Life Skills Broward County School in Oakland Park, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 2.

2360 W OAKLAND PARK BLVD
Oakland Park, FL 33311

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
The Quest Center School (9.1 miles):

87
Doctors Charter Of Miami Shores School (20.0 miles):

79
Miami Lakes Educational Center School (18.7 miles):

60
Olympic Heights Community High School (14.6 miles):

45
Thompson Academy School (12.5 miles):

33
Parkway Academy School (13.8 miles):

16
International Of Broward School (9.7 miles):

2
Life Skills Broward County School:

2
Robert Renick Education Center School (14.5 miles):

0
Life Skills Broward County School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Broward County:

47
Oakland Park:

37
Life Skills Broward County School:

2

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (954) 735-6970 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 6
School number: 5365
School type: Senior High
District Name: BROWARD
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (954) 735-6022
Principal: Derek Stein
Regular charter school.
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 93
Senate District: 29

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (71%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (64%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (70%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (64%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (73%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (64%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (61%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (59%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (62%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (60%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (60%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (59%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (63%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (59%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (61%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (58%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (67%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (66%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (76%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 122 (71%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LIFE SKILLS BROWARD COUNTY:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (73%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (79%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (68%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (60%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (67%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (58%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (68%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (60%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1705
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

68%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

10%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

8
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
LIFE SKILLS BROWARD COUNTY:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1567
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LIFE SKILLS BROWARD COUNTY:

234
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

11%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

82%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

3%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

3%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

68%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

3%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

3%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
LIFE SKILLS BROWARD COUNTY:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1754
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

61%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

13%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LIFE SKILLS BROWARD COUNTY:

3%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

18%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1772
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

43%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

48%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LIFE SKILLS BROWARD COUNTY:

27%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1619
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

256
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1499
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

221
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

233
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 89%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1755
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1680
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

249
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 1
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 64
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 39%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1600
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

253
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1567
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

234
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

230
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 91%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1662
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LIFE SKILLS BROWARD COUNTY:

225
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1775
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

45
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

654
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

24
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
LIFE SKILLS BROWARD COUNTY:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
LIFE SKILLS BROWARD COUNTY:

8
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
LIFE SKILLS BROWARD COUNTY:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
LIFE SKILLS BROWARD COUNTY:

42
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

35
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
LIFE SKILLS BROWARD COUNTY:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LIFE SKILLS BROWARD COUNTY:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 16
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

229
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 6%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 6
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 63%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
LIFE SKILLS BROWARD COUNTY:

1539
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 57%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1492
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1569
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -77

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 2
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1707
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LIFE SKILLS BROWARD COUNTY:

238
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 58%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1685
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1660
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 25

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1764
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1738
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
LIFE SKILLS BROWARD COUNTY:

1746
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 59
Mean Scale Score
Here:

656
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 26
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 25
Mean Scale Score
Here:

658
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 20
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 59
Mean Scale Score
Here:

672
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 34
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 25
Mean Scale Score
Here:

673
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 18
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 52
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

205
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 2%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
LIFE SKILLS BROWARD COUNTY:

2
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 35%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 21%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Oakland Park, FL
  5. Life Skills Broward County School in Oakland Park, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.