Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Harmony Of Fine Arts And Technology-Houston School in Houston, TX
(KG-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 53
Address
 9115 KIRBY DR
Houston, TX 77054
Telephone
(832) 433-7001
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.hsart.org
City-data.com school rating
53
Students
734
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
42.0
Free lunch eligible students
365
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
84
School district
HARMONY SCIENCE ACADEMY
Charter school
Yes
Charter authorizer name
STATE BOARD OF (#000001)
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
ROBERTS EL (2.8 miles):

99
TWAIN EL (2.4 miles):

98
PERSHING MIDDLE (2.6 miles):

78
RICE SCH /LA ESCUELA RICE (1.8 miles):

74
Harmony Of Fine Arts And Technology-Houston School:

53
HARMONY SCHOOL OF INGENUITY-HOUSTON (1.7 miles):

42
LONGFELLOW EL (1.6 miles):

39
WHIDBY EL (2.3 miles):

34
SHEARN EL (1.8 miles):

23
Harmony Of Fine Arts And Technology-Houston School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Harris County:

51
Houston:

47
This School:

53

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 734
Enrollment in 2015: 744
Enrollment in 2014: 664
Enrollment in 2013: 724
Enrollment in 2012: 598
Enrollment in 2011: 419

Harmony Of Fine Arts And Technology-Houston School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeKGG01G02G03G04G05G06G07G08Total
All students305258581111351317782734
Female students152431296660704547387
Male students152827294575613235347
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - - - - - - - 11
Asian students31316781333
Hispanic students142431274858483031311
Black students102421235263724142348
White students32152633429
Two or More Races students - 12231 - 2112

Enrollment by grade:
Kindergarten enrollment: 30
1st grade enrollment: 52
2nd grade enrollment: 58
3rd grade enrollment: 58
4th grade enrollment: 111
5th grade enrollment: 135
6th grade enrollment: 131
7th grade enrollment: 77
8th grade enrollment: 82

Harmony Of Fine Arts And Technology-Houston School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 387 (52.7%)
Harmony Of Fine Arts And Technology-Houston School:

52.7%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 347 (47.3%)
School:

47.3%
State:

50.1%

Harmony Of Fine Arts And Technology-Houston School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.1%)
Here:

0.1%
Texas:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 33 (4.5%)
Harmony Of Fine Arts And Technology-Houston School:

4.5%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 311 (42.4%)
Here:

42.4%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 348 (47.4%)
Harmony Of Fine Arts And Technology-Houston School:

47.4%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 29 (4.0%)
Here:

4.0%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 12 (1.6%)
School:

1.6%
Texas:

2.1%

Harmony Of Fine Arts And Technology-Houston School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 449 (61.2%)
Harmony Of Fine Arts And Technology-Houston School:

61.2%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 365 (49.7%)
School:

49.7%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 84 (11.4%)
Here:

11.4%
Texas:

6.2%

Harmony Of Fine Arts And Technology-Houston School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 42

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 9
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 5

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

17.5
Texas:

15.6

Harmony Of Fine Arts And Technology-Houston School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $220,228,976
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 46 (Salary Expenditures: $2,070,001)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 7 (Salary Expenditures: $82,237)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 9 (Salary Expenditures: $180,334)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 5.2 (Salary Expenditures: $269,554)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,371,977
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $0
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,070,000
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $3,015,141

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic127
  • Asian10
  • Black2
  • White4
  • IDEA7
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 143 (male: 69, female: 74)
  • Hispanic: 127 (male: 62, female: 65)
  • Asian: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 37 (male: 26, female: 11)
  • Hispanic: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
  • Black: 26 (male: 19, female: 7)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 17 (male: 13, female: 4)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 12 (male: 7, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 2,061 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
School:

3.4%
Texas:

4.1%
Total number of students retained in 4th grade: 6 (male: 2, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 4th grade students retained
Here:

5.4%
Texas:

3.6%
Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 5th grade students retained
School:

1.5%
Texas:

4.3%
Total number of students retained in 6th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 6th grade students retained
Harmony Of Fine Arts And Technology-Houston School:

1.5%
Texas:

6.3%
Total number of students retained in 7th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2

Percent of 7th grade students retained
Harmony Of Fine Arts And Technology-Houston School:

2.6%
Texas:

6.0%
Total number of students retained in 8th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2

Percent of 8th grade students retained
Here:

2.4%
Texas:

7.0%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic10
  • Asian13
  • Black19
  • White4
  • Multirace2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 48 (male: 26, female: 22)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Asian: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Black: 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Harmony Of Fine Arts And Technology-Houston School:

65.4
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,413
  • Males1,403
  • Females1,423
  • Hispanic1,398
  • Black1,423
Math Average Scale Score:

1,413
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 52
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 52

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.3 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.3 (48%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.4 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 43%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 9%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

40%
43%
9%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,403, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 7%)
37%
44%
12%
7%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,423, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 8%)
44%
40%
8%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,398, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 3%)
38%
45%
14%
3%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,423, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 11%)
44%
39%
6%
11%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,376
  • Males1,384
  • Females1,368
  • Hispanic1,364
  • Black1,386
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,376
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 52
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 52

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.6 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.2 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.4 (53%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 10%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

42%
35%
10%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,384, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 15%)
44%
26%
15%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,368, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 4%, Masters: 12%)
40%
44%
4%
12%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,364, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 10%)
38%
38%
14%
10%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,386, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 5%, Masters: 17%)
44%
34%
5%
17%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,576
  • Males1,579
  • Females1,573
  • Hispanic1,582
  • Black1,573
Math Average Scale Score:

1,576
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 53
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 53

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.7 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.5 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.3 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.6 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 21%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%

21%
21%
35%
23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,579, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 21%)
17%
33%
29%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,573, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 24%)
24%
10%
42%
24%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,582, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 20%)
20%
23%
37%
20%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,573, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 25%)
19%
18%
38%
25%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,444
  • Males1,403
  • Females1,479
  • Hispanic1,433
  • Black1,463
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,444
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 53
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 53

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.3 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.1 (55%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 49%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 4%

49%
23%
24%
4%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,403, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 71%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 0%)
71%
16%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,479, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 7%)
31%
28%
34%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,433, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 54%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 3%)
54%
23%
20%
3%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,463, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 0%)
38%
25%
38%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,399
  • Males3,259
  • Females3,515
  • Hispanic3,299
  • Black3,628
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,399
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 53
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 53

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.2 (41%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.8 (48%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.3 (52%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 2%

60%
27%
11%
2%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,259, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 71%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 4%, Masters: 0%)
71%
25%
4%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,515, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 3%)
52%
27%
18%
3%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,299, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 66%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 0%)
66%
28%
6%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,628, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 6%)
50%
19%
25%
6%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,557
  • Males1,556
  • Females1,559
  • Hispanic1,560
  • Black1,554
Math Average Scale Score:

1,557
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 56
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 56

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.1 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.9 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.4 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 1.9 (48%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

32%
39%
24%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,556, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 4%)
31%
38%
27%
4%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,559, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 7%)
33%
40%
20%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,560, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 4%)
28%
32%
36%
4%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,554, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 8%)
42%
37%
13%
8%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,520
  • Males1,534
  • Females1,508
  • Hispanic1,504
  • Black1,526
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,520
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 56
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 56

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.2 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.8 (55%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

38%
33%
17%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,534, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 19%)
35%
34%
12%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,508, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 7%)
40%
30%
23%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,504, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 8%)
44%
24%
24%
8%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,526, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 13%)
38%
34%
16%
13%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,750
  • Males3,785
  • Females3,720
  • Hispanic3,668
  • Black3,784
Science Average Scale Score:

3,750
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 56
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 56

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.3 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.9 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.9 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

30%
40%
21%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,785, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 12%)
31%
34%
23%
12%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,720, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 7%)
30%
43%
20%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,668, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 0%)
35%
38%
27%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,784, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 17%)
29%
42%
12%
17%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,626
  • Males1,607
  • Females1,642
  • Hispanic1,613
  • Black1,604
  • White1,647
Math Average Scale Score:

1,626
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 106
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 106

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.5 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.6 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.8 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

25%
39%
22%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,607, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 8%)
30%
34%
28%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,642, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 20%)
20%
44%
16%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,613, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 7%)
23%
47%
23%
7%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,604, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 11%)
31%
40%
18%
11%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,647, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 22%)
22%
22%
34%
22%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,555
  • Males1,533
  • Females1,574
  • Hispanic1,534
  • Black1,565
  • White1,560
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,555
Texas:

1,457
Reading students tested: 106
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 106

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.9 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.3 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.8 (59%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 10%

36%
36%
18%
10%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,533, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 2%)
40%
44%
14%
2%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,574, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 18%)
32%
29%
21%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,534, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 11%)
46%
34%
9%
11%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,565, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 3%)
26%
43%
28%
3%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,560, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 11%)
33%
34%
22%
11%
7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,677
  • Males1,656
  • Females1,695
  • Hispanic1,675
  • Black1,676
Math Average Scale Score:

1,677
Texas:

1,571
Math students tested: 116
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 116

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.8 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.8 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.8 (55%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

22%
34%
24%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,656, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 20%)
31%
31%
18%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,695, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 20%)
15%
36%
29%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,675, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 19%)
20%
39%
22%
19%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,676, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 20%)
27%
28%
25%
20%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,649
  • Males1,617
  • Females1,679
  • Hispanic1,656
  • Black1,632
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,649
Texas:

1,550
Reading students tested: 116
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 116

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.4 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.1 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.4 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 22%

24%
34%
20%
22%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,617, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
33%
29%
25%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,679, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 30%)
16%
38%
16%
30%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,656, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 23%)
20%
36%
21%
23%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,632, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 18%)
32%
32%
18%
18%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All3,727
  • Males3,572
  • Females3,869
  • Hispanic3,735
  • Black3,693
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,727
Texas:

3,515
Writing students tested: 117
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 117

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.3 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.6 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.9 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%

34%
30%
30%
6%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,572, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 2%)
45%
28%
25%
2%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,869, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 10%)
25%
31%
34%
10%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,735, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 7%)
34%
28%
31%
7%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,693, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 2%)
36%
32%
30%
2%
8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,706
  • Males1,728
  • Females1,693
  • Hispanic1,734
  • Asian1,845
  • Black1,665
Math Average Scale Score:

1,706
State:

1,539
Math students tested: 90
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 90

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.8 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.2 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.4 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

20%
36%
26%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,728, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 24%)
18%
32%
26%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,693, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 14%)
21%
38%
27%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,734, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 25%)
15%
35%
25%
25%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,845, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 40%)
20%
40%
40%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,665, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 9%)
27%
39%
25%
9%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,708
  • Males1,712
  • Females1,706
  • Hispanic1,721
  • Asian1,781
  • Black1,686
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,708
Texas:

1,561
Reading students tested: 90
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 90

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 14.3 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.3 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

12%
37%
22%
29%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,712, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 29%)
12%
38%
21%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,706, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 29%)
13%
36%
23%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,721, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 33%)
8%
38%
22%
33%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,781, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 60%)
40%
60%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,686, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 20%)
18%
37%
25%
20%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,865
  • Males3,976
  • Females3,804
  • Hispanic3,934
  • Asian4,557
  • Black3,730
Science Average Scale Score:

3,865
Texas:

3,634
Science students tested: 89
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 90

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.6 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.1 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.8 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.6 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

26%
34%
28%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,976, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 22%)
28%
22%
28%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,804, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 7%)
25%
40%
28%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,934, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 21%)
21%
35%
23%
21%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,557, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 40%)
60%
40%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,730, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 2%)
34%
34%
30%
2%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,635
  • Males3,809
  • Females3,538
  • Hispanic3,697
  • Asian3,983
  • Black3,543
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,635
Texas:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 89
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 90

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 9.3 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.4 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.7 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.8 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 12%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

44%
35%
12%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,809, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 19%)
34%
32%
15%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,538, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 49%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 4%)
49%
37%
10%
4%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,697, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 8%)
36%
38%
18%
8%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 3,983, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 40%)
40%
20%
40%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,543, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 7%)
52%
32%
9%
7%

Health & Safety


Offenses:
(State average from 2,394 schools)
An incident refers to a specific criminal act involving one or more victims and offenders. For example, if two students are robbed without a weapon, at the same time and place, this is classified as two robbery victimizations but only one robbery without a weapon incident

A weapon is any instrument or object used with the intent to threaten, injure, or kill. This includes look-alikes if they are used to threaten others.

Physical attack or fight refers to an actual and intentional touching or striking of another person against his/her will, or the intentional causing of bodily harm to an individual. Physical attack or fight does not include rape.

A threat refers to an act where there was no physical contact between the offender and victim but the victim felt that physical harm could have occurred based on verbal or nonverbal communication by the offender. This includes nonverbal threats (e.g., brandishing a weapon), and verbal threats of physical harm which are made in person. Threats made over the telephone or threatening letters are excluded.
At least one incident at this school that involved a shooting: No
Any of this school's students, faculty, or staff died as a result of a homicide committed at this school: No

Incidents of physical attack or fight without a weapon: 14

Incidents of threats of physical attack without a weapon: 5


Total incidents per 1,000 students
Here:

25.9
Texas:

38.0

Harassment & Bullying:
Show data for

(State average from 919 schools)
An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.

Harassment or bullying on the basis of sex includes sexual harassment or bullying and gender-based harassment or bullying. Sexual harassment or bullying is unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature, such as unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, nonverbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature. Gender-based harassment or bullying is nonsexual intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on the student's actual or perceived sex, including harassment based on gender identity, gender expression, and nonconformity with gender stereotypes. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Both male and female students can be victims of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex, and the harasser or bully and the victim can be of the same sex. Bullying on the basis of sex constitutes sexual harassment.

Harassment or bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin refers to intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on actual or perceived race, color or national origin. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin constitutes racial harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex: 1
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex per 1,000 students
School:

1.4
State:

2.5
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of sex: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2
Students disciplined for bullying or harassment on the basis of sex: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2

Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin: 4
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin per 1,000 students
Here:

5.4
Texas:

1.3
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of race, color, or national origin: 6 (male: 2, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic13
  • Asian2
  • Black19
  • White2
  • Multirace2
  • LEP7
  • IDEA4
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 38 (male: 13, female: 25)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 5, female: 8)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
School:

51.8
Texas:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)
Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of Non-IDEA students subjected to physical restraint: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Non-IDEA students subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
School:

5.4
State:

3.0

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic6
  • Black40
  • LEP2
  • IDEA19
  • 5043
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 46 (male: 30, female: 16)
  • Hispanic: 6 (male: 5, female: 1)
  • Black: 40 (male: 25, female: 15)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
  • Section 504: 3 (all male)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 42

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
School:

57.2
Texas:

102.7

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic13
  • Black31
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 46 (male: 27, female: 19)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 11, female: 2)
  • Black: 31 (male: 14, female: 17)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 23 (male: 13, female: 10)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 19

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Here:

25.9
State:

27.5
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Section 504 only): 10

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Section 504 only)
Here:

13.6
State:

12.0
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 18 (male: 13, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
  • Section 504: 2 (all female)
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Black: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Classes & Courses


Algebra I:
Show data for

(State average from 1,291 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.

    8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I

  • Hispanic13
  • Asian4
  • Black10
  • White2
8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 29 (male: 12, female: 17)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 10 (male: 2, female: 8)
  • White: 2 (all female)
8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 25 (male: 11, female: 14)
  • Hispanic: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
  • Black: 14 (male: 4, female: 10)
Percent of 8th grade students who passed
Harmony Of Fine Arts And Technology-Houston School:

86.2%
Texas:

87.0%

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Houston, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Houston main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Harmony Of Fine Arts And Technology-Houston School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents