% 10.0% 23.5% 90.0% 48.4% 0.0% 21.4%
Hispanic 25 0.7% 0.9% 16.0% 18.6% 40.0% 37.2% 32.0% 36.6% 12.0% 7.6%
Black 26 22.1% 1.2% 11.5% 19.7% 23.1% 35.8% 50.0% 34.6% 15.4% 9.9%
White 18 51.1% 28.0% 0.0% 7.4% 5.6% 21.2% 55.6% 46.4% 38.9% 24.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 28 10.3% 0.6% 17.9% 19.2% 28.6% 36.9% 35.7% 36.2% 17.9% 7.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 5 Students Tested: 83
This School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.9%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
4.8%Nevada:
17.2%
Meets Standard This School:
51.8%State:
38.9%
Exceeds Standard This School:
31.3%Nevada:
23.8%
Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 83 17.2% -3.2% 4.8% 17.2% 12.1% 20.1% 51.8% 38.9% 31.3% 23.8%
Male 50 20.1% -7.4% 8.0% 20.7% 6.0% 20.7% 58.0% 37.3% 28.0% 21.2%
Female 33 12.9% 1.2% 0.0% 13.5% 21.2% 19.4% 42.4% 40.5% 36.4% 26.6%
Hispanic 28 19.8% -13.3% 3.6% 22.8% 10.7% 24.6% 71.4% 37.2% 14.3% 15.5%
Black 20 -0.9% -20.3% 10.0% 28.2% 25.0% 26.2% 50.0% 33.3% 15.0% 12.3%
White 17 22.3% 9.3% 5.9% 10.1% 5.9% 14.7% 29.4% 41.1% 58.8% 34.1%
Two or more Races 14 27.0% 5.0% 0.0% 12.3% 7.1% 16.8% 50.0% 41.4% 42.9% 29.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 22 11.4% -19.8% 4.6% 27.4% 18.2% 26.5% 63.6% 34.7% 13.6% 11.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 37 7.1% -14.0% 5.4% 23.4% 21.6% 24.7% 62.2% 37.1% 10.8% 14.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 82 0.0% -12.3% 6.1% 8.2% 28.0% 38.2% 56.1% 44.1% 9.8% 9.4%
Male 44 -2.3% -14.8% 9.1% 9.9% 27.3% 38.9% 50.0% 42.9% 13.6% 8.2%
Female 38 2.5% -9.8% 2.6% 6.4% 28.9% 37.5% 63.2% 45.4% 5.3% 10.7%
Asian 14 12.7% 0.0% 0.0% 3.8% 21.4% 30.3% 57.1% 49.6% 21.4% 16.3%
Hispanic 30 -5.9% -25.1% 10.0% 11.3% 30.0% 47.8% 60.0% 36.1% 0.0% 4.8%
Black 28 -12.3% -27.0% 7.1% 13.1% 39.3% 48.0% 50.0% 34.3% 3.6% 4.6%
White 10 34.1% 1.6% 0.0% 4.8% 0.0% 27.7% 60.0% 53.6% 40.0% 14.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 11 -38.6% -49.2% 27.3% 21.2% 45.5% 62.1% 27.3% 16.2% 0.0% 0.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 33 -14.4% -24.7% 15.2% 11.8% 33.3% 46.9% 51.5% 36.4% 0.0% 4.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 79 12.1% -4.4% 7.6% 8.6% 24.1% 39.4% 58.2% 43.4% 10.1% 8.5%
Male 44 5.1% -7.9% 9.1% 10.8% 29.5% 40.8% 54.5% 41.2% 6.8% 7.2%
Female 35 20.8% -0.7% 5.7% 6.4% 17.1% 38.0% 62.9% 45.7% 14.3% 9.9%
Hispanic 21 -8.7% -16.2% 4.8% 11.8% 47.6% 48.1% 47.6% 35.4% 0.0% 4.7%
Black 25 7.7% -18.9% 16.0% 15.2% 20.0% 47.4% 56.0% 33.0% 8.0% 4.4%
White 22 34.6% 8.5% 0.0% 4.7% 9.1% 30.5% 72.7% 52.5% 18.2% 12.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 33 -4.8% -17.1% 12.1% 12.4% 36.4% 48.4% 48.5% 34.9% 3.0% 4.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 81 6.7% -9.7% 3.7% 11.5% 33.3% 41.8% 51.9% 39.0% 11.1% 7.6%
Male 48 8.3% -14.4% 2.1% 14.2% 33.3% 43.8% 54.2% 36.2% 10.4% 5.7%
Female 33 4.3% -4.8% 6.1% 8.7% 33.3% 39.8% 48.5% 41.9% 12.1% 9.6%
Asian 10 33.7% 1.5% 10.0% 6.3% 0.0% 35.9% 70.0% 46.5% 20.0% 11.3%
Hispanic 28 -17.0% -23.5% 7.1% 16.9% 53.6% 50.3% 32.1% 29.4% 7.1% 3.4%
Black 27 3.0% -22.6% 0.0% 16.6% 40.7% 49.7% 51.9% 29.6% 7.4% 4.1%
White 15 37.0% 4.1% 0.0% 6.5% 6.7% 33.1% 73.3% 48.7% 20.0% 11.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 30 3.7% -23.3% 6.7% 17.1% 33.3% 49.9% 46.7% 29.6% 13.3% 3.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 80 38.0% 8.2% 1.3% 9.5% 17.5% 39.0% 61.3% 44.7% 20.0% 6.8%
Male 42 37.7% 4.1% 0.0% 11.7% 19.0% 40.9% 61.9% 42.5% 19.0% 4.9%
Female 38 38.3% 12.6% 2.6% 7.1% 15.8% 37.1% 60.5% 47.0% 21.1% 8.8%
Asian 16 50.5% 18.2% 0.0% 4.9% 6.3% 33.5% 56.3% 52.1% 37.5% 9.5%
Hispanic 19 30.4% -6.1% 0.0% 13.9% 26.3% 48.9% 73.7% 34.6% 0.0% 2.6%
Black 20 21.7% -5.8% 5.0% 15.3% 30.0% 47.1% 55.0% 34.4% 10.0% 3.1%
White 24 48.4% 22.3% 0.0% 4.9% 8.3% 29.4% 62.5% 54.7% 29.2% 10.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 23 21.9% -5.9% 0.0% 14.2% 34.8% 48.4% 60.9% 34.5% 4.3% 2.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 80 7.1% -6.1% 12.5% 15.1% 35.0% 45.6% 43.8% 35.1% 8.8% 4.2%
Male 45 -1.0% -10.0% 11.1% 18.1% 44.4% 46.6% 37.8% 32.2% 6.7% 3.2%
Female 35 17.5% -2.2% 14.3% 12.1% 22.9% 44.7% 51.4% 38.1% 11.4% 5.1%
Asian 11 9.1% 2.9% 0.0% 8.6% 45.5% 43.1% 45.5% 42.8% 9.1% 5.5%
Hispanic 20 -5.4% -19.6% 20.0% 21.6% 40.0% 52.7% 40.0% 24.3% 0.0% 1.4%
Black 26 -3.1% -22.9% 23.1% 25.2% 34.6% 52.2% 38.5% 20.9% 3.8% 1.6%
White 21 30.8% 7.4% 0.0% 8.5% 23.8% 38.6% 57.1% 46.1% 19.0% 6.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 21 -21.6% -20.8% 33.3% 22.8% 42.9% 52.6% 23.8% 23.3% 0.0% 1.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 77 14.3% -2.9% 11.7% 14.1% 28.6% 43.4% 51.9% 36.9% 7.8% 5.6%
Male 40 4.6% -5.6% 15.0% 16.7% 35.0% 43.5% 47.5% 34.9% 2.5% 4.9%
Female 37 24.9% 0.2% 8.1% 11.1% 21.6% 43.3% 56.8% 39.2% 13.5% 6.4%
Hispanic 23 -1.9% -19.7% 13.0% 22.3% 43.5% 51.9% 43.5% 23.9% 0.0% 1.8%
Black 16 -7.9% -19.8% 31.3% 22.5% 31.3% 51.9% 37.5% 23.4% 0.0% 2.1%
White 31 28.8% 12.3% 3.2% 6.9% 22.6% 35.4% 54.8% 48.6% 19.4% 9.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 -3.1% -18.8% 19.2% 21.8% 38.5% 51.6% 38.5% 24.6% 3.8% 2.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 75 20.9% 9.0% 5.4% 12.5% 39.2% 43.9% 41.9% 37.3% 13.5% 6.3%
Male 34 21.4% 5.8% 5.9% 14.8% 38.2% 44.9% 35.3% 35.4% 20.6% 4.9%
Female 41 20.5% 12.5% 5.0% 10.0% 40.0% 43.0% 47.5% 39.3% 7.5% 7.7%
Asian 10 -234.5% 16.4% -100.0% 7.2% -100.0% 41.9% -100.0% 44.2% -100.0% 6.7%
Hispanic 16 -3.2% -9.0% 0.0% 20.0% 68.8% 54.6% 31.3% 23.4% 0.0% 2.1%
Black 30 5.5% -7.4% 13.3% 20.5% 46.7% 52.4% 33.3% 25.4% 6.7% 1.7%
White 19 49.7% 23.8% 0.0% 6.5% 15.8% 35.2% 63.2% 48.2% 21.1% 10.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 10 -24.5% -21.7% 40.0% 43.3% 50.0% 43.8% 0.0% 11.7% 10.0% 1.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 -3.5% -6.8% 10.3% 19.1% 58.6% 53.1% 24.1% 25.4% 6.9% 2.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Language Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 79 13.3% 23.0% 17.3% 25.4% 28.0% 25.9% 41.3% 25.7%
Male 44 22.5% 27.8% 25.0% 26.6% 17.5% 24.3% 35.0% 21.3%
Female 35 2.9% 18.0% 8.6% 24.2% 40.0% 27.5% 48.6% 30.3%
Black 27 20.8% 33.3% 0.0% 26.8% 33.3% 22.5% 45.8% 17.3%
White 20 10.5% 14.6% 15.8% 21.5% 10.5% 27.9% 63.2% 36.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 10 30.0% 42.6% 50.0% 33.4% 10.0% 18.1% 10.0% 5.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 16.7% 33.1% 30.0% 29.8% 23.3% 23.3% 30.0% 13.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 81 13.6% 22.9% 17.3% 24.2% 30.9% 25.4% 38.3% 27.5%
Male 52 11.5% 27.7% 15.4% 25.4% 36.5% 24.0% 36.5% 22.9%
Female 29 17.2% 17.9% 20.7% 23.1% 20.7% 26.8% 41.4% 32.2%
Asian 10 0.0% 10.7% 0.0% 16.3% 40.0% 28.0% 60.0% 45.0%
Black 26 15.4% 31.6% 23.1% 28.0% 34.6% 23.7% 26.9% 16.7%
White 18 0.0% 14.0% 16.7% 19.8% 22.2% 27.6% 61.1% 38.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 28 28.6% 33.6% 17.9% 29.3% 28.6% 22.6% 25.0% 14.5%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 79 7.6% 23.5% 6.3% 24.8% 17.7% 25.1% 68.4% 26.5%
Male 43 11.6% 28.3% 7.0% 25.6% 18.6% 23.9% 62.8% 22.3%
Female 36 2.8% 18.5% 5.6% 24.1% 16.7% 26.4% 75.0% 30.9%
Asian 14 0.0% 10.4% 0.0% 18.5% 14.3% 27.6% 85.7% 43.5%
Hispanic 23 13.0% 34.6% 4.3% 29.7% 26.1% 22.1% 56.5% 13.6%
Black 21 9.5% 33.1% 19.0% 27.9% 19.0% 21.8% 52.4% 17.2%
White 21 4.8% 14.3% 0.0% 21.0% 9.5% 27.9% 85.7% 36.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 10.3% 35.0% 10.3% 29.2% 24.1% 21.7% 55.2% 14.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 81 3.7% 23.5% 9.9% 25.1% 21.0% 24.9% 65.4% 26.6%
Male 49 6.1% 27.9% 12.2% 26.1% 14.3% 23.5% 67.3% 22.5%
Female 32 0.0% 18.9% 6.3% 24.0% 31.3% 26.2% 62.5% 30.9%
Asian 11 0.0% 10.8% 18.2% 18.4% 18.2% 27.1% 63.6% 43.7%
Hispanic 18 0.0% 34.9% 5.6% 29.8% 44.4% 21.6% 50.0% 13.7%
Black 26 11.5% 34.2% 15.4% 28.7% 23.1% 22.3% 50.0% 14.8%
White 24 0.0% 14.5% 4.2% 21.7% 4.2% 27.3% 91.7% 36.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 24 8.3% 35.3% 16.7% 30.0% 25.0% 21.1% 50.0% 13.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 77 19.5% 26.8% 16.9% 23.8% 16.9% 24.0% 46.8% 25.4%
Male 40 27.5% 31.1% 17.5% 24.4% 10.0% 22.9% 45.0% 21.6%
Female 37 10.8% 22.2% 16.2% 23.1% 24.3% 25.2% 48.6% 29.5%
Hispanic 20 15.0% 39.4% 25.0% 28.6% 20.0% 20.2% 40.0% 11.9%
Black 21 42.9% 37.8% 23.8% 25.9% 19.0% 22.3% 14.3% 14.0%
White 28 10.7% 17.5% 7.1% 20.6% 17.9% 26.3% 64.3% 35.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 13 15.4% 48.4% 30.8% 29.2% 30.8% 15.9% 23.1% 6.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 34.6% 38.2% 19.2% 28.3% 19.2% 21.0% 26.9% 12.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Mathematics Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 79 17.1% 20.6% 21.1% 24.2% 26.3% 27.9% 35.5% 27.3%
Male 44 26.8% 21.9% 19.5% 23.0% 22.0% 26.4% 31.7% 28.7%
Female 35 5.7% 19.2% 22.9% 25.4% 31.4% 29.6% 40.0% 25.8%
Black 27 16.0% 34.3% 12.0% 27.1% 36.0% 23.1% 36.0% 15.6%
White 20 15.8% 13.1% 15.8% 20.4% 10.5% 29.1% 57.9% 37.4%
Limited English Proficiency Students 10 40.0% 34.0% 40.0% 31.8% 10.0% 24.0% 10.0% 10.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 25.0% 28.9% 28.1% 27.9% 28.1% 26.7% 18.8% 16.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 81 13.8% 20.8% 16.3% 24.4% 25.0% 27.4% 45.0% 27.3%
Male 52 13.5% 21.6% 13.5% 23.6% 26.9% 26.1% 46.2% 28.7%
Female 29 14.3% 20.0% 21.4% 25.3% 21.4% 28.7% 42.9% 26.0%
Asian 10 0.0% 9.7% 0.0% 19.3% 30.0% 29.2% 70.0% 41.9%
Black 26 19.2% 33.8% 15.4% 28.6% 38.5% 23.0% 26.9% 14.6%
White 18 5.6% 12.7% 11.1% 20.2% 16.7% 28.8% 66.7% 38.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 28 22.2% 29.7% 18.5% 29.1% 11.1% 25.5% 48.1% 15.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 79 5.1% 21.4% 13.9% 24.6% 19.0% 26.9% 62.0% 27.0%
Male 43 9.3% 22.6% 11.6% 23.5% 16.3% 25.5% 62.8% 28.5%
Female 36 0.0% 20.3% 16.7% 25.7% 22.2% 28.5% 61.1% 25.6%
Asian 14 0.0% 10.8% 7.1% 20.7% 0.0% 27.8% 92.9% 40.7%
Hispanic 23 8.7% 30.1% 8.7% 28.9% 39.1% 25.5% 43.5% 15.5%
Black 21 9.5% 34.7% 33.3% 27.9% 14.3% 22.3% 42.9% 15.1%
White 21 0.0% 13.0% 4.8% 20.8% 14.3% 28.9% 81.0% 37.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 10.3% 31.5% 13.8% 29.1% 27.6% 24.2% 48.3% 15.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 81 3.8% 22.1% 16.3% 25.2% 25.0% 27.2% 55.0% 25.5%
Male 49 4.2% 23.3% 14.6% 24.0% 22.9% 26.1% 58.3% 26.6%
Female 32 3.1% 20.9% 18.8% 26.4% 28.1% 28.2% 50.0% 24.4%
Asian 11 0.0% 11.4% 9.1% 20.2% 18.2% 30.4% 72.7% 38.0%
Hispanic 18 5.6% 30.3% 33.3% 30.5% 27.8% 24.9% 33.3% 14.4%
Black 26 7.7% 36.3% 23.1% 28.3% 34.6% 22.9% 34.6% 12.5%
White 24 0.0% 14.4% 0.0% 21.2% 13.0% 29.3% 87.0% 35.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 24 8.3% 31.9% 37.5% 30.0% 25.0% 24.0% 29.2% 14.1%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 77 18.2% 25.0% 18.2% 23.9% 18.2% 26.7% 45.5% 24.5%
Male 40 25.0% 25.6% 12.5% 22.8% 10.0% 25.7% 52.5% 25.9%
Female 37 10.8% 24.4% 24.3% 24.9% 27.0% 27.7% 37.8% 23.0%
Hispanic 20 15.0% 34.2% 20.0% 28.1% 30.0% 24.8% 35.0% 12.9%
Black 21 38.1% 39.3% 28.6% 27.7% 23.8% 21.4% 9.5% 11.6%
White 28 10.7% 16.8% 10.7% 20.8% 7.1% 28.5% 71.4% 34.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 13 15.4% 39.8% 30.8% 29.1% 30.8% 22.0% 23.1% 9.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 34.6% 34.8% 19.2% 28.0% 30.8% 23.9% 15.4% 13.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Reading Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 79 17.1% 23.7% 25.0% 27.6% 27.6% 25.3% 30.3% 23.5%
Male 44 24.4% 25.9% 24.4% 27.8% 29.3% 24.1% 22.0% 22.2%
Female 35 8.6% 21.4% 25.7% 27.3% 25.7% 26.5% 40.0% 24.8%
Black 27 26.9% 31.9% 3.8% 30.0% 38.5% 23.9% 30.8% 14.2%
White 20 5.6% 11.6% 22.2% 21.5% 16.7% 29.4% 55.6% 37.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 10 60.0% 51.7% 40.0% 34.9% 0.0% 11.1% 0.0% 2.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 21.9% 35.4% 37.5% 32.7% 25.0% 21.0% 15.6% 10.9%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 81 16.0% 24.8% 16.0% 27.0% 22.2% 24.8% 45.7% 23.4%
Male 52 15.4% 26.9% 13.5% 27.2% 23.1% 23.5% 48.1% 22.4%
Female 29 17.2% 22.6% 20.7% 26.9% 20.7% 26.1% 41.4% 24.4%
Asian 10 0.0% 14.1% 0.0% 26.7% 20.0% 30.1% 80.0% 29.1%
Black 26 19.2% 31.9% 23.1% 31.6% 26.9% 22.4% 30.8% 14.1%
White 18 0.0% 11.5% 5.6% 21.6% 11.1% 29.7% 83.3% 37.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 28 25.0% 37.9% 25.0% 31.7% 21.4% 20.1% 28.6% 10.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 79 3.8% 25.9% 24.1% 26.5% 24.1% 23.9% 48.1% 23.7%
Male 43 7.0% 27.9% 20.9% 26.6% 20.9% 22.9% 51.2% 22.6%
Female 36 0.0% 23.9% 27.8% 26.5% 27.8% 24.8% 44.4% 24.8%
Asian 14 0.0% 15.0% 7.1% 25.4% 28.6% 31.1% 64.3% 28.5%
Hispanic 23 8.7% 42.7% 26.1% 30.3% 26.1% 17.9% 39.1% 9.1%
Black 21 4.8% 35.2% 38.1% 31.2% 23.8% 19.5% 33.3% 14.1%
White 21 0.0% 11.9% 19.0% 22.3% 19.0% 28.5% 61.9% 37.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 10.3% 40.0% 27.6% 30.7% 24.1% 18.6% 37.9% 10.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 81 4.9% 25.8% 18.5% 26.9% 23.5% 24.0% 53.1% 23.3%
Male 49 6.1% 27.3% 12.2% 27.3% 24.5% 23.2% 57.1% 22.1%
Female 32 3.1% 24.1% 28.1% 26.4% 21.9% 24.9% 46.9% 24.5%
Asian 11 9.1% 15.7% 9.1% 26.6% 36.4% 31.3% 45.5% 26.4%
Hispanic 18 5.6% 43.2% 33.3% 31.3% 33.3% 17.0% 27.8% 8.5%
Black 26 7.7% 35.1% 30.8% 31.6% 19.2% 22.0% 42.3% 11.4%
White 24 0.0% 12.5% 0.0% 22.4% 16.7% 28.5% 83.3% 36.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 24 8.3% 40.3% 37.5% 31.0% 29.2% 18.7% 25.0% 10.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 77 22.1% 27.4% 23.4% 27.0% 16.9% 21.2% 37.7% 24.4%
Male 40 22.5% 28.7% 22.5% 27.6% 15.0% 20.5% 40.0% 23.2%
Female 37 21.6% 26.0% 24.3% 26.4% 18.9% 21.9% 35.1% 25.6%
Hispanic 20 30.0% 46.3% 40.0% 30.3% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 8.4%
Black 21 38.1% 37.3% 28.6% 32.1% 19.0% 18.0% 14.3% 12.6%
White 28 7.1% 13.9% 7.1% 23.3% 17.9% 25.2% 67.9% 37.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 13 38.5% 58.9% 46.2% 28.5% 15.4% 9.5% 0.0% 3.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 34.6% 41.5% 38.5% 30.9% 19.2% 16.7% 7.7% 11.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Science Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 79 15.4% 19.9% 16.7% 26.8% 37.2% 31.5% 30.8% 21.8%
Male 44 23.3% 21.4% 18.6% 26.2% 30.2% 29.8% 27.9% 22.6%
Female 35 5.7% 18.2% 14.3% 27.6% 45.7% 33.3% 34.3% 20.9%
Black 27 19.2% 29.7% 11.5% 33.6% 46.2% 26.2% 23.1% 10.5%
White 20 5.0% 11.8% 10.0% 19.6% 45.0% 34.4% 40.0% 34.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 10 40.0% 35.4% 30.0% 38.4% 20.0% 22.2% 10.0% 4.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 27.3% 28.0% 18.2% 33.0% 36.4% 28.2% 18.2% 10.8%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 81 14.8% 21.4% 21.0% 26.8% 25.9% 30.8% 38.3% 21.1%
Male 52 9.6% 22.7% 25.0% 26.0% 21.2% 29.2% 44.2% 22.1%
Female 29 24.1% 20.0% 13.8% 27.6% 34.5% 32.5% 27.6% 20.0%
Asian 10 0.0% 14.1% 0.0% 23.9% 40.0% 36.2% 60.0% 25.7%
Black 26 15.4% 33.1% 38.5% 31.7% 23.1% 25.2% 23.1% 10.0%
White 18 5.6% 11.9% 0.0% 20.2% 33.3% 34.6% 61.1% 33.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 28 28.6% 30.7% 25.0% 32.5% 14.3% 26.7% 32.1% 10.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 79 8.9% 22.4% 8.9% 26.3% 38.0% 30.7% 44.3% 20.6%
Male 43 14.0% 23.7% 7.0% 25.6% 30.2% 29.4% 48.8% 21.3%
Female 36 2.8% 21.1% 11.1% 27.1% 47.2% 31.9% 38.9% 19.9%
Asian 14 0.0% 14.1% 7.1% 25.5% 42.9% 36.4% 50.0% 24.0%
Hispanic 23 17.4% 33.0% 0.0% 32.3% 34.8% 25.6% 47.8% 9.1%
Black 21 14.3% 33.3% 23.8% 30.7% 38.1% 26.0% 23.8% 10.0%
White 21 0.0% 12.6% 4.8% 20.4% 38.1% 34.8% 57.1% 32.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 13.8% 32.4% 17.2% 32.2% 37.9% 25.9% 31.0% 9.5%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 81 4.9% 22.7% 11.1% 27.3% 33.3% 30.2% 50.6% 19.8%
Male 49 8.2% 23.8% 6.1% 27.0% 36.7% 28.9% 49.0% 20.2%
Female 32 0.0% 21.5% 18.8% 27.6% 28.1% 31.5% 53.1% 19.4%
Asian 11 0.0% 14.8% 9.1% 27.5% 27.3% 33.8% 63.6% 23.9%
Hispanic 18 0.0% 33.2% 27.8% 33.5% 55.6% 25.2% 16.7% 8.0%
Black 26 15.4% 35.6% 11.5% 32.7% 30.8% 23.5% 42.3% 8.2%
White 24 0.0% 13.2% 0.0% 21.5% 25.0% 34.7% 75.0% 30.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 24 12.5% 32.7% 20.8% 33.4% 45.8% 25.0% 20.8% 9.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 77 18.2% 22.4% 16.9% 24.1% 26.0% 33.2% 39.0% 20.4%
Male 40 22.5% 23.9% 20.0% 23.5% 12.5% 31.7% 45.0% 21.0%
Female 37 13.5% 20.8% 13.5% 24.7% 40.5% 34.7% 32.4% 19.8%
Hispanic 20 25.0% 32.3% 20.0% 30.9% 25.0% 28.4% 30.0% 8.4%
Black 21 23.8% 33.4% 33.3% 30.7% 28.6% 27.7% 14.3% 8.3%
White 28 14.3% 14.1% 3.6% 17.9% 21.4% 36.8% 60.7% 31.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 13 30.8% 38.6% 23.1% 34.3% 38.5% 23.0% 7.7% 4.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 34.6% 31.4% 26.9% 30.3% 23.1% 29.0% 15.4% 9.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
All Cities
Nevada Forum
Nevada
Las Vegas, NV
Mabel Hoggard Mathematics and Science Magnet Elementary School in Las Vegas, Nevada (NV)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: