Lealman Intermediate School in St. Petersburg, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 27.

4900 28TH STREET N
St. Petersburg, FL 33714

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Disston Gifted Center School (4.4 miles):

98
Seminole Elementary School (6.9 miles):

72
Southern Oak Elementary School (7.2 miles):

56
Ponce De Leon Elementary School (10.7 miles):

46
Egypt Lake Elementary School (17.0 miles):

38
John Hopkins Middle School (3.8 miles):

29
Lealman Intermediate School:

27
Athenian Academy School (16.2 miles):

18
Lealman Intermediate School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Pinellas County:

51
St. Petersburg:

31
Lealman Intermediate School:

27

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (727) 528-5802 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 2151
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: GRADES 5 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 528-5807
Principal: Cheryl M Dicicco
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
School Web Address: http://www.lealman-ms.pinellas.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 13 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 13 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 13 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

54%
State average from 13 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 13 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 12 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 13 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 13 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

561
State average from 13 schools:

498
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 12 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

72%
State average from 13 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

81%
State average from 13 schools:

44%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 390 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 389 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 374
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 367

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 375
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 365
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 191 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 191 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 184
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 185
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 179
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 149
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 148
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 307 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 306 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 295
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 291

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 296
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 289
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 12 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 11 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

98%
State average from 12 schools:

90%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

45%
State average from 12 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

65%
State average from 11 schools:

68%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 12 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 11 schools:

63%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 11 schools:

64%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

549
State average from 11 schools:

555
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 12 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

62%
State average from 12 schools:

45%
Minority Rate
Here:

77%
State average from 13 schools:

38%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 413 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 413 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 95
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 382
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 370

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 383
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 369
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 191 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 191 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 181
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 172

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 182
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 172
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 176 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 322 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 322 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 297
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 289

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 298
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 288
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

64%
State average from 12 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 12 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 13 schools:

81%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

43%
State average from 12 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 12 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 12 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 12 schools:

59%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 12 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

544
State average from 12 schools:

533
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 12 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

56%
State average from 12 schools:

41%
Minority Rate
Here:

72%
State average from 12 schools:

39%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 382 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 382 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 89
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 367
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 360

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 369
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 359
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 184 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 171

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 176
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 279 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 279 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 269
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 271
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

18%
State average from 10 schools:

56%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

16%
State average from 10 schools:

52%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 10 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

4%
State average from 10 schools:

34%
Making Reading Gains
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

51%
State average from 10 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

54%
State average from 10 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 10 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 10 schools:

65%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

362
State average from 10 schools:

474
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 10 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

72%
State average from 10 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

50%
State average from 10 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 390 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 388 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 104
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 377
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 374
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 192 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 191 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 185
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 169 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 165
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

5%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 284 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 283 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 71
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 278
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 276
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

17%
State average from 9 schools:

54%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

14%
State average from 9 schools:

52%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

71%
State average from 9 schools:

81%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

55%
State average from 9 schools:

60%
Making Math Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 9 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 9 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

286
State average from 9 schools:

379
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 9 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

75%
State average from 9 schools:

64%
Minority Rate
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

48%
State average from 9 schools:

49%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 404 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 403 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 84
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 379
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 380
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 211 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 210 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 45
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 196
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 196
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 158 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 150
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 152
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 306 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 305 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 64
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 286
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 287
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 87
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 89
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

14%
State average from 9 schools:

53%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

8%
State average from 9 schools:

50%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

53%
State average from 9 schools:

75%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

50%
State average from 9 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 9 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 9 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

252
State average from 9 schools:

366
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 9 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

77%
State average from 9 schools:

63%
Minority Rate
Here:

45%
State average from 9 schools:

47%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1239
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

1494
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

32%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1355
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

55%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

24%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1387
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

253
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

57%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

21%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1542
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

46%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

14%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

20%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

1692
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

48%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

15%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

18%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

1734
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

50%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

18%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

18%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

249
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

69%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

12%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

12%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

5
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

62%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

12%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

13%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

1426
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

73%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1578
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

5%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

77%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

1384
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

58%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

33%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

10%
State average:

27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1407
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

69%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

12%
State average:

29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

12%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1567
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

64%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

6%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

7%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1754
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

5%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

25%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1799
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

34%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

41%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

25%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1122
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1453
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 02%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

1308
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

249
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1461
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1587
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1616
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

253
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1703
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

229
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1147
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1419
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1326
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1428
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

253
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1652
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1723
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1771
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 51
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 65%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 105
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1167
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1359
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

1284
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1394
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1517
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1685
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1682
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1236
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1370
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1360
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

268
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1395
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

1646
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1717
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1693
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

234
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

59
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

606
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

37
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

44
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

628
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

48
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

68
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

628
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

36
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

4
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

104
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

628
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

24
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

8
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

90
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

647
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

35
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

9
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

94
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

655
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

34
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

27
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

651
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

22
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

6
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

8
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 42
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

244
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 19%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 48%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 95
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

255
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 11%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 52%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1336
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 98%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1333
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1281
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 51

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1414
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

258
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1411
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1350
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 62

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1568
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1573
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1456
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 117

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1693
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1693
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1548
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 145

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

230
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1410
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1407
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1377
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 30

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1445
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 98%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1443
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1432
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 11

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1633
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

1631
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1449
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 182

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1761
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

1761
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1643
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 118

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 93
Mean Scale Score
Here:

630
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 37
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 91
Mean Scale Score
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

646
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 39
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 87
Mean Scale Score
Here:

654
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 42
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 107
Mean Scale Score
Here:

656
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 34
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 93
Mean Scale Score
LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:

629
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 43
Number Sense (max 12): 7
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 91
Mean Scale Score
Here:

636
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 32
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88
Mean Scale Score
Here:

657
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 45
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 107
Mean Scale Score
Here:

676
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 50
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 107
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

237
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 9%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 80%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 61%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. St. Petersburg, FL
  5. Lealman Intermediate School in St. Petersburg, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.