Leewood K-8 Center School in Miami, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 83.

10343 SW 124TH ST
Miami, FL 33176

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Herbert A. Ammons Middle School (5.3 miles):

98
Leewood K-8 Center School:

83
South Miami K-8 Center School (5.4 miles):

77
Dr. Gilbert L. Porter Elementary School (5.7 miles):

66
Jack David Gordon Elementary School (4.6 miles):

52
Bel-Aire Elementary School (4.7 miles):

40
Dr. Edward L. Whigham Elementary School (6.5 miles):

31
Robert Russa Moton Elementary School (3.7 miles):

16
Young Mens Academy For Academic And Civic Development At Miami Douglas Macarthur North Senior High School (16.9 miles):

0
Leewood K-8 Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Miami:

44
Leewood K-8 Center School:

83

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 233-7430 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 2881
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: DADE
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 256-3104
Principal: Bart D Christie
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 21
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 114
Senate District: 38
School Web Address: http://leewood.dadeschools.net

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

91%
State average from 54 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

88%
State average from 54 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

86%
State average from 54 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

79%
State average from 54 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 54 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 53 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 54 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 54 schools:

65%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

641
State average from 54 schools:

539
Percent Tested
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

100%
State average from 53 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

19%
State average from 54 schools:

60%
Minority Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 54 schools:

57%
Region: 5

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 402 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 402 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 98
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 395
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 382

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 395
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 382
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 240 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 240 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 226

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 226
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

90%
State average from 53 schools:

78%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

89%
State average from 52 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

94%
State average from 53 schools:

89%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

72%
State average from 53 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 52 schools:

69%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 53 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 52 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

55%
State average from 52 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

611
State average from 52 schools:

566
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 52 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

15%
State average from 52 schools:

55%
Minority Rate
Here:

67%
State average from 53 schools:

52%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 360 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 360 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 353
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 339

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 353
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 339
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 120 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 120 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 178 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 178 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

92%
State average from 52 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

90%
State average from 52 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

94%
State average from 52 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

62%
State average from 51 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

82%
State average from 51 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 51 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

83%
State average from 51 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 51 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

645
State average from 51 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 51 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

14%
State average from 52 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

65%
State average from 52 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 217 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 212 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 149

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (93%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 167 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 43 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

85%
State average from 43 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 43 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

53%
State average from 43 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 43 schools:

65%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 43 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 43 schools:

64%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 43 schools:

68%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

566
State average from 43 schools:

531
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 43 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

37%
State average from 43 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

70%
State average from 43 schools:

57%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 415 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 415 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 131
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 404
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 405
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 126 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

84%
State average from 44 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

89%
State average from 44 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

77%
State average from 44 schools:

84%
Making Reading Gains
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

71%
State average from 44 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 44 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 44 schools:

65%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

473
State average from 44 schools:

418
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 44 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

30%
State average from 44 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

67%
State average from 44 schools:

56%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 471 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 472 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 153
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 458
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 459
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 149 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 149 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 42

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 148
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 148
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 152 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 153 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 52

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 142
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 143
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 32

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 108
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 108
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 54

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 142
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 143
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 57

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 37

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

80%
State average from 43 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

79%
State average from 43 schools:

65%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 43 schools:

80%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 43 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 43 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

62%
State average from 43 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

457
State average from 43 schools:

400
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 43 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

32%
State average from 43 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

65%
State average from 43 schools:

55%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1613
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

49%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

20%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

89%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1758
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

350
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

5%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

41%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

19%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

90%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1785
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

334
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

48%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

16%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

83%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1927
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

41%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

17%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

90%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1971
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

19%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

81%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

25%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

73%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

10
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1674
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

381
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

3%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

41%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

92%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1636
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

4%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

86%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1770
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

355
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

40%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

19%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

80%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1827
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

46%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

17%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1921
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

11%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

19%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1512
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1677
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1882
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1909
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1627
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

371
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1655
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1828
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

367
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1836
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 90
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1470
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1785
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

354
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 22
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1824
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1366
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

249
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1544
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1583
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

246
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1670
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1589
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

220
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

212
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1559
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1750
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

367
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1801
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

361
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1593
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1686
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1751
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1799
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

96
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

650
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

75
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

103
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

85
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

101
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

691
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

87
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

15
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

18
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

640
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

33
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

6
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

46
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

648
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

36
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

43
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

647
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

26
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

45
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

20
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

8
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

39
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

674
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

33
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

11
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 104
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

337
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 83%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 52
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

211
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 2%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 54%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 45
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

223
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 4%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 22%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1414
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1618
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1626
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1437
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 188

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1642
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1656
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1596
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 60

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1548
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

354
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1633
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1640
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1511
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 128

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1732
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

1741
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1668
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 73

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 143
Mean Scale Score
Here:

639
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 66
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 134
Mean Scale Score
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

649
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 67
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 139
Mean Scale Score
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

675
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 142
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 80
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 134
Mean Scale Score
Here:

669
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 85
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 138
Mean Scale Score
LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER:

677
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 82
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 133
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

317
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 71%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 88%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Miami, FL
  5. Leewood K-8 Center School in Miami, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.