Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


La Academia De Estrellas School in Dallas, TX
(PK-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 32
Address
 4680 W KIEST BLVD
Dallas, TX 75236
Telephone
(214) 946-8908
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
32
Students
1,126
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
55.7
Free lunch eligible students
890
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
121
School district
LA ACADEMIA DE ESTRELLAS
Charter school
Yes
Charter authorizer name
STATE BOARD OF (#000001)
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
LENORE KIRK HALL EL (1.6 miles):

76
MARY MCLEOD BETHUNE EL (1.5 miles):

72
TRINIDAD GARZA EARLY COLLEGE AT MT VIEW (1.4 miles):

70
THOMAS TOLBERT EL (0.8 miles):

63
LESLIE A STEMMONS EL (0.7 miles):

51
La Academia De Estrellas School:

32
LIFE SCHOOL MOUNTAIN CREEK (1.4 miles):

25
MOISES E MOLINA H S (1.4 miles):

21
JUSTIN F KIMBALL H S (1.4 miles):

16
La Academia De Estrellas School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Dallas County:

53
Dallas:

53
La Academia De Estrellas School:

32

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 1,126
Enrollment in 2015: 1,048
Enrollment in 2014: 1,059
Enrollment in 2013: 950
Enrollment in 2012: 743
Enrollment in 2011: 602
Enrollment in 2010: 354
Enrollment in 2009: 334
Enrollment in 2008: 271
Enrollment in 2007: 176

La Academia De Estrellas School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05G06G07G08Total
All students268100959389959593961021,126
Female students130525047444842494052554
Male students138484546454753445650572
Hispanic students2619794918994939193991,102
Black students3 - - 1 - - - 1139
White students2311 - 1211 - 12
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - - - - - - - - 1 - 1
Two or More Races students2 - - - - - - - - - 2

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 268
Kindergarten enrollment: 100
1st grade enrollment: 95
2nd grade enrollment: 93
3rd grade enrollment: 89
4th grade enrollment: 95
5th grade enrollment: 95
6th grade enrollment: 93
7th grade enrollment: 96
8th grade enrollment: 102

La Academia De Estrellas School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 554 (49.2%)
La Academia De Estrellas School:

49.2%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 572 (50.8%)
Here:

50.8%
State:

50.1%

La Academia De Estrellas School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Hispanic enrollment: 1,102 (97.9%)
La Academia De Estrellas School:

97.9%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 9 (0.8%)
Here:

0.8%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 12 (1.1%)
La Academia De Estrellas School:

1.1%
Texas:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 1 (0.1%)
School:

0.1%
Texas:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 2 (0.2%)
La Academia De Estrellas School:

0.2%
State:

2.1%

La Academia De Estrellas School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 1,011 (89.8%)
La Academia De Estrellas School:

89.8%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 890 (79.0%)
La Academia De Estrellas School:

79.0%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 121 (10.7%)
School:

10.7%
Texas:

6.2%

La Academia De Estrellas School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 55.7

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 5
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 8
Number of FTE school counselors: 2
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 23

Student/Teacher Ratio
La Academia De Estrellas School:

20.2
State:

15.6

La Academia De Estrellas School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $4,570,303
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 46 (Salary Expenditures: $2,639,969)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 14 (Salary Expenditures: $454,558)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 11 (Salary Expenditures: $569,211)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 17.9 (Salary Expenditures: $906,566)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,661,840
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $5,769,859
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,639,969
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 33 (Salary Expenditures: $866,331)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 11.7 (Salary Expenditures: $619,706)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 18.7 (Salary Expenditures: $961,610)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $2,541,300

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic649
  • American Indian2
  • White4
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA67
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 657 (male: 336, female: 321)
  • Hispanic: 649 (male: 332, female: 317)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all female)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 67 (male: 47, female: 20)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 108 (male: 70, female: 38)
  • Hispanic: 104 (male: 70, female: 34)
  • Black: 4 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 65 (male: 46, female: 19)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 18 (male: 8, female: 10)
  • Hispanic: 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
La Academia De Estrellas School:

2.0%
Texas:

5.2%
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Percent of 1st grade students retained
La Academia De Estrellas School:

4.2%
Texas:

6.1%
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Here:

4.3%
State:

4.8%
Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
La Academia De Estrellas School:

4.5%
State:

4.1%
Total number of students retained in 4th grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)

Percent of 4th grade students retained
School:

4.2%
State:

3.6%
Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 5th grade students retained
School:

2.1%
State:

4.3%
Total number of students retained in 6th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 6th grade students retained
La Academia De Estrellas School:

2.2%
State:

6.3%

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
End-of-course (EOC)

    Algebra I Average Scale Score

  • All4,286
  • Males4,321
  • Females4,273
  • Hispanic4,286
Algebra I Average Scale Score:

4,286
State:

4,001
Algebra I students tested: 19
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 19

Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.6 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.7 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.9 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.9 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 5.2 (87%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 11%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 53%

5%
11%
31%
53%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,321, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 40%)
20%
40%
40%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,273, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 57%)
7%
7%
29%
57%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,286, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 53%)
5%
11%
31%
53%
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,435
  • Males1,433
  • Females1,438
  • Hispanic1,437
Math Average Scale Score:

1,435
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 93
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 93

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.6 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.3 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.6 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

31%
39%
13%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,433, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 13%)
32%
38%
17%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,438, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 22%)
30%
40%
8%
22%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,437, Tested: 92, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 17%)
30%
40%
13%
17%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,412
  • Males1,407
  • Females1,416
  • Hispanic1,414
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,412
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 93
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 93

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.2 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.6 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

30%
36%
18%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,407, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 15%)
28%
42%
15%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,416, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 17%)
33%
28%
22%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,414, Tested: 92, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 16%)
29%
36%
19%
16%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,586
  • Males1,601
  • Females1,570
  • Hispanic1,585
Math Average Scale Score:

1,586
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 85
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 85

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.4 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.9 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 32%

21%
24%
23%
32%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,601, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 41%)
25%
16%
18%
41%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,570, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 22%)
17%
32%
29%
22%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,585, Tested: 84, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 31%)
21%
24%
24%
31%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,485
  • Males1,463
  • Females1,509
  • Hispanic1,483
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,485
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 85
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 85

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.1 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.1 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

38%
27%
19%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,463, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 14%)
45%
30%
11%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,509, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 20%)
29%
25%
26%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,483, Tested: 84, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 15%)
38%
27%
20%
15%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,602
  • Males3,501
  • Females3,709
  • Hispanic3,592
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,602
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 85
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 85

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.5 (44%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.1 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.9 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%

46%
27%
21%
6%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,501, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 2%)
57%
23%
18%
2%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,709, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 10%)
34%
32%
24%
10%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,592, Tested: 84, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 6%)
46%
28%
20%
6%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,597
  • Males1,585
  • Females1,611
  • Hispanic1,597
Math Average Scale Score:

1,597
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 92
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 92

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.7 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.9 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.6 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 37%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

17%
33%
37%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,585, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 12%)
16%
40%
32%
12%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,611, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 14%)
19%
24%
43%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,597, Tested: 92, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 13%)
17%
33%
37%
13%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,526
  • Males1,519
  • Females1,534
  • Hispanic1,526
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,526
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 92
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 92

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.4 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.2 (58%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

32%
31%
29%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,519, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 6%)
34%
30%
30%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,534, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 10%)
29%
33%
28%
10%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,526, Tested: 92, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 8%)
32%
31%
29%
8%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,758
  • Males3,782
  • Females3,730
  • Hispanic3,758
Science Average Scale Score:

3,758
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 92
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 92

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.5 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

28%
40%
23%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,782, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 12%)
26%
42%
20%
12%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,730, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 5%)
31%
38%
26%
5%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,758, Tested: 92, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 9%)
28%
40%
23%
9%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,600
  • Males1,609
  • Females1,593
  • Hispanic1,600
Math Average Scale Score:

1,600
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 95
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 95

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.2 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.7 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 2.7 (44%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (43%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 47%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

25%
47%
23%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,609, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 7%)
25%
41%
27%
7%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,593, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 51%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 4%)
25%
51%
20%
4%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,600, Tested: 93, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 5%)
26%
46%
23%
5%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,542
  • Males1,524
  • Females1,557
  • Hispanic1,540
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,542
Texas:

1,457
Reading students tested: 95
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 95

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.8 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.3 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8 (53%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 8%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

41%
39%
8%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,524, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 9%)
48%
34%
9%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,557, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 14%)
35%
43%
8%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,540, Tested: 93, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 12%)
42%
39%
7%
12%
7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,622
  • Males1,626
  • Females1,619
  • Hispanic1,623
Math Average Scale Score:

1,622
Texas:

1,571
Math students tested: 93
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 93

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.4 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.5 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.9 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.7 (39%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 57%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 12%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

26%
57%
12%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,626, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 62%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 4%)
21%
62%
13%
4%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,619, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 51%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 7%)
31%
51%
11%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,623, Tested: 92, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 58%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 5%)
25%
58%
12%
5%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,622
  • Males1,612
  • Females1,632
  • Hispanic1,621
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,622
Texas:

1,550
Reading students tested: 93
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 93

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.2 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.3 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.6 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

35%
37%
11%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,612, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 15%)
44%
27%
14%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,632, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 20%)
27%
46%
7%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,621, Tested: 92, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 17%)
36%
36%
11%
17%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All3,656
  • Males3,546
  • Females3,773
  • Hispanic3,654
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,656
Texas:

3,515
Writing students tested: 93
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 93

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.8 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 43%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

35%
43%
17%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,546, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 48%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 2%)
42%
48%
8%
2%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,773, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 9%)
29%
38%
24%
9%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,654, Tested: 92, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 5%)
36%
42%
17%
5%
8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,659
  • Males1,641
  • Females1,683
  • Hispanic1,660
Math Average Scale Score:

1,659
State:

1,539
Math students tested: 67
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 86

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2.4 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.4 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.3 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.7 (53%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 3%

27%
40%
30%
3%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,641, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 3%)
38%
27%
32%
3%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,683, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 57%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 3%)
13%
57%
27%
3%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,660, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 3%)
27%
40%
30%
3%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,648
  • Males1,608
  • Females1,685
  • Hispanic1,648
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,648
Texas:

1,561
Reading students tested: 86
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 86

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.2 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.8 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.7 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

29%
37%
19%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,608, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 10%)
43%
36%
11%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,685, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 20%)
16%
39%
25%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,648, Tested: 85, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 15%)
29%
37%
19%
15%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,834
  • Males3,735
  • Females3,929
  • Hispanic3,837
Science Average Scale Score:

3,834
State:

3,634
Science students tested: 86
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 86

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.4 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.9 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.1 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 6.9 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 10%

30%
36%
24%
10%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,735, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 10%)
43%
24%
23%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,929, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 48%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 11%)
18%
48%
23%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,837, Tested: 85, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 11%)
31%
35%
23%
11%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,650
  • Males3,583
  • Females3,713
  • Hispanic3,656
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,650
Texas:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 86
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 86

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 9.2 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.7 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.6 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.1 (59%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 50%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%

33%
50%
11%
6%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,583, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 5%)
45%
41%
9%
5%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,713, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 7%)
20%
60%
13%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,656, Tested: 85, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 6%)
32%
50%
12%
6%

Health & Safety


Offenses:
(State average from 2,394 schools)
An incident refers to a specific criminal act involving one or more victims and offenders. For example, if two students are robbed without a weapon, at the same time and place, this is classified as two robbery victimizations but only one robbery without a weapon incident

A weapon is any instrument or object used with the intent to threaten, injure, or kill. This includes look-alikes if they are used to threaten others.

Physical attack or fight refers to an actual and intentional touching or striking of another person against his/her will, or the intentional causing of bodily harm to an individual. Physical attack or fight does not include rape.

A threat refers to an act where there was no physical contact between the offender and victim but the victim felt that physical harm could have occurred based on verbal or nonverbal communication by the offender. This includes nonverbal threats (e.g., brandishing a weapon), and verbal threats of physical harm which are made in person. Threats made over the telephone or threatening letters are excluded.
At least one incident at this school that involved a shooting: No
Any of this school's students, faculty, or staff died as a result of a homicide committed at this school: No

Incidents of physical attack or fight without a weapon: 23

Incidents of threats of physical attack without a weapon: 2


Total incidents per 1,000 students
La Academia De Estrellas School:

22.2
Texas:

38.0

Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic55
  • Black2
  • White2
  • LEP19
  • IDEA4
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 59 (male: 31, female: 28)
  • Hispanic: 55 (male: 29, female: 26)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

52.4
State:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic88
  • Black15
  • LEP59
  • IDEA33
  • 5049
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 103 (male: 98, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 88 (male: 83, female: 5)
  • Black: 15 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 59 (male: 57, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 33 (all male)
  • Section 504: 9 (all male)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 33

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Here:

29.3
Texas:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 28 (male: 26, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 28 (male: 26, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 14 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 5 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 5
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 13

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
La Academia De Estrellas School:

11.5
State:

27.5
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Section 504 only): 2

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Section 504 only)
Here:

1.8
State:

12.0

    Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic7
  • Black2
  • LEP2
  • 5047
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 9 (male: 7, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 7 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 5
  • Black: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

    Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic2
  • Black2
  • LEP2
  • 5042
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Black: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Section 504: 2

Transfers:
(State average from 1,202 schools)
Transfer to an alternative school for disciplinary reasons is a subset of expulsion with educational services. An alternative school is a public elementary or secondary school that addresses the needs of students that typically cannot be met in a regular school program. The school provides nontraditional education; serves as an adjunct to a regular school; and falls outside of the categories of regular education, special education, or vocational education.
Students without disabilities transferred to an alternative school for disciplinary reasons: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Students without disabilities transferred to an alternative school for disciplinary reasons per 1,000 students
Here:

1.8
Texas:

49.7

Classes & Courses


Algebra I:
Show data for

(State average from 1,291 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 45 (male: 14, female: 31)
  • Hispanic: 43 (male: 14, female: 29)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 44 (male: 16, female: 28)
  • Hispanic: 44 (male: 16, female: 28)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (all female)
Percent of 8th grade students who passed
La Academia De Estrellas School:

97.8%
Texas:

87.0%

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Dallas, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Dallas main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. La Academia De Estrellas School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents