Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Joseph J Rhoads Learning Center School in Dallas, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 60
Address
 4401 N 2ND AVE
Dallas, TX 75210
Telephone
(972) 749-1000
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.dallasisd.org/rhoads
City-data.com school rating
60
Students
720
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
43.0
Free lunch eligible students
711
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
4
School district
DALLAS ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
IRMA RANGEL YOUNG WOMENS LEADERSHIP MIDDLE (0.9 miles):

100
IRMA LERMA RANGEL YOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP SCHOOL (0.9 miles):

82
CHARLES RICE LEARNING CENTER (0.9 miles):

70
ST ANTHONY ACADEMY (0.8 miles):

67
ST ANTHONY SCHOOL (0.8 miles):

63
Joseph J Rhoads Learning Center School:

60
PAUL L DUNBAR LEARNING CENTER (0.8 miles):

10
JAMES MADISON H S (1.1 miles):

10
LINCOLN HUMANITIES/COMMUNICATIONS MAGNET HIGH SCH (0.6 miles):

9
Joseph J Rhoads Learning Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Dallas County:

53
Dallas:

53
Joseph J Rhoads Learning Center:

60

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 720
Enrollment in 2015: 788
Enrollment in 2014: 658
Enrollment in 2013: 631
Enrollment in 2012: 412
Enrollment in 2011: 429
Enrollment in 2010: 429
Enrollment in 2009: 453
Enrollment in 2008: 455
Enrollment in 2007: 477
Enrollment in 2006: 613
Enrollment in 2005: 546
Enrollment in 2004: 579
Enrollment in 2003: 591
Enrollment in 2002: 655
Enrollment in 2001: 668
Enrollment in 2000: 721
Enrollment in 1999: 703

Joseph J Rhoads Learning Center School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students71105108106117112101720
Female students38465440574545325
Male students33595466606756395
American Indian/Alaska Native students1 - - - - - - 1
Asian students - - - - 1 - 12
Hispanic students27424043454838283
Black students43636859706462429
White students - - - 3 - - - 3
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - - - 1 - - - 1
Two or More Races students - - - - 1 - - 1

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 71
Kindergarten enrollment: 105
1st grade enrollment: 108
2nd grade enrollment: 106
3rd grade enrollment: 117
4th grade enrollment: 112
5th grade enrollment: 101

Joseph J Rhoads Learning Center School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 325 (45.1%)
Here:

45.1%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 395 (54.9%)
Here:

54.9%
State:

50.1%

Joseph J Rhoads Learning Center School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.1%)
Here:

0.1%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 2 (0.3%)
Here:

0.3%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 283 (39.3%)
Joseph J Rhoads Learning Center School:

39.3%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 429 (59.6%)
Joseph J Rhoads Learning Center School:

59.6%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 3 (0.4%)
School:

0.4%
Texas:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 1 (0.1%)
Joseph J Rhoads Learning Center School:

0.1%
Texas:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 1 (0.1%)
Joseph J Rhoads Learning Center School:

0.1%
Texas:

2.1%

Joseph J Rhoads Learning Center School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 715 (99.3%)
Here:

99.3%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 711 (98.8%)
Here:

98.8%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 4 (0.6%)
Here:

0.6%
Texas:

6.2%

Joseph J Rhoads Learning Center School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 43

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 7
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 5
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 4
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

16.8
State:

15.6

Joseph J Rhoads Learning Center School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,550,956
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 42 (Salary Expenditures: $1,979,047)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $77,252)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 10.9 (Salary Expenditures: $277,451)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 6 (Salary Expenditures: $217,206)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $136,703
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $3,044,311
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,258,995
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 6.9 (Salary Expenditures: $176,827)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 6 (Salary Expenditures: $391,283)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $217,206)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $297,966

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic220
  • Asian4
  • Black2
  • IDEA7
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 226 (male: 132, female: 94)
  • Hispanic: 220 (male: 128, female: 92)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 20 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 10
  • Black: 10
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,162 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Here:

1.9%
Texas:

6.1%
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Joseph J Rhoads Learning Center School:

1.9%
State:

4.8%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic28
  • Black28
  • LEP25
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 56 (male: 22, female: 34)
  • Hispanic: 28 (male: 11, female: 17)
  • Black: 28 (male: 11, female: 17)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 25 (male: 11, female: 14)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Joseph J Rhoads Learning Center School:

77.8
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,376
  • Males1,334
  • Females1,415
  • Hispanic1,384
  • Black1,374
Math Average Scale Score:

1,376
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 115
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 115

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.4 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.2 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.2 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 12%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 7%

48%
33%
12%
7%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,334, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 5%)
57%
32%
6%
5%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,415, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 8%)
39%
34%
19%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,384, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 7%)
46%
34%
13%
7%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,374, Tested: 72, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 49%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 7%)
49%
32%
12%
7%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,357
  • Males1,306
  • Females1,403
  • Hispanic1,276
  • Black1,370
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,357
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 85
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 85

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.1 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.4 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.1 (51%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 9%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

45%
35%
9%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,306, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 59%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 5%)
59%
29%
7%
5%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,403, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 16%)
32%
41%
11%
16%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,276, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 55%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 0%)
55%
36%
9%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,370, Tested: 72, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 13%)
43%
35%
9%
13%
3rd Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 2
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 2

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,342
  • Males1,324
  • Females1,363
  • Hispanic1,342
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,342
State:

956
Reading students tested: 33
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 33

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.7 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.2 (52%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 43%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 12%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

36%
43%
12%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,324, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 11%)
44%
34%
11%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,363, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 53%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 7%)
27%
53%
13%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,342, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 9%)
36%
43%
12%
9%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,460
  • Males1,456
  • Females1,467
  • Hispanic1,491
  • Black1,439
Math Average Scale Score:

1,460
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 80
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 80

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.8 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.1 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.9 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2 (50%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 49%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 10%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%

49%
35%
10%
6%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,456, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 54%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 8%)
54%
29%
9%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,467, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 4%)
39%
47%
10%
4%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,491, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 13%)
48%
23%
16%
13%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,439, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 2%)
50%
42%
6%
2%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,410
  • Males1,395
  • Females1,438
  • Hispanic1,493
  • Black1,397
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,410
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 56
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 57

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7 (47%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.3 (49%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 63%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

63%
22%
11%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,395, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 64%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 3%)
64%
22%
11%
3%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,438, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 10%)
60%
20%
10%
10%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,493, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 0%)
25%
25%
50%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,397, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 68%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 5%, Masters: 6%)
68%
21%
5%
6%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,162
  • Males3,109
  • Females3,257
  • Hispanic3,309
  • Black3,145
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,162
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 58
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 58

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3 (38%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 2.6 (33%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.2 (45%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 69%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 5%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

69%
26%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,109, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 73%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 3%, Masters: 0%)
73%
24%
3%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,257, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 62%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 0%)
62%
28%
10%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,309, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 75%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
25%
75%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,145, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 76%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 0%)
76%
18%
6%
4th Grade (Spanish)

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,461
  • Males1,430
  • Females1,520
  • Hispanic1,461
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,461
State:

815
Reading students tested: 23
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 23

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.8 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.7 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.2 (56%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

39%
26%
22%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,430, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 13%)
47%
26%
14%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,520, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 13%)
25%
25%
37%
13%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,461, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 13%)
39%
26%
22%
13%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All3,965
  • Males3,816
  • Females4,246
  • Hispanic3,965
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,965
Texas:

2,017
Writing students tested: 23
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 23

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.8 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.8 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 22%

17%
35%
26%
22%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,816, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 13%)
20%
40%
27%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,246, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 38%)
13%
25%
25%
38%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,965, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 22%)
17%
35%
26%
22%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,523
  • Males1,519
  • Females1,528
  • Hispanic1,646
  • Black1,461
Math Average Scale Score:

1,523
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 123
# Absent - Not Tested: 2
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 125

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2.9 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.9 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.5 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 1.8 (45%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 14%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 10%

47%
29%
14%
10%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,519, Tested: 69, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 49%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 9%)
49%
22%
20%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,528, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 11%)
44%
37%
8%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,646, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 30%)
20%
22%
28%
30%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,461, Tested: 82, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 61%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 0%)
61%
32%
7%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,447
  • Males1,436
  • Females1,462
  • Hispanic1,469
  • Black1,442
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,447
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 90
# Absent - Not Tested: 2
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 92

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.4 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.1 (43%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 61%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%

61%
22%
11%
6%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,436, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 6%)
67%
15%
12%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,462, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 54%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 5%)
54%
31%
10%
5%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,469, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 14%)
57%
14%
15%
14%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,442, Tested: 82, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 62%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 4%)
62%
23%
11%
4%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,282
  • Males3,274
  • Females3,292
  • Hispanic3,300
  • Black3,274
Science Average Scale Score:

3,282
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 89
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 90

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.9 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.1 (41%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 5.7 (48%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 73%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 2%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 1%

73%
24%
2%
1%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,274, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 70%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 2%, Masters: 0%)
70%
28%
2%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,292, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 77%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 2%, Masters: 3%)
77%
18%
2%
3%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,300, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 88%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
88%
13%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,274, Tested: 80, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 73%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 3%, Masters: 1%)
73%
24%
3%
1%
5th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,659
  • Males1,644
  • Females1,678
  • Hispanic1,659
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,659
Texas:

683
Reading students tested: 34
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 34

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.4 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 15%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 47%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 32%

6%
15%
47%
32%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,644, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 37%)
11%
15%
37%
37%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,678, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 27%)
13%
60%
27%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,659, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 47%, Masters: 32%)
6%
15%
47%
32%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade (Spanish))

  • All3,848
  • Males3,831
  • Females3,870
  • Hispanic3,848
Science Average Scale Score:

3,848
Texas:

857
Science students tested: 34
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 34

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.8 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.5 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.6 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 41%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

18%
41%
29%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,831, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 5%)
16%
42%
37%
5%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,870, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
20%
40%
20%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,848, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 12%)
18%
41%
29%
12%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic13
  • Black34
  • White2
  • LEP7
  • IDEA2
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 49 (male: 31, female: 18)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Black: 34 (male: 23, female: 11)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

68.1
State:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 6 (all male)
  • Black: 6
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 2

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
School:

2.8
State:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Dallas, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Dallas main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Joseph J Rhoads Learning Center School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents