Lawton Chiles Middle Academy School in Lakeland, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 43.

400 N FLORIDA AVE
Lakeland, FL 33801

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Union Academy School (13.4 miles):

91
Mckeel Academy Of Technology School (1.6 miles):

61
Berkley Accelerated Middle School (10.7 miles):

50
Lawton Chiles Middle Academy School:

43
Polk Life And Learning Center School (13.3 miles):

40
Rosabelle W. Blake Academy School (0.9 miles):

35
Sleepy Hill Middle School (3.7 miles):

24
Crystal Lake Middle School (3.1 miles):

15
Lawton Chiles Middle Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Polk County:

41
Lakeland:

44
Lawton Chiles Middle Academy:

43

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (863) 499-2742 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 43
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: POLK
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 499-2774
Magnet School.
Principal: Sharon Neuman
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 64
Senate District: 10

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

35%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

77%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

41%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

44%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

38%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

59%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

441
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

94%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

58%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

27%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 2

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 645 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 631 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 307
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 618
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 585

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 604
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 574
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 481 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 469 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 231
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 465
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 440

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 453
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 431
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 97

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 399 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 389 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 188
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 380
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 354

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 369
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 344
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

35%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

69%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

35%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

46%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

46%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

65%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

441
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

95%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

48%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

26%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 2


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 658 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 643 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 302
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 629
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 601

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 612
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 584
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 474 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 464 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 222
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 454
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 431

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 443
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 421
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 358 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 352 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 156
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 339
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 320

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 332
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 313
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

41%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

71%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

45%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

52%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

43%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

456
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

94%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

41%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

27%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 670 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 660 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 294
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 604
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 576

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 594
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 567
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 489 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 480 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 215
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 446
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 425

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 435
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 414
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 124 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 125 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 316 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 311 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 116
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 278
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 261

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 273
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 258
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (88%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

85%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

84%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

75%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

628
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

100%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

22%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

37%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 589 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 589 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 183
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 572
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 572
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 370 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 370 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 120
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 362
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 362
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 155 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 131 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 131 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

85%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

82%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

486
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

20%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

38%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 562 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 562 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 182
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 558
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 558
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 350 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 350 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 118

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 348
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 348
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 39

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 146
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 146
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 32

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 38

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 111
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 111
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

79%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

83%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

454
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

19%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

33%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1387
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

6%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

77%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1619
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

29%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1637
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

308
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

67%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1662
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

62%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

19%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1938
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

43%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1911
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

50%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

39%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

13%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

25%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

11%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

239
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

65%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

5%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

38%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1457
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

78%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

1571
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

70%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1664
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

57%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1710
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

52%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

14%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

33%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1925
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

16%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

62%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

1977
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

80%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1913
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

310
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1928
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1926
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

303
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1982
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 307
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 65%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1912
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1933
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1934
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1975
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

3
State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

2
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

6
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

318
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

692
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

59
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

11
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

297
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

705
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

63
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 330
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

282
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 38%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 64%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1854
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1862
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1857
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1948
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1950
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1884
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 66

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2028
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 9
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2029
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1957
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 72

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

355
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1831
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1836
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1822
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 14

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1938
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1940
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1813
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 127

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2035
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 38%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2037
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1947
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 91

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 205
Mean Scale Score
Here:

697
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 84
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 197
Mean Scale Score
Here:

701
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 81
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 11
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 186
Mean Scale Score
Here:

715
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 85
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 16
Initial Understanding (max 10): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 205
Mean Scale Score
LAWTON CHILES MIDDLE ACADEMY:

700
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 84
Number Sense (max 10): 7
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 197
Mean Scale Score
Here:

716
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 87
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 186
Mean Scale Score
Here:

732
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 89
Number Sense (max 9): 8
Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 185
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

360
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 82%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 14%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 98%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Lakeland, FL
  5. Lawton Chiles Middle Academy School in Lakeland, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.