Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Jim Ned Middle School in Tuscola, TX
(06-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 84
Address
 9TH AND GARZA
Tuscola, TX 79562
Telephone
(325) 554-7870
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.jimned.esc14.net
City-data.com school rating
84
Students
279
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
17.4
Free lunch eligible students
51
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
18
School district
JIM NED CISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I targeted assistance eligible school-No program
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
WYLIE J H (9.8 miles):

96
LAWN EL (6.0 miles):

90
WYLIE H S (11.2 miles):

90
WYLIE INT (10.2 miles):

87
Jim Ned Middle School:

84
WYLIE MIDDLE (9.7 miles):

76
JIM NED H S (0.0 miles):

75
BUFFALO GAP EL (5.0 miles):

70
WARD EL (13.0 miles):

70
Jim Ned Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Taylor County:

54
Tuscola:

80
Jim Ned Middle School:

84

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 279
Enrollment in 2015: 276
Enrollment in 2014: 252
Enrollment in 2013: 244
Enrollment in 2012: 251
Enrollment in 2011: 235
Enrollment in 2010: 241
Enrollment in 2009: 240
Enrollment in 2008: 264
Enrollment in 2007: 268
Enrollment in 2006: 238
Enrollment in 2005: 244
Enrollment in 2004: 255
Enrollment in 2003: 254
Enrollment in 2002: 255
Enrollment in 2001: 257
Enrollment in 2000: 249
Enrollment in 1999: 235

Jim Ned Middle School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeG06G07G08Total
All students8410491279
Female students365144131
Male students485347148
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - 11
Hispanic students12161038
White students728877237
Two or More Races students - - 33

Enrollment by grade:
6th grade enrollment: 84
7th grade enrollment: 104
8th grade enrollment: 91

Jim Ned Middle School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 131 (47.0%)
Here:

47.0%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 148 (53.0%)
Jim Ned Middle School:

53.0%
State:

50.1%

Jim Ned Middle School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.4%)
Jim Ned Middle School:

0.4%
Texas:

0.4%
Hispanic enrollment: 38 (13.6%)
Jim Ned Middle School:

13.6%
Texas:

46.9%
White enrollment: 237 (84.9%)
Here:

84.9%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 3 (1.1%)
Here:

1.1%
Texas:

2.1%

Jim Ned Middle School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 69 (24.7%)
School:

24.7%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 51 (18.3%)
Jim Ned Middle School:

18.3%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 18 (6.5%)
Jim Ned Middle School:

6.5%
State:

6.2%

Jim Ned Middle School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 17.4

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 5
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

16.0
State:

15.6

Jim Ned Middle School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,040,000
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 20 (Salary Expenditures: $986,700)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $74,760)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $130,900)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $77,760)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $3,997,387
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $0
    Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $0

    Students with disabilities:
    Show data for
    Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

    Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
    Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 20 (male: 16, female: 4)
    • White: 20 (male: 16, female: 4)
    Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 23 (male: 16, female: 7)
    • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
    • White: 19 (male: 14, female: 5)

    Retention:
    Show data for

    (State average from 1,054 schools)
    A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
    Total number of students retained in 6th grade: 2 (all male)
    • White: 2
    • Section 504: 2

    Percent of 6th grade students retained
    Here:

    2.4%
    State:

    6.3%

    Gifted and Talented:
    Show data for

    (State average from 7,254 schools)
    This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
    Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

      Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

    • Hispanic4
    • American Indian2
    • White22
    • Multirace2
    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 30 (male: 18, female: 12)
    • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
    • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
    • White: 22 (male: 14, female: 8)
    • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
    Jim Ned Middle School:

    107.5
    State:

    79.4

    Statewide Student Assessments


    State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
    Show data for

    (State average from 3,456 schools)
    The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
    End-of-course (EOC)

      Algebra I Average Scale Score

    • All4,918
    • Males4,913
    • Females4,931
    • White4,923
    Algebra I Average Scale Score:

    4,918
    State:

    4,001
    Algebra I students tested: 21
    Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 21

    Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
    • Reporting Category 1: 9.5 (87%)
    • Reporting Category 2: 11 (92%)
    • Reporting Category 3: 12 (86%)
    • Reporting Category 4: 9.9 (90%)
    • Reporting Category 5: 5.4 (90%)

    Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
    Approaches Grade Level Performance: 5%
    Meets Grade Level Performance: 5%
    Masters Grade Level Performance: 90%

    5%
    5%
    90%
    Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,913, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 87%)
    7%
    6%
    87%
    Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,931, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
    100%
    White: (Average Scale Score: 4,923, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 5%, Meets: 5%, Masters: 90%)
    5%
    5%
    90%
    6th Grade

      Math Average Scale Score
      (6th Grade)

    • All1,662
    • Males1,666
    • Females1,659
    • Hispanic1,631
    • White1,667
    Math Average Scale Score:

    1,662
    Texas:

    1,546
    Math students tested: 96
    Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 96

    Math Avg Items Correct:
    • Reporting Category 1: 6.4 (64%)
    • Reporting Category 2: 8.7 (58%)
    • Reporting Category 3: 3.8 (64%)
    • Reporting Category 4: 3.7 (53%)

    Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
    Approaches Grade Level Performance: 41%
    Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
    Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

    10%
    41%
    31%
    18%
    Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,666, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 21%)
    8%
    38%
    33%
    21%
    Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,659, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 16%)
    12%
    42%
    30%
    16%
    Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,631, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 57%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 7%)
    14%
    57%
    22%
    7%
    White: (Average Scale Score: 1,667, Tested: 79, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 19%)
    9%
    38%
    34%
    19%

      Reading Average Scale Score
      (6th Grade)

    • All1,607
    • Males1,609
    • Females1,605
    • Hispanic1,578
    • White1,617
    Reading Average Scale Score:

    1,607
    Texas:

    1,457
    Reading students tested: 96
    Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 96

    Reading Avg Items Correct:
    • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (71%)
    • Reporting Category 2: 12.7 (75%)
    • Reporting Category 3: 9.5 (63%)

    Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
    Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
    Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
    Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

    28%
    26%
    26%
    20%
    Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,609, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 21%)
    26%
    28%
    25%
    21%
    Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,605, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 19%)
    30%
    24%
    27%
    19%
    Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,578, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 14%)
    36%
    35%
    15%
    14%
    White: (Average Scale Score: 1,617, Tested: 79, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 22%)
    25%
    24%
    29%
    22%
    7th Grade

      Math Average Scale Score
      (7th Grade)

    • All1,669
    • Males1,669
    • Females1,669
    • Hispanic1,654
    • White1,675
    Math Average Scale Score:

    1,669
    Texas:

    1,571
    Math students tested: 104
    Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 104

    Math Avg Items Correct:
    • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (66%)
    • Reporting Category 2: 8.7 (58%)
    • Reporting Category 3: 6.5 (54%)
    • Reporting Category 4: 3.6 (52%)

    Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
    Approaches Grade Level Performance: 41%
    Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
    Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

    21%
    41%
    19%
    19%
    Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,669, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 19%)
    22%
    35%
    24%
    19%
    Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,669, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 20%)
    20%
    46%
    14%
    20%
    Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,654, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 58%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 17%)
    17%
    58%
    8%
    17%
    White: (Average Scale Score: 1,675, Tested: 89, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 20%)
    20%
    38%
    22%
    20%

      Reading Average Scale Score
      (7th Grade)

    • All1,702
    • Males1,686
    • Females1,718
    • Hispanic1,648
    • White1,708
    Reading Average Scale Score:

    1,702
    Texas:

    1,550
    Reading students tested: 104
    Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 104

    Reading Avg Items Correct:
    • Reporting Category 1: 6 (74%)
    • Reporting Category 2: 13.5 (75%)
    • Reporting Category 3: 11.8 (74%)

    Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
    Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
    Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
    Masters Grade Level Performance: 36%

    10%
    27%
    27%
    36%
    Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,686, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 30%)
    13%
    33%
    24%
    30%
    Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,718, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 42%)
    6%
    22%
    30%
    42%
    Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,648, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 59%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 17%)
    8%
    59%
    16%
    17%
    White: (Average Scale Score: 1,708, Tested: 89, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 38%)
    10%
    23%
    29%
    38%

      Writing Average Scale Score
      (7th Grade)

    • All4,067
    • Males3,952
    • Females4,191
    • Hispanic3,956
    • White4,092
    Writing Average Scale Score:

    4,067
    Texas:

    3,515
    Writing students tested: 104
    Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 104

    Writing Avg Items Correct:
    • Reporting Category 1: 8.7 (54%)
    • Reporting Category 2: 10.1 (77%)
    • Reporting Category 3: 13.3 (78%)

    Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
    Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
    Meets Grade Level Performance: 43%
    Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

    16%
    20%
    43%
    21%
    Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,952, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 19%)
    20%
    26%
    35%
    19%
    Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,191, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 52%, Masters: 24%)
    12%
    12%
    52%
    24%
    Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,956, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 67%, Masters: 8%)
    17%
    8%
    67%
    8%
    White: (Average Scale Score: 4,092, Tested: 89, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 24%)
    16%
    20%
    40%
    24%
    8th Grade

      Math Average Scale Score
      (8th Grade)

    • All1,737
    • Males1,724
    • Females1,748
    • Hispanic1,688
    • White1,745
    Math Average Scale Score:

    1,737
    Texas:

    1,539
    Math students tested: 68
    Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 90

    Math Avg Items Correct:
    • Reporting Category 1: 2.6 (66%)
    • Reporting Category 2: 11.4 (71%)
    • Reporting Category 3: 10.1 (67%)
    • Reporting Category 4: 5.3 (75%)

    Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%
    Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
    Meets Grade Level Performance: 45%
    Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

    12%
    25%
    45%
    18%
    Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,724, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 16%)
    13%
    29%
    42%
    16%
    Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,748, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 49%, Masters: 19%)
    11%
    21%
    49%
    19%
    Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,688, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 15%)
    31%
    31%
    23%
    15%
    White: (Average Scale Score: 1,745, Tested: 53, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 51%, Masters: 17%)
    8%
    24%
    51%
    17%

      Reading Average Scale Score
      (8th Grade)

    • All1,739
    • Males1,730
    • Females1,748
    • Hispanic1,701
    • White1,743
    Reading Average Scale Score:

    1,739
    Texas:

    1,561
    Reading students tested: 90
    Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 90

    Reading Avg Items Correct:
    • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (79%)
    • Reporting Category 2: 15.3 (81%)
    • Reporting Category 3: 12.8 (75%)

    Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
    Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
    Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
    Masters Grade Level Performance: 39%

    11%
    29%
    21%
    39%
    Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,730, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 37%)
    17%
    29%
    17%
    37%
    Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,748, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 41%)
    5%
    29%
    25%
    41%
    Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,701, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 29%)
    29%
    21%
    21%
    29%
    White: (Average Scale Score: 1,743, Tested: 74, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 39%)
    8%
    31%
    22%
    39%

      Science Average Scale Score
      (8th Grade)

    • All4,122
    • Males4,307
    • Females3,944
    • Hispanic3,929
    • White4,145
    Science Average Scale Score:

    4,122
    Texas:

    3,634
    Science students tested: 88
    Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 88

    Science Avg Items Correct:
    • Reporting Category 1: 7.2 (66%)
    • Reporting Category 2: 6.6 (73%)
    • Reporting Category 3: 7.7 (70%)
    • Reporting Category 4: 8.5 (77%)

    Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
    Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
    Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
    Masters Grade Level Performance: 33%

    19%
    24%
    24%
    33%
    Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,307, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 47%)
    16%
    17%
    20%
    47%
    Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,944, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 20%)
    22%
    31%
    27%
    20%
    Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,929, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 27%)
    27%
    37%
    9%
    27%
    White: (Average Scale Score: 4,145, Tested: 75, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 33%)
    19%
    22%
    26%
    33%

      Social Studies Average Scale Score
      (8th Grade)

    • All3,918
    • Males4,029
    • Females3,813
    • Hispanic3,727
    • White3,942
    Social Studies Average Scale Score:

    3,918
    Texas:

    3,461
    Social Studies students tested: 88
    Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 88

    Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
    • Reporting Category 1: 11.4 (67%)
    • Reporting Category 2: 6.4 (64%)
    • Reporting Category 3: 6.6 (66%)
    • Reporting Category 4: 4.9 (69%)

    Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
    Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
    Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
    Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

    20%
    36%
    16%
    28%
    Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,029, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 40%)
    21%
    23%
    16%
    40%
    Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,813, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 18%)
    20%
    47%
    15%
    18%
    Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,727, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 55%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 9%)
    27%
    55%
    9%
    9%
    White: (Average Scale Score: 3,942, Tested: 75, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 31%)
    20%
    32%
    17%
    31%

    Health & Safety


    Referrals and Arrests:
    Show data for

    (State average from 1,516 schools)
    Referral to law enforcement is an action by which a student is reported to any law enforcement agency or official, including a school police unit, for an incident that occurs on school grounds, during school-related events, or while taking school transportation, regardless of whether official action is taken. Citations, tickets, court referrals, and school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.

    School-related arrest refers to an arrest of a student for any activity conducted on school grounds, during off-campus school activities (including while taking school transportation), or due to a referral by any school official. All school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
    Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 4 (all female)
    • Hispanic: 2
    • White: 2

    Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
    School:

    14.3
    Texas:

    17.4
    Students without disabilities who received a school-related arrest: 4 (all female)
    • Hispanic: 2
    • White: 2

    Students without disabilities who received a school-related arrest per 1,000 students
    Jim Ned Middle School:

    14.3
    State:

    13.1

    Corporal Punishment:
    Show data for
    This school uses corporal punishment to discipline students
    Corporal punishment refers to paddling, spanking, or other forms of physical punishment imposed on a child.
    Instances of corporal punishment (Students without disabilities): 7
    Students without disabilities who received corporal punishment: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
    • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

    Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
    Show data for

    (State average from 7,777 schools)
    A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
    Chronic Student Absenteeism: 47 (male: 28, female: 19)
    • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
    • White: 40 (male: 23, female: 17)
    Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
    School:

    168.5
    Texas:

    147.9

    Suspensions:
    Show data for

    (State average from 3,231 schools)
    In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
    • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

    Classes & Courses


    Algebra I:
    Show data for

    (State average from 1,291 schools)
    Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
    8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 33 (male: 19, female: 14)
    • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
    • White: 31 (male: 17, female: 14)
    8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 32 (male: 16, female: 16)
    • White: 32 (male: 16, female: 16)
    Percent of 8th grade students who passed
    Jim Ned Middle School:

    97.0%
    State:

    87.0%

    Comments

    Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

    Discuss Tuscola, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

    1. All Cities
    2. Texas
    3. Tuscola main city page
    4. Schools in Texas
    5. Jim Ned Middle School


    City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
    Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

    Table of Contents