Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Kathleen Joerger Lindsey Elementary School in Katy, TX
(KG-6 • Public • Regular School • Future)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 78
Address
2431 JOAN COLLIER TRACE
Katy, TX 77494
Telephone
(832) 223-0000
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
78
School district
LAMAR CISD
Charter school
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Kathleen Joerger Lindsey Elementary School:

78
Kathleen Joerger Lindsey Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Harris County:

51
Katy:

74
This School:

78

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,491
  • Males1,479
  • Females1,501
  • Hispanic1,435
  • Asian1,624
  • Black1,524
  • White1,490
Math Average Scale Score:

1,491
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 70
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 70

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.9 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 24%

11%
38%
27%
24%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,479, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 20%)
17%
33%
30%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,501, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 28%)
8%
40%
25%
28%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,435, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 55%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 18%)
18%
55%
9%
18%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,624, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 80%)
20%
80%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,524, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 28%)
6%
27%
39%
28%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,490, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 14%)
10%
38%
38%
14%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,482
  • Males1,430
  • Females1,521
  • Hispanic1,451
  • Asian1,518
  • Black1,503
  • White1,476
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,482
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 70
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 70

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.9 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 33%

13%
37%
17%
33%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,430, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 17%)
17%
50%
16%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,521, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 45%)
10%
27%
18%
45%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,451, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 23%)
23%
41%
13%
23%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,518, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 40%)
60%
40%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,503, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 44%)
11%
33%
12%
44%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,476, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 29%)
10%
28%
33%
29%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,598
  • Males1,603
  • Females1,591
  • Hispanic1,635
  • Asian1,663
  • Black1,536
  • White1,584
  • Multirace1,604
Math Average Scale Score:

1,598
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 65
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 65

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.4 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.3 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.1 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.2 (81%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 34%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

3%
35%
34%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,603, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 33%)
3%
33%
31%
33%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,591, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 21%)
3%
38%
38%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,635, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 42%)
33%
25%
42%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,663, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 56%)
22%
22%
56%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,536, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 55%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 9%)
9%
55%
27%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,584, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 25%)
4%
35%
36%
25%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,604, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 80%, Masters: 0%)
20%
80%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,580
  • Males1,576
  • Females1,584
  • Hispanic1,568
  • Asian1,623
  • Black1,553
  • White1,582
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,580
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 64
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 65

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.2 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.4 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.9 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 39%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 30%

13%
19%
39%
30%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,576, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 33%)
14%
19%
34%
33%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,584, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 25%)
11%
18%
46%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,568, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 25%)
8%
25%
42%
25%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,623, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 44%)
22%
34%
44%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,553, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 27%)
27%
9%
37%
27%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,582, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 29%)
11%
21%
39%
29%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All4,009
  • Males3,982
  • Females4,044
  • Hispanic4,018
  • Asian4,363
  • Black3,885
  • White3,961
  • Multirace3,898
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,009
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 65
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 65

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.7 (80%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 48%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

17%
23%
48%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,982, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 11%)
14%
33%
42%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,044, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 55%, Masters: 14%)
21%
10%
55%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,018, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 25%)
17%
25%
33%
25%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,363, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 56%, Masters: 22%)
22%
56%
22%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,885, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 9%)
27%
18%
46%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,961, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 54%, Masters: 7%)
18%
21%
54%
7%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 3,898, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 0%)
20%
40%
40%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,644
  • Males1,648
  • Females1,642
  • Hispanic1,592
  • Asian1,715
  • Black1,674
  • White1,653
Math Average Scale Score:

1,644
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 68
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 68

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.2 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.5 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.6 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 34%

10%
33%
23%
34%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,648, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 41%)
10%
38%
11%
41%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,642, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 28%)
10%
28%
34%
28%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,592, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 14%)
18%
37%
31%
14%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,715, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 57%)
14%
29%
57%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,674, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 46%)
15%
23%
16%
46%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,653, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 41%)
5%
36%
18%
41%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,609
  • Males1,593
  • Females1,621
  • Hispanic1,559
  • Asian1,632
  • Black1,659
  • White1,615
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,609
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 67
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 67

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.4 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.8 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 33%

13%
27%
27%
33%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,593, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 31%)
17%
24%
28%
31%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,621, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 34%)
11%
28%
27%
34%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,559, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 14%)
29%
19%
38%
14%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,632, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 57%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 43%)
57%
43%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,659, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 46%)
8%
23%
23%
46%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,615, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 36%)
9%
27%
28%
36%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,953
  • Males3,987
  • Females3,928
  • Hispanic3,866
  • Asian4,170
  • Black4,133
  • White3,866
Science Average Scale Score:

3,953
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 68
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 68

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.2 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.8 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

16%
35%
33%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,987, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 21%)
21%
27%
31%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,928, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 13%)
13%
41%
33%
13%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,866, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 55%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 9%)
18%
55%
18%
9%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,170, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 29%)
29%
42%
29%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,133, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 54%, Masters: 23%)
15%
8%
54%
23%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,866, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 18%)
23%
32%
27%
18%
5th Grade (Spanish)
Reading students tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Katy, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Katy main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Kathleen Joerger Lindsey Elementary School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents