City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
47.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Englewood Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Duval County: | 44 |
Jacksonville: | 43 |
Englewood Elementary School: | 47 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (904) 739-5280 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 16
School number: 871
School type: Elementary
District Name: DUVAL
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (904) 739-5316
Magnet Program.
Principal: Gail K Brinson
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 4
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 16
Senate District: 1
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 41% |
State average from 963 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 47% |
State average from 963 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 71% |
State average from 963 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 26% |
State average from 962 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 47% |
State average from 963 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 68% |
State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 74% |
State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 80% |
State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 454 |
State average from 963 schools: | 543 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 963 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: C
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 85% |
State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateHere: | 90% |
State average from 963 schools: | 47% |
Region: 5
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 228 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 228 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 87% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 67
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 35% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 208
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 202
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 48% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 208
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 202
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 173 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 173 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 27% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 50% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 202 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 31% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 185
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 185
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 28% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 45% |
State average from 959 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in MathENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 53% |
State average from 959 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 70% |
State average from 959 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 38% |
State average from 959 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 58% |
State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 59% |
State average from 959 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 73% |
State average from 959 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 67% |
State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 463 |
State average from 959 schools: | 560 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 959 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 84% |
State average from 959 schools: | 54% |
Minority RateHere: | 88% |
State average from 959 schools: | 46% |
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 199 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 199 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 179
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 169
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 179
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 33% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 129
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 42% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 171 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 171 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 36% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 144
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 34% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 43% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 27% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 60% |
State average from 954 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 66% |
State average from 954 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 86% |
State average from 954 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 42% |
State average from 954 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 66% |
State average from 954 schools: | 65% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 83% |
State average from 954 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 65% |
State average from 954 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 77% |
State average from 954 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 545 |
State average from 954 schools: | 544 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 954 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 84% |
State average from 954 schools: | 51% |
Minority RateHere: | 90% |
State average from 954 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 141
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 141
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 70% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 140 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 42% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 86% |
State average from 862 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 71% |
State average from 862 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 90% |
State average from 862 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 49% |
State average from 862 schools: | 43% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 85% |
State average from 862 schools: | 70% |
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere: | 68% |
State average from 862 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 75% |
State average from 862 schools: | 66% |
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 76% |
State average from 862 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere: | 600 |
State average from 862 schools: | 539 |
Percent TestedENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 100% |
State average from 862 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 62% |
State average from 865 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateHere: | 61% |
State average from 865 schools: | 56% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 212 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 213 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 67
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 199
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 199
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 77% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 68% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 95% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 69% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 78% |
State average from 848 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 71% |
State average from 848 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 82% |
State average from 848 schools: | 79% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 59% |
State average from 848 schools: | 62% |
Making Math GainsENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 66% |
State average from 848 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 66% |
State average from 848 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 422 |
State average from 848 schools: | 413 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 848 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 63% |
State average from 848 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateHere: | 60% |
State average from 848 schools: | 55% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 232 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 232 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 67
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 210
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 68% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 210
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 31
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 94
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 94
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 91 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 30
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 68% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 76
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 61% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 76
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 95% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 39
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 127
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 61% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 127
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 75% |
State average from 834 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 70% |
State average from 834 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 87% |
State average from 834 schools: | 79% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 69% |
State average from 834 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 67% |
State average from 834 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 68% |
State average from 834 schools: | 60% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 436 |
State average from 834 schools: | 412 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 834 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 100% |
State average from 834 schools: | 60% |
Minority RateHere: | 59% |
State average from 832 schools: | 54% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1138 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 273 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 44% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 15% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 27% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 41% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1312 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 274 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 44% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 19% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 25% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 10% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 36% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1295 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 247 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 58% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 16% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 19% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 25% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 278 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 40% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 31% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 25% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 28% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1282 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 296 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 24% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 13% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 51% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1426 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 293 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 21% |
State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 29% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 15% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 50% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1516 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 301 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 37% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 24% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 12% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 27% |
State average: | 28% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 39% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1082 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 264 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1267 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 266 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 07%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 07
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1465 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 277 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 294 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1231 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 285 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1279 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 260 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1634 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 326 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 70
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 3 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 4
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 57%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1123 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 271 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1408 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 290 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1474 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 279 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 311 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1288 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 297 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1457 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 300 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1625 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 324 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 56 |
State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 606 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 633 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 13 |
State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 653 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 9 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 42
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 283 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 52%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 50%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1412 |
State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1539 |
State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 312 |
State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1542 |
State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1450 |
State average: | 1397 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 92
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1669 |
State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 314 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1689 |
State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1591 |
State average: | 1532 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 98
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 306 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1363 |
State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 314 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1494 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 309 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1497 |
State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1380 |
State average: | 1414 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 117
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1631 |
State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 325 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1652 |
State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1529 |
State average: | 1519 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 123
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 79
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 638 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 71
Mean Scale ScoreENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 644 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 67
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 673 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR: 77
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 80
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 628 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 71
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 644 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Median NPR: 70
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 67
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 664 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Median NPR: 74
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 70
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 298 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 57%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 84%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 63%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Jacksonville, FL
- Englewood Elementary School in Jacksonville, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: