Hoover Street Elementary School in Los Angeles, CA
(KG-05 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in California) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 59
- Address
- 2726 Francis Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 90005
- Telephone
- (213) 387-3296
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- City-data.com school rating
- 59
- Students
- 802
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 34.0
- National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status - Yes, under Community Eligibility Option (CEO)
- Free lunch eligible students
- 717
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 32
- School district
- Los Angeles Unified
- Charter school
- No
- Title I status
- Title I schoolwide school
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
No street view available for this location
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Hoover Street Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:California: | 46 |
Los Angeles County: | 44 |
Los Angeles: | 36 |
Hoover Street Elementary School: | 59 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 802
Enrollment in 2015: 806
Enrollment in 2014: 783
Enrollment in 2013: 807
Enrollment in 2012: 795
Enrollment in 2011: 820
Enrollment in 2010: 851
Enrollment in 2009: 1,361
Enrollment in 2008: 1,483
Enrollment in 2007: 1,552
Enrollment in 2006: 1,655
Enrollment in 2005: 1,757
Enrollment in 2004: 2,182
Enrollment in 2003: 2,177
Enrollment in 2002: 2,372
Enrollment in 2001: 2,395
Enrollment in 2000: 2,434
Enrollment in 1999: 2,427
Hoover Street Elementary School - Historical enrollment
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | KG | G01 | G02 | G03 | G04 | G05 | Total |
---|
All students | 160 | 124 | 145 | 130 | 121 | 122 | 802 |
Female students | 94 | 67 | 60 | 54 | 64 | 59 | 398 |
Male students | 66 | 57 | 85 | 76 | 57 | 63 | 404 |
Asian students | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
Hispanic students | 147 | 115 | 139 | 125 | 117 | 120 | 763 |
Black students | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | - | 11 |
White students | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 | - | - | 13 |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | 2 |
Two or More Races students | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | 3 |
Enrollment by grade:
Kindergarten enrollment: 160
1st grade enrollment: 124
2nd grade enrollment: 145
3rd grade enrollment: 130
4th grade enrollment: 121
5th grade enrollment: 122
Hoover Street Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 398 (49.6%)Hoover Street Elementary School: | 49.6% |
California: | 49.4% |
Male enrollment: 404 (50.4%)Here: | 50.4% |
California: | 49.6% |
Hoover Street Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Asian enrollment: 10 (1.2%)School: | 1.2% |
California: | 9.4% |
Hispanic enrollment: 763 (95.1%)
Black enrollment: 11 (1.4%)
White enrollment: 13 (1.6%)Hoover Street Elementary School: | 1.6% |
California: | 28.3% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 2 (0.2%)Hoover Street Elementary School: | 0.2% |
California: | 0.6% |
Two or More Races enrollment: 3 (0.4%)
Hoover Street Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 749 (93.4%)Here: | 93.4% |
California: | 61.2% |
Free lunch eligible students: 717 (89.4%)
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 32 (4.0%)Hoover Street Elementary School: | 4.0% |
State: | 8.6% |
Hoover Street Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 34
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 3
Number of FTE nurses: 2
Number of FTE psychologists: 2.4
Hoover Street Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$3,319,579- Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 32.4 (Salary Expenditures: $2,667,600)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 5.7 (Salary Expenditures: $120,101)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1.4 (Salary Expenditures: $277,039)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $254,840)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$235,184Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,:
$4,652,203- Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $3,229,171
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 16 (Salary Expenditures: $420,083)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 4.9 (Salary Expenditures: $691,221)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $311,728)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds:
$277,965 Limited English Proficiency:
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic499
- Asian4
- White13
- IDEA76
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 516 (male: 258, female: 258)
- Hispanic: 499 (male: 251, female: 248)
- Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 13 (male: 5, female: 8)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 76 (male: 50, female: 26)
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic577
- Asian4
- Black2
- IDEA82
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 583 (male: 321, female: 262)
- Hispanic: 577 (male: 317, female: 260)
- Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 82 (male: 56, female: 26)
Students with disabilities:
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 90 (male: 65, female: 25)
- Hispanic: 86 (male: 61, female: 25)
- White: 4 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 80 (male: 55, female: 25)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 95 (male: 67, female: 28)
- Hispanic: 95 (male: 67, female: 28)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 86 (male: 58, female: 28)
Retention:
(State average from 2,659 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Percent of Kindergarten students retainedHoover Street Elementary School: | 1.3% |
California: | 5.3% |
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Percent of 1st grade students retainedHoover Street Elementary School: | 1.6% |
State: | 4.8% |
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Percent of Kindergarten students retainedHoover Street Elementary School: | 1.3% |
State: | 5.6% |
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Percent of 1st grade students retainedHoover Street Elementary School: | 1.6% |
California: | 5.5% |
Gifted and Talented:
(State average from 5,551 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 18 (male: 13, female: 5)
- Hispanic: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
- Asian: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment
- Hispanic28
- Asian2
- Black2
- LEP4
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 32 (male: 21, female: 11)
- Hispanic: 28 (male: 17, female: 11)
- Asian: 2 (all male)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Statewide Student Assessments
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments:
(State average from 10,463 schools)
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments (SB) is one of the online summative assessments - part of California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System.
The summative assessments are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments of grade-level learning that measure progress toward college and career readiness. Each test in English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics is comprised of two parts: (1) a computer-adaptive test and (2) a performance task, administered within a selected testing window available at 66 percent of the instructional year for grades three through eight, and grade eleven.
The summative assessments are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA and mathematics. The tests capitalize on the strengths of computer adaptive testing efficient and precise measurement across the full range of achievement and timely turnaround of results.
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All58%
- Males53%
- Females63%
- Hispanic59%
ELA students tested: 351
ELA students with scores: 351
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 58% |
California: | 49% |
Standard Not Met:
19.1%Standard Nearly Met:
23.4%Standard Met:
33.6%Standard Exceeded:
23.9%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2451.5, Students tested: 124, Standard Not Met: 15.3%, Nearly Met: 18.6%, Met: 33.1%, Exceeded: 33.1%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2478.1, Students tested: 111, Standard Not Met: 18.9%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 34.2%, Exceeded: 19.8%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2502.6, Students tested: 116, Standard Not Met: 23.3%, Nearly Met: 25.0%, Met: 33.6%, Exceeded: 18.1%)Hoover Street Elementary School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All57%
- Males58%
- Females56%
- Hispanic58%
Math students tested: 357
Math students with scores: 357
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 57% |
State: | 38% |
Standard Not Met:
13.4%Standard Nearly Met:
29.4%Standard Met:
34.5%Standard Exceeded:
22.7%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2472.6, Students tested: 124, Standard Not Met: 8.9%, Nearly Met: 14.5%, Met: 42.7%, Exceeded: 33.9%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2475.3, Students tested: 115, Standard Not Met: 11.3%, Nearly Met: 46.1%, Met: 30.4%, Exceeded: 12.2%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2519.3, Students tested: 118, Standard Not Met: 20.3%, Nearly Met: 28.8%, Met: 29.7%, Exceeded: 21.2%)Hoover Street Elementary School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All53%
- Males50%
- Females55%
- Hispanic53%
ELA students tested: 355
ELA students with scores: 355
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 53% |
State: | 48% |
Standard Not Met:
19.0%Standard Nearly Met:
28.0%Standard Met:
30.0%Standard Exceeded:
23.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2445.7, Students tested: 125, Standard Not Met: 13.0%, Nearly Met: 30.0%, Met: 32.0%, Exceeded: 25.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2473.8, Students tested: 118, Standard Not Met: 24.0%, Nearly Met: 24.0%, Met: 25.0%, Exceeded: 28.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2494.6, Students tested: 112, Standard Not Met: 21.0%, Nearly Met: 30.0%, Met: 33.0%, Exceeded: 15.0%)Hoover Street Elementary School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All48%
- Males50%
- Females45%
- Hispanic48%
Math students tested: 359
Math students with scores: 359
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 48% |
State: | 37% |
Standard Not Met:
21.0%Standard Nearly Met:
31.0%Standard Met:
29.0%Standard Exceeded:
18.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2450.7, Students tested: 126, Standard Not Met: 13.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 35.0%, Exceeded: 21.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2469.0, Students tested: 119, Standard Not Met: 24.0%, Nearly Met: 32.0%, Met: 28.0%, Exceeded: 17.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2494.2, Students tested: 114, Standard Not Met: 28.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 25.0%, Exceeded: 17.0%)Hoover Street Elementary School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All42%
- Males36%
- Females47%
- Hispanic42%
ELA students tested: 363
ELA students with scores: 361
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 42% |
California: | 44% |
Standard Not Met:
34.0%Standard Nearly Met:
25.0%Standard Met:
28.0%Standard Exceeded:
14.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2435.6, Students tested: 125, Standard Not Met: 20.0%, Nearly Met: 24.0%, Met: 35.0%, Exceeded: 21.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2426.6, Students tested: 127, Standard Not Met: 44.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 21.0%, Exceeded: 8.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2475.5, Students tested: 111, Standard Not Met: 38.0%, Nearly Met: 23.0%, Met: 27.0%, Exceeded: 13.0%)Hoover Street Elementary School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All32%
- Males35%
- Females29%
- Hispanic32%
Math students tested: 364
Math students with scores: 363
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 32% |
California: | 34% |
Standard Not Met:
33.0%Standard Nearly Met:
35.0%Standard Met:
20.0%Standard Exceeded:
12.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2440.0, Students tested: 125, Standard Not Met: 21.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 30.0%, Exceeded: 20.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2438.8, Students tested: 127, Standard Not Met: 35.0%, Nearly Met: 43.0%, Met: 17.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2467.9, Students tested: 112, Standard Not Met: 45.0%, Nearly Met: 32.0%, Met: 13.0%, Exceeded: 10.0%)Hoover Street Elementary School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Paper-based CAASPP:
(State average from 9,784 schools)
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:
California Standards Tests (CSTs) - The CSTs for science in grades five, eight, and ten are administered only to students in California public schools. All questions are multiple-choice. These tests were developed specifically to assess students' knowledge of the California content standards in science.
California Modified Assessment (CMA) - The CMA for science was administered to eligible students in grades five, eight, and ten. The CMA is a standards-based test for students with an individualized education program who meet the eligibility criteria adopted by the State Board of Education. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act called for a range of assessments appropriate to students' abilities. The CMA provides an appropriate assessment for a small percentage of students allowing them to demonstrate their knowledge of skills in the California academic content standards for science.
CST Science students tested: 91
CST Science students with scores: 91
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 40% |
State: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
8.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
20.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
32.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
27.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
12.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 342.7, Students tested: 91, Far Below Basic: 8.0%, Below Basic: 20.0%, Basic: 32.0%, Proficient: 27.0%, Advanced: 12.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 23
CMA Science students with scores: 23
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 30% |
State: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
35.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
35.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
26.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
4.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 323.3, Students tested: 23, Far Below Basic: 0.0%, Below Basic: 35.0%, Basic: 35.0%, Proficient: 26.0%, Advanced: 4.0%) CST Science students tested: 100
CST Science students with scores: 100
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 47% |
State: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
6.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
11.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
36.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
35.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
12.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 351.0, Students tested: 100, Far Below Basic: 6.0%, Below Basic: 11.0%, Basic: 36.0%, Proficient: 35.0%, Advanced: 12.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 12
CMA Science students with scores: 12
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 50% |
State: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
25.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
25.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
42.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
8.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 342.1, Students tested: 12, Far Below Basic: 0.0%, Below Basic: 25.0%, Basic: 25.0%, Proficient: 42.0%, Advanced: 8.0%) CST Science students tested: 101
CST Science students with scores: 101
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 65% |
California: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
3.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
6.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
26.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
37.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
29.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 378.1, Students tested: 101, Far Below Basic: 3.0%, Below Basic: 6.0%, Basic: 26.0%, Proficient: 37.0%, Advanced: 29.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 11
CMA Science students with scores: 11
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 45% |
California: | 39% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
1.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
36.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
18.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
18.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
27.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 346.5, Students tested: 11, Far Below Basic: 1.0%, Below Basic: 36.0%, Basic: 18.0%, Proficient: 18.0%, Advanced: 27.0%) The Physical Fitness Test:
The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 118, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 37.3%, Needs Improvement: 49.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 13.5%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 118, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 29.7%, Needs Improvement: 27.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 43.2%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 118, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 72.0%, Needs Improvement: 28.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 118, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.6%, Needs Improvement: 3.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 118, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 37.3%, Needs Improvement: 62.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 118, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 66.9%, Needs Improvement: 33.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 114, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 42.1%, Needs Improvement: 41.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 16.7%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 114, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 36.0%, Needs Improvement: 21.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 42.1%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 114, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 73.7%, Needs Improvement: 26.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 114, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 98.2%, Needs Improvement: 1.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 114, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 40.4%, Needs Improvement: 59.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 114, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 66.7%, Needs Improvement: 33.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 112, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 50.9%, Needs Improvement: 36.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 12.5%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 112, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 30.4%, Needs Improvement: 29.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 40.1%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 112, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 73.2%, Needs Improvement: 26.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 112, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.4%, Needs Improvement: 3.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 112, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 32.1%, Needs Improvement: 67.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 112, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 69.6%, Needs Improvement: 30.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 111, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 50.5%, Needs Improvement: 25.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 24.3%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 111, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 31.5%, Needs Improvement: 28.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 39.7%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 111, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 80.2%, Needs Improvement: 19.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 111, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 92.8%, Needs Improvement: 7.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 111, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 25.2%, Needs Improvement: 74.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 111, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.3%, Needs Improvement: 47.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 121, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 48.8%, Needs Improvement: 19.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 32.2%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 121, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 28.9%, Needs Improvement: 11.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 59.5%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 121, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 73.6%, Needs Improvement: 26.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 121, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 98.3%, Needs Improvement: 1.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 121, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 38.8%, Needs Improvement: 61.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 121, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 54.5%, Needs Improvement: 45.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 113, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 50.4%, Needs Improvement: 37.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 12.4%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 113, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 38.9%, Needs Improvement: 6.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 54.9%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 113, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 81.4%, Needs Improvement: 18.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 113, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 92.9%, Needs Improvement: 7.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 113, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 61.9%, Needs Improvement: 38.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 113, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 57.5%, Needs Improvement: 42.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
California English Language Development Test:
(State average from 9,932 schools)
Students in kindergarten through grade twelve whose home language is not English are required by law to take an English skills test. In California, the test is called the California English Language Development Test (CELDT).
Hoover Street Elementary School - students who met CELDT criterion (all grades)
All Grades:Student Count: 542
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 168
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 31.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 161
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 3.0% |
California: | 13.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 325.0 |
State: | 364.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 267.5 |
California: | 276.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 345.2 |
State: | 375.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 274.0 |
California: | 286.0 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 102
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 49
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 48.0% |
State: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 448.4 |
State: | 439.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 406.1 |
California: | 383.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 441.2 |
State: | 446.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 415.6 |
California: | 386.5 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 101
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 40
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 40.0% |
State: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 479.9 |
California: | 477.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 462.2 |
State: | 440.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 486.3 |
State: | 483.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 474.9 |
State: | 456.4 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 71
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 19
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 27.0% |
California: | 26.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 481.0 |
State: | 475.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 458.5 |
State: | 459.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 491.3 |
California: | 491.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 464.6 |
State: | 478.6 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 61
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 27
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 44.0% |
State: | 37.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 491.1 |
California: | 509.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 504.8 |
California: | 490.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 507.1 |
California: | 515.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 513.0 |
State: | 502.2 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 46
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 28
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 61.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 551.5 |
California: | 533.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 530.7 |
State: | 514.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 559.8 |
State: | 530.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 528.0 |
California: | 519.1 |
All Grades:Student Count: 581
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 200
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 34.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 143
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 9
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 6.0% |
State: | 13.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 327.4 |
State: | 365.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 283.6 |
California: | 279.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 343.8 |
California: | 374.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 288.9 |
California: | 285.8 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 105
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 70
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 67.0% |
California: | 42.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 465.7 |
State: | 437.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 436.7 |
California: | 382.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 473.7 |
State: | 443.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 437.1 |
State: | 383.8 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 129
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 46
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
State: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 472.2 |
State: | 478.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 459.9 |
State: | 441.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 487.2 |
California: | 482.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 476.2 |
State: | 458.7 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 75
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 16
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 21.0% |
California: | 26.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 476.3 |
State: | 475.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 464.6 |
California: | 461.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 513.6 |
State: | 493.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 491.1 |
California: | 479.8 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 67
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 25
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 37.0% |
State: | 37.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 508.5 |
State: | 511.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 504.4 |
State: | 494.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 521.0 |
California: | 515.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 508.6 |
California: | 504.8 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 62
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 34
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 55.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 532.5 |
California: | 533.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 505.9 |
State: | 515.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 547.8 |
State: | 527.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 514.5 |
California: | 519.3 |
All Grades:Student Count: 607
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 158
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 26.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 137
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 4
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 3.0% |
California: | 12.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 344.8 |
State: | 362.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 277.4 |
California: | 277.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 336.2 |
State: | 373.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 293.3 |
State: | 289.5 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 140
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 36
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 26.0% |
State: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 420.9 |
California: | 434.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 365.2 |
California: | 380.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 424.3 |
State: | 443.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 383.0 |
California: | 386.6 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 128
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 52
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 41.0% |
State: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 474.8 |
State: | 477.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 471.3 |
California: | 442.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 491.5 |
State: | 483.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 479.3 |
California: | 459.9 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 86
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 35
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 41.0% |
California: | 28.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 517.0 |
State: | 478.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 476.0 |
State: | 464.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 517.6 |
State: | 494.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 494.7 |
California: | 486.2 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 73
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 12
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 16.0% |
California: | 36.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 478.8 |
State: | 509.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 483.6 |
State: | 494.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 491.6 |
California: | 515.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 494.4 |
State: | 505.6 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 43
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 19
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 44.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 553.4 |
State: | 535.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 517.9 |
State: | 519.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 579.5 |
State: | 532.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 524.7 |
State: | 523.7 |
All Grades:Student Count: 599
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 139
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 23.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 160
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 2
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 1.0% |
California: | 11.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 323.2 |
California: | 358.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 262.0 |
California: | 275.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 332.9 |
California: | 365.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 268.0 |
California: | 285.3 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 129
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 34
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 26.0% |
State: | 37.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 418.4 |
California: | 432.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 384.8 |
State: | 380.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 418.9 |
California: | 438.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 375.2 |
California: | 383.8 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 105
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 37
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
State: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 472.3 |
State: | 476.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 463.8 |
California: | 444.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 478.4 |
State: | 481.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 479.8 |
State: | 461.7 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 88
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 16
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 18.0% |
State: | 29.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 453.4 |
California: | 478.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 459.3 |
California: | 470.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 482.6 |
California: | 494.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 477.8 |
State: | 487.2 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 63
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 22
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
State: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 492.6 |
State: | 512.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 496.4 |
California: | 499.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 521.9 |
California: | 514.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 501.3 |
California: | 509.1 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 54
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 28
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 52.0% |
State: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 529.9 |
State: | 534.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 530.2 |
California: | 521.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 552.4 |
State: | 531.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 530.5 |
State: | 525.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 647
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 159
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 25.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 146
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 7
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 5.0% |
State: | 9.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 336.0 |
State: | 359.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 293.5 |
State: | 301.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 319.8 |
California: | 351.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 348.0 |
State: | 347.9 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 129
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 28
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 22.0% |
California: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 404.8 |
State: | 428.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 387.6 |
State: | 393.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 409.8 |
California: | 429.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 406.0 |
California: | 405.0 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 129
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 33
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 26.0% |
State: | 28.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 460.6 |
California: | 483.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 433.1 |
State: | 444.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 462.8 |
State: | 477.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 465.4 |
State: | 468.9 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 89
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 21
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 24.0% |
State: | 30.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 464.2 |
State: | 482.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 478.8 |
State: | 482.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 484.6 |
State: | 483.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 485.2 |
State: | 496.8 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 77
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 30
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 39.0% |
California: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 509.7 |
State: | 511.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 517.9 |
State: | 506.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 505.7 |
State: | 501.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 523.2 |
California: | 514.3 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 77
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 40
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 52.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 546.0 |
State: | 537.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 526.3 |
State: | 528.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 534.8 |
California: | 517.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 522.7 |
State: | 531.8 |
All Grades:Student Count: 676
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 116
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 17.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 146
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 2
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 1.0% |
California: | 9.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 311.0 |
California: | 358.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 285.3 |
California: | 299.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 272.4 |
State: | 357.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 350.1 |
California: | 350.9 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 136
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 21
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 15.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 400.6 |
California: | 428.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 364.5 |
State: | 391.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 388.9 |
State: | 434.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 398.6 |
California: | 405.5 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 120
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 11.0% |
State: | 25.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 445.6 |
State: | 478.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 419.3 |
State: | 442.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 447.5 |
State: | 478.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 450.3 |
California: | 465.8 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 107
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 17
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 16.0% |
California: | 32.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 475.0 |
California: | 493.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 484.6 |
California: | 482.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 472.2 |
State: | 486.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 490.4 |
State: | 494.3 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 94
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 22
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 23.0% |
State: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 509.4 |
California: | 522.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 504.3 |
California: | 510.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 501.3 |
California: | 505.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 503.5 |
State: | 512.8 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 73
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 41
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 56.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 568.4 |
California: | 544.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 533.8 |
California: | 531.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 557.1 |
California: | 519.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 520.0 |
California: | 527.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 705
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 110
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 16.0% |
State: | 31.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 138
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 3
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 2.0% |
State: | 8.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 301.0 |
California: | 348.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 267.9 |
California: | 294.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 263.3 |
California: | 345.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 325.5 |
State: | 337.4 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 129
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 21
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 16.0% |
State: | 32.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 405.4 |
California: | 423.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 355.7 |
California: | 389.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 382.0 |
California: | 431.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 392.5 |
California: | 402.3 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 125
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 10.0% |
State: | 24.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 455.7 |
California: | 466.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 428.9 |
California: | 440.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 454.3 |
California: | 484.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 428.7 |
California: | 452.2 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 111
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 16
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 14.0% |
California: | 25.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 444.3 |
California: | 468.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 447.9 |
State: | 471.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 493.0 |
California: | 486.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 462.7 |
State: | 484.8 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 95
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 18
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 19.0% |
State: | 33.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 481.3 |
State: | 504.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 482.7 |
California: | 503.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 512.4 |
California: | 505.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 493.1 |
State: | 506.6 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 107
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 39
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
California: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 524.3 |
California: | 528.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 509.8 |
California: | 526.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 511.1 |
State: | 517.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 520.2 |
State: | 524.0 |
Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
Hoover Street Elementary School - Adequate Yearly Progress status
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 346 out of 348 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 340 out of 342 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 321 out of 325 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 56 out of 56 enrolled)
Math Participation RateSchool: | 99.0% |
California: | 96.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 347 out of 350 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 341 out of 344 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 325 out of 327 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 57 out of 57 enrolled)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 11
Number of AYP criteria possible: 11
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)Attendance rate (calculated by using number of days attended and enrolled) : 97
Met Attendance rate Target: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
ELA Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 95.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 354 out of 355 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 348 out of 349 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 311 out of 312 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 67 out of 67 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 41.0% |
California: | 42.6% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic41
- SED41
- LEP37
- With Disabilities5
- Hispanic: 41% (142 out of 347 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 41% (139 out of 340 valid scores)
- English Learners: 37% (113 out of 302 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 5% (3 out of 66 valid scores)
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Math Participation RateHoover Street Elementary School: | 100.0% |
State: | 94.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 357 out of 358 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 351 out of 352 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 314 out of 315 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 67 out of 67 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic33
- SED33
- LEP32
- With Disabilities6
- Hispanic: 33% (114 out of 347 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 33% (112 out of 340 valid scores)
- English Learners: 32% (96 out of 302 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 6% (4 out of 66 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 20
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 89.2%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 479 out of 480 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 473 out of 474 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 435 out of 435 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 84 out of 84 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic53
- SED54
- LEP54
- With Disabilities31
- Hispanic: 53% (246 out of 461 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 54% (247 out of 459 valid scores)
- English Learners: 54% (226 out of 421 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 31% (25 out of 81 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 89.5%
Math Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 479 out of 480 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 473 out of 474 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 435 out of 435 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 84 out of 84 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveHoover Street Elementary School: | 70.7% |
State: | 59.6% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic70
- SED71
- LEP71
- With Disabilities42
- Hispanic: 70% (324 out of 461 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 71% (325 out of 459 valid scores)
- English Learners: 71% (297 out of 421 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 42% (34 out of 81 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 9
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 78.4%
ELA Participation RateHoover Street Elementary School: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 480 out of 482 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 500 out of 502 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 453 out of 453 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 85 out of 85 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic46
- SED47
- LEP46
- With Disabilities30
- Hispanic: 46% (214 out of 463 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 47% (226 out of 480 valid scores)
- English Learners: 46% (201 out of 442 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 30% (25 out of 84 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 79%
Math Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 480 out of 482 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 500 out of 502 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 453 out of 453 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 85 out of 85 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveHoover Street Elementary School: | 60.4% |
California: | 59.9% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic60
- SED60
- LEP60
- With Disabilities37
- Hispanic: 60% (277 out of 463 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 60% (290 out of 480 valid scores)
- English Learners: 60% (266 out of 442 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 37% (31 out of 84 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 17
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 67.6%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian80
- Filipino100
- Black100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 496 out of 499 enrolled)
- Asian: 80% (tested 12 out of 15 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 465 out of 471 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 477 out of 479 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 76 out of 77 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHoover Street Elementary School: | 45.8% |
State: | 55.9% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic45
- SED46
- LEP45
- With Disabilities24
- Hispanic: 45% (213 out of 473 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 46% (205 out of 445 valid scores)
- English Learners: 45% (204 out of 457 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 24% (17 out of 71 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 68.5%
Math Participation RateHere: | 99.0% |
California: | 98.0% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian80
- Filipino100
- Black100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 496 out of 499 enrolled)
- Asian: 80% (tested 12 out of 15 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 465 out of 471 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 477 out of 479 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 76 out of 77 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 64.4% |
California: | 59.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic64
- SED65
- LEP64
- With Disabilities44
- Hispanic: 64% (302 out of 473 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 65% (289 out of 445 valid scores)
- English Learners: 64% (293 out of 457 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 44% (31 out of 71 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 13
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 56.8%
ELA Participation RateHere: | 96.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic96
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED96
- LEP96
- With Disabilities80
- Hispanic: 96% (tested 515 out of 535 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 16 out of 16 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 96% (tested 505 out of 525 enrolled)
- English Learners: 96% (tested 484 out of 502 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 80% (tested 69 out of 87 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHoover Street Elementary School: | 35.8% |
State: | 53.7% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic35
- SED36
- LEP34
- With Disabilities14
- Hispanic: 35% (172 out of 489 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 36% (171 out of 479 valid scores)
- English Learners: 34% (158 out of 464 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 14% (9 out of 66 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 58%
Math Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 535 out of 535 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 16 out of 16 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 525 out of 525 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 502 out of 502 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 87 out of 87 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic54
- SED53
- LEP54
- With Disabilities16
- Hispanic: 54% (274 out of 508 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 53% (266 out of 498 valid scores)
- English Learners: 54% (259 out of 481 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 16% (13 out of 83 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 13
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 46%
ELA Participation RateHoover Street Elementary School: | 99.0% |
State: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities96
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 861 out of 872 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 11 out of 11 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 894 out of 906 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 806 out of 810 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 96% (tested 114 out of 119 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 26.7% |
California: | 52.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic26
- Asian57
- Black18
- SED27
- LEP26
- With Disabilities7
- Hispanic: 26% (213 out of 807 valid scores)
- Asian: 57% (8 out of 14 valid scores)
- Black: 18% (2 out of 11 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 27% (224 out of 838 valid scores)
- English Learners: 26% (198 out of 769 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 7% (8 out of 108 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 47.5%
Math Participation RateSchool: | 99.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 863 out of 872 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 11 out of 11 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 896 out of 906 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 809 out of 810 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 119 out of 119 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 56.0% |
California: | 55.6% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic56
- Asian86
- Black18
- SED56
- LEP56
- With Disabilities20
- Hispanic: 56% (451 out of 810 valid scores)
- Asian: 86% (12 out of 14 valid scores)
- Black: 18% (2 out of 11 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 56% (471 out of 841 valid scores)
- English Learners: 56% (434 out of 772 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 20% (22 out of 112 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 13
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 35.2%
ELA Participation RateHoover Street Elementary School: | 99.0% |
State: | 98.1% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian96
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 917 out of 921 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 96% (tested 21 out of 22 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 17 out of 17 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 966 out of 971 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 878 out of 879 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 119 out of 119 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHoover Street Elementary School: | 24.4% |
State: | 48.6% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic23
- Asian65
- Black21
- SED24
- LEP23
- With Disabilities8
- Hispanic: 23% (206 out of 882 valid scores)
- Asian: 65% (11 out of 17 valid scores)
- Black: 21% (3 out of 14 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 24% (225 out of 921 valid scores)
