Lealman Intermediate School in St. Petersburg, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 49.

4900 28TH ST N
St. Petersburg, FL 33714

Lealman Intermediate School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Pinellas County:	51
St. Petersburg:	31
Lealman Intermediate School:	49

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (727) 528-5802 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 2151
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: PINELLAS
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 528-5807
Principal: Gwendolyn B Anderson
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 10
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 53
Senate District: 16
School Web Address: http://www.lealman-ms.pinellas.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 65%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 89%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 54%

Making Reading Gains : 64%

Making Math Gains: 76%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 66%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 74%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 561

Percent Tested: 99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 72%

Minority Rate: 81%

Region: 5

Title I: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 390 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 389 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 374
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 367

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	14%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 375
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 365
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 191 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 191 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 184
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 185
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 179
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	13%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 149
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 148
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 307 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 306 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	19%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 295
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 291

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	13%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 296
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 289
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	16%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 64%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 68%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 98%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 45%

Making Reading Gains : 65%

Making Math Gains: 74%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 63%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 72%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 549

Percent Tested: 100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 62%

Minority Rate: 77%

Region: 5

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 413 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 413 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 95
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	18%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 382
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 370

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	14%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 383
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 369
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 191 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 191 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 181
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 172

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 182
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 172
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 176 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	9%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 322 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 322 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 297
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 289

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	13%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 298
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 288
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	19%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	19%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 64%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 66%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 93%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 43%

Making Reading Gains : 65%

Making Math Gains: 74%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 67%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 72%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 544

Percent Tested: 99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 56%

Minority Rate: 72%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 382 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 382 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 89
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	12%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 367
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 360

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	11%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 369
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 359
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 184 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	15%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 171

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 176
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	6%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 279 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 279 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	10%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 269
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	10%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 271
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	10%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	14%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 78%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 98%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 55%

Making Reading Gains: 67%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math Gains: 70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 57%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 64%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns: 564

Percent Tested: 99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 55%

Minority Rate: 46%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 535 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 535 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	99%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 107
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 484
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 484
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 294 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 293 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	98%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 268
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 267
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 301 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 302 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	98%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 261
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 262
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 81%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 99%

Making Reading Gains: 67%

Making Math Gains: 72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 63%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 457

Percent Tested: 100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 50%

Minority Rate: 40%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 545 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 544 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	100%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 113
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 511
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 510
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 326 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 325 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	100%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 57

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 309
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 308
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 107
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 107
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 55

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 274 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 273 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	100%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 56

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 257
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 256
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 100
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 100
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 81%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 78%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 97%

Making Reading Gains: 70%

Making Math Gains: 72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 66%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 464

Percent Tested: 99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 52%

Minority Rate: 38%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1239
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	290
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	27%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	40%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	16%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	58%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	15
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1494
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	305
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	23%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	16%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	25%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	61%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1355
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	257
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	55%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	22%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	18%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	6%
State average:	28%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	24%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	2
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	11
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	1
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1387
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	253
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	57%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	20%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	1%
State average:	25%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	21%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	9
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1542
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	266
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	46%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	34%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	14%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	5%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	20%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	12
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1692
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	269
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	48%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	34%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	15%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	3%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	18%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	12
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	5
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1734
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	50%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	32%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	18%
State average:	26%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	18%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	9
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	5
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	249
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	69%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	12%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	12%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	7
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	5
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	254
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	62%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	24%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	12%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	1%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	13%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	6
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	5
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1426
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	327
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	38%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	73%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1578
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	18%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	43%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	32%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	77%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1384
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	273
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	58%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	33%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	10%
State average:	27%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	10%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	3
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	3
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	1407
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	248
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	69%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	12%
State average:	29%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	12%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	2
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1567
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	251
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	64%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	30%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	6%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	1%
State average:	19%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	7%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	2
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	3
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1754
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	284
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	41%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	34%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	20%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	5%
State average:	17%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	25%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	3
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	3
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1799
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	265
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	34%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	41%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	25%
State average:	31%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	25%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	2
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	3
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1122
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	271
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1453
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 02%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1308
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	249
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1461
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	266
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1587
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	275
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	1616
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	253
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1703
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	272
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	242
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	229
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1147
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	267
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1419
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	292
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1326
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	260
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1428
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	253
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	1652
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	272
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1723
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	277
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1771
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	257
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 51

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 65%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 105

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1167
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	278
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1359
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	282
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1284
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	245
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1394
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	254
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1517
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	261
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1685
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	268
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1682
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	268
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	236
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	237
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1236
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	286
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1370
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	280
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	1360
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	268
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1395
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	245
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1646
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	271
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1717
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	275
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1693
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	234
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	59
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	606
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	37
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	10
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	11
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	44
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	628
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	48
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	11
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	12
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	7
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	68
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	628
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	36
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	9
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	10
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	4
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	104
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	628
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	24
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	9
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	8
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	10
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	5
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	10
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	90
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	647
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	35
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	9
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	9
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	11
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	94
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	655
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	34
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	10
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	9
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	10
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	6
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	11
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	27
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	651
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	22
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	9
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	6
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	8
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	5
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	9
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	6
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	3
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 42

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	244
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 19%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 48%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 95

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	255
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 11%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 52%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1392
State average:	1342

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1511
State average from 1875 schools:	1542

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	313

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1517
State average:	1546

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1359
State average:	1397

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 158

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1635
State average from 1873 schools:	1629

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1667
State average:	1632

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	1595
State average:	1532

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 71

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1710
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	311
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1707
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	1615
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 92

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	311
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1423
State average:	1413

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1520
State average from 1874 schools:	1525

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1539
State average:	1528

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1408
State average:	1414

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 131

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1667
State average from 1872 schools:	1647

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	333
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1691
State average:	1649

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	1595
State average:	1519

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 96

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1714
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	1728
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

LEALMAN INTERMEDIATE:	1618
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 110

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 133

Mean Scale Score

Here:	636
State average from 1891 schools:	633

Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 121

Mean Scale Score

Here:	640
State average from 1874 schools:	642

Median NPR: 59
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 139

Mean Scale Score

Here:	669
State average from 1870 schools:	667

Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 149

Mean Scale Score

Here:	677
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 69
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 133

Mean Scale Score

Here:	630
State average from 1891 schools:	632

Median NPR: 67
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 121

Mean Scale Score

Here:	650
State average from 1874 schools:	652

Median NPR: 75
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 139

Mean Scale Score

Here:	663
State average from 1870 schools:	663

Median NPR: 73
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 149

Mean Scale Score

Here:	678
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 72
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 122

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	334
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 86%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 98%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AL	CA	CO	DC	DE	FL	GA
IA	ID	IL	IN	KS	KY	LA
MD	ME	MI	MN	NC	NE	NH
NJ	NV	NY	OH	OK	OR	PA
SC	TN	TX	UT	VA	WA	WI