Immokalee Community School in Immokalee, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 7.

123 N 4TH ST
Immokalee, FL 34142

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
The Learning Center School (0.6 miles):

91
Sabal Palm Elementary School (12.5 miles):

66
Oakridge Middle School (19.7 miles):

55
Immokalee Middle School (0.6 miles):

48
Mirror Lakes Elementary School (15.9 miles):

42
Lehigh Elementary School (17.7 miles):

26
Immokalee High School (0.4 miles):

21
Immokalee Community School:

7
Immokalee Community School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Collier County:

49
Immokalee:

42
Immokalee Community School:

7

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (239) 867-3220 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 11
School number: 9021
School type: Elementary
District Name: COLLIER
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 6
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (239) 867-3224
Principal: James Mcdevitt
Regular charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 25
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 77
Senate District: 39

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

53%
State average from 24 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

45%
State average from 24 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

69%
State average from 24 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

31%
State average from 24 schools:

54%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 24 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

43%
State average from 24 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

47%
State average from 24 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

40%
State average from 24 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

388
State average from 24 schools:

548
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 24 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: NO

Grade in 2010: F

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: F

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

93%
State average from 24 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 24 schools:

40%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 126 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 124 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 124 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

42%
State average from 24 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

43%
State average from 23 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 23 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

48%
State average from 23 schools:

55%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

52%
State average from 23 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

44%
State average from 23 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 24 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

57%
State average from 23 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

440
State average from 23 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 23 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: F

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 23 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 23 schools:

40%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 123 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 123 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 117 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

51%
State average from 21 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

39%
State average from 21 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

23%
State average from 21 schools:

81%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

46%
State average from 21 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

50%
State average from 21 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

40%
State average from 21 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 21 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

50%
State average from 21 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

359
State average from 21 schools:

530
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 21 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: F

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

16%
State average from 21 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 21 schools:

41%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 133 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 128 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 18 schools:

78%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

46%
State average from 18 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

76%
State average from 18 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

20%
State average from 18 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 18 schools:

74%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 18 schools:

63%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 18 schools:

71%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 18 schools:

63%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

442
State average from 18 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 18 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

88%
State average from 18 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 18 schools:

38%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 137 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 137 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 127
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 127
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 131 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 131 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 17 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

49%
State average from 16 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

75%
State average from 17 schools:

82%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 17 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 17 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 17 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

392
State average from 17 schools:

419
Percent Tested
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

97%
State average from 17 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

83%
State average from 18 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 17 schools:

40%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 33
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 99
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 99
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 30

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 92
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 92
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 86
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 86
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 48
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 48
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

45%
State average from 16 schools:

78%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

31%
State average from 16 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

78%
State average from 16 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 16 schools:

68%
Making Math Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 16 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 16 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

347
State average from 16 schools:

422
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 16 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: S

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

97%
State average from 16 schools:

43%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 16 schools:

35%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1180
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

30%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

41%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

54%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1413
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

23%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

1458
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

37%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

56%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1533
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

34%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

40%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

37%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

30%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

30%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1270
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1482
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

50%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

60%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1568
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

33%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

33%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

15%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1493
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

268
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

57%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

17%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

20%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

1209
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1385
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 07%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1454
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1542
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1603
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 94%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1431
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

1399
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

1485
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

294
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1550
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1903
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 29
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 48%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1263
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1462
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1318
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1625
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1532
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

273
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

235
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1321
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

304
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1405
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1439
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1589
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

1744
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

249
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

28
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

594
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

28
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

36
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

639
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

59
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

33
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

638
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

45
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

36
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

666
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

59
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

6
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

8
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 37
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

241
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 16%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 30%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1175
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

1402
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

289
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1417
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1198
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 219

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1572
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1564
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

1466
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 97

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1414
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

258
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1414
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1482
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -67

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1308
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1389
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1395
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1235
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 160

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1584
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1581
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1380
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 201

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

1532
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1532
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1581
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -49

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale Score
Here:

602
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 34
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 35
Mean Scale Score
Here:

617
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 39
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 35
Mean Scale Score
Here:

655
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 61
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 29
Mean Scale Score
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

642
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 36
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale Score
Here:

603
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 44
Number Sense (max 14): 9
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 35
Mean Scale Score
IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL:

624
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 54
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 35
Mean Scale Score
Here:

652
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 65
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 29
Mean Scale Score
Here:

650
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 47
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 34
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

232
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 3%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 35%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 18%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Immokalee, FL
  5. Immokalee Community School in Immokalee, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.