- English Learners: 23% (193 out of 851 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 8% (9 out of 112 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 37%
Math Participation RateHere: | 99.0% |
California: | 98.0% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian96
- Filipino100
- Black95
- White100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 915 out of 921 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 96% (tested 21 out of 22 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Black: 95% (tested 16 out of 17 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 963 out of 971 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 876 out of 879 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 119 out of 119 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic54
- Asian88
- Black15
- SED54
- LEP54
- With Disabilities23
- Hispanic: 54% (474 out of 881 valid scores)
- Asian: 88% (15 out of 17 valid scores)
- Black: 15% (2 out of 13 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 54% (496 out of 919 valid scores)
- English Learners: 54% (456 out of 850 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 23% (26 out of 112 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 13
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian84
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 938 out of 940 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 84% (tested 26 out of 31 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 15 out of 15 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 991 out of 998 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 885 out of 886 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 104 out of 105 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 20.9% |
California: | 46.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic19
- Asian75
- SED21
- LEP19
- With Disabilities8
- Hispanic: 19% (171 out of 887 valid scores)
- Asian: 75% (15 out of 20 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 21% (194 out of 927 valid scores)
- English Learners: 19% (159 out of 856 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 8% (8 out of 98 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateHoover Street Elementary School: | 99.0% |
State: | 97.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian88
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 936 out of 939 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 88% (tested 27 out of 31 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 15 out of 15 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 990 out of 997 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 883 out of 885 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 103 out of 105 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveHoover Street Elementary School: | 47.9% |
California: | 50.5% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic48
- Asian85
- SED48
- LEP47
- With Disabilities19
- Hispanic: 48% (421 out of 886 valid scores)
- Asian: 85% (17 out of 20 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 48% (444 out of 926 valid scores)
- English Learners: 47% (403 out of 855 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 19% (19 out of 98 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 13
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateHoover Street Elementary School: | 100.0% |
State: | 97.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian97
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,034 out of 1,036 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 97% (tested 27 out of 28 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,018 out of 1,020 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 967 out of 968 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 65 out of 66 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic17
- Asian33
- SED17
- LEP15
- Hispanic: 17% (158 out of 960 valid scores)
- Asian: 33% (7 out of 21 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 17% (160 out of 953 valid scores)
- English Learners: 15% (143 out of 935 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateHoover Street Elementary School: | 100.0% |
State: | 97.5% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian97
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,033 out of 1,036 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 97% (tested 27 out of 28 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,017 out of 1,020 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 966 out of 968 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 65 out of 66 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 43.7% |
California: | 49.9% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Asian86
- SED43
- LEP43
- With Disabilities7
- Asian: 86% (18 out of 21 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 43% (411 out of 953 valid scores)
- English Learners: 43% (399 out of 935 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 7% (4 out of 60 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 13
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateHoover Street Elementary School: | 100.0% |
California: | 99.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian96
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,162 out of 1,164 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Asian: 96% (tested 45 out of 47 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,229 out of 1,233 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,120 out of 1,121 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 85 out of 85 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHoover Street Elementary School: | 17.6% |
California: | 44.5% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic17
- Asian41
- SED18
- LEP17
- With Disabilities5
- Hispanic: 17% (180 out of 1,072 valid scores)
- Asian: 41% (13 out of 32 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 18% (198 out of 1,123 valid scores)
- English Learners: 17% (176 out of 1,060 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 5% (4 out of 74 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateHoover Street Elementary School: | 100.0% |
California: | 99.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian96
- Filipino100
- Black86
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,162 out of 1,164 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Asian: 96% (tested 45 out of 47 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Black: 86% (tested 6 out of 7 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,228 out of 1,233 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,120 out of 1,121 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 85 out of 85 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveHoover Street Elementary School: | 36.5% |
State: | 49.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic36
- Asian66
- SED37
- LEP36
- With Disabilities8
- Hispanic: 36% (382 out of 1,072 valid scores)
- Asian: 66% (21 out of 32 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 37% (410 out of 1,123 valid scores)
- English Learners: 36% (381 out of 1,060 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 8% (6 out of 74 valid scores)
Health & Safety
Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
(State average from 8,737 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic76
- Asian2
- Black4
- White2
- LEP55
- IDEA16
- 5042
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 84 (male: 48, female: 36)
- Hispanic: 76 (male: 44, female: 32)
- Asian: 2 (all male)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 55 (male: 32, female: 23)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 16 (male: 14, female: 2)
- Section 504: 2 (all female)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic40
- White2
- LEP28
- IDEA7
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 42 (male: 25, female: 17)
- Hispanic: 40 (male: 23, female: 17)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 28 (male: 17, female: 11)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsHoover Street Elementary School: | 52.4 |
State: | 178.2 |
Restraint and Seclusion:
(State average from 741 schools)
Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Asian: 2 (all female)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: