City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
43.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Indiantown Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Martin County: | 58 |
Indiantown: | 63 |
Indiantown Middle School: | 43 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (772) 597-2146 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 43
School number: 221
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: MARTIN
Grade range: GRADES 5 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (772) 597-5854
Principal: Debra Harper-Henderson
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 78
Senate District: 28
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 61% |
State average from 13 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 86% |
State average from 13 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 92% |
State average from 13 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 48% |
State average from 13 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 58% |
State average from 13 schools: | 62% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 78% |
State average from 12 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 47% |
State average from 13 schools: | 60% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 67% |
State average from 13 schools: | 66% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 547 |
State average from 13 schools: | 498 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 12 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 34% |
State average from 13 schools: | 54% |
Minority RateHere: | 10% |
State average from 13 schools: | 44% |
Region: 4
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 979 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 976 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 480
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 920
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 866
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 919
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 864
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 871 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 868 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 433
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 59% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 822
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 777
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 821
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 775
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 366 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 363 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 166
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 336
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 318
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 336
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 318
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 32% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 117
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 59% |
State average from 12 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 86% |
State average from 11 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 81% |
State average from 12 schools: | 90% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 47% |
State average from 12 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 55% |
State average from 11 schools: | 68% |
Making Math GainsINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 77% |
State average from 12 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 45% |
State average from 11 schools: | 63% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 61% |
State average from 11 schools: | 64% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 521 |
State average from 11 schools: | 555 |
Percent TestedHere: | 98% |
State average from 12 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 27% |
State average from 12 schools: | 45% |
Minority RateHere: | 9% |
State average from 13 schools: | 38% |
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1007 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1004 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 461
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 972
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 912
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 968
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 910
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 914 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 912 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 418
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 886
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 829
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 882
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 827
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 303 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 303 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 136
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 287
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 272
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 286
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 270
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 152 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 25% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 57% |
State average from 12 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 84% |
State average from 12 schools: | 68% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 88% |
State average from 13 schools: | 81% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 50% |
State average from 12 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 57% |
State average from 12 schools: | 63% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 80% |
State average from 12 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 48% |
State average from 12 schools: | 59% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 67% |
State average from 12 schools: | 69% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 541 |
State average from 12 schools: | 533 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 12 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 20% |
State average from 12 schools: | 41% |
Minority RateHere: | 8% |
State average from 12 schools: | 39% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1003 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 998 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 458
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 974
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 899
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 968
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 893
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 910 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 906 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 423
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 886
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 825
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 882
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 821
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 210 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 210 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 36% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 205
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 188
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 204
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 187
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 154 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 26% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 135
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 61% |
State average from 10 schools: | 56% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 68% |
State average from 10 schools: | 52% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 90% |
State average from 10 schools: | 87% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 35% |
State average from 10 schools: | 34% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 67% |
State average from 10 schools: | 58% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 72% |
State average from 10 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 68% |
State average from 10 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 76% |
State average from 10 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere: | 537 |
State average from 10 schools: | 474 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 10 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 100% |
State average from 10 schools: | 57% |
Minority RateHere: | 94% |
State average from 10 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 427 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 427 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 95% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 110
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 415
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 59% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 415
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 334 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 334 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 96% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 330
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 330
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 427 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 427 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 95% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 110
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 415
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 59% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 415
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 229 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 229 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 228
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 50% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 228
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 33% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 53% |
State average from 9 schools: | 54% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 62% |
State average from 9 schools: | 52% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 89% |
State average from 9 schools: | 81% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 58% |
State average from 9 schools: | 60% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 72% |
State average from 9 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 66% |
State average from 9 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 400 |
State average from 9 schools: | 379 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 9 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 100% |
State average from 9 schools: | 64% |
Minority RateHere: | 93% |
State average from 9 schools: | 49% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 481 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 481 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 117
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 454
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 454
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 77% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 87
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 87
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 352 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 352 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 83
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 43% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 335
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 335
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 481 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 481 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 117
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 454
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 454
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 228 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 228 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 54
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 31% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 218
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 42% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 218
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 27% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 92
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 43% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 92
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 44% |
State average from 9 schools: | 53% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 53% |
State average from 9 schools: | 50% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 69% |
State average from 9 schools: | 75% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 63% |
State average from 9 schools: | 59% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 75% |
State average from 9 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 70% |
State average from 9 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 374 |
State average from 9 schools: | 366 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 9 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 93% |
State average from 9 schools: | 63% |
Minority RateHere: | 90% |
State average from 9 schools: | 47% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1498 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 333 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 11% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 11% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 28% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 39% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 79% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1734 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 346 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 10% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 34% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 21% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 84% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 21 |
State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1725 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 323 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 12% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 36% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 39% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 81% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1790 |
State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 326 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 15% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 38% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 30% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 76% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 15 |
State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1858 |
State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 327 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 20% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 34% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 28% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 71% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1931 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 29% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 40% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 20% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 63% |
State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2025 |
State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 331 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 11% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 27% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 20% |
State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 62% |
State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 12 |
State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2088 |
State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 330 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent PassingHere: | 75% |
State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 18% |
State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 29% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 23% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 11% |
State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 19% |
State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 52% |
State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 335 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 11% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 32% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 37% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 14% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 57% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 10 |
State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 325 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 16% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 31% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 38% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 53% |
State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 321 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 15% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 38% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 40% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5% |
State average: | 5% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 46% |
State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1541 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 352 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 35% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 21% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 89% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1669 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 349 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 12% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 34% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 33% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 19% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 86% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1726 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 345 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 18% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 36% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 33% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 76% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1736 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 324 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 16% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 21% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 37% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 21% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 63% |
State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1828 |
State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 316 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 15% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 24% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 20% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 61% |
State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1933 |
State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 330 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 16% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 41% |
State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 24% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 11% |
State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 76% |
State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1994 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 323 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 16% |
State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 32% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 77% |
State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 2056 |
State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 341 |
State average: | 326 |
Percent PassingHere: | 90% |
State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 12% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 26% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 46% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 83% |
State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1522 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 337 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1707 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 341 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 03%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1756 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 329 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1782 |
State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 324 |
State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1867 |
State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 328 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1932 |
State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 320 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 2015 |
State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 329 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2014 |
State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 316 |
State average: | 299 |
Percent Passing: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 339 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 320 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 311 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1635 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 372 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1642 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 343 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1740 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 348 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1739 |
State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 325 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1869 |
State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 326 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1916 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 326 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1998 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 324 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2041 |
State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 337 |
State average: | 321 |
Percent Passing: 89%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 107
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 50%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 257
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 471
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1490 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 331 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1658 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 333 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1773 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 332 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1786 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 325 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1826 |
State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 320 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1915 |
State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 316 |
State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1997 |
State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 326 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2045 |
State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 322 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 340 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 323 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 314 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1585 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 362 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1636 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 341 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1785 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 358 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1733 |
State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 324 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1818 |
State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 313 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1929 |
State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 329 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1983 |
State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2056 |
State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 341 |
State average: | 323 |
Percent Passing: 91%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 121 |
State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 646 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 660 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Functional (max 18)INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 14 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 10 |
State average: | 10 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 103 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 684 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 265 |
State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 683 |
State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Literary (max 18)INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 14 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 8 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 10 |
State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 253 |
State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 688 |
State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 10 |
State average: | 9 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 217 |
State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale ScoreINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 700 |
State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Informational (max 18)INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13 |
State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 14 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 15 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 504 |
State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale ScoreINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 709 |
State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Informational (max 18)INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13 |
State average: | 11 |
Functional (max 18)INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13 |
State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 16 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of StudentsINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 424 |
State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale ScoreINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 724 |
State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 111
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 323 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 71%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 51%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 227
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 312 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 59%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 469
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 319 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 67%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1552 |
State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 293 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1566 |
State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1503 |
State average: | 1532 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 63
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1589 |
State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 289 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 79%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1601 |
State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1472 |
State average: | 1592 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 130
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1682 |
State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 293 |
State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1690 |
State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1568 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 122
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1796 |
State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 291 |
State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1805 |
State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1657 |
State average: | 1738 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 148
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 282 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 281 |
State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1602 |
State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1618 |
State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1560 |
State average: | 1519 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 58
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1625 |
State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 299 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 79%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1659 |
State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1575 |
State average: | 1620 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 84
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1858 |
State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 323 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1861 |
State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1628 |
State average: | 1645 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 233
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000INDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1901 |
State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 322 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1907 |
State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1782 |
State average: | 1755 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 125
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 96
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 655 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR: 61
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 116
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 666 |
State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR: 59
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 102
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 669 |
State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Median NPR: 56
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 107
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 678 |
State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 55
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 94
Mean Scale ScoreINDIANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 654 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Median NPR: 67
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 116
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 664 |
State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Median NPR: 61
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 102
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 693 |
State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 77
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 107
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 711 |
State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 108
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 274 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 35%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 84%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Indiantown, FL
- Indiantown Middle School in Indiantown, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